Alberta not verifying daycare funds used to lower costs for parents: auditor general
A report from Doug Wylie says without verifying claims submitted by daycares, Alberta could be overcompensating operators.
The report says a review of documents submitted by daycares found inaccurate reporting more than half the time, including an instance that led Alberta to overpay one daycare $26,000 in a month.
The funds come from Alberta's multi-year agreement with Ottawa to lower daycare fees to an average of $10 per day by subsidizing operating costs for eligible daycares.
Diana Batten, the Opposition NDP's children and family services critic, says without having proper checks and balances the United Conservative Party government isn't meeting its commitment to lower fees for parents.
The report says Alberta spent more than $1 billion on daycare subsidies in 2023-2024.
The office for Education and Childcare Minister Demetrios Nicolaides didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 17, 2025.
Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
14 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
Tuesday's letters: Alberta government helps MAGA singer but not disabled
Just so we are clear on Alberta government priorities. Staff at Alberta Infrastructure are helping U.S. anti-diversity, anti-2SLGBTQ+ and anti-women's rights MAGA musician Sean Feucht complete his incompletely submitted event permit form. The rest of the country has cancelled on him. Alberta government resources are being put towards helping to provide him a venue at our Alberta legislature grounds. Article content Article content Article content Article content The Liberals are three votes short of a majority. Historically they have negotiated with the NDP for those votes and not the Conservatives. A win for Pierre Poilievre changes nothing, but an independent conservative can impact federal policy during a minority government, forcing the Liberals to make compromises to get legislation passed. The NDP did this last time, and now it could be our turn. The Conservatives will never wheel and deal with the Liberals. Article content Article content I do not know much about Bonnie aside from that she says she is local, has conservative views, and will represent the will of the people in Battle River-Crowfoot. That combination is exactly what we need to make Alberta's needs heard. That said, feel free to look into her yourself. Poilievre may be born in Alberta, but he has lived in and represented a riding in Ottawa for decades. I see him as a parachute candidate. He is an Eastern carpetbagger. Article content
CTV News
14 minutes ago
- CTV News
Calgary mayor, Alberta minister to discuss bike lanes as threats of removal loom
In a composite image made from two file photographs, Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek, left, is shown in Calgary on Oct. 25, 2021 and Alberta Minister of Transportation Devin Dreeshen is shown in Calgary on May 19, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh EDMONTON — It was 10 years ago this month that Edmonton city staff returned a national traffic safety award when the councillors of the day voted to rip up a trio of bike lanes that played a small role in winning the prize. Councillors considered the lanes unsafe and underutilized. Edmonton has since built a flurry of new lanes to higher standards in busier areas. But the spectre of lane removals is again looming — this time over both of Alberta's major cities. In recent months, Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen has said he thinks Edmonton and Calgary have been going the wrong way when it comes to building bike infrastructure. He has said the province hasn't ruled out stepping in. In April, Dreeshen called on Edmonton and Calgary to remove bike lanes from 'major corridors,' as he said they clash with provincial goals and investments in expanding roadway networks for vehicles. Dreeshen, in an April interview, said his eyes were set on four already-finished bike lanes in Edmonton, plus an additional project that was nearly complete. When it came to Calgary, he said he hadn't done the same level of digging for examples. He traded brief letters with Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek earlier this summer over the future of bike infrastructure in her city, and the two are set to meet Wednesday to discuss next steps. Just like the reasoning used in 2015 by Edmonton councillors, Dreeshen has said the lanes he's concerned about aren't being used enough to justify their cost and, in turn, are making commutes longer for drivers. Francisco Alaniz Uribe, a professor at the University of Calgary's School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, said little has changed in the politics of bike lanes over the past 10 years. He expects it to remain a political conversation for years to come. 'We are in a moment where we're shifting some of our values of what we have been doing for decades, which is to prioritize the car on the street,' Alaniz Uribe said. 'And that has come to a point where you cannot continue to add capacity to that — there's no more room for extra lanes. 'But the political part of it is that there's a huge pushback on these changes for people that are accustomed and used to what is the status quo.' He said what's usually missing in the political conversation around bike lanes is data. 'They make streets safer, they allow for other aspects of urban planning to develop like making our cities more compact and building housing closer to employment centres, not having to spend so much money on parking, and even opening space for trees and green infrastructure,' Alaniz Uribe said. 'It is very difficult to talk about those in this kind of political conversation. Is it really the issue — bike lanes — or are we talking about more (of) a resistance to change?' City planners in Edmonton and Calgary say the actual percentage of cycling infrastructure that shares the road with cars is small in terms of each city's overall cycling network. In Edmonton, separated bike lanes and painted, but not protected, bike lanes make up just five per cent of the city's roughly 1,500 kilometres of cycling infrastructure, said Natalie Lazurko with the city's infrastructure department. Just how much of that five per cent meets the 'major corridor' threshold set by Dreeshen is unclear. Earlier this month, his office said the province is undertaking a review of existing bike lanes in both cities. Dreeshen has said the province hasn't ruled out stepping in to remove existing bike lanes, and that Alberta could follow Ontario in legislating that any new bike lane coming at the price of removing a vehicle lane would require provincial approval. Ontario's law, passed last year, also gave it the power to order municipalities to remove bike lanes and reinstall traffic lanes. A Charter challenge has been launched against parts of the bill, and awaits a judicial ruling. Lazurko said it would be difficult to pivot if the province or the next city council were to act on anti-bike lane urges. Adapting to new directions handed down by elected officials is also just part of the job, she said. 'Right now, we have a plan. Council has approved that plan. We're moving forward with that mandate,' said Lazurko. The plan, approved by council in 2020, set Edmonton's philosophy around bike infrastructure as being necessary to ensure residents have options to get around as the city grows. 'We have to rely on other ways of getting around. Otherwise, we're going to be living in congestion all over the place,' Lazurko said. 'We're not moving away from vehicular travel in Edmonton — that's never going to happen — but we are looking at providing more opportunities for people to travel in a different way.' A spokesperson for Edmonton Mayor Amarjeet Sohi, who, unlike Gondek, isn't seeking re-election in the municipal elections this fall, said the minister hadn't requested a meeting with him about bike lanes. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025. Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press
National Post
14 minutes ago
- National Post
Terry Newman: Why your steak sucks this summer
Article content When questioned about where the meat comes from, he said that, 'The chicken is almost 99 per cent Canadian. The beef and the pork, one day we could get 10 cases of back ribs and it's all Canadian, and the next day we get two cases of American.' Article content Yet 'none of the labels would tell you. That's what the little flags are for,' he explained, pointing to signs sitting above a bin of meat. 'Every couple of hours, they're constantly revising it in terms of what is and what isn't (Canadian).' Article content Again, there was nothing on the individual packages of meat to indicate whether the beef is foreign or homegrown, just flags or signs being shifted around to indicate whether beef is Canadian. Article content I spoke to a fourth butcher, this time at a Loblaws store, who confirmed that if it is not marked, there is no way for consumers to tell if the beef they are buying is from the United States or elsewhere. Article content At this location, a display case with unpackaged prime cuts featured some pieces of meat with flags indicating that they were Canadian. However, other meats in the case did not have any country-identifying information. Article content Article content There were packages of beef marked 'Canadian Beef,' with stickers saying, 'Pick the Beef with the Leaf,' and clearly displaying a black Canadian flag with 'Canada' written in the centre on each individual package. Article content Article content However, there was also beef that was unmarked. For example, a section filled with stewing beef, striploins and eye round marinating steaks with and without 'Canadian Pepper Seasoning' did not bear the same Canadian symbol on the individual packages. Article content Article content Article content The Loblaws butcher did, however, point to price tags above one bin of meats that had Canadian flags on it. These, he told me, were brought in as part of the 'Buy Canadian' movement against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. But these weren't everywhere in the store. In this location, they were above some vacuum-sealed, pre-seasoned pork products. Article content Article content Article content Grading requirements aside, I needed to determine whether the butchers were correct about Canadians not being able to tell if their meat is not Canadian. Article content I contacted Metro, Loblaws and the CFIA to ask why, as per the butchers I spoke with, there appears to be a lack of clarity around the labelling of meats from foreign countries, despite the rules posted on the food agency's website. Article content I asked Stephanie Bonk, communications manager for Metro, if the butchers were correct in saying that beyond marked boxes out back, consumers in the store would not be able to know if their meat was Canadian. Bonk said that Metro follows Ontario rules, which do not require country of origin labelling. Article content When I asked about store inspection, Bonk said that, 'To ensure compliance with federal and provincial requirements, the stores could be inspected by CFIA and/or' the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Agribusiness. Article content She explained that, 'There is no requirement for country of origin on retail meat cuts that are cut and packaged at store level. This would include ground meats, stewing meat, kabobs, stir fry meat, etc.'
