Germany's electoral commission confirms parliamentary election result
According to the final results, the conservative bloc comprised of the Christian Democrats (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party the Christian Social Union (CSU) received 28.5% of the vote.
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) won 20.8% and the Social Democrats (SPD) of outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz took 16.4% of the vote.
The Greens received 11.6% of the vote, while The Left party took 8.8%.
The Free Democrats (FDP), which were part of the current government coalition until November, won 4.3% of the vote, failing to reach the 5% threshold typically needed to enter the Bundestag, the lower house of Germany's parliament.
The populist Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) also narrowly missed out on entering the Bundestag, with 4.98% of the vote according to the final figures. The preliminary figures put the BSW at 4.972% of the vote.
This leaves the distribution of seats unchanged from the preliminary figures, with 208 seats for the CDU/CSU, 152 for the AfD, 120 for the SPD, 85 for the Greens, 64 for The Left and one seat for the South Schleswig Voters' Association (SSW), a party which represents Danish and Frisian minorities and which benefits from a special provision in the electoral law.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Trump knows the dangers of addiction — he must reject Big Weed's push to reclassify marijuana
You know it's a bad idea if Joe Biden was for it. That's the case with the mad push for marijuana reform, which Biden promised in a cynical grab for young voters in his State of the Union address last year. But now President Trump is reported to be open to fulfilling Biden's promise to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous Schedule III drug, which would benefit the $33 billion industry by giving them tax deductions and expanding their market. According to The Wall Street Journal, Trump told donors he was considering the 'de-scheduling' of marijuana at a $1 million-a-plate fundraiser at his Bedminster golf club in New Jersey this month that was attended by Kim Rivers, the chief executive of one of the largest marijuana companies, Trulieve. Advertisement Trulieve and its ilk pretend that marijuana reforms are for altruistic medical reasons rather than about growing their profits. Medical marijuana was the bait-and-switch trap when states started legalizing pot more than a decade ago. Now recreational use has exploded to the point where it has overtaken alcohol, and there's still no sound science on the benefits of medical marijuana. 'Complicated subject' Advertisement The president confirmed last week to reporters at the White House that his administration is 'looking at reclassification' and intends to make a decision soon. 'Some people like it. Some people hate it,' he said. 'Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana because if it does bad for the children, it does bad for people that are older than children. 'It's a very complicated subject base,' he said. 'I've heard great things having to do with medical and bad things having to do with just about everything else.' Advertisement Trump is a teetotaler. He credits his late older brother Fred Trump Jr., with his decision not to drink or take drugs. Fred struggled with alcoholism, and died in 1981, aged 42, as a consequence of his disease. 'He was a very handsome guy,' Trump told me on 'Pod Force One.' 'He had an unbelievable personality, but the booze got to him . . . He'd always say, 'Don't drink, don't smoke.' Now in those days, there were no drugs, or I guess there were, but you didn't know about it. But he would have added drugs in there. He said, 'Don't ever smoke and don't ever drink.' 'He was a great guy, you know, he was terrific. Could have done anything. He could fly airplanes unbelievably well,' Trump added. 'He had a great talent for that, but alcohol was a killer for him.' Advertisement Trump learned from his brother's mistakes: 'I never had a drink of alcohol. I don't smoke, and I'm a hard worker. Well, he worked, but he just had the curse, you know, and it was tough.' Marijuana is a disaster. It's infinitely worse than alcohol on every metric, especially mental health. The scientific evidence is incontrovertible that marijuana triggers psychosis in susceptible people. For example, a large-scale Danish study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry in 2017 found that up to 30% of young men's schizophrenia could have been prevented if they had not used pot. Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters Even one psychotic episode triggered by marijuana use was associated with a 47% chance of a person developing schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, with the highest risk for those aged 16-to-25, according to the study of 6.9 million Danes between 1972 and 2021. Another longitudinal study of 50,000 Swedes that began in 1987 found that marijuana users were twice as likely as non-users to develop psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Heavy users had a six times greater risk. A more potent problem And it was a far less potent drug than it is now. Marijuana of 40 years ago had about a 5% concentration of THC, the intoxicating component of cannabis, but today's industrial products such as gummies, vapes and pre-rolled joints can be as high as 99% THC. Advertisement The stench of pot wafting through blue cities like New York is a hallmark of chaos and disorder. It's the opposite of President Trump's law and order image. So it is hard to believe he would bow to Big Weed and normalize this insidious drug further. Unlike his predecessor, Trump understands on a personal level the perils of addiction. Advertisement You'd think with the drug problems that have afflicted the lives of both his adult children, Hunter and Ashley, Biden might have had more sense, but pandering to Big Weed was a running theme of his presidency, with executive orders and performative pardons for federal marijuana possession (not one person was in jail for possession alone). Thankfully, wise heads inside the Drug Enforcement Administration dragged the chain long enough to stop Biden's plan to reclassify marijuana. The drug lobby has redoubled efforts under Trump, but the signs don't look good for them with the confirmation last month of the new DEA administrator, Terrance Cole. Much to the disappointment of pot advocates, marijuana was nowhere to be seen on his list of 'strategic priorities' announced after he took office, which included combating drug trafficking, Mexican cartels, fentanyl and drug-fueled violence. Advertisement Even better, in a post on LinkedIn last year, he wrote: 'Everybody knows my stance on marijuana after 30 plus years in law enforcement, so don't even ask!' He added anti-drug hashtags #justsayno, #disorders, #notlegal4distribution, #healthissues, #thinblueline and #backtheblue. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! Cole, who worked at the DEA for 21 years, has made no secret of his concerns about marijuana. sharing a link last year to an article titled 'NOT 'Just Weed': Four Times More Dangerous in Three Decades' that found that higher THC levels are 'linked to increased problems with memory and learning, distorted perception, difficulty in thinking and problem-solving, and loss of coordination.' Cole's attitude is a good sign. 3 states 'just say no' Advertisement So is the fact that three states — Florida, North Dakota and South Dakota — last November rejected marijuana legalization measures on the ballot: reversing the trend of the past decade in which 24 states have now approved the drug for recreational use and 40 for medical use, which of course is just the Trojan horse. In Florida, Big Weed, mainly Trulieve, spent a reported $153 million lobbying for legalization and still lost, despite outspending opponents almost five to one. It was the third time in four years that poor old North and South Dakotans rejected the ballot measure. But Big Weed just won't take no for an answer, believing that it will eventually wear voters down. Another good sign is that even The New York Times is starting to tell the truth about marijuana, reporting that 18 million people — nearly a third of adult users — reporting symptoms of 'cannabis use disorder.' The Times points out that only two states cap the levels of THC, with lobbyists busy preventing any new state health restrictions. Let's hope that the Trump administration puts the brakes on the headlong rush to legalize this dangerous drug.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Drive a wedge': Divide over WFH laws
A second Australian state is set to push for workers to be able to work from home one day a week; however, the move has not come without its detractors. MLC Robert Simms announced on Thursday the South Australian Greens were drafting a Bill to guarantee public sector staff could work from home (WFH) one day a week if it was 'reasonable', saying it would 'set a benchmark for the private sector'. His call comes after Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan announced plans to legislate WFH protections for workers who could 'reasonably' carry out their duties from home. Ms Allan said the reform, which would make Victoria the first state to enshrine WFH legislation, was about recognising modern work patterns and protecting employees from having flexible arrangements arbitrarily revoked. 'It's working now, but we know that we need to protect it,' Ms Allan said on Today. 'We need to protect it for workers but also make it really clear for employers as well who are already doing this that working from home should be a right, not a request.' In SA, however, the move has been greeted largely with disapproval. Earlier this week, SA Premier Peter Malinauskas told ABC Radio that he would not support the proposed legislation. 'To mandate things, I think, runs the risk of having unintended consequences,' he said. 'And occasionally I think employers should have the ability to say, 'Look, we're paying you to do a particular task and this is where I need you to perform those tasks'.' Mr Simms claimed more staff working from home would negate travel time, cut traffic congestion and boost productivity, along with saving workers and families vital dollars. However, the SA Business Chamber has rejected the plan, saying legislation could drive a wedge between workers and hamper investment. Chamber chief executive Andrew Kay claimed current arrangements were working 'perfectly well where employers and employees negotiated WFH arrangements'. 'Enshrining WFH rights has the potential to drive a wedge in the workplace between the haves and the have nots,' he said. Legal experts revealed the Labor-Allan government's push to legislate WFH rights in the private sector were logistically almost impossible. Stacks Law Firm special counsel Geoff Baldwin said a large number of workers in Victoria were already eligible to request flexible working arrangements, and any new legislation would be at risk of being 'struck down', as it would presumably be inconsistent with existing Commonwealth laws. 'It's hard to see what (the) Victorian (government) might do which would have any appreciable impact on the Victorian workforce as a whole,' he said. A SA government spokesperson added that 'the state government opposes any Peter Dutton-style attempts to ban working from home'. 'Working from home arrangements where practical are important in a modern workplace,' they said. 'These arrangements tend to work best where it is mutually agreed between employees and employers, which is why mandating such a practice through legislation is not being contemplated by the state government.'
NBC News
4 days ago
- NBC News
Plastic pollution treaty stalled as Geneva talks end without deal
GENEVA — Delegates discussing the world's first legally binding treaty to tackle plastic pollution failed to reach consensus, diplomats said Friday, voicing disappointment and even rage that the 10-day talks produced no deal. Delegates had been seeking a breakthrough in the deadlocked United Nations talks in Geneva, but states pushing for an ambitious treaty said that the latest text released in the early hours of Friday failed to meet their expectations. French ecology minister Agnes Pannier-Runacher said in the talks' closing session that she was 'enraged because despite genuine efforts by many, and real progress in discussions, no tangible results have been obtained.' In an apparent reference to oil-producing nations, Colombia's delegate Haendel Rodriguez said a deal had been 'blocked by a small number of states who simply did not want an agreement.' The path forward for the negotiations is uncertain. Some countries like Britain said that negotiations should resume, but others described a broken process. 'It is very clear that the current process will not work,' South Africa's delegate said. More than 1,000 delegates have gathered in Geneva for the sixth round of talks, after a meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee in South Korea late last year ended without a deal. Negotiations had gone into overtime on Thursday as countries scrambled to bridge deep divisions over the extent of future curbs. Diplomats and climate advocates had warned earlier this month that efforts by the European Union and small island states to cap virgin plastic production — fueled by petroleum, coal and gas — are threatened by opposition from petrochemical-producing countries and the U.S. under President Donald Trump. 'Of course we cannot hide that it is tragic and deeply disappointing to see some countries trying to block an agreement,' Danish environment minister Magnus Heunicke said on behalf of the E.U. He said the treaty was necessary to tackle 'one of the biggest pollution problems we have on earth' and promised more efforts to reach a deal. 'We will keep on working until we have a treaty that will help us solve the problem,' he told reporters. The most divisive issues include capping production, managing plastic products and chemicals of concern, and financing to help developing countries implement the treaty.
