logo
Factbox-Trump makes false claims of white genocide in South Africa during Ramaphosa meeting

Factbox-Trump makes false claims of white genocide in South Africa during Ramaphosa meeting

The Star21-05-2025

U.S. President Donald Trump shows a copy of an article that he said its about white South Africans who had been killed, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 21, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
JOHANNESBURG -U.S. President Donald Trump made several false statements and misrepresented some facts about the alleged persecution of South Africa's white minority during a contentious Oval Office meeting on Wednesday with President Cyril Ramaphosa.
Ramaphosa tried to rebuff the assertions but was frequently interrupted by Trump, who repeated the claims. Trump had staff play a video consisting mostly of years-old clips of inflammatory speeches by some South African politicians that have been circulating on social media.
Among the claims contradicted by the evidence:
1. There is a genocide of white farmers in South Africa.
This conspiracy theory has been propagated by some fringe groups of white South Africans since the end of apartheid in 1994. It has been circulating in global far-right chat rooms for at least a decade, with the vocal support of Trump's ally, South African-born Elon Musk.
Supporters of the theory point to murders of white farmers in remote rural parts of the country as proof of a politically orchestrated campaign of ethnic cleansing, rather than ordinary violent crime.
They accuse the Black-majority led government of being complicit in the farm murders, either by encouraging them or at least turning a blind eye. The government strongly denies this.
South Africa has one of the world's highest murder rates, with an average of 72 a day, in a country of 60 million people. Most victims are Black.
South African police recorded 26,232 murders nationwide in 2024, of which 44 were linked to farming communities. Of those, eight of the victims were farmers.
The high court in Western Cape province ruled that claims of white genocide were "clearly imagined and not real" in a case earlier this year, forbidding a donation to a white supremacist group on those grounds.
2. The government is expropriating land from white farmers without compensation, including through violent land seizures, in order to distribute it to Black South Africans.
The government has a policy of attempting to redress inequalities in land ownership that are a legacy of apartheid and colonialism. But no land has been expropriated, and the government has instead tried to encourage white farmers to sell their land willingly.
That hasn't worked. Some three-quarters of privately-owned farmland is still in the hands of whites, who make up less than 8% of the population, while 4% is owned by Black South Africans who make up 80%.
In an effort to address this, Ramaphosa signed a law in January allowing the state to expropriate land "in the public interest," in rare cases without compensating the owner. The law requires authorities to first try to reach an agreement. It still hasn't been used.
3. The "Kill the Boer (farmer)" song sung by some Black South Africans is an explicit call to murder Afrikaners, the ethnic group of European descent who make up the majority of whites and who own most of the farmland.
The song dates back to the resistance against apartheid, when Afrikaner nationalists controlled the country. In one of the video clips Trump showed, firebrand opposition leader Julius Malema of the Marxist Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) is singing the song.
Three South African courts have ruled against attempts to have it designated as hate speech, on the basis that it is a historical liberation chant, not a literal incitement to violence.
In a statement following the meeting between Trump and Ramaphosa, the EFF said it was "a song that expresses the desire to destroy the system of white minority control over the resources of South Africa" and that it is "a part of African Heritage."
4. Trump played a video clip that showed a long line of white crosses on the side of a highway, which Trump said were "burial sites" for white farmers.
The video was made in September 2020 during a protest against farm murders after two people were killed on their farm a week earlier. The crosses did not mark actual graves. An organizer told South Africa's public broadcaster, SABC, at the time that the wooden crosses represented farmers who had been killed over the years.
5. The opening scene of the White House video shows Malema in South Africa's parliament announcing "people are going to occupy land. We require no permission from ... the president." It also shows another clip of him pledging to expropriate land.
Some land has been illegally occupied over the years, mostly by millions of desperate squatters with nowhere else to go, although some land seizures are politically motivated. The land is usually unused and there is no evidence the EFF orchestrated any land invasions.
(Reporting by Tim Cocks, additional reporting by Siyanda Mthethwa, Nellie Peyton and Milan Pavicic, editing by Ross Colvin and Howard Goller)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court lets Trump keep national guard in LA, marines on the way
Appeals court lets Trump keep national guard in LA, marines on the way

Free Malaysia Today

time39 minutes ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Appeals court lets Trump keep national guard in LA, marines on the way

Many of the protests in solidarity for detained immigrants have taken place in downtown Los Angeles. (AP pic) LOS ANGELES : A US appeals court today allowed President Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of national guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilisation. The ninth US circuit court of appeals' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Trump, but it does leave command of the guard with the president for now. Earlier today, San Francisco-based US district judge Charles Breyer found that Trump's deployment of the guard was unlawful. Breyer's 36-page ruling had ordered the national guard to return to the control of California governor Gavin Newsom, who had brought the case. It was a short-lived victory for Newsom, as Breyer's order was paused about two-and-a-half hours later. Asked for a comment, Newsom's press office referred to the governor's statement after the initial ruling, and noted that the appeals court put a temporary pause on the ruling but did not reverse it. 'I'm confident, on the basis of the review of the 36 pages – absolutely it will stand,' Newsom said of the district judge's order. Trump welcomed the ruling in a social media post today. The three-judge appeals court panel consisted of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. The panel said it would hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the merits of Breyer's order. The court's action, called an administrative stay, gives the appeals judges additional time to consider the Trump administration's request to block Breyer's order while litigation in the case continues. Trump summoned the national guard on Saturday in response to protests that had broken out over immigration raids, then on Monday ordered the US marines to support the guard. A battalion of 700 US marines is expected to arrive today, marking an extraordinary use of military forces to support civilian police operations within the US. The troops have stood guard at a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where many of the protests have taken place in a show of solidarity for immigrants detained inside. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence, and restricted to a few city blocks. The guard had also accompanied immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) agents on operations to detain immigrants. In his ruling, Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters – a contention made by Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, among others – and depriving the state of the ability to use the guard for other purposes. Mayor wants ICE out of LA Donald Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterising the protests in Los Angeles as a 'rebellion'. (AP pic) Bass yesterday called on ICE officers to stand down from the intensified series of raids that led to the protests, saying the local economy could be harmed as immigrants stayed home from work and school for fear of being snatched off the streets. 'The peace that we need to have happen needs to begin in Washington, and we need to stop the raids,' Bass told a press conference as supporters flanking her broke out in a chant of 'Stop the raids'. 'Peace begins with ICE leaving Los Angeles,' said Bass, who has imposed a nighttime curfew over 2.5sq km of downtown LA. Bass spoke after department of homeland security secretary Kristi Noem pledged to 'liberate' Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic US senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarisation generated by Trump's hardline approach to immigration enforcement and expansive use of presidential power. Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Democrats have said the use of military force was unnecessary and an example of Trump's authoritarianism. Americans are divided over Trump's decision to activate the military. A Reuters/Ipsos poll showed 48% of respondents agreed with a statement that the president should 'deploy the military to bring order to the streets' when protests turned violent, while 41% disagreed. Between the rulings, Newsom said the national guard would be redeployed to its previous tasks, including border security, preparing for wildfires and countering drug smuggling. But the Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order, calling Breyer's ruling 'an extraordinary intrusion on the president's constitutional authority as commander in chief'. Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterising the protests in Los Angeles as a 'rebellion', but Breyer said in his temporary restraining order that the protests fell far short of that legal standard. 'The court is troubled by the implication inherent in defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the first amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote. Trump today reiterated his comments that if he had not ordered in the national guard the city would be in flames, writing: 'We saved L.A.'

Trump says he had given Iran 60-day ultimatum, Tehran now has 2nd chance
Trump says he had given Iran 60-day ultimatum, Tehran now has 2nd chance

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Trump says he had given Iran 60-day ultimatum, Tehran now has 2nd chance

WASHINGTON: U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he had given Iran a 60-day ultimatum on a nuclear deal before Israel's strikes, but added Tehran now has a second chance. 'Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to 'make a deal.' They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store