logo
Takeaways from AP's report on how federal public health cuts are affecting communities across the US

Takeaways from AP's report on how federal public health cuts are affecting communities across the US

Washington Post2 days ago

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Americans are losing a vast array of people and programs dedicated to keeping them healthy. State and local health departments responsible for invisible but critical work including inspecting restaurants, monitoring wastewater for harmful germs, responding to outbreaks and other tasks to protect both individuals and communities are being hollowed out.
The Trump administration is cutting health spending on an unprecedented scale, experts say. It's pulled $11 billion of direct federal support and eliminated 20,000 jobs at at national health agencies that in part support local public health work. It's proposing billions more be slashed.
Public health leaders said the cuts are reducing the entire system to a shadow of what it once was and threatening to undermine even routine work – even as the nation faces threats from diseases like measles, whooping cough and bird flu.
The moves reflect a shift away from the very idea of public health: doing the work that no individual can do alone to safeguard the population as a whole.
Here are some takeaways from The Associated Press examination of how federal cuts to public health are affecting communities and people across the United States.
Prevention work is low key. It's impossible to identify who was saved because, if it goes well, the person never knows when they've fended off a mortal threat with the invisible shield of public health.
The health department in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, for example, has run a mobile clinic that it brings to high schools to ensure students are up-to-date on shots for diseases like measles and polio. Those shots help both the student and the wider community stay healthy — if enough people are vaccinated.
U.S. health departments run programs to reduce suicides and drug overdoses, improve prenatal health and help people stop smoking. They educate people about health and test for and treat diseases such as HIV and tuberculosis. Some, including Mecklenburg, operate medical and dental clinics too.
The work departments do is also cost effective, experts have found. For every dollar spent on childhood immunizations , the country is estimated to save $11; on tobacco cessation , $2-$3; on asthma control , $70.
State and local health departments depend on federal money and support. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sends about 80 percent of its budget to states and local communities and helps those departments with its expertise and other resources.
When the Trump administration pulled $11 billion from state and local health departments without warning in March, then laid off thousands of people at CDC a week later, public health leaders said the cuts delivered a serious blow to communities across the country.
All eight employees dedicated to the mobile vaccine program in Mecklenburg were laid off. Nine disease intervention specialists in Columbus, Ohio, were let go as the department prepared to address a measles outbreak. Nashville had to end a program offering free flu and COVID tests.
Meanwhile, tobacco hotlines, early intervention programs for children who are deaf or hard of hearing, and programs to prevent drowning are all being affected in states and communities because CDC teams were laid off.
A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said HHS is reorganizing what he said were 'broken systems' and rejected 'the implication that HHS has turned its back on urgent health threats.'
HHS justified the grant cancellations by saying the money was for COVID and the pandemic is over. But most of the cuts were in areas that are especially important given today's health threats, including epidemiology and laboratory capacity as well as immunizations.
Connecticut's state health commissioner told a Democratic congressional hearing the current uncertainty 'puts lives at risk.'
The new cuts are especially damaging because health departments are funded differently than other government agencies meant to protect the public: Funding pours in during emergencies and slows to a relative trickle when they subside. Public health leaders often cite the contrast with fire departments, which are kept ready at all times, not scrambling to find firefighters and fire trucks when houses are already burning.
A temporary surge of money during the pandemic allowed some health departments to expand and strengthen programs. But by early this year, most of that money had disappeared, along with other COVID-era grants across the nation — some because they ended and some because the government rescinded them . Departments were again left brittle and vulnerable.
In Chicago, one-time COVID grants made up 51% of the health department budget, and their ending will push staff numbers below pre-pandemic levels — slowing responses to outbreaks and forcing officials to scale back food safety, violence prevention and other programs.
In Mecklenburg, the department lost 180 employees as COVID funds dried up. It also lost a wastewater monitoring partnership with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte that helped the county react quickly to changing COVID variants and could have also been used to detect new threats like bird flu.
The cuts are not over.
The Trump administration has proposed cutting billions more from CDC's budget, enough to cut the agency's spending in half. CDC sends about 80 percent of its budget to states and local communities
Public health leaders warn the the relentless cuts to the system leave departments unable to respond to new pandemics and old diseases returning across the United States.
___
Ungar reported from Charlotte and Louisville, Kentucky, and Smith reported from Providence, Rhode Island. Associated Press reporters Mary Conlon in Washington and Kenya Hunter in Atlanta contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ASX-listed James Hardie secures $3.5 billion credit to fund AZEK deal
ASX-listed James Hardie secures $3.5 billion credit to fund AZEK deal

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ASX-listed James Hardie secures $3.5 billion credit to fund AZEK deal

(Reuters) -ASX-listed James Hardie said on Monday it had secured new senior credit facilities for a total of $3.5 billion with broad support, including 30 participating banks to support its operations and acquisition of U.S.-listed AZEK. The multi-billion dollar loan facility can be broken down into a $1 billion revolving credit facility and a $2.5 billion senior secured term loan A, split into two tranches. The fibre-cement maker had offered to buy the U.S. artificial decking maker for $8.75 billion in March, while markets were concerned about a slowdown in the U.S. housing sector. With the new credit facilities, bridge facility commitments with certain lenders in connection with the pending acquisition were reduced from $4.3 billion to $1.7 billion. New housing stock in the U.S. is near a two-decade high and tariffs and an immigration crackdown under President Donald Trump are seen as likely to slow construction further. In May, the building material firm forecast tepid earnings growth for its North American business, the company's biggest market and profit engine, while reporting a drop in annual profit. Back in Australia, market scrutiny has also increased on such large corporate buyouts after investors raised questions about the AZEK deal. In a separate announcement, James Hardie terminated its American depositary shares (ADS) program, believing it will become unnecessary after the company lists its share on the New York Stock Exchange. James Hardie's ASX-listed shares jumped as much as 3.2% to A$36.57, their highest level in over a week, and were last trading up 2.9%. The stock has lost more than 8% in value since the buyout deal was announced in March. Sign in to access your portfolio

Ana de Armas & Tom Cruise Have Reportedly ‘Discussed' What Role Scientology Plays In Their Relationship
Ana de Armas & Tom Cruise Have Reportedly ‘Discussed' What Role Scientology Plays In Their Relationship

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ana de Armas & Tom Cruise Have Reportedly ‘Discussed' What Role Scientology Plays In Their Relationship

We all thought 2025 couldn't outdo itself when Elizabeth Hurley started canoodling with Billy Ray Cyrus, but Tom Cruise and Ana de Armas may just be the most unexpected celebrity couple of 2025. The Top Gun legend and the Cuban-born Oscar nominee have gone from helicopter drop-ins and Valentine's Day dates to sparking serious headlines — especially now that sources reveal they've had 'discussions' about how Scientology could shape their future together. For anyone catching up, this pairing felt a bit out-of-nowhere at first: Cruise is 62 and arguably Hollywood's most high-maintenance bachelor; she's 37, a Bond girl-turned-Marilyn Monroe, with a devout Catholic upbringing and a history of keeping her love life as locked down as Cruise's film sets. But these two have been spotted flying across Europe together (literally), making low-key exits from David Beckham's birthday bash, and appearing to dodge the paparazzi like it's their own personal Mission: Impossible. And while the two are reportedly connecting to discuss future projects, some insiders suggest there is more to what's going on between the two. More from SheKnows Tom Cruise Has Allegedly Offered His Reported New GF the Role of His Love Interest in a New Movie According to insiders who spoke with the Daily Mail, there's one thing they can't quite outmaneuver: religion. Cruise's long-standing ties to the Church of Scientology are public knowledge — and polarizing, to put it gently. He's one of the religion's most visible (and powerful) figures, and many point to Scientology as a key factor in his past divorces, including his split from Katie Holmes. Holmes famously sought sole custody of their daughter, Suri, who, by the way, dropped his surname and now goes by Suri Noelle. De Armas, on the other hand, hails from a modest, deeply religious family in Cuba. Raised in the Catholic Church, the Knives Out star still holds her values close. So while her jet-setting with Cruise might look carefree, the question of faith is reportedly weighing heavily behind the scenes. 'Ana was raised Catholic and her family are religious,' a source said. 'She knows that her family would not accept Tom because of his beliefs. Ana and Tom have discussed this.' The actress has always charted her own path, but even so, those close to her suspect she may be more flexible than expected. 'His Scientologist beliefs are not a deal breaker for Ana,' one insider added. 'She is her own woman. And honestly, no one would be surprised if she took up Scientology.' Whether she's about to go Clear or just keeping an open mind for the sake of love, one thing's for sure: the two are having some serious discussions. But if they plan to make it past the Cannes red carpet (Cruise's Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning premieres May 14), they might have to land on the same spiritual page of SheKnows 90 Incredible Shows on Netflix You Should Be Watching Right Now Everything Harry & Meghan Have Done Since Leaving the Royal Family These 9 Books Reveal Details About JFK Jr. & Carolyn Bessette That Were Never Known Before

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store