Manipur's Naga Groups Demand Kukis To Hand Over Accused In Attack On Vehicle
Tangkhul Naga civil society organisations in Manipur on Friday issued a 24-hour ultimatum to the Kuki tribes, demanding the handing over of those involved in an attack on a passenger vehicle in Ukhrul district. The attack happened on June 26, leaving two people injured.
The Tangkhul Naga, one of the major Naga tribes, is an ethnic group primarily living in Ukhrul district of Manipur and parts of neighbouring Myanmar.
The ultimatum, jointly issued by the Katho Katamnao Long and the Tangkhul Naga Valley Students' Association, came a day after a mob, suspected to be of the Kuki tribes, allegedly assaulted the driver of the vehicle and injured a woman passenger in Mongkot Chepu village.
The civil society organisations demanded that the miscreants be handed over to them within 24 hours, failing which there would be "serious consequences" and no member of the Kuki tribes would be allowed to enter Ukhrul district where the Nagas are in majority.
The vehicle was going to Ukhrul when it was allegedly intercepted and attacked.
This was not the first instance in which Kuki tribe members settled along the stretch of Ukhrul to Imphal road have engaged in such unwarranted actions against commuters, the Naga groups said in a statement.
Alleging that Kuki tribes have proved that they do not want peace, the statement said, "Ever since the May 3, 2023, incident, our efforts to live in peace and cordial harmony have been overlooked and often seen as weakness and cowardice."
Manipur, where over 260 people have been killed in ethnic violence since May 2023, is under President's rule.
The strife between the Meitei community and the Kuki tribes also left thousands of people homeless, forcing them to stay in relief camps.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Centre invites UNC for talks in Delhi
Imphal: The MHA has invited the United Naga Council (UNC) for talks in New Delhi on Aug 26 to address escalating tensions surrounding the Free Movement Regime (FMR) and the contentious Indo-Myanmar border fencing. This development follows the UNC's growing concern over the Centre's decision to halt the FMR and proceed with border fencing, actions they argue will devastate the longstanding social, cultural, and economic bonds among Naga communities straddling the international boundary. The UNC had previously issued an ultimatum to the central govt, demanding immediate attention to their grievances. In a subsequent meeting with the governor of Manipur, UNC leaders emphasized that the border measures threaten to sever Naga families and villages, disrupting traditional movement, livelihoods, and cross-border community ties. The governor acknowledged the gravity of the situation but admitted that resolving the issue was beyond his jurisdiction. The upcoming New Delhi meeting is poised to bring UNC representatives face-to-face with senior MHA officials for direct negotiations. Sources indicate that the dialogue will likely focus on finding a balance between national security imperatives and the rights and sentiments of the borderland communities. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Manipur violence was not spontaneous, but planned, ethnically targeted and facilitated by state failures: report
Apart from historical factors such as ethnic divisions, socio-political marginalisation and land disputes, what led to escalation of feelings of mistrust and enmity between the warring Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities were the systematic hate campaign played out through digital media and statements made by the political leadership in the prelude to the conflict, said Independent People's Tribunal's report on the ongoing ethnic conflict in Manipur, which was released in Delhi on Wednesday (August 20, 2025). The report also highlighted that the violence was not spontaneous, but planned, ethnically targeted and facilitated by state failures. The tribunal, constituted by the People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) in 2024, was chaired by Kurian Joseph, former judge, Supreme Court, also had members who were former High Court judges, ex-IAS officers, ex-IPS officers, advocates, authors, professors, journalists, human rights activists, among others. In its 694-page report, the jury stressed that more than 60,000 internally displaced people still remain in camps in Manipur with no end in sight. High Court directive The tribunal said the Manipur High Court's March 27, 2023 directive, recommending Scheduled Tribe (ST) status for Meiteis served as a vital trigger, as it was perceived by the tribal groups, including the Kuki-Zo groups and the Nagas, as a threat to their constitutional protections. This in turn sparked protests across all tribal districts, leading to a major protest programme on May 3, 2023 in all the hill districts. While by and large the protests ended peacefully, violence erupted in a few places, which soon engulfed the whole State. Another contending narrative was the involvement of Kukis in poppy cultivation, in line with the then Chief Minister Biren Singh's 'war on drugs', which translated into popular propaganda against Kukis, the report stated. After meeting people from all walks of life, including the survivors and victims in different districts of Manipur, including Bishnupur, Churachandpur, Imphal East, Imphal West, Kakching, Kangpokpi, Senapati followed by sittings in Delhi, the tribunal recorded the testimonies of the survivors, which, it says present a stark picture of the failure of the state authorities and institutions to protect them, leaving them to fend for themselves. The tribunal also notes the failure of the Central government to fulfil its constitutional responsibility to ensure that Manipur remained under the regime of both rule of law and the Constitution. The overwhelming evidence placed before the tribunal lays bare the gruesome and systemic nature of the violence, the role of the radical groups, the failure of state institutions and the immense humanitarian fallout that followed, it said. The report also attributed a significant role to the media in the conflict, which actively shaped public perception and escalated tensions. While the print media was partisan and lacked investigative rigour, digital channels and social media were used to spread unverified and inflammatory content. From poor arrangements in camps to dismal healthcare, the tribunal's report painted a poor picture of relief and rehabilitation in violence-hit Manipur. The tribunal suggested that India's judiciary, Parliament and civil society must come forward to reclaim their duty and ensure that Manipur does not become a template for future impunity. It also demanded a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the conflict and emphasised that lasting peace in Manipur requires structural changes, community dialogue, legal accountability and sustained moral leadership.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Assam job panel to drop controversial question on Manipur crisis
GUWAHATI The Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) has decided to 'drop/delete/cancel' a Manipur-related controversial question in an examination conducted on August 8 to recruit agricultural development officers. In a letter to APSC Chairperson Debaraj Upadhaya on August 17, the Meitei Heritage Society (MHS) stated that question no 95 in the exam paper was malicious, disturbing, and misleading. The question was on the conflict between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities and the role of Arambai Tenggol and Meitei Leepun, two radical groups. 'Such a one-sided portrayal is unbecoming of a Public Service Commission, whose mandate is to recruit public servants committed to fairness, impartiality, and service to the nation without prejudice,' the MHS said. The MHS expressed serious concern for 'selectively targeting one community while ignoring publicly available data on the role of Chin-Kuki militants and their civil society organisations'. It cited reports by the National Investigation Agency, Central Bureau of Investigation, and a Supreme Court-appointed committee to make a point. 'Such misrepresentation not only tarnishes the image of a community but also undermines the credibility of the Commission,' the Meitei group said, requesting the APSC to issue a clarification acknowledging the biased nature of the question and declare the objectionable question null and void, ensuring it is not used for evaluation purposes. 'After considering our representation, the APSC informed us today (Tuesday) that it has decided to drop/delete/cancel question number 95,' an MHS spokesperson said.
