
Sony WH-1000XM6 vs WH-1000XM4: Is it finally time to upgrade?
Sony's older XM4 are still a very solid pair of headphones that you can grab even years after their initial release. The ANC remains excellent, sound is very good, and comfort is as good as ever. They're also available at lower prices than either the XM5 or the brand new XM6 — perfect if you're looking for flagship specs at a lower price.
It's very possible that you've got a pair of Sony's WH-1000XM4 headphones. They really put the marque on the map, with a host of features that made them the best wireless headphones of their day. They remain an excellent option, in fact, given that you can still buy them for what are often now much lower prices than the newer and more advanced competition.
But Sony has just released the most compelling reason to upgrade your best noise-canceling headphones to date — the Sony WH-1000XM6. They've got a new design, a new sound signature, and some of the best call quality we've ever experienced. They could be just what you've been waiting for if you've been rocking the XM4 since their first release.
So let's put the two head-to-head and find out which ones are the better pair of headphones to spend money on in 2025, or whether you should upgrade your aging cans.
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony WH-1000XM4
Price
$449 / £399 / AU$699
$348 / £229 / AU$399
Colors
Black; Silver; Midnight Blue
Black; Midnight Blue; Silver
Size
Not specified
Not specified
Weight
8.9 ounces
9 ounces
Battery life (rated)
Up to 40 hours
Up to 30 hours
Connectivity
Bluetooth 5.3 with SBC, AAC and LDAC support
Bluetooth 5.0 with SBC, AAC and LDAC
Special features
Adaptive ANC, Ambient Sound Mode, DSEE Extreme Audio, Bluetooth multipoint, customizable sound, quick charge, passive mode, 360 Reality Audio
Adaptive ANC, Ambient Sound Mode, DSEE Extreme Audio, Bluetooth multipoint, customizable sound, quick charge, passive mode, 360 Reality Audio
With the release of the XM6, Sony has raised the price of its flagship cans. They cost $449, a full $50 more than the previous model. That also makes them more than some of their key competitors, like the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, and the same as the brand new Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 — which I awarded 4 and a half stars.
You can also still pick up the XM5 for $399, so if you're looking for a way to upgrade without spending as much money, that might be a good way to go. You won't get all of the shiny new features of the XM6, but you get a very good pair of headphones for less money.
On launch, the XM4 were $380 — around $70 less than the launch price of the XM6. Since then they've seen significant price drops. If you shop around, you can find a pair for as little as $340, and potentially even less. Wait for sales events like Black Friday and you'll be able to pick up a pair for less than $300, making them a flagship headphones bargain.
Sony still produces the XM4 as well, so you won't have any problems finding either on Amazon or other retailers like Best Buy.
Given that the XM6 are the more expensive pair and that you can still buy the XM5, this first round is going to go to the XM4.
The Sony WH-1000XM6 present a much bigger visual update over the XM4 than they do the XM5. They've got a more minimalist style than the older headphones, with cleaner looking earcups and a completely redesigned headband.
It would be difficult to argue that they're not the better looking headset. While available in the same colors as the XM4, the XM6 wrap the headset in a more premium finish, set off by more subtle design focal points in the hinges. They're clean and attractive.
Unlike the direct successor to the XM4, the XM6 bring back the folding hinges that many users loved on their headphones. That allows for a smaller carrying case so that you can fit them into a wider range of backpacks.
That case is a big design departure from the traditional headsets we've seen from Sony as well. Instead of a zipper holding everything in place, there's now a magnetic clasp mechanism. It's harder, too, making the whole package feel more confidence inspiring.
There are some benefits to the XM4, however. The hinge mechanisms feel sturdier than the thinner versions on the XM6, and some might appreciate their more involved design.
Both headphones are extremely comfortable, with the XM6 and its wider headband doing away with the cranial pressure often found in the XM5. You'll have little problem wearing either for long periods of time.
Put the two side by side and you can see the progression — but the XM6 and their new design touches and unexpected returns to form means they take this round.
As with all of its headphone models, Sony has stuck with touch controls for the XM6. They're intuitive and easy to use. Swipe left and right to skip tracks, and double tap to pause playback.
The most useful touch control is the instant transparency mode trigger — hold your hand over the right earcup, the volume drops, and transparency mode turns on. It's very helpful to quickly order a coffee at a cafe, or grab a bus ticket.
There are two physical controls on the XM6: The power button and the ANC button. These have been redesigned. The power button is a round button, and the ANC control a small rectangle. This distinction between the two makes it much easier to work out which is which when you can't see what you're doing.
No more accidental ANC activation when you want to turn the headphones off, and vice versa.
The WH-1000XM4 share the same touch controls with the XM6, all the way down to their gestures. Much like the newer pair, they're intuitive and easy to use.
They lack the round power button for easier on-head activation and de-activation of ANC — so the XM6 take this round.
Sony went back to the sonic drawing board with the XM6, focusing on vocal clarity rather than bass response and soundstage. The result is an excellent-sounding pair of headphones, with the clearest vocals you'll find in a pair of wireless headphones.
They sound good for all genres, from R&B to classical and everything in between. Managing Editor of AV at Tom's Guide, Nick Pino, was a particular fan of the "unmatched" vocal clarity.
There are some caveats. Soundstage is restricted, and there's still the pervasive bass that Sony has become known for. They're still an excellent-sounding pair of headphones, but their sonic shortcomings are well worth noting.
The XM4 are a less refined listen than the XM6, but they retain that signature Sony low-end grunt. They don't have the vocal clarity of the XM6, but they have a wider soundstage and slightly improved bass response.
This is going to be mostly down to taste, although the XM6 manage greater control over the frequency range. As a result, the new headphones win out. It is closer than you might expect, however.
The XM6 pack in an incredible array of features, with many shared from previous iterations of the line. Thanks to Bluetooth 5.3, you get excellent codec support, including LDAC, SBC, AAC, and LC3. Then there's Sony's proprietary DSEE Extreme, which can make wireless playback sound even better.
Sony also has the best array of noise canceling modes out of just about anything. There are not just levels to the ANC so that you can dial it, but the chip inside the headphones will change the ANC dynamically depending on ambient noise levels. The GPS activated ANC that changes depending on your location is also here as a bonus.
You can also adjust the EQ with a comprehensive 10-band EQ. There are customized options as well for different genres too. The feature set is nicely rounded out by Sony's 360 Reality Audio, although it only works with Amazon Music Unlimited. There's a "Spatial Upmix" feature coming down the road, but we are yet to get our hands on it to test it out.
You'd be surprised how few features the XM4 forgo due to their age. You still get the solid Codec support, although there's no Auracast on account of the aging Bluetooth 5.0 specification.
You still get a host of noise canceling modes, although the ANC doesn't shift dynamically depending on ambient noise. There are only 5 bans in the customizable EQ. For the price, though, the feature set remains very much appreciated.
Sony's noise canceling algorithm has long kept its headphones amongst the best noise canceling headphones, and the WH-1000XM6 are no exception. They block out loads of noise and easily silence a noisy office or chaotic commute.
It might not be as big an improvement as we were hoping for over the XM5, but it still does a great job of keeping the noise out. There's a focus this time around on the high frequencies, making it easier to listen to podcasts and audiobooks in louder environments.
There are still struggles for the ANC — crying children, very busy coffee shops, and the like. Engine noise on flights might not be completely defeated either, so long-haulers may want to consider something like the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones instead.
The noise-canceling performance of the WH-1000XM4 isn't as big a downgrade from the new model as you might expect, with some great noise blocking on offer. They lose out in the high-range sounds, with more voices coming through, but you'll still find relative silence in most environments while listening to music.
They struggle with really loud sounds, and sometimes noises like keyboards and sudden sounds can creep through. Loud airplane trips are also a struggle, so again, frequent flyers will want the Bose equivalent. In this case, the Bose QuietComfort Headphones.
Thanks to their superior noise-blocking ability, the Sony WH-1000XM6 take this round.
Battery life on the XM6 hasn't stepped it up all that much from the previous XM models. There are 30 hours of staying power with ANC turned on, and that rises to 40 hours if you turn it off.
Quick charge is better than ever, though. Three minutes of charge will net you an extra three hours of battery life when you run out in a pinch, which is always a nice bonus considering how much you're likely to use them.
The battery life of the XM4 is very similar to the XM6. You get 30 hours of life with ANC turned on, and then 38 if you turn the noise canceling on. There is also a quick charge function, but you need a special wall wart. 5 hours of use out of 10 minutes of charge is a nice bonus, though.
Overall, the battery life is extremely similar — although the more useful quick charge and better ANC off time gives the XM6 the win here.
It's no great surprise that at the end of it all, the Sony WH-1000XM6 take the crown between the two pairs. They sound better, have an updated design, and have more features and better noise canceling. They are the better pair of headphones.
Yet there is still a case to buy the XM4. Given their much lower price and just how close they where to the XM6 in all of our testing, they're still a very compelling buy if you're looking for good headphones without breaking the bank.
XM4 users looking to upgrade to Sony's latest flagship will find plenty of reasons to part with their cash as well — and given that your headphones are now likely closing on 4 years of use, the time might be right.
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony WH-1000XM4
Price and value (5)
3
4
Design (15)
13
12
Controls (10)
7
7
Sound quality (25)
22
19
Active noise cancelation (20)
19
17
Call quality (10)
9
7
Connectivity (5)
5
4
Battery life (10)
8
8
Total Score (100)
84
78

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Sony Reon Pocket Pro: Updated Personal Air Conditioner With More Advanced Features
Sony's latest version of personal temperature control has just gone on sale. Like the earlier Reon Pocket 5, the Reon Pocket Pro is a wearable thermal device to cool or warm your body where it touches it. Here's what's changed, and what hasn't, in the Pocket Pro. As before, it's a hands-free device that sits on the back of your neck and is held in place with a neckband that rests on your shoulders. A cooling plate rests on the back of your neck and a vent releases air at the top. Inside, a fan gently whirs. There are two vent sizes included: a smaller one that can sit under a T-shirt and a longer one so you wear a collared shirt but the warm air is still able to escape. What's new in the Pocket Pro is that it's noticeably bigger than the previous model, to allow for a cooling plate around twice the size of the Pocket 5 and longer-lasting battery inside. Additionally, the fan is much quieter than it was previously, and in a moderately noisy environment is hard to hear at all. The new, larger battery can last up to 15 hours in cooling mode, Sony says, which is twice the previous amount, Sony claims. Recharging around two hours. Another update is the inclusion of physical control buttons — for the Reon Pocket 5 controls lay in the Sony smartphone app. Now, you can adjust the temperature by pressing a button, defined enough to be found if you're pressing through a shirt, though it may need a little more dexterity in winter if you're using it to warm you up and you're wearing a jacket. More granular control will still need the app. Smart mode can switch between warm and cool modes automatically, as before, and you can customize the temperature at which the device crosses from one mode to the other. The Pocket Tag is a sensor which can monitor ambient temperature more accurately. It's included in the box and has a key ring so you can put it on your rucksack if you prefer. The price is £199 in the U.K. which is $270, though it's not yet available in the U.S. The Reon Pocket Pro is a hands-free alternative to a fan and offers significant upgrades compared both to a fan and the last Sony device.


Tom's Guide
6 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I test headphones for a living but I can't recommend Sony's latest over-ears — here's what I'd buy instead
While I was studying for my Master's degree, I needed a new pair of headphones to replace my aging Bose noise cancelers — so I opted for the then brand new Sony WH-1000XM4. They gave me everything I wanted from a pair of the best headphones, including good sound, excellent ANC and a comfortable, all-day fit. They were my faithful daily audio companions for a time as a result, and the headphones now live on in my sister's ownership. They painted a lovely picture of Sony's headphone line for me — although I was quickly let down by the next version, the WH-1000XM5. They offered a new design that wasn't as comfortable as before, a new case that wasn't as compact, and sound that wasn't as rounded. They were still excellent headphones, but they paled in comparison to my time with the XM4. So when I saw some of the specs and new features of the WH-1000XM6, I was excited to see a potential return to form for what used to be a line I loved. And sure, there were some new improvements that make them a better pair of headphones than their predecessor, but there are still some key areas that they let me down. Let me tell you all about the issues I've personally had with the XM6, and which headphones I would recommend you buy instead. First off, the good bits — and there are still loads. The case is massively improved over that found in the XM5 box, with a protective outer that feels like it will last a lifetime. The magnetic clasp works well, although you'll want to make sure that the carrying strap thing doesn't get in the way when you close the case. The ANC is still very good, and the battery life remains perfectly fine. But there are significant issues that mean I don't think they're quite as worth picking up as my old XM4. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. For one, they're still not as comfortable as that old version. Sure, the XM6 are very light and the cushioning on the earcups is good, but the headband remains a bugbear. I can't wear either the XM5 or the XM6 for very long because the headbands press too hard on the top of my head, something I didn't find with my old headphones. The sound too has taken a dive. The old XM4 headphones were more balanced than either the XM5 or the XM6, and the focus on vocal clarity in the XM6 makes them a strange listen indeed. In a vacuum, they sound very good, but they don't exist in a vacuum — they're up against competitors that now sound even better. The XM6 were not the return to the XM4 that I hoped they'd be — so here's what I'd buy instead of Sony's cans. It's difficult to argue that the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are a better set of cans than the XM6 on paper, but it's much easier if you've got the two pairs in hand. The QuietComfort are far more comfortable for a start, and I'd argue they're more handsome as well with the use of different materials. The case is actually a bit smaller as well, so they more easily fit into bags and backpacks. The sound is about on par with the XM6. While the Sony headphones emphasize the vocals of a track, the Bose are more interested in showing you the bass and low-end. I'd wager that more people would like the more comforting sound of the Bose headphones, but that's not to say that they sound better. Different, yes, and perhaps more welcoming, but not better. It's the ANC where the Bose really take the cake. They're the best noise-canceling headphones you can buy right now for a reason. With just a quick orchestral swell, the outside world melts away into nothing. I've missed deliveries because of the QuietComfort Ultra, and even people trying to get my attention directly behind me. They're the noise-canceling kings. As a result, if you're looking for the best noise-canceling headphones, the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are the way to go. The QuietComfort Ultra bring excellent comfort and some stunning ANC to the table. Their battery might not be quite up to par, but they block out all the noise and sound pretty good to boot. The protective case is solid as well, and compact. There are a whole load of reasons why you should pick up the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 over the XM6. They're a better-built, more substantial pair of headphones for one, with more premium materials and a nicer design, for example. They're more comfortable thanks to a wider headband and thicker, more plush memory foam. The clicky button controls are less inaccurate and work much better than the annoying touch options you'll find in the Sony headphones. The case is perhaps a little more bulky because the headphones don't fold like the XM6, but the shape of the case means it's still easy to fit into whatever bag you might want to toss them in. It feels more protective too, and I far prefer the magnetic wire compartment for your 3.5mm cable and USB-C charging cord. But the sound is the true strength of the PX7 S3. They're a wonderfully balanced listen, giving you some of the best wireless sound before you spend double. The bass is tight and controlled, and the highs are detailed. The mids are wide, and the soundstage impressive. They're a much nicer listen than the XM6. The ANC might not be quite up to Sony's standards, but the PX7 S3 make up for it in just about every other metric. They're comfortable, super handsome, and feature excellent sound. The battery life is on par with Sony as well, and the protective case will keep them safe for a long time to come. If you want to get close to the XM6 but don't want to spend loads of money, then the excellent Cambridge Audio P100 SE are a very good option. You'll have to make a couple of compromises — there's no spatial audio and the case is very large — but for $150 less you get a pair of headphones that are comfortable, sound better, and feature some ridiculous battery life. The P100 SE have a newly padded headband, which has made them more comfortable to wear for long periods of time. The eacups are lovely and soft, making their not insignificant weight feel far less. I think they look really nice, and they feel sturdier and more premium than Sony's headphones. The ANC might not be as good, and they're not as fully featured, but they're still the headphones that I'd pick up if I wanted a pair of ANC headphones for less. Cambridge Audio's updated P100 SE are a wonderful set of headphones that don't cost the earth. They're comfortable, sound really good, and have 60 hours of ANC on battery life to get you through the week.


Tom's Guide
6 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I'm a TV expert, and there's one button I miss having on remote controls
While on vacation recently, I settled into a charming hotel room for a two-night stay. It had all of the most charming hotel amenities: a carefully made bed with sheets tucked in way too tight, watery, mediocre coffee and a tiny, decade-old TV. These are all things I earnestly love. As the evening wound down and my eyelids began to droop, I found myself enamored with another novelty: the sleep button on the old TV's remote control. Not all will agree, but the only thing more soothing than falling asleep while a TV softly plays is falling asleep in a hotel room while a TV softly plays. The only downside is being startled awake by a loud infomercial several hours later. This is where the sleep button comes in. These days, the sleep button has migrated from your remote control to your TV's settings menu. In fact, TV remotes are getting smaller, sleeker and shedding as many buttons as possible. Don't get me wrong: I appreciate a slender clicker. But in recent years, essential buttons are being tossed to the side for the sake of minimalism. LG's latest AI Remote doesn't even have an input button, nor does Samsung's Solar Cell remote. These days, instead of having a dedicated button for a sleep timer, manufacturers are putting the function deeper and deeper in the settings. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. For example, most TVs that come with the Google TV software suite offer a sleep timer, but unless the TV-maker includes the option in a quick settings menu, you'll have to navigate to the System submenu and find Power & Energy. It's buried pretty deep. Depending on whether or not your Google-enabled TV supports voice commands, you can always 'Hey, Google' your way through the process, but based on my experience, content needs to be playing in order for this to work. You can always 'Hey, Google' your way through the process. Newer LG TVs (like the C5 OLED) put the option just a few clicks away in the quick menu that appears when you short-press the settings button. On newer Samsung TVs (like the S95F OLED), the sleep timer is accessible via the quick settings menu, too, and its icon can be shuffled around and placed closer to the front of the menu bar for easier access. For Roku TVs (like the Roku Plus Series), the sleep timer can be found in the Time submenu. This option is only available on Roku TVs, however, not Roku devices connected to a TV. If you're a sleep button fan and a Roku TV owner, I recommend picking up the Roku Voice Remote Pro. Not only is this a convenient upgrade to the already-excellent standard Roku remote, it also comes with two programmable buttons that can be customized to set a sleep timer. The Roku Voice Remote Pro is an essential upgrade for Roku owners. It offers backlit buttons, a rechargeable battery and programmable buttons that can be customized to quickly access your Roku TV's sleep timer. In recent years, Sony TVs have been built around the Google TV streaming platform with an extensive array of settings and functions layered on top of the Google interface. Fortunately, the sleep timer can be found within the quick settings menu. These options are fine and dandy, but I don't think anyone thinks they're convenient. I contend that the good ol' fashioned sleep button is essential — perhaps not as essential as an input button, but certainly more so than many dedicated app buttons whose sponsorships keep them glued under our thumbs. As mentioned, most TVs still offer some form of a sleep timer, but the function is typically buried beneath several layers of menu options — just beyond the reach of my drowsy, rapidly fading faculties. Look, I know it's a small thing, but when I'm drifting off to dream land but still want the gentle rhythms of a baseball game to carry me there, nothing will feel as cozy as jamming my thumb on a sleep button.