Australia adds YouTube to social media ban for children
Australia's internet watchdog last month urged the government to overturn the proposed exemption for YouTube after its research found 37% of children aged 10 to 15 reported seeing harmful content on the platform, the most of any social media site.
Other social media companies such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok had argued an exemption for YouTube would be unfair.
"Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement.
"Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs."
Social media firms will be fined up to A$49.5 million ($32.2 million) from December if they break the law, which passed through parliament in November.
A YouTube spokesperson said the company would consider next steps and would continue to engage with the government.
"We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," the spokesperson said by email.
Online gaming, messaging apps, and health and education sites will be excluded from the centre-left government's minimum age rules as they pose fewer social media harms to teens under 16, or are regulated under different laws, Communications Minister Anika Wells said.
"The rules are not a set and forget, they are a set and support," Wells said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Boston mayoral candidate on his Jeffrey Epstein-like name: 'Trying to be straight up'
An Australian man running for mayor in Massachusetts is facing a unique problem due to comparisons to the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, because of his name. Geoffrey Epstein, who goes by 'Geoff,' however, has said that he wasn't afraid of the homophonic resemblance of his name to the notorious sex trafficker. The Australian man, who was born on September 11, holds a PhD in theoretical physics.( 'That other one is a dead American, and I am a live Aussie. But, of course, there is all the horrifying criminality and darkness of the other guy. I have lived my life trying to be straight up and improving things,' Epstein, who is seeking office in Framingham, told HuffPost. The aspiring politician has said that he does not intend to change his name to avoid association with Epstein. 'I like my name and I am proud of my family,' he said, adding that his family fought in World War II. The Australian man, who was born on September 11, holds a PhD in theoretical physics. In 2024, another politician, a New York State Assemblyman named Harvey Epstein, faced a similar controversy over his name, which is similar to that of Jeffrey Epstein, as well as convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein. "Your name is your name. It is what it is. Both [Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein] are horrific,' the politician had said.
India.com
41 minutes ago
- India.com
SHOCKING! This Muslim nation slaps terror charges on 7-year-old boy for sharing video of..., name is..., not Saudi Arabia, UAE
Representational Image Balochistan Independence: In a despicable case of human rights abuse, Pakistan Army officials have slapped terror charges on a 7-year-old boy in Balochistan after he shared a video of a human rights activist on his YouTube channel. What is the child accused of? According to details, the child, a native of Turbat in Balochistan, uploaded a video of rights activist Gulzar Dost on the video-sharing platform, following which a case was registered against him by Pakistani military officials under anti-terrorism laws. The shocking case has sparked outrage in Balochistan, as well as across Pakistan, with the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) condemning the incident, calling it a gross misuse of anti-terrorism laws and blatant abuse of power by the country's armed forces in the conflict-torn region. How human rights watchdog responded? 'The registration of an FIR under anti-terrorism laws against a 7-year-old minor child in Turbat, Balochistan is highly reprehensible and a serious violation of human rights. The move is not only contrary to the spirit of the law but also in gross violation of national and international obligations related to the protection of children. Terming the mere sharing of a video as terrorism shows a blatant misuse of power,' the HRCP said in a statement. The rights watchdog has raised serious concerns about child rights and the legal obligations of the Pakistani government to protect them, urging Islamabad to take a serious cognizance of the matter, and introduce reforms. Calling the situation in Balochistan 'worrisome', the HRCP has demanded the revocation of the FIR against the child, and asked for protection to the family from harassment and abuse by Pakistani military officials. Court extends police custody of Mahrang Baloch, other BYC activists Meanwhile, in yet another move underscoring Pakistan's continued repression of peaceful Baloch activism, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Quetta on Saturday extended the police custody of Mahrang Baloch and several organisers from the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) for another 20 days. The order was issued despite growing criticism from rights advocates and legal experts over the ongoing detention. According to Dawn News, the court's latest decision comes after several months of repeated extensions in the detention of Mahrang and other BYC leaders, who were arrested in March following a protest against alleged enforced disappearances.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anthropic CEO throws shade at Mark Zuckerberg's billion-dollar AI talent hunt with dartboard dig: ‘You can't buy purpose with a paycheck'
Culture Over Cash You Might Also Like: Billionaire Vinod Khosla predicts AI teachers will disrupt education and careers. Here's how — BigTechPod (@BigTechPod) The AI Hiring Wars: A Battle for Brains Buying Purpose? Not Quite, Says Amodei In the escalating turf war for top AI talent, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has delivered a pointed, and slightly humorous, critique of Meta 's aggressive recruitment tactics. Speaking on the Big Technology Podcast, Amodei painted a vivid picture: "If Mark Zuckerberg throws a dart at a dartboard and it hits your name, that doesn't mean you should be paid ten times more than the guy next to you who's just as skilled."His remarks come amid widespread reports of Meta launching an all-out offensive to poach AI engineers from rivals like OpenAI, Apple, Google, and Anthropic itself. Yet Amodei claims his startup has remained largely untouched. 'Some [employees] wouldn't even talk to Meta,' he said, asserting that their culture and mission are more attractive than any compensation package Meta can has reportedly been dangling massive offers, with some packages surpassing $200 million for a single hire, according to Business Insider and WIRED. Amodei, however, says Anthropic refuses to match such sums, insisting on fair and consistent pay across the board."I recently posted in our company Slack that we will not compromise our compensation principles or fairness if someone gets a big offer," he shared. In his view, rewarding one employee disproportionately just because they were on Meta's radar would be unjust to their equally capable this stance, Meta has managed to lure away at least one former Anthropic engineer—Joel Pobar—but Amodei suggests their broader impact has been latest AI moonshot, the Superintelligence Lab , has ignited a fierce scramble for elite minds. OpenAI's Chief Research Officer Mark Chen likened it to a break-in after losing several staffers overnight. Meanwhile, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman accused Meta of deploying 'giant offers' to lure talent, with some signing bonuses rumored to top $100 is unapologetic about the ambition. In an internal memo seen by CNBC, he claimed, 'Developing superintelligence is coming into sight,' declaring his goal to bring personal AI to every individual, not just enterprise Meta may have the resources, Amodei questions whether mission-driven AI work can be bought. 'Zuckerberg is trying to buy something that can't be bought,' he said during the podcast, underscoring Anthropic's long-term focus on safe and ethical AI sentiment resonates with other industry leaders too. OpenAI continues to frame itself as a purpose-first organization, while Meta's flashier, big-money moves risk creating tension even within its own teams. As CNBC reported, some insiders at Meta worry that a talent-heavy, cash-fueled approach could lead to ego clashes and fractured the current AI landscape, where demand far outpaces supply, the value of a skilled AI researcher is rivaling that of a professional athlete. Yet, for companies like Anthropic and OpenAI, the real challenge isn't just retaining talent—it's maintaining a sense of purpose amid the frenzy.
