Cannabis use raises risk of heart attack and stroke more than cocaine, other drugs, major review suggests
The potential risk of cannabis use has been in the spotlight following recent research pointing toward negative health effects.
This includes a new meta-analysis by French researchers, published in the journal Heart, which reviewed multiple studies to assess the link between cannabis and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
The researchers analyzed data from more than 400 million patients involved in 24 previous cross-sectional studies (capturing data at a single point in time) and cohort studies (following patients over time). One study focused on medical cannabis.
The overall results noted a significant increase in risk of major cardiovascular events, including a 29% higher likelihood of heart attack, 20% higher risk of stroke and twice the chances of cardiovascular death.
The danger was also elevated in people who used cannabis at least once a week.
Several studies found higher odds of acute myocardial infarction, commonly known as a heart attack.
One study pinpointed the risk among younger populations aged 15 to 22, while another observed it in patients who used cannabis more than once a week.
One study from the primary French administrative database for hospitals found that, compared to other illicit drugs like cocaine and opioids, cannabis was a larger predictor of heart attack.
Another study analyzed the association between cannabis and acute coronary syndrome (reduced blood flow to the heart) in nearly 15,000 patients ranging from 18 to 54 years old.
The analysis found no significant association in the overall sample, but signaled a higher risk in a subgroup of patients aged 18 to 36.
Cannabis use significantly increased all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of patients who experienced a heart attack before age 50.
A UK Biobank analysis pointed out that women have a "significantly higher" risk of cardiovascular mortality than men.
The larger review concluded that these findings reveal "positive associations" between cannabis use and MACE, and should "encourage investigating cannabis use in all patients presenting with serious cardiovascular disorders."
Although medical marijuana can provide relief for people with conditions like arthritis, multiple sclerosis, cancer and other illnesses, overuse has been linked to potential health risks, especially for seniors.
The authors of the French review acknowledged that there were some limitations to the findings – primarily that there is a lower prevalence of cocaine and opioids compared to cannabis use.
"Cannabis exposure was poorly reported in the included studies, which prevented our meta-analysis from assessing it," they wrote.
There was also a potential for some degree of bias in some of the studies due to lack of information or missing data.
"Studies that relied on patient surveys faced substantial bias regarding exposure and outcome misclassification when patients assessed these data themselves," the researchers noted.
Other potential limitations included overlapping data and limited timeframes.
During an appearance on "America's Newsroom" in early June, Fox News senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel commented on a recent study that found more seniors are using cannabis than ever before, despite the potential health risks.
Siegel noted that regular use of cannabis can be dangerous if not tracked.
"We definitely jumped the gun by not anticipating all the medical risks here."
"You might use a gummy to go to bed, and then the next thing, you're using two gummies, or three gummies, and it could increase anxiety, it can increase discombobulation, you're not thinking clearly, ER visits are on the increase," he cautioned.
"We know about problems with the lungs," Siegel added. "It can accelerate dementia and can affect behavior."
The doctor likened the use of marijuana to the effects of smoking cigarettes in terms of damage to the heart and lungs.
"It is absolutely an active chemical we need to watch out for, and I'm very disturbed that the elderly are using it," he said.
"We've completely jumped the gun [on legalization] because people are going to the ER with psychosis. They're going there with vomiting disorders. They're having car accidents as a result," he went on.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"We are studying Colorado ever since it was legalized there, and the results are not pretty. We definitely jumped the gun by not anticipating all the medical risks here."
Fox News Digital reached out to the study authors for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Beloved wellness trend promises health benefits — but instead it causes weight gain, shocking many
They're supposed to slim you down — but ice baths might actually be plumping you up. The frigid wellness fad beloved by celebs and influencers could be backfiring, new research suggests. Cold plunges — long-touted for easing sore muscles and torching fat — may crank up your appetite and make you gain weight, originally reported on by the Daily Mail. In a study, volunteers took 30-minute dips in tubs set at 95°F, 79°F and a chilly 61°F before an all-you-can-eat pasta test. The colder the water, the increased hunger levels — those in the iciest pool scarfed down over 200 extra calories. Talk about a chilling twist. Study lead Marie Grigg, a Ph.D. researcher at Coventry University, told the Daily Mail it's still a mystery why icy dips spike cravings. She noted that 'further research is required to identify if the afterdrop in core temperature is a potential mechanism responsible for compensatory food intake post cold-water immersion.' With cold plunges trending, experts warn the icy fad could backfire for anyone counting on it to shed pounds — and might force weight-loss pros to rethink their playbook. New York City trainer Natalya Alexeyenko has a theory. She said to the outlet, 'During cold water immersion, the body kicks into thermoregulation mode — blood vessels constrict, heart rate rises, and metabolism revs to keep your core warm.' But once you get out, she explained that your body keeps cooling — an 'afterdrop' — and sends a strong signal: 'We need energy now,' even if you're not hungry. The catch? Many of us answer that call with calorie bombs, packing on pounds. Her advice? Skip the snacks and 'refuel smart' with lean proteins, complex carbs, leafy greens — and don't forget a 'warm drink' to tame the urge. Ice baths and cold plunges may also blunt muscle growth and carry serious risks like hyperventilation, hypothermia, drowning or even cardiac arrest as the body fights icy shock. As The Post previously reported, cold water squeezes your blood vessels then pops them open, boosting circulation. But health expert François Haman recently noted to Yahoo Life, 'Assuming everybody responds the same way to cold is extremely dangerous.' He added, 'I've had some people have a lot of difficulties in the cold; other people had no issues.' Still, plenty of ice bath fans swear by the benefits. Dutch extreme athlete Wim Hof credits cold therapy and his breathing techniques for boosting body and mind, though research calls the inflammation benefits 'promising' but not definitive. Dr. Craig Van Dien, a rehab specialist, told Forbes there's only 'low-quality evidence' that cold plunges aid depression or recovery — but they can ease muscle soreness. Bottom line? 'Understanding your medical comorbidities and what risk they pose is extremely important before cold plunging,' Van Dien advised. He also stressed that people with heart or lung issues, diabetes, asthma or chronic conditions should check with a doctor first. So before you dive in headfirst, remember: That icy plunge or bath might not be the skinny miracle you hoped for — it could be the chill that fills you up instead.
Health Line
an hour ago
- Health Line
Can Ulcerative Colitis Be Deadly?
Key takeaways While ulcerative colitis itself is not fatal, it's a chronic disease that needs to be properly managed to prevent serious health complications. Potentially serious health complications that can result from UC include toxic megacolon, a perforation in your bowel, primary sclerosing cholangitis, colorectal cancer, and heart disease. UC is a chronic condition that, for most people, requires lifelong treatment, and the only way to cure the condition is by having surgery to remove your colon and rectum. Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a lifelong condition that you need to manage. It's not deadly on its own, but it is a serious disease that can cause some dangerous and potentially life threatening complications, especially if you don't get the right treatment. UC is one form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It causes inflammation in the inner lining of your rectum and your large intestine (also known as your colon). The other type of IBD, Crohn's disease, can affect any part of your digestive tract. When you have UC, your immune system mistakenly attacks your intestines, and these attacks lead to inflammation and sores, or ulcers, in your intestines. Treatments are available for UC. Most people with UC have a full life expectancy. However, according to one 2003 Danish study, complications can increase the risk of an early death. Ulcerative colitis complications While UC itself usually isn't fatal, some of its complications can be. Potentially serious health complications that can result from UC include: toxic megacolon a perforation (hole) in your bowel primary sclerosing cholangitis colorectal cancer heart disease Toxic megacolon The most serious possible complication related to UC is toxic megacolon, which is swelling of your colon that can cause it to rupture. This condition affects up to 10% of people with UC. Some studies show that the death rate among people hospitalized with toxic megacolon is around 6.5%. However, the death rate drops to less than 2% in people with IBD who receive an early diagnosis and prompt medical care. Bowel perforation A hole in your bowel is also dangerous. Bacteria from your intestine can get into your abdomen and cause a potentially life threatening infection called peritonitis. Primary sclerosing cholangitis Primary sclerosing cholangitis is another rare but serious complication of UC. It causes swelling and damage around your liver and in your bile ducts, which carry digestive fluid from your liver to your intestines. Scars can form and narrow your bile ducts, and this can eventually cause severe liver damage. In time, you can develop serious infections and liver failure. These conditions can be life threatening. Colorectal cancer According to a 2001 research review, people with UC have up to an 8% chance of developing colorectal cancer within 20 years of their UC diagnosis. In comparison, the review noted that the risk among the larger population was 3% to 6%. More recently, a 2023 review article noted that rates of colorectal cancer among people with UC are decreasing but are still higher than the rates in the larger population. Colorectal cancer can be fatal if it spreads to other parts of your body. Heart conditions According to a 2022 study, UC is associated with a greater risk of heart conditions, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. And a 2023 study suggests that people with IBD are at a higher risk of death from these types of heart conditions.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gaia, Europe's Galactic Cartographer, Is Gone But Not Forgotten
This observatory has probably been the most transformative astronomy project of the 21st century, but there's a good chance you've never heard of it. Just last week, for instance, the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) in New York City debuted a new 'space show' called Encounters in the Milky Way—and this often overlooked spacecraft is its scientific superstar. But you're more likely to know about actor Pedro Pascal's narration in the show than you are to be familiar with the single space mission that serves as the presentation's backbone. The observatory is called Gaia. And, like so many good things, you wouldn't really miss it until it's gone—and now it is. Launched in 2013 by the European Space Agency (ESA), it ceased operations this past March, when it used what little fuel it had left to steer into a graveyard orbit around the sun. From its station in a quiescent region of deep space more than 1.6 million kilometers from Earth, Gaia's mission was, in essence, quite simple: it was designed to give us a better sense of where we are—a celestial 'reference frame' on overlapping interplanetary, interstellar and intergalactic scales. To do that, it used twin sky-sweeping telescopes and three instruments, including a billion-pixel camera, to painstakingly measure the distances, positions, motions, and more of about two billion celestial objects, most of them stars in our own galaxy. It made some three trillion observations in all, producing (among many other things) the largest, most precise three-dimensional map of the Milky Way ever made. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] 'Gaia was our best galactic cartographer, and I sometimes say that Encounters in the Milky Way is my love letter to it,' says Jackie Faherty, a senior research scientist at the AMNH, who curated the new space show and regularly works with Gaia data. 'It turns out you can learn a lot by determining where and how far off the stars are from you—and especially by how they are moving.... Gaia's creation of this map is something we all should celebrate because it's just as iconic and useful as the maps of Earth we all see in school or pull up on Google. Looking at it, you can find and explore all sorts of different things you want to know.' From Gaia's map, more than 13,000 peer-reviewed studies have already emerged, and many have concerned the fundamental structure and deep history of the Milky Way. Thanks to Gaia, scientists now can better gauge the amount of dark matter within our galaxy and have been able to track the Milky Way's growth and evolution across eons via relic streams of stars strewn from ancient mergers with other, smaller galaxies. 'Stars retain memories of their origins in their ages, motions and chemical compositions—all of which Gaia measured,' says Amina Helmi, an astronomer at the Kapteyn Astronomical Institute in the Netherlands. She and her colleagues used the mission's data to discover evidence of a major galactic merger that, some 10 billion years ago, shaped our home galaxy into the Milky Way we know today. 'With all that information, it was like a veil being lifted,' Helmi says. 'We could suddenly perform what's sometimes called 'galactic archaeology,' reconstructing the Milky Way's history to see when and how this merger happened with another, smaller galaxy that was about a third to a quarter of our galaxy's mass.... Gaia allows us to look billions of years into the Milky Way's history—before our solar system even formed—to see what actually happened back then, which is absolutely amazing.' Tracing perturbations from one more recent and ongoing merger, astronomers have even managed to reveal an apparent warp in the Milky Way's disk, offering a new twist—literally—on the classic image of our cosmic home. At smaller scales, the spacecraft has refined the orbits of more than 150,000 asteroids, surveilling hundreds of them to see if they have their own moons. It has spied hints of thousands of worlds and even a few black holes orbiting other stars. At larger scales, it has helped estimate the expansion rate of the universe, and it has also teased out the subtle tugging of the Milky Way's heart upon the solar system across tens of thousands of light-years. Gaia's sprawling cosmic reckoning is now a cornerstone for most state-of-the-art Earth- and space-based telescopes, which rely on the mission's target-dense celestial map to orient and calibrate their own observations and operations. Whether it's NASA's James Webb Space Telescope, ESA's Euclid mission, the ground-based, U.S.-built Vera C. Rubin Observatory or Europe's under-construction Extremely Large Telescope, practically all of the world's most exciting starlight-gathering telescopes will, in some sense, be guided by Gaia. And stunningly, the best is yet to come. More than two thirds of the mission's treasure trove of data is still under wraps. It is being prepared in a time-consuming process for two major upcoming milestones: about half of Gaia's total data are targeted for release next year, and the mission's full data are set to arrive no earlier than 2030. But because it didn't beam back images ready-made for lush wall posters and desktop backgrounds, Gaia was destined from the start to be 'criminally under-recognized outside astronomy,' says Mark McCaughrean, an astronomer and former senior adviser to ESA. 'And because Gaia provided utterly essential, if mundane, information such as precise stellar distances, it's been doomed with this curse of simultaneous ubiquity and obscurity as many people use its data but take it for granted as just 'coming from a catalog.'' Anthony Brown, an astronomer at Leiden University in the Netherlands, who leads the mission's data processing and analysis group, puts it most succinctly: 'For astronomers, Gaia has become almost like the air you breathe,' he says. At the heart of Gaia's mapmaking is a technique called astrometry, the measurement of celestial positions and motions in the plane of the sky. Paired with a phenomenon called parallax—the apparent shift of an object's position when viewed from two vantage points—astronomers can use Gaia for determining distances, too. You can see the parallax effect with your own two eyes: hold your thumb out at arm's length and watch as it appears to jump around as you blink one eye and then the other. The closer the object is, the bigger its displacement will be. And the bigger your baseline is between two vantage points, the smaller the displacement will be that you can discern. Your eyes have a baseline of about six centimeters; Gaia's was 300 million kilometers, set by the opposite sides of Earth's orbit around the sun. A Gaia predecessor, ESA's Hipparcos mission, used that same gigantic baseline to survey the sky from 1989 until it ran out of fuel in 1993. But the technology of the time limited Hipparcos's astrometric reckoning to a precision of about one milliarcsecond, with high-quality measurements only for about 100,000 objects within about 200 parsecs (650 light-years) of the solar system. (A single arc second is a very small angular slice of the heavens, making Hipparcos's milliarcsecond precision all the more noteworthy. The moon, for instance, takes up about 1,800 arc seconds in Earth's sky.) As impressive as Hipparcos was, Gaia shattered the records set by its precursor—although not without challenges, such as precision-threatening sprays of stray light that leaked around the edges of the spacecraft's sun shield and through a hole punched by an errant micrometeoroid. But ultimately, Brown says, Gaia's measurements achieved on the order of 100 times greater precision—reaching about 10 microarcseconds. And within the Milky Way, the spacecraft's view encompassed 100 times more volume and included 10 times more targets. The numbers underpinning Gaia are so alien to everyday experience that they border on nonsensical, says Michael Perryman, a former ESA researcher, who has served as project scientist for Hipparcos and Gaia and played a crucial developmental role for both missions. He likens Hipparcos's precision to discerning a second's worth of growth of a human hair from a distance of one meter. Gaia's 100-times-better view, he says, is more like measuring the width of a single hydrogen atom from the same distance. Another comparison involves the size of the two missions' datasets. When the Hipparcos team printed out its complete catalog, Perryman recalls, it comprised five thick volumes—almost enough to fill a single shelf of a bookcase. Printing out the full Gaia catalog with the same density of information per page, he says, would require about 10 kilometers of shelf space. 'The mind boggles,' he says. 'It's almost incomprehensible; these are numbers and dimensions we're simply not equipped to visualize, so even the analogies are very difficult to grasp.' The best example of the heights such precision can reach may be Gaia's tour de force determination of the solar system's acceleration with respect to a vast, sky-encompassing field of quasars. Quasars are the conspicuously bright cores of remote galaxies that harbor actively feeding supermassive black holes. As such, quasars are among the most powerful beacons astronomers can use to probe distant regions of the universe. Gaia pinpointed the positions of more than one and a half million of them to establish a fixed backdrop of sorts, against which various minuscule motions of our solar system or other nearby celestial objects could be seen. One motion Gaia managed to measure was an astonishingly small acceleration of just 0.232 nanometer per second squared—a continuous atom-scale deflection in the solar system's 220-kilometer-per-second trajectory through the Milky Way, attributed to the gravitational pull from our galaxy's center some 26,000 light-years away. Writ large, the displacement adds up to less than a meter per day—and essentially reflects the real-time sculpting of our galactic orbit as the solar system carves a path through the Milky Way's gravitational field. 'It's an almost circular motion around the galactic center, and it's directed toward the supermassive black hole there,' says astronomer Sergei Klioner of Germany's Dresden University of Technology, who led much of the work behind the measurement. 'No other observational data could come anywhere close to competing with Gaia here.... You often hear the term 'astronomical' in the sense of something being very large—but this is an example where Gaia has shown us something that's astronomically small.' Now that Gaia has gone dark, there's already talk of what comes next. 'Do we really need another astrometry mission?' asks Brown, who first began working on Gaia in 1997. 'Well, not immediately, but the extremely precise stellar reference frame it gave us—upon which many other observatories depend—will eventually deteriorate because all the stars are moving, right?' ESA is envisioning a follow-on mission, which would potential launching in the 2040s. This time that mission would be optimized for infrared observations to allow astronomers to see through the dust that otherwise clouds their view of the Milky Way's star-packed disk and galactic center. 'It's, in a way, wonderful but also a bit sad that people take Gaia for granted because, my God, it was a tough mission,' Perryman reflects. 'I don't feel sadness that it's gone; I'm just delighted and relieved it lasted so long, and I'm very conscious of how remarkable it is that we live in a time when society is willing to pool its resources to support such things, and we have the technology in place to do them. I hope this period continues—but I worry we've been taking that for granted, too.'
