Telangana govt urged to impose total ban on single-use plastics
1
2
Hyderabad: The Forum for Good Governance (FGG) has urged the state govt to impose a total ban on single-use plastics (SUP), citing severe environmental damage and health risks.
In a detailed representation, FGG highlighted the widespread littering of plastic carry bags, plates and other disposable items, which choke drains, pollute water bodies, endanger wildlife and compromise soil and groundwater quality.
Drawing attention to successful bans in Karnataka and Maharashtra, the forum stressed that enforcement of existing rules was ineffective and called for comprehensive action.
FGG president Padmanabha Reddy said, "Even with the slightest rain, the roads get flooded, leading to traffic chaos, particularly in metropolitan cities such as Hyderabad, besides damaging property and sometimes claiming human life. Domesticated animals consuming leftover food and other waste thrown in plastic bags die a painful death.
Burning of plastics leads to the emission of highly toxic gases, particularly dioxins and furans.
"
He added, "In Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, less than 50 micron thickness carry bags were banned, but it is impossible to control and regulate the manufacturing and use of such plastic carry bags as public are not in a position to know the exact thickness."
FGG said the National Green Tribunal (NGT) upheld the legal validity of the total ban on plastics imposed by Karnataka.
The plastic industry filed an appeal against the NGT order before the SC, which refused to stay the NGT order, he said.
"The govt of Karnataka has taken into account the environmental concern and protection of public interest, which is of much greater cause than the economic interest sought by the manufacturers of single-use plastic items. Telangana should follow the footsteps of Karnataka," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
19 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
National Green Tribunal points out gaps in Uttar Pradesh govt report on STPs, sewage waste management
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has raised serious objections to the Uttar Pradesh government's report on the status of Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) and Sewage Waste Management (SWM) submitted to the tribunal. Directing the government to fill the gaps, a three-member bench of NGT comprising chairperson Justice Prakash Shrivastava, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and expert member A. Senthil Vel passed the order on May 26. The tribunal also handed over a prescribed format to the state government in which details have to be submitted before the next hearing on July 28. 'Report dated 16.04.2025 filed on 24.5.2025 disclosing the status of solid and liquid waste management does not point out gaps plugged thereby not complying with SWM Rules, Water Act and order of the Supreme Court,' the tribunal said. Anomalies pointed out by tribunal Against disclosure of 95% waste processing facilities (19,014 TDP or tons per day), the quantity of segregated waste is 74% (14,884 TPD). This anomaly needs to be clarified. No clarification was given on the operation of waste processing plants without authorisation under the SWM Rules. The report discloses figures of waste generation in 762 local bodies, but does not reveal the actual waste processed by urban local bodies. The report says there has been 100% remediation of legacy waste at 60 sites but no material has been placed on record in support of this claim. Figures disclosed indicate 60 sites remediated and only 26 sites are left with legacy waste. Since, in other ULBs, waste processing facilities do not exist, specific disclosure of legacy waste in such ULBs should be pointed out. No disclosure has been made on the operational status of waste-to-energy plants. Legacy waste Legacy waste refers to accumulated solid waste that has been improperly collected and stored for an extended period, often in landfills or dumpsites. It is essentially a backlog of waste that was not managed effectively and has created a significant environmental problem. Sewage management In view of sewage generation of 5,500 MLD (million litres per day) and installed treatment capacity of 4,651 MLD (but treating only 3,122 MLD), the gap in treatment comes to 2,378 MLD. Untreated sewage is being discharged into the environment, which is evidenced by the disclosure that only 21.08 lakh households (HH) are connected to the sewerage system out of 52.17 lakh houses in 17 municipal corporations. STPs have been designed in excessive capacities compared to sewage generation in Agra, Bijnor, Anupshahar, Chirakoot Karwi, Pilkhuva, Kannauj, Bela, Pratapgarh and other cities. But many urban local bodies do not have STPs, including Bahraich, Banda, Deoria, Fatehpur, Gonda, Hathras, Sambhal and Bhadohi. THE CASE In 2018, the Supreme Court in the 'Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors' case issued key directions regarding environmental protection, particularly river pollution and industrial waste treatment. The top court made it compulsory for industries to install and maintain functional primary effluent treatment plants (PETPs) within a specific timeframe. SC directed the municipalities to operate existing STPs and established timelines for setting up of common effluent treatment plants (CETPs) and STPs. The apex court also emphasized on the responsibility of municipalities to ensure public health, sanitation, and solid waste management. The Supreme Court permitted Uttar Pradesh to approach NGT with an application regarding the feasibility of the time lines set by the top court. The NGT was tasked with monitoring compliance with the Supreme Court's directions.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Where are the trees to compensate for those felled at altar of devpt projects, ask activists
1 2 3 Bhopal: As a city expands and develops in an 'unplanned' manner, with construction and infrastructure projects emerging everywhere, the green cover of the city is the first casualty. Bhopal is a prime example of this trend, as per experts and activists. And as the green cover, which was once the pride of Bhopal, vanishes, a question that attracts the attention of environmental activists and common residents alike is about the effectiveness of compensatory afforestation, which is required to offset the loss to green cover by any 'development' project. As against one tree felled, four trees are required to be planted by the person or agency given permission to cut trees by the municipal corporation. So where are those lakhs of trees that should've been planted over the years and why is green cover diminishing if these trees are being planted? These are questions to which authorities have no definite answers for, activists say. Only in the two latest road projects—the Kolar road project, under which permission to cut as many as 4,105 trees was given, and the 11 Mile to Bangrasia road project, under which cut 1,377 trees were cut, environmental activists point out irregularities. 'RTI Reveals Delay' Environmental activist Nitin Saxena, who moved the green watchdog NGT over the huge loss to the environment due to these projects because there was no compensatory afforestation, said, "We wish to know whether the site of afforestation has been decided for planting of trees and if the agency, which cut the trees, has deposited the amount required to undertake afforestation with the social forestry department, which was once a part of the Capital Project Administration (CPA). " Saxena said that the PWD, which executed the Kolar road project, was required to pay Rs 1.26 crore to the social forestry department for compensatory afforestation to get an NOC from the BMC for cutting 4,105 trees, but the NOC was issued to PWD without depositing the amount. Saxena added that he asked the BMC under RTI whether the requisite fund was deposited by the PWD for afforestation, and the reply was that a notice was issued to PWD in Jan to deposit the amount. "More than 4,000 trees were cut, and they are still corresponding with the PWD to get the money for compensatory afforestation. Mind you, the project began in 2022, and it's 2025," Saxena said. Saxena said that he moved the NGT asking the tribunal to check the cutting of trees for the 11 Mile to Bangrasia (Ratanpur road project), and the NGT on Jan 1, 2025, directed that trees should only be cut according to law and if necessary, but the cutting of trees continued, and now 700 trees are being cut for road and stadium construction at Neelbad. "Our question is why the BMC commissioner, who is the tree officer entitled to allow the cutting of trees, has delegated his powers to a subordinate officer, which he can't do according to the Tree Protection Act (urban), and only the state govt can do it," said Saxena. Govt Depts Pass Buck BMC commissioner Harendra Narayan, when contacted for comments, said, "Our tree officer is additional commissioner Devendra Chauhan. You talk to him; he will be able to give you information." Chauhan, when asked whether the PWD has deposited the amount for compensatory afforestation against trees cut in the Kolar project and where the trees have been planted, said, "We only give permission for cutting of trees only when the social forestry department gives us NOC after money is deposited. I don't know about the Kolar project, but it's a matter between two govt departments; it will be done. As far as the site of afforestation is concerned, it's for the social forestry department to plant trees and not BMC." DFIO, social forestry, Nidhi Chauhan, when asked the same question, said, "I will have to see. I am new to the post. I can't tell you offhand whether the money was deposited or not. As far as the site of compensatory afforestation is concerned, we do face problems in getting land for afforestation. Getting NOC from the revenue department for the purpose is difficult at times. As far as the number of trees that have to be planted, if the girth of the trees is 30 cm or more, four trees are planted against a tree felled, and if it's less than that, we plant two trees. " 'Act Silent On Compliance' Advocate Harpreet Singh Gupta, who has appeared in several cases concerning environmental damage due to trees felling, when asked if there is any punitive action, said, "Tree Protection Act applicable in MP is silent over the issue. Permission to cut trees is given subject to the undertaking that compensatory plantation would be done, but there is no reference to punishment if undertaking is not adhered to."
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Telangana govt urged to impose total ban on single-use plastics
1 2 Hyderabad: The Forum for Good Governance (FGG) has urged the state govt to impose a total ban on single-use plastics (SUP), citing severe environmental damage and health risks. In a detailed representation, FGG highlighted the widespread littering of plastic carry bags, plates and other disposable items, which choke drains, pollute water bodies, endanger wildlife and compromise soil and groundwater quality. Drawing attention to successful bans in Karnataka and Maharashtra, the forum stressed that enforcement of existing rules was ineffective and called for comprehensive action. FGG president Padmanabha Reddy said, "Even with the slightest rain, the roads get flooded, leading to traffic chaos, particularly in metropolitan cities such as Hyderabad, besides damaging property and sometimes claiming human life. Domesticated animals consuming leftover food and other waste thrown in plastic bags die a painful death. Burning of plastics leads to the emission of highly toxic gases, particularly dioxins and furans. " He added, "In Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, less than 50 micron thickness carry bags were banned, but it is impossible to control and regulate the manufacturing and use of such plastic carry bags as public are not in a position to know the exact thickness." FGG said the National Green Tribunal (NGT) upheld the legal validity of the total ban on plastics imposed by Karnataka. The plastic industry filed an appeal against the NGT order before the SC, which refused to stay the NGT order, he said. "The govt of Karnataka has taken into account the environmental concern and protection of public interest, which is of much greater cause than the economic interest sought by the manufacturers of single-use plastic items. Telangana should follow the footsteps of Karnataka," he said.
