
Man released after murder conviction is overturned
STAR-ADVERTISER 'We conclude that prosecutorial misconduct prejudiced Cardona's right to a fair trial in violation of the due process clause … of the Hawaii Constitution.' Opinion of the high court On overturning the murder conviction for Oscar Cardona, pictured above with his attorney Christian Enright during his sentencing in 2022
STAR-ADVERTISER 'We conclude that prosecutorial misconduct prejudiced Cardona's right to a fair trial in violation of the due process clause … of the Hawaii Constitution.'
Opinion of the high court On overturning the murder conviction for Oscar Cardona, pictured above with his attorney Christian Enright during his sentencing in 2022 A Circuit Court judge has ordered the supervised release of Oscar Cardona, who was convicted in 2022 of second-degree murder in the June 1, 2021, stabbing death of a visitor in Waikiki.
Cardona will live with his mother in her one-bedroom Waikiki condo while he awaits a new trial.
The Hawaii Supreme Court overturned the December 2022 conviction and life sentence with the possibility of parole, finding prosecutorial misconduct, which violated Cardona's right to a fair trial. It also vacated the Intermediate Court of Appeals' decision, which affirmed the conviction.
On Wednesday, Judge James Kawashima granted the defense's motion to modify the terms of the supervised release by allowing Cardona not only to live with his mother in her Waikiki home, but also to attend school and seek employment remotely while he awaits retrial.
Attorney Myles Breiner, who handled his appeal, said that if Cardona gets a job, he could help out his single mother. He also asked that Cardona be allowed to obtain MedQuest medical coverage and his Hawaii State ID.
The state did not object to the defense's motion for modifying the supervised release.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
The defense said Cardona will also take out the trash and get mail in the building.
During his trial, Deputy Public Defender Christian Enright said Cardona's single mother worked as a jewelry salesperson in Waikiki to support her only child, and that Cardona's father lived in Mexico. The then-21-year-old man was described as a sheltered innocent who wore thick glasses since age 5 and played Pokemon Go. He had moved out only a couple of months before his arrest.
The Sept. 20 Supreme Court opinion details what was presented at trial and where Deputy Prosecutor Franklin Don Pacarro Jr. and the appeals court erred :
Cardona brought a gold pocketknife to Kuhio Beach Park after his new roommate, Elijah Horn, called him for help.
Horn had just met four women at Kuhio Beach Park, when two men approached, 19-year-old California visitor Elian Delacerda, who was later killed, and Osvaldo Castaneda-Pena.
They were initially friendly but began calling Horn the 'N-word ' and other names and became aggressive. Horn phoned Cardona for help. He testified he didn't want to look like a 'pipsqueak.'
Cardona arrived on his electric bicycle.
The argument turned physical. Cardona pulled out his gold pocketknife. Castaneda-Pena struck Horn, who hit back with his skateboard. One of the women also hit Castaneda-Pena with the skateboard.
Delacerda punched Cardona in the face. Cardona, who has extremely poor vision and wears thick glasses, said he lost his glasses in the scuffle.
Cardona stabbed him several times, and he died of a sharp-force wound to his heart.
The high court said in closing arguments Pacarro improperly called Cardona a liar and an 'enforcer, ' denying him the right to a fair trial.
Cardona filed a notice of intent that explains he has myopic degeneration, resulting in extremely blurred vision and headaches, and needs extremely thick glasses at all times to see.
Horn said Cardona was not a fighter, not violent, and that he had never seen him fight before.
The ruling says the deputy prosecutor asked Horn improper leading questions.
The chief medical examiner testified Delacerda died of an inch-long wound between 1 and 2 inches deep that hit his heart.
He had a total of five sharp-force injuries. His blood alcohol content was more than three times the legal limit.
Cardona testified Dela cerda punched him in the face, which broke his glasses, and everything went 'blurry and dark.'
He also testified that he held out the knife, and Dela cerda may have run up against it and stabbed himself.
Cardona and Pacarro got into a back-and-forth about whether Delacerda walked into the knife.
'You never gave him any strikes ?' Pacarro asked.
'No, ' Cardona answered.
'Oh, so he stabbed himself ?' the prosecutor asked.
'He probably ran into it, ' Cardona said.
The high court found prosecutorial misconduct when, during the deputy prosecutor's rebuttal closing argument, he said :
'People lie. The evidence doesn't lie.
'Defendant said, 'Well, when I don't wear my glasses, I'm blurry.' He didn't say he was colorblind. Guy was wearing a red hat, black shirt, red shorts. You take off your glasses … you see a figure.'
He also says, 'He's scared ? He looks like the enforcer, ' 'riding around on his bike, like he owned those streets.'
Pacarro also said, 'There's no credible, independent evidence that he had an eye problem.'
The high court found the appeals court erred by characterizing the deputy prosecutor's statements as benign, and that his use of leading questions throughout the trial was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
'We conclude that prosecutorial misconduct prejudiced Cardona's right to a fair trial in violation of the due process clause … of the Hawaii Constitution, ' the opinion reads.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Choy sues Hawai‘i Tourism Authority for ‘retaliation,' seeks reinstatement
Isaac Choy, who remains on unpaid leave from the Hawai 'i Tourism Authority, has sued named and unnamed HTA officials alleging they retaliated against him for reporting what he called HTA procurement, spending and other violations. The lawsuit filed Thursday in Circuit Court by Choy—who was HTA's vice president of finance and acting chief administrative officer—represents the latest drama at HTA, which has the key responsibility for organizing state and private tourism entities and marketing Hawaii as a travel destination. HTA interim President and CEO Caroline Anderson, whom Choy names as a defendant in his lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. HTA Chair Todd Apo declined to comment on the lawsuit. The Attorney General's office had not been served with Choy's lawsuit by the end of Friday and said it generally does not comment on pending litigation. Choy's lawsuit seeks penalties up to $5, 000 against Anderson and anyone else at HTA for each alleged violation of 'the Hawaii Whistleblowers Protection Act ' in what he calls retaliation for reporting violations. He also wants to be reinstated with back pay, in addition to payment of his attorneys' fees. Choy, Hawaii's former tax director, had worked at HTA since April 2023 and had responsibility for 'fiscal supervision of the funds appropriated to the HTA in a manner consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles standards, State budget fiscal requirements, and any regulatory requirement, ' among other duties. Beginning in March 2024, Choy said he began reporting HTA violations to state and HTA officials that continued into February. In one instance, according to the lawsuit, the state Procurement Office in January 2024 'confirmed that the then-program manager, Caroline Anderson, violated state procurement laws by failing to conduct a proper contract extension and then verbally extending the contract without going through the proper procurement process.' 'Mr. Choy reported his concerns about HTA's failure to timely and consistently comply with laws, rules, regulations and contracts to the State Legislative Auditor, the State Attorney General, and State legislators, who were conducting investigations or inquiry as part of their legislative duties, ' according to the lawsuit. After Choy alleged improper use of Hawai 'i Convention Center space by then-HTA CEO Mufi Hannemann, Choy's lawsuit said the Attorney General's office confirmed in writing that Choy mentioned Hawaii's whistleblower law in September 'as a protection against retaliation for himself and other HTA staff members.' Then allegations emerged that Choy had made racist and sexist remarks on the job, prompting the Attorney General's office and the Department of Human Resources on May 9 to direct that he be placed on unpaid leave. In his lawsuit, Choy said that Anderson on May 9 'delivered a letter to Mr. Choy, stating that Mr. Choy was being placed on administrative leave without pay, and was barred from coming to the HTA offices.' 'At Ms. Anderson's direction, Mr. Choy was immediately escorted from the HTA offices, on a 'perp walk' in front of all HTA employees as if Mr. Choy had been charged with a crime, in an attempt to humiliate Mr. Choy and intimidate other HTA staff members.' The reasons that Anderson cited in her May 9 letter for placing him on leave 'were false, misrepresented and /or grossly overstated, based on hearsay and unsubstantiated allegations, ' according to the lawsuit. 'The reasons stated in Ms. Anderson's May 9, 2025 letter were an obvious pretext, to silence Mr. Choy, and to retaliate against Mr. Choy for reporting numerous, serious violations of State laws, rules, regulations, and contracts, including the procurement violations by Ms. Anderson that Mr. Choy had reported. Placing Mr. Choy on leave without pay, without any legitimate basis under State law, was a transparent attempt by HTA and Ms. Anderson to harm Mr. Choy financially and unlawfully coerce him into resigning his position from HTA, to prevent him from providing additional details about the violations of State laws, rules, regulations, and contracts Mr. Choy had reported or was about to report.' On May 15, Choy sent a letter to Anderson, demanding that 'your retaliatory actions cease immediately and that my employment status be restored immediately.' In the letter, Choy told Anderson that 'Your false and reckless statements and retaliatory behavior have not only significantly damaged my reputation and income but also profoundly affected my family.' Choy served five terms in the House representing Manoa from 2008 through 2018.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Disgraced pastor turns down year offer and now faces a jury, life in prison
Eric Readon, a controversial Miami Gardens pastor arrested three years ago on charges of stealing an elderly man's Northwest Miami-Dade home, turned down a plea deal from the state Wednesday and now could spend the rest of his life in prison. By turning down the state's offer of a year in prison and a decade of probation, Readon, 49, could end up behind bars from anywhere between six years to more than six decades, for the crimes he is accused of committing. Before Readon decided to leave his fate in jurors' hands, Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Christine Hernandez warned the pastor of the vast gulf between the state's offer and a guilty verdict. 'This is your life,' Hernandez said. 'It's a decision you have to make with the consultation of your lawyer.' Readon, who has been out of jail since his February 2022 arrest, quickly left the court hearing, his attorney at his side. Hernandez set a trial date for July 7. The pastor is accused of swindling retiree Edward Fuller out of his $267,000 home on Northwest 19th Avenue. The scheme, state prosecutors said, involved Readon guaranteeing a loan to refurbish the home in exchange for the senior signing over the deed to the property and paying Readon a $15,000 fee. Readon is facing charges of exploitation of an elderly or disabled person, organized scheme to defraud, conspiracy to commit organized scheme to defraud, theft from a person 65 years or older, and grand theft. The disgraced pastor — who court records show served probation for strong-armed robbery and grand theft over two decades ago — led New Beginning Missionary Baptist Church in Northwest Miami-Dade. He made a name for himself fighting gun violence, often showing up at rallies and seen comforting grieving family members. A call to the church Wednesday said the number had been disconnected. Readon reached a plea deal last month with the Broward State Attorney's Office over allegations that he also fraudulently stole properties in Davie and Lauderdale Lakes. The Davie property was worth $1.7 million. As part of the deal in which he avoided admitting guilt but agreed to a punishment, Readon paid one of the property owners $150,000 and the other $46,500. He also agreed to two years of house arrest and 10 years probation and to repay all restitution before he can be considered for early termination of probation. Both victims won back their properties after legal battles. Readon was also arrested in April in Pembroke Pines. Charging documents say he used false paperwork in a wire transfer when he bought a Range Rover from Miami's Braman Motors. The case was later closed. Though the state prosecutor indicated Wednesday that if Readon didn't agree to the plea offer, the stolen vehicle charge could resurface.

Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
3 Kellam High students accused of racial harassment sue principal for defamation
VIRGINIA BEACH — On the morning of March 12, a group of Kellam High School friends got together at their usual gathering spot outside the school. It was one friend's birthday, and they celebrated by giving him presents before classes began. The gifts included a birthday card with handwritten notes, some candy and a bag of fried chicken. Videos later obtained from school surveillance cameras showed the group hugging and laughing after the gift exchange, according to a lawsuit recently filed in Virginia Beach Circuit Court. A teacher who witnessed the interaction told Kellam Principal Ryan Schubert about it a shortly afterwards, the lawsuit said. The concern: The three boys offering the fried chicken were white, while the one receiving it was Black, suggesting that the act may have been a play on an old and racist stereotype about Blacks and fried chicken. Soon, the students were brought in for questioning. They told school officials it was all just a joke. The teen celebrating his birthday also told them he thought the gift was funny, and said he'd even asked his friends to give him fried chicken for his birthday, the lawsuit said. Police and prosecutors were notified, but determined no crime had been committed, according to the claim. Within hours, representatives of the NAACP, school board and community members were contacting the school. The next day, Schubart authorized an email to all parents that described the incident as 'racist harassment' and said the students, who weren't named in the email, would be disciplined 'to the fullest extent possible,' the lawsuit said. Local TV reports soon followed. That was the last day the three teens attended Kellam, and now they have filed a $10 million dollar lawsuit against Schubart in Virginia Beach Circuit Court. They were suspended from school and they claim that — as a result of the school email and the television stories that followed — they have repeatedly been threatened with bodily harm, stalked, hostilely confronted by strangers, and have suffered damage to their property. A spokesperson for Virginia Beach Public Schools, which is not named as a defendant, didn't immediately respond Wednesday to a request for comment. Schubart couldn't be reached by The Pilot and no attorney was listed for him in online court records. The students who are suing are not named in the filing to protect them from further damage to their reputations, according to their attorney, Tim Anderson. Even though they weren't named in the email, other students and parents quickly figured out who they were, Anderson said. All three have been homeschooled since their suspension, and do not plan to return to Kellam next year even though they've been told they can, he said. 'The actions of Ryan Schubart were reckless, defamatory and an outright betrayal of the trust placed in a school principal,' the lawyer said in a message to The Pilot. 'Mr. Schubart knowingly spread false allegations against minor students — branding them as racists in a narrative he manufactured to appease political pressure. His email to the school community not only disregarded the truth but also destroyed the reputations and futures of innocent children.' Schubart knew the boy receiving the gift was friends with the others, and wasn't offended by the gift, yet left that out in investigative reports, the lawsuit said. He also failed to view the video or conduct a reasonable investigation before taking action, the complaint said. And a claim in the email that a teacher 'immediately intervened' when they saw the incident occurring was proven false by the video, Anderson said. The students' long-term suspension has put their academic futures in jeopardy, according to the claim, and their rights to due process were denied when they weren't given a fair and impartial disciplinary hearing. Jane Harper,