Jinggoy seeks accountability from DPWH over fallen Isabela bridge
Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada on Monday questioned the lack of accountability on the part of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) nearly six months after the collapse of the P1.2 billion Cabagan-Sta. Maria Bridge in Isabela.
In his privileged speech, Estrada emphasized that aside from the truck driver, design consultant, and bridge contractor, there should also be public officials who exercised oversight functions that must be held accountable for the collapse.
'Why is there no mention of disciplinary actions against these supervising officials whose approval and oversight, or lack thereof, enabled this tragedy? Mr. President, wala tayong nabalitaan na nasuspinding opisyal ng DPWH na may kinalaman sa proyektong ito. Wala rin tayong nabalitaang inimbestigahan sila upang panagutin,' the Senate president pro tempore said.
(Mr. President, we have not heard that any DPWH official was suspended concerning this project. We've also not heard that any official was investigated to be held accountable.)
'This incident is more than a structural failure. It is a failure of governance. It exposes weaknesses in our systems, weaknesses that will persist if we refuse to confront them with transparency and resolve,' he added.
Estrada urged the DPWH to take full responsibility and accountability on the matter, not just by pursuing private contractors, but also by holding its officials who were involved in the planning, approval, and implementation of the project liable.
'Explain the approval process, identify the lapses in monitoring and enforcement, and most importantly, assure the public that this will never happen again—not through promises, but through concrete reforms in design, review, safety compliance, and project oversight,' he said.
On February 27, a portion of the bridge that connects the town of Cabagan to Santa Maria in Isabela province collapsed, leaving six people injured.
The DPWH said the bridge can only accommodate up to 44 tons, which is far from the weight of the truck, which was 100 tons.
President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. visited the collapsed bridge a week after the incident and noted that it had a 'design problem.' But the engineer behind the bridge refuted this, asserting that the structure adhered to the Bridge Code of the Philippines.
During the Senate Blue Ribbon subcommittee's investigation in March, Senator Alan Peter Cayetano expressed belief that the collapse of the Sta. Maria-Cabagan Bridge was not an 'accident,' as he presented several reports from the DPWH and a private construction firm that claim to show there are defects in the bridge even during its construction. –NB, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
8 hours ago
- GMA Network
House vows to abide by SC ruling on MR for Sara's impeachment
The House of Representatives will abide by the Supreme Court's decision should it rule against its motion for reconsideration (MR) on its decision to declare the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. 'Hindi 'ho namin susuwayin 'yan, susundin namin 'yan. The House will not cause the constitutional crisis. The reason, the catalyst for the constitutional crisis will never be caused by the House,' House prosecution spokesperson Atty. Antonio Bucoy said at a news forum in Quezon City on Saturday. House Deputy Speaker Janette Garin, likewise, said the lower chamber will abide by the Supreme Court's ruling should it stand with its decision to declare Duterte's impeachment as unconstitutional. 'Definitely, kasi obligasyon namin sa taumbayan tutukan ang mga problema without bypassing accountability and working for whatever is in the interest of the general public,' Garin said. 'A constitutional crisis should not have a place in a… I think the Philippines is in the top 2 happiest people in the world, so talagang hindi siya dapat na mangyari,' she said. Voting 13-0, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously, deeming that the Articles of Impeachment are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. Moreover, magistrates ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. In its appeal before the high tribunal, the House argued that the fourth impeachment complaint, signed off by 215 House members, is the only initiated impeachment case against the Vice President because it met the Constitutional requirement of the complaint being endorsed by at least one-third of the House members, which allowed the House to transmit the Articles of Impeachment straight to the Senate en route to the impeachment trial, bypassing Committee deliberations. ''Yung motion for reconsideration ay hindi ho para pagpuna, hindi po ito para itakwil. Ito ay para tawagin ang kanyang pansin upang magsumamo na bisitahin niyong muli ang inyong desisyon na sa palagay namin at inilahad namin sa aming motion for reconsideration ay mali mula letrang A hanggang letrang Z,' Bucoy said. 'Wait and see' Asked what the House's next course of action would be should the SC junk its MR, Garin said that 'hearing the legal luminaries in the House… klaro sa kanilang pananaw na talagang may basehan 'yung motion for reconsideration so we put it at that.' 'Let's wait and see what happens in the next months… I leave it to the members of the 20th Congress… Kasi sa ngayon lahat naguusap usap… These are things that we need to balance and we need to discuss…and come up with concrete statements,' Garin said. On the Senate's move to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Duterte, Bucoy said, 'Hindi kami susuko na di porke't archived na ay susuko na kami.' 'Meron pang chance na dinggin pa kami. Sinabi nga ni Speaker: 'The House will not bow down.' Hindi ho kami sumusuko na sana maliwanagan ang Supreme Court at sana tumugon at sumunod ang Senado,' he said. Three motions for reconsideration have been filed with the SC against its ruling. The first was filed by some of the individuals behind the first impeachment complaint against Duterte, followed by the motion for reconsideration filed by the House of Representatives. The third motion was filed by the 1Sambayan coalition, including Carpio-Morales and Carpio, previously filed a motion for reconsideration with the SC on its ruling. They asked the SC to issue a status quo ante order and to set the case for oral arguments. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Makabayan files MR to reverse SC ruling on VP Sara impeachment case
The Koalisyong Makabayan sought to reverse the SC ruling on the VP Sara impeachment case. (Photo from the FB post of Koalisyong Makabayan) The progressive Koalisyong Makabayan on Friday filed a joint motion for reconsideration (MR) calling on the Supreme Court (SC) to reverse its decision junking the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte. According to Manny Vargas' report over Super Radyo dzBB, the petitioners also filed a separate motion to intervene as they urged the SC to overturn its initial decision that declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unsconstitutional. They also appealed for the Court to rule that House lawmakers did not commit grave abuse of discretion and that the filing of the articles of impeachment was not covered by the one-year ban on impeachment. Among the petitioners were ACT-Partylist Rep. Antonio Tinio, Kabataan Partylist Rep. Renee Co, Makabayan president Liza Masa, and BAYAN president Renato Reyes. The Senate on Wednesday voted to archive the impeachment case against Duterte following the SC decision. The Court earlier declared the articles of impeachment against the Vice President unconstitutional, stressing that it was barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violated her right to due process. It also said the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings because the articles of impeachment were void. The SC said it was not absolving Duterte of any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026. The House then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. Motions for reconsideration Three motions for reconsideration have been filed with the SC against its ruling. The first was filed by several individuals behind the first impeachment complaint against Duterte, followed by the motion for reconsideration filed by the House of Representatives. The third motion was filed by the 1Sambayan coalition, including Carpio-Morales and Carpio, previously filed a motion for reconsideration with the SC on its ruling. They asked the SC to issue a status quo ante order and to set the case for oral arguments.—Sundy Locus/LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Jinggoy urges agencies to verify report Chinese ships blocked BFAR vessel
Senator Jinggoy Estrada on Friday called on government agencies to verify a report that Chinese militia vessels bloced a Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources ship en route to Sandy Cay in the West Philippine Sea. Estrada, chairperson of the Senate committee on national defense and security, peace, unification and reconciliation, expressed concern over the report, saying it is a "serious breach" of the country's sovereign rights if proven true. "I urge the concerned agencies to validate this information, as the incident—if verified—would constitute a serious breach of our sovereign rights and harassment of a Philippine-flagged vessel conducting a legitimate monitoring mission within our own maritime domain," he said in a statement. "Hindi natin dapat hayaan na ma-normalize ang ganitong pangliliit sa ating karapatan at ang paglalagay sa panganib ng ating mga kababayan (We should not normalize this act of belittling our rights and endangering our people)," he added. On X (formerly Twitter), maritime security expert Ray Powell said BRP Datu Romapenet reversed course while en route to Sandy Cay after it was impeded by three Chinese ships. "At 0745 local time, Philippine fisheries ship BRP Datu Romapenet left Pag-Asa (Thitu) Island in the direction of Sandy Cay," he said. "It was impeded by at least 3 of China's maritime militia ships. At 9:00, it reversed course and returned to Pag-Asa. No further details yet available," he added. Estrada said the Department of Foreign Affairs should lodge a diplomatic protest and assert the country's rights once the incident is verified. "Our kababayans deserve nothing less than a government that firmly stands its ground in asserting our sovereignty and defending our nation's interest," he added. GMA News Online reached out to BFAR, Philippine Coast Guard, and Philippine Navy for comment on the matter and will publish it once available. China claims almost the entire South China Sea, a conduit for more than $3 trillion of annual ship-borne commerce, including parts claimed by the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei. In July 2016, the UN Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, based on a case filed by Manila, junked China's nine-dash line claim covering the entire SCS. Beijing has refused to acknowledge the ruling. —Sundy Locus/AOL, GMA Integrated News
