Over 100 former senior officials warn against planned staff cuts at US State Department
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -More than 130 retired diplomats and other former senior U.S. officials issued an open letter on Thursday criticizing a planned overhaul of the State Department that could see thousands of employees laid off.
"We strongly condemn Secretary of State Marco Rubio's announced decision to implement sweeping staff reductions and reorganization at the U.S. Department of State," the officials said in the letter.
The signatories included dozens of former ambassadors and senior officials, including Susan Rice, who served as national security advisor under President Barack Obama, a Democrat.
The timing of the cuts remains unclear, with the U.S. Supreme Court expected to weigh in at any moment on a bid by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to halt a judicial order blocking the firings.
The administration in late May notified Congress of a plan to overhaul its diplomatic corps that could cut thousands of jobs, including hundreds of members of its elite Foreign Service who advocate for U.S. interests in the face of growing assertiveness from adversaries such as China and Russia.
Initial plans to send the notices last month were halted after a federal judge on June 13 temporarily blocked the State Department from implementing the reorganization plan.
The shake-up forms part of a push by Trump to shrink the federal bureaucracy, cut what he says is wasteful spending and align what remains with his "America First" priorities.
"At a time when the United States faces unprecedented challenges from strategic competitors, ongoing conflicts, and emerging security threats, Secretary Rubio's decision to gut the State Department's institutional knowledge and operational capacity is reckless," the former officials wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Norway's Wealth Fund to reduce Israeli holdings amid regional tensions
Norway's sovereign wealth fund has disclosed plans to scale back its investments in Israeli companies. The decision follows a review prompted by the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in Gaza and the West Bank. The fund, which is an extension of Norway's central bank, has recently ceased its relationships with external asset managers who previously oversaw some of its Israeli investments. As a result, the fund has already divested from 11 Israeli firms, although it has not publicly named these companies. A Reuters report suggested that the review was accelerated after the fund's investment in an Israeli jet engine company came to light, a company known for providing maintenance services to the Israeli military. To address these concerns, the fund has stated that all Israeli investments formerly handled by external managers will now be managed internally. The investment strategy regarding Israeli companies will now be more selective, focusing only on those listed in the equity benchmark index. As of the end of 2024, the fund's stakes in Israeli firms were valued at $1.95bn, with investments in 65 companies. In the past year, the fund has divested from an Israeli energy company and a telecommunications group on ethical grounds. Moreover, an ethics council is currently evaluating whether the fund should divest from five banks. Despite Norway's parliament rejecting a motion to divest from all companies operating in the occupied Palestinian territories, the fund has, to date, excluded 11 companies on the advice of the Council on Ethics. These exclusions were due to the potential risk of contributing to severe norm violations in the West Bank. "Norway's Wealth Fund to reduce Israeli holdings amid regional tensions " was originally created and published by Private Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Doug LaMalfa faces hostile crowd at town hall meeting in his own congressional district
Even though he was deep inside his bright red congressional district, U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa faced a mostly hostile crowd Monday during his first North State town hall meeting in several years. Residents at LaMalfa's town hall meeting in Red Bluff peppered him with a wide range of questions and comments on such topics as immigration, redistricting, the Epstein files, support for Israel, tariffs, wildfires, climate change, forest management and changes to Medicaid. Many times he was shouted down by members of the audience, who held up green cards to show approval or red pieces of paper for disapproval. "You just embarrass yourself when you act like that," LaMalfa said after several people yelled out "You're a liar," and "Tell the truth!" It was the second rowdy crowd the Republican lawmaker faced Monday. He held a similar town hall earlier in the day in Chico, where members of the audience shouted obscenities at him. Jill Smith, a lifelong Red Bluff resident, said the crowd of about 350 people was upset because it had been years since LaMalfa had held a public meeting in Tehama County. "All these people are angry. They have concerns. I have concerns. I could vote Democrat or Republican as long as I think they're doing something good for our country. But right now I don't see that happening with this, and that's why everybody's angry," Smith said. LaMalfa was criticized for many of his votes in Congress, including his support in 2021 not to certify the 2020 election that ushered in Joe Biden as president and this year for backing President Trump and his many executive orders, which some on Monday said usurped power from Congress. "You made a choice to violate your oath to the Constitution," Max Walter of Redding said, referring to LaMalfa's vote not to certify the 2020 presidential election. "And every day since then, you have violated your oath. But you have loyalty, you have loyalty to a felon (Trump), to somebody who mocks people in wheelchairs, to someone who mocks women." On questions about tariffs, LaMalfa said he supported them, claiming they would bring jobs back to the U.S. He also said he supported release of the Epstein files, but wanted to make sure the names of victims aren't released. Roy Reddin asked if LaMalfa supported the type of congressional redistricting that is proposed in Texas. "Currently the Texas legislature is very close to to an epic gerrymandering where they are going to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of Democratic voters by realigning their districts. So my question to you, is in two parts: Do you support what the Texas legislature is doing and why should California not do the same thing for five seats, one of which could be yours," Reddin said. Although redistricting congressional districts happen at the state level, LaMalfa said he opposed attempts at redistricting such as what is happening in Texas, where the state legislature has proposed redrawing congressional district maps. The redistricting plan in Texas could lead to the state picking up an additional five Republican seats in Congress, helping the GOP retain a majority in the House next year. But other states, including California, have vowed to re-draw congressional district boundaries, if Texas goes through with its plan. Not everyone was critical of LaMalfa. One woman said she was an immigrant and she supports LaMalfa because he backs the Trump administration's actions against undocumented immigrants. "He's an honest Christian man and he's fighting for us," one woman said. One woman who spoke out said many of the issues that came up Monday were moral issues that transcended a political climate that has become too divisive. "I'm afraid to stand up for my rights because I might get shot," she told LaMalfa, citing the shootings of state legislators in Minnesota this summer.
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Here's how Trump's BLS commissioner pick has criticized the BLS
Hours before President Donald Trump fired former Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner Erika McEntarfer this month, E.J. Antoni appeared on former White House strategist Steve Bannon's podcast to discuss the BLS' monthly jobs report, which showed much-lower-than-expected numbers for July and shockingly steep revisions for May and June. Antoni called McEntarfer 'incompetent' for failing to fix data collection and interpretation problems at the BLS that have led to major revisions in recent years. He agreed with Bannon on the solution: A MAGA Republican who 'Trump knows and trusts' should be put into the position. 'We still haven't gotten there,' Antoni said of a Trump loyalist running the BLS. 'And I think that's part of the reason why we continue to have all of these different data problems.' On Monday, Antoni became that trusted ally when Trump nominated him to become the new commissioner for the BLS. It's the latest example of Trump's appointment of loyalists to otherwise nonpartisan or independent agencies. Some of those appointments have worked to radically reshape the institutions they were chosen to lead. BLS, an independently operated agency within the Department of Labor, collects and publishes crucial data on jobs and inflation used by businesses, investors and governments. Antoni, an economist at the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation and contributor to Project 2025, has been an outspoken critic of the way BLS collects that data. 'There are better ways to collect, process, and disseminate data—that is the task for the next BLS commissioner, and only consistent delivery of accurate data in a timely manner will rebuild the trust that has been lost over the last several years,' Antoni posted on X last week. In particular, Antoni has criticized the BLS for failing to capture sufficient and prompt data in the post-pandemic era. By law, except in a handful of states and Puerto Rico, participation in the survey for the monthly jobs report is voluntary. But survey response rates have tumbled since Covid – from 60% in January 2020 to less than 43% for the April 2025 report. Antoni has also echoed a frequent Trump criticism of the BLS, claiming that recent massive annual revisions – including a revision that showed 589,000 fewer jobs were created in 2024 than initially reported – gave former President Joe Biden favorable headlines each month that critics say he didn't deserve. 'Under the Biden administration … we routinely got a great number – a blockbuster number – initially, and then in the subsequent months that number would be revised down, and then when it was time for an annual revision, the figures would be revised down further. In other words, millions of jobs that we thought we had, it turns out were never there in the first place,' Antoni said in July on 'The Right Idea,' a Texas Publicly Policy Foundation podcast. 'Of course, no one pays attention to the revisions months later, so it always is just that blockbuster headline and then quietly revising those numbers down.' That revision was not a record, as Trump has falsely claimed: A 902,000-job revision in 2009 was larger. The BLS said the difference between the initial and final annual revisions last year was due to information received in US tax returns. Antoni called post-pandemic economic data 'highly problematic.' The BLS has warned cuts issued by the Department of Government Efficiency have disrupted the data collection that feeds into the government's reports. Yet Antoni has applauded the work by DOGE in cutting government jobs. His criticisms of the BLS go back years. In a 2022 blog post, he called a methodology change for the BLS' Consumer Price Index an 'Orwellian trick' to mask higher inflation. Antoni is a favorite of conservatives and makes frequent appearances on right-wing media outlets. In addition to his work at the Heritage Foundation and the Texas Public Policy Foundation, he is an opinion columnist for the Daily Caller and guest on Bannon's show. But Trump's firing of McEntarfer and nominating of Antoni have been met with swift backlash from many economists, who worry about the credibility and non-partisan nature of the bureau. Trump accused McEntarfer – who was appointed by former President Joe Biden to the role of commissioner in 2023 and confirmed by a bipartisan Senate vote – of manipulating jobs data without offering any evidence. 'E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner. He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise. He would be a break from decades of nonpartisan technocrats,' economist Jason Furman posted on X. Another economist, Justin Wolfers, called Antoni 'disastrously terrible' and wrote that he has 'few credentials beyond a long history of misrepresenting or misunderstanding basic economic statistics.' CNN has reached out to Antoni for comment.
