Fighting in south of Syria 'halted' after sectarian violence leaves more than 900 dead
Druze fighters had pushed out rival armed factions from the city on Saturday, a monitor said, after the government ordered a ceasefire following a US-brokered deal to avert further Israeli military intervention.
Sweida was 'evacuated of all tribal fighters, and clashes within the city's neighbourhoods were halted', Syria's interior ministry spokesman Noureddine al-Baba said in a post on Telegram.
Israel had bombed government forces in both Sweida and Damascus earlier this week to force their withdrawal after they were accused of summary executions and other abuses against Druze civilians during their brief deployment in the southern province.
More than 900 people have been killed in Sweida since last Sunday as sectarian clashes between the Druze and Bedouin drew in the Islamist-led government, Israel and armed tribes from other parts of Syria.
Syrian security forces ride in the back of a pickup truck on the international highway near Izraa, in rural Daraa province, Syria, Saturday, July 19.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
Yesterday, an Associated Foreign Press correspondent saw dozens of torched homes and vehicles and armed men setting fire to shops after looting them.
But in the evening, Bassem Fakhr, spokesman for the Men of Dignity, one of the two largest Druze armed groups, told AFP there was 'no Bedouin presence in the city'.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor also said 'tribal fighters withdrew from Sweida city on Saturday evening' after Druze fighters launched a large-scale attack.
Fighting nonetheless persisted in other parts of Sweida province, even as the Druze regained control of their city following days of fierce battle with armed Bedouin supported by tribal gunmen from other parts of Syria.
Israel sceptical
The deal between the Islamist-government and Israel had been announced by Washington early Saturday.
US pointman on Syria Tom Barrack said interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'have agreed to a ceasefire' negotiated by the United States.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio later called on the Syrian government's security forces to prevent jihadists from entering and 'carrying out massacres', in a post on X.
He also urged the Syrian government to 'hold accountable and bring to justice anyone guilty of atrocities including those in their own ranks'.
Advertisement
Barrack, who is the US ambassador to Ankara, said the deal had the backing of Turkey, a key supporter of Sharaa, as well as neighbouring Jordan.
'We call upon Druze, Bedouins and Sunnis to put down their weapons and together with other minorities build a new and united Syrian identity in peace and prosperity with its neighbours,' he wrote on X.
Barrack later held a meeting in Amman with the Syrian and Jordanian top diplomats, during which they 'agreed on practical steps to support Syria in implementing the agreement', the US envoy said in a later post on X.
The US administration, which alongside Turkey and Saudi Arabia has forged ties with the Islamist president despite his past links with Al-Qaeda, was critical of its Israeli ally's recent air strikes on Syria and had sought a way out for Sharaa's government.
Sharaa followed up on the US announcement with a televised speech in which he announced an immediate ceasefire in Sweida and renewed his pledge to protect Syria's ethnic and religious minorities.
'The Syrian state is committed to protecting all minorities and communities in the country… We condemn all crimes committed' in Sweida, he said.
The president paid tribute to the 'important role played by the United States, which again showed its support for Syria in these difficult circumstances and its concern for the country's stability'.
But Israel expressed deep scepticism about Sharaa's renewed pledge to protect minorities, pointing to deadly violence against Alawites as well as Druze since he led the overthrow of longtime leader Bashar al-Assad in December.
In Sharaa's Syria 'it is very dangerous to be a member of a minority — Kurd, Druze, Alawite or Christian', Foreign Minister Gideon Saar posted on X.
Humanitarian corridors
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based war monitor, said at least 940 people had been killed in the violence since last Sunday.
They included 326 Druze fighters and 262 Druze civilians, 165 of whom were summarily executed, according to the Observatory.
They also included 312 government security personnel and 21 Sunni Bedouin, three of them civilians who were 'summarily executed by Druze fighters'.
Another 15 government troops were killed in Israeli strikes, the Observatory said.
Syria's Information Minister Hamza al-Mustafa on Saturday evening said that after the first phase of the ceasefire, which began on Saturday and involved the deployment of security forces to the province, a second phase would see the opening of humanitarian corridors.
According to the United Nations, the fighting has displaced least 87,000 people.
© Agence France-Presse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
18 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
‘We don't want another 9/11 attack' – warning that Israel's war on Gaza could provoke attack on US soil
The worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza risks undermining America's standing in the Middle East and radicalising would-be terrorists to target the US, a senior congressional aide told The Telegraph. 'Ending Hamas is beneficial to American national security, but at what cost? If we continue to see this humanitarian crisis exacerbate, that does further damage to America's standing globally,' the source said, warning that US support for Israel comes with the risk of American citizens becoming targets in revenge plots by Hamas and its allies. 'Ultimately, we don't want to see another 9/11.' The source added that, while Israel is 'fighting a valiant and fair and worthy fight' against Hamas, the tools that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, and the IDF are using against the Palestinian territory risk provoking 'further escalation against the West'. The warning comes as international pressure is mounting on Israel to ensure humanitarian relief reaches the people of Gaza, amid reports from aid groups that thousands of children could die from starvation as the enclave teeters on the brink of famine. In a rare divergence from Mr Netanyahu, President Donald Trump acknowledged on Monday that there was 'real starvation' in Gaza, adding the US would set up aid centres. 'We have to get the kids fed,' he said. Responding to Israel's insistence that there is 'no starvation' and that such claims were being spread by Hamas, Mr Trump said: 'I see it, and you can't fake that,' although he stopped short of criticising Mr Netanyahu directly. Mr Trump was referring to images and television reports showing distressingly thin children inside Gaza. Marjorie Taylor Greene accused Israel of genocide Vice-president JD Vance also struck a more direct tone towards Israel during a visit to Ohio on Monday, in which he called the images of starving children 'heartbreaking' and said it was 'up to the Israelis' to allow aid into the enclave. MAGA Republicans broke with the administration this week, urging Mr Trump to get tough with Israel. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a MAGA firebrand and Trump loyalist, became the first GOP lawmaker to accuse the Jewish state of carrying out 'genocide'. Ms Taylor Greene, who has previously accused Israel critics within Congress of 'sympathising with terrorists', compared the 'genocide, humanitarian crisis and starvation' in Gaza to the horrors of October 7. She was joined by Steve Bannon, a former Trump adviser, who told his War Room podcast that Israel has 'almost no support' among MAGA supporters under the age of 30, and accused Mr Netanyahu of trying to 'save himself politically by dragging America in deeper to another Middle East war'. A former Trump White House senior adviser said: 'Right now the Bannons and the Marjorie Taylor Greenes are at the very beginning stages of potentially gaining traction on this issue.' Unwavering support for Israel has long been a core tenet of Republican politics, but as the humanitarian crisis unfolds in Gaza, patience with Mr Netanyahu's government among lawmakers in Washington is beginning to wear thin.
Irish Independent
18 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: An erudite, cultured doyen of the arts world, RTÉ radio's Seán Rocks will be greatly missed
Although he had been a teacher and a successful actor in his own right, he was best known for his work on RTÉ radio's Arena since 2009. He had such a comprehensive knowledge of all the arts and was such a joy to listen to. This knowledgeable, erudite, well-read and cultured man will be truly missed. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary Pressure must remain on Israel so it engages with neighbours diplomatically Now that prominent Jewish people, along with some Western nations, are admitting the fact of genocide in Palestine, it is imperative that the pressure is kept on the government of Benjamin Netanyahu and, by default, US president Donald Trump. One obstacle tacitly ignored is that a number of Israel's neighbours may not desire a democratic Palestine or even a democratic Syria. Israel is facing the prospects of a forever war – or a peaceful existence with all of its neighbours. For a Palestinian state to come to fruition and prosper as a democracy, all discussion should include the immediate neighbouring nations. Declan Foley, Melbourne, Australia Hamas opposes two-state solution as jihadism still holds sway in Palestine Paul Johnston, the UK's ambassador to Ireland, claims Israel is wrong to oppose an independent Palestinian state alongside the existing Jewish one ('Israeli opposition to a two-state solution is morally wrong', Irish Independent, July 31). However, Hamas itself is opposed to such a two-state solution, and since 1937 every Palestinian leader has opposed five major peace plans proposed by the likes of the Peel Commission, the UN and Bill Clinton. Israel accepted each one. ADVERTISEMENT This illustrates that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is more about religion than land. Egypt ruled Gaza and Jordan ruled the West Bank until 1967, when Israel defeated both in the Six-Day War. When Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, the Palestinian Authority took charge. However, Hamas then won the 2006 election and turned Gaza into a jihadist fortress dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the eradication of Jews. All the evidence points to a future Palestinian state becoming, in due course, an Islamist failed state. Karl Martin, Dublin 13 Ireland can use its 'soft power' again by setting the standard through bill Francesca Albanese, the UN rapporteur for the Occupied Territories, has warned that 'the European Union is consciously supporting Israel's genocide of the Palestinians'. As perhaps never before, social media has helped expose the terms 'Western values' and 'Western democracy' as no more than hollow slogans used to cover the grossest violations of international law, including illegal occupation, apartheid and now genocide against defenceless civilians. By enacting the Occupied Territories Bill (OTB) now, in full and without further delay, the Irish Government would strike a blow for international law and Irish democracy, and in the process help bring an end to the most shocking example of international criminality since the start of World War II. In 1987, the Charles Haughey-led government defied the then EEC and unilaterally banned all trade with apartheid South Africa. A number of European countries followed Ireland's lead, apartheid fell within a few years and Ireland's 'soft power' and standing internationally was further enhanced. Billy Fitzpatrick, Terenure, Dublin 6 Starmer appears flaky on statehood for Palestinians after nudge from his party The UK government's signal that it will recognise the state of Palestine unless Israel acts to stop the famine in Gaza is symptomatic of British prime minister Keir Starmer's wishy-washy approach. He is a middle-of-the-road prime minister who seems afraid of his own shadow. It is his Labour colleagues who have taken the lead and embarrassed him into doing something. But his lack of conviction does not serve the Palestine cause one bit, and looks more like an attempt to punish Israel than any genuine belief in the statehood of Palestine. Starmer needs to show honest leadership and conviction. Aidan Roddy, Cabinteely, Co Dublin Labour camps suggestion is appalling when you look back at Shannon deaths I was appalled at the suggestion by Harry Crosbie that we return to the use of labour camps ('Worker compounds that move around could be a huge help in housing crisis', Letters, July 31). We need not look to Roosevelt's America, but to the Shannon Scheme here in 1925. Thirty-three workers died on the Shannon Scheme and should be remembered. That era has ended, thank God. We have trade unions and workers' rights. In regard to the return of tax to eastern European construction workers, I believe our expat Irish construction workforce would return home for the same consideration. Perhaps it's time that we renationalise our energy sector, given current crisis It wasn't surprising to see another crisis emerging, with many households now struggling to maintain access to energy ('Record numbers in arrears on energy bills as families forced to prioritise buying groceries', Irish Independent, July 31). But what is surprising is the fact that our politicians fail to recognise these problems were created by the wholesale outsourcing of provision of such social goods to the market under the governments of Bertie Ahern and Mary Harney. The pursuit of profit replaced the priority to ensure access to these vital services for society. The 301,379 households reported to be in arrears on energy bills do not include the many thousands suffering frequent electricity-supply disconnections when pre-pay meters cannot be topped up. Astonishingly, the Commission for the Regulation of Utilities (CRU) does not require suppliers to keep records of all such pre-pay meter disconnections. Is it time to renationalise the energy sector? Can CRU tell us how much of the energy spend in Ireland is going to profits? Jim O'Sullivan, Rathedmond, Sligo
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Reducing Vat rate a blunt and costly policy instrument for hospitality
Less than a week on from its publication, one of the fundamental assumptions underpinning the summer economic statement has changed with the agreement of the EU-US trade deal. This will have implications for October's budget and a potential reduction in the overall budgetary package outlined by the Government just a week ago. Of the total budget package detailed in the summer economic statement, €1.5bn has been allocated to a "tax package". The Government identifies the narrowness of Ireland's tax base as a cause of concern in the summer economic statement, noting that income tax, corporation tax, and revenue make up the bulk of Ireland's tax base. At a time of heightened global economic uncertainty, increased tariffs for Irish exporters, a growing and ageing population, increasing demand for and pressure on services, a further narrowing of Ireland's tax base in the budget would seem at odds with the programme for government commitment to maintain a broad tax base "to guard against the need for counter-cyclical fiscal policy in the event of a downturn" and prepare for demographic change. Much of the subsequent discussion on the so-called "tax package" has been the commitment in the programme for government to support the hospitality sector through changes to Vat and its implications in terms of the space available for any income tax changes in the budget. According to the Department of Finance, a reduction in the Vat rate for the hospitality sector to 9% would cost almost €900m a year This discussion fails to look at the broader context, the impact to date of "tax packages" introduced by the previous government from 2020-2025, and the precariousness of Ireland's tax base. Looking at budgetary policy of the last government, income gaps have opened up between working households, and the gap between people and households at the bottom and middle of the income distribution and those at the top has grown. This has been driven by the skewed nature of income tax reduction choices which prioritised higher earners and provided relatively little to low income workers paying income tax at the standard rate. This was further compounded by the concentration of temporary cost-of-living measures among lower income households, supports that will fade away. The tax packages contained in those budgets are permanent, costly, and have not reached those working households who have been most impacted by rising costs. Ireland's tax base is narrow, dominated by three revenue streams, and our over exposure in terms of corporation tax is a major concern Rather than looking at how to build a broad and sustainable tax base, recent discussion has focused on the "tax package", the cost of the aforementioned Vat reduction for the hospitality sector, which would narrow Ireland's tax base further, and how much this would leave for an "income tax package" which — if modelled on previous budgetary policy — will see the income gaps between working households grow further. Softening demand Looking at Vat, it accounted for 23% of Ireland's total tax revenue last year. At present, the hospitality sector is subject to the reduced 13.5% Vat rate. The sector was subject to the lower rate of 9% from 2011 to 2018, and again from late 2020 to mid-2023 at an estimated cost of €3.6bn. The sector has identified high energy costs, softening demand, labour market challenges, increased cost of inputs, and a lack of hotel capacity as the main challenges facing the industry and the rationale for a return to the 9% VAT rate. However, a recent Department of Finance examination of the Vat reduction for the hospitality sector since 2011 concluded that the reduction was not always passed on to customers in the form of lower prices, it was highly regressive in that it benefitted higher income households more than lower income households, and it was very costly. It is clear that parts of the hospitality sector are under significant pressure, but other parts of it are doing very well Reducing the Vat rate is a very blunt and costly policy instrument. It will not lower energy costs, it will not increase demand, nor will it address the challenge of full employment or produce more hotel capacity — the very issues that the sector itself has identified as major challenges. The Government and the sector must look at other available sustainable measures to support the industry, including measures used in other EU member states to support hospitality and tourism. Calls for new tax breaks, or the return of old ones, are a feature of most periods of economic and social recovery. However, their provision involves great cost to the State and the unequal allocation of these resources to small groups of beneficiaries. Few of these initiatives have proven to be worthwhile in the past — in particular the opportunity cost of using the revenue in a better way is frequently overlooked. As the first of the kites are flown in advance of Budget 2026, the Government should turn its attention to those who have been most impacted by persistent rising prices, and use the resources available to ensure that vulnerable households are protected and supported through adequate social welfare rates, and that growing income gaps between working households are closed. It must deliver on the commitment to progressive budgets and build a broad and sustainable revenue base that can meet the needs of a growing and ageing population This requires developing progressive policies and measures in a fair taxation system, and working with the hospitality sector to identify sustainable ways to fund the maintenance of the hospitality and tourism industry. A reduction in Vat for the hospitality sector is costly and it won't address the challenges the sector faces. It didn't address these core issues in the 124 months that it was applied between 2011 and 2023, and there is no evidence to suggest that it will do so if applied again in Budget 2026. Michelle Murphy is a research and policy analyst at Social Justice Ireland
