India to make one last push to square series against Stokes-less England in fifth Test starting today
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The action on the field has been so intense and protracted in the four Tests that you would have thought any downtime would be a chance to be still, calm, regroup and return with energy topped up. But that's not how things panned out.India were fuming, led by Gautam Gambhir, who didn't warm to the Oval curator, Lee Fortis, to put it mildly.As with every story, there are two sides, but clearly India felt strongly enough at what they perceived to be discriminatory treatment that the issue has taken centre stage. At the heart of the matter is the pitch.Traditionally, the Oval is a batting beauty and this Test being played at the end of a warm summer means there's some hard work ahead for the bowlers. If India are aggrieved enough to carry that feeling into the game, and channel it into motivation, even determination, that would be no bad thing. But, if they allow an 'us against the world' mentality to fester, they could take their eyes off the real prize.A 2-2 result would be a good one for a team that arrived on English shores with a new captain, legends freshly retired and an inexperienced fast bowling attack led by Jasprit Bumrah, whose mind was on workload mana g ement as much as on opposition wickets.You can' t blame Bumrah in the slightest: he's not actually choosing to rest; rather he is eking out every last bit of physical energy from his body and trying to maximise its efficacy in the team's cause.That said, India will miss Bumrah sorely, even if this gives Akash Deep, who missed the last Test with a niggle, a chance to build on the huge strides he has made in his nascent career. Deep has proven that he has what it takes.Now it's time to reinforce the faith the management has in him by turning potential into performance. India will be tempted to bring Kuldeep Yadav into the mix, but, with Rishab Pant out of action, they will want to shore up the batting.Dhruv Jurel has been excellent behind the stumps and in front, in the limited opportunities he has got, but India will take inspiration from earlier in the series when they picked what everyone believed was a defensive team and pulled off a stunning win. For once , England's selection issues are bigger than India's. Ben Stokes has been ruled out with what is believed to be a muscle tear in the shoulder, though he didn't confirm the exact nature of his injury on match eve.'The risk was way too high for damaging this any further than it currently is,' Stokes said. 'It's obviously very, very disappointing. It was risk reward. I'll always try to push myself as much as I possibly can. Being a professional sportsman, injuries are part of this game and I can't do anything about that.' Stokes's injury left England with plenty of tinkering to do. They made four changes to the team that was stonewalled by India in Manchester with Jacob Bethell, Gus Atkinson, Jamie Overton and Josh Tongue coming in.Jofra Archer and Brydon Carse were rested while Liam Dawson was left out with conventional wisdom suggesting that seamers had a better chance of success at the Oval.But, more than Stokes the player — who's been majestic with ball and bat — it's the leader who'll be missed. Ollie Pope will stand in, but the question is whether England can retain their essential character without their guiding light. As a stand-in, Pope will look to carry on what Stokes has set in place and his reaction and behaviour when the team is in a tight spot will be carefully watched.The final Test brings the curtain down on a long and defining series for India. Gambhir does not like to call this a team in transition — he sees it simply as the best team India can put on the park at the moment — but the fact of the matter is that this has been a steep learning curve. Just for that the experience was worth it. But, in the highpressure world of international cricket you are judged by results.If India can make one final push and square the series, there is no doubt they will be the happier team at the end of the day. Hopefully, bat and ball will have the final say, and the grumpiness, tetchiness and ill feeling between two very good teams can end with a handshake and a feeling of genuine mutual respect.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Bumrah didn't perform like no 1 bowler in England, should've pushed harder: Pathan
Former India cricketer-turned commentator Irfan Pathan has said that Jasprit Bumrah didn't live up to the standards of being the number one bowler during the series in England. Bumrah played three out of the five Tests in the series and scalped 14 wickets from three matches (5 innings) at an average of 26 and an economy of speedster bowled 119.4 overs across three Tests but didn't look at his best in the fourth Test at Old Trafford in Manchester, where he leaked over 100 runs for the first time in his career. Analysing his performance after the series, Pathan said that even though he got his names on the honours board, he didn't live up the expectations of a number one be fair, whenever he played, he did perform. He took a five-wicket haul and got his name on the Lord's honours board. But when you are the number one bowler, there is an expectation of number one-level performance, and I felt he did not quite live up to that," Pathan said on his YouTube channel. Furthermore, he also mentioned that there were occasions when Bumrah could've pushed himself in the series but he didn't."There were moments, like when a sixth over was needed. I spoke about this during commentary as well. Joe Root had been dismissed by him 11 times, and in that Lord's Test, Bumrah bowled five overs. Just one more over, the sixth, could have pushed harder. I felt he held back a little there. There was also some pick-and-choose, which I have always been against, and that was visible too," he of the tour, Bumrah had revealed that he would only play in three matches during the series. The team management was also considerate in managing Bumrah's workload and not putting extra pressure on him as he was returning from an injury. It remains to be seen if Bumrah will be available for the home Test series against West Indies and South Africa in October-November, as he will be featuring in the T20 World Cup 2026 as well.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Saying he'll only play three Tests was unnecessary' – Former India wicketkeeper on India's handling of Jasprit Bumrah
Jasprit Bumrah of India (Photo by) Former India wicketkeeper-batter Deep Dasgupta has criticized the Indian cricket team's decision to announce Jasprit Bumrah 's limited availability of three Tests before the recent Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy series in England, which ended in a 2-2 draw. Dasgupta believes this pre-series announcement was unnecessary and the team could have made decisions based on physical conditions and series scenarios. Bumrah participated in three Tests during the series - the first Test at Headingley, Leeds, followed by matches at Lord's and Old Trafford, Manchester. He secured 14 wickets, including two five-wicket hauls, bowling 119.4 overs at an average of 26. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! The fast bowler was not included in the playing eleven for the fifth Test at The Oval and was released from the squad before day two's play. "Well, I think India shouldn't have announced the fact that he would be playing only three Test matches prior to departing for the series. I mean, you can always take a call on his availability as and when based on his physical situation and series scenario. But this thing of saying that he will be playing only three Test matches before the series has started, I think India could have avoided it," Dasgupta told IANS. Inside The Oval: An Exclusive Tour of the Stadium Where India Played the Final Test Dasgupta questioned India's approach to managing Bumrah's workload, which involves giving him adequate rest and playing him in crucial matches. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo "It depends on obviously him and the medical staff. But how I see it is, he's the best bowler in the world across three formats. So, you want him for all the crucial games. But then once he's available for the crucial ones, then I guess it can't be at the start of a tournament, that I'm going to play only 40% or 60% of the games - that can't happen." Poll Do you agree with Deep Dasgupta's criticism of India's announcement regarding Bumrah's limited availability? Yes, it was unnecessary. No, it was a strategic decision. "I mean, keep him ready for the crucial ones, and make sure he's available for all games. Then obviously, if there are injuries, if the body has taken a toll and he's not ready, that's a different issue altogether. But this availability for 50%, 60%, and all, I think that needs to be looked into because he is by far the best bowler in the world right now," he added. In Bumrah's absence at The Oval, Prasidh Krishna stepped up with impressive performance, taking four wickets in each innings for a match total of 8-188. Despite facing criticism on social media for underwhelming performances in the first two Tests at Headingley and Edgbaston, Krishna finished the series strongly with his performance at The Oval. "With Prasidh, he's a quality bowler. I mean, his release is the best in this Indian team in terms of his backspin and seam position, and skill-wise, he's right up there. Only thing is, obviously, over the years, even though he made his first-class debut a long time ago, because of injuries and all, he hasn't really played a lot of cricket and never got into a rhythm." "He would play a Test match or two, and then get injured. But then, also in the first few Test matches, I don't think he was used well. By the time the last Test came, he got some rhythm and bowled the way he generally bowls. So a lot of credit to him, and I hope this gives him a lot of confidence and he plays a lot because, again, he's found his rhythm. I hope he goes back to India and keeps bowling in future matches," Dasgupta concluded. The decision to manage Bumrah's workload came after he suffered a back injury in the Sydney Test against Australia in January this year, as explained by chief selector Ajit Agarkar and head coach Gautam Gambhir before the team's departure for England. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
When Gautam Gambhir explained Kuldeep Yadav's omission in England Test series
Former India cricketer Deep Dasgupta has explained why star spinner Kuldeep Yadav did not play a single Test match in England. Kuldeep, the only wrist-spinner in the Indian team, did not get a game in the five-match Test series, despite the pitches having barely any grass throughout the exclusion raised many questions, especially as England were regularly scoring 350+ totals. When asked about it during the series, the Indian think tank maintained that including Kuldeep upset the balance of the on X, cricketer-turned-analyst Dasgupta revealed he had a conversation with Gautam Gambhir and the Indian team management and was satisfied with the explanation they gave. Dasgupta said the main problem against England was their ability to score quickly, which meant India needed a batting cushion of 350-400 runs to stay in the game. That requirement made it hard to include Kuldeep in the further added that India might have played Kuldeep if the lower order had contributed more in the first Test at Headingley. Given the failure of Sai Sudharsan, Karun Nair, and the tailenders in that game, the management stayed apprehensive about playing an extra spinner.'Tactically I did not agree with several things from Gambhir. In this series, India batted till 8. I had a long chat with Gambhir and the team management, who explained to me that against England they needed a longer batting line-up because the Ben Stokes side is known to chase down big targets. Yes, they needed 20 wickets to win but to stay in the game, India needed 350-400 runs,' Dasgupta said on X.'If Karun, Sai, or the lower-end batters had scored in the first Test at Headingley, maybe then we could have seen Kuldeep Yadav play in England. So, I understand,' he I didn't agree with all the tactical calls, talking to Gautam made me understand where the team was coming from. Deep Dasgupta (@DeepDasgupta7) August 7, 2025Dasgupta also weighed in on the workload management of Jasprit Bumrah. The former wicketkeeper stated that Bumrah not playing all matches in a Test series should not become the norm. He argued that any player should either be declared fit or unfit, instead of being scheduled to play only certain games.'Jasprit Bumrah is the best bowler in the world, across formats. But this whole workload management issue, I do not think it helps the team to settle down. Either he is fit or not fit. It is not fair to the team, and not fair to the team as well. When words go in the air like 'will he play or not', that is not good,' he put things in context, Bumrah and the Indian team had clarified at the start of the series that the pacer would play only three matches. Bumrah had returned to cricket during the Indian Premier League after a three-month injury layoff. He had sustained the injury during the Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2024-25, where he bowled a high decision to not play Bumrah in all Tests came from the BCCI medical team, which wanted to avoid the risk of another injury.- EndsTune InMust Watch
