Should I buy my teenage daughter an electric car to learn to drive in - I'm not sure it's a good idea?
Firstly, I'm concerned insurance will be astronomically expensive. Secondly, I'm worried about her not being able to drive a manual car. Thirdly, I'm worried that she'll end up charging in unsafe places.
We had a deal that my wife and I would buy her a nearly-new car if she got a Saturday job to pay for the insurance and fuel. She's entirely held up her end of the bargain there.
She'll be sharing it with her mother and will pass it on to her younger brother in a couple of years' time (he's also keen on an EV).
She says her mates are getting EVs and she wants to be environmentally friendly.
Can you advise me if my reservations are warranted or I'm just being an old fuddy duddy? David, Nottingham
Daily Mail and This is Money electric cars expert Freda Lewis-Stempel replies: David, welcome to the joys of independent teenagers. 10 years ago I was getting my first car, and although I wasn't getting an EV, the family 'debates' around what ended up being my 1.6-litre Peugeot 207 are still etched on my memory today.
I completely understand that you want your daughter to have the safest, most sensible, best value for money first car. And you're asking the same questions as many parents because so many young people now want to own an EV: almost half of learners want lessons in an EV.
So to make sure you're armed with all the facts, I've asked some of the leading experts in each area to give you their best insight and advice.
The rest I'm afraid is down to trusting your daughter – as you've said she's done everything asked of her, and just because you wouldn't chose an EV doesn't mean it's the wrong choice for her. Also the 'my friends all have one' is always hard argument to resist... Good luck with that one!
MoneySuperMarket explains that EVs are more expensive to insure but used EVs are cheaper and the cost of insuring EVs is coming down
How insurance costs for an EV learner compare
Alicia Hempsted, car insurance expert at MoneySuperMarket says: 'Generally, insurance premiums for electric vehicles (EVs) are higher than petrol and diesel cars because EVs tend to be more expensive to buy upfront and repair, batteries are costly components, and repairs often need specialist knowledge and parts.
'As a result, insurers will factor in the greater cost and complexity of claims when calculating premiums.
'Between 01 January 2025 and 29 July 2025, the average price of an annual premium bought through MoneySuperMarket by under-25s was £1,771 for an electric vehicle and £1,467 for petrol.
'However, there has been an increase in the availability of more affordable EVs that are suited to learner and newly passed drivers. Models like the Renault Zoe, Vauxhall Corsa-e or Nissan Leaf often come with lower insurance group ratings.
'As more people buy EVs and insurers build more detailed risk profiles, the cost gap between EV and petrol car insurance will continue to fall.
The average annual car insurance cost for electric vehicles has fallen by more than £100 since 2023 according to MoneySuperMarket data.'
Expert tips to keep learner EV insurance down:
1. Choose a telematic or 'black box policy'
This tracks driving behaviours, and rewards careful driving with lower premiums. For younger drivers, who are usually seen as higher risk by insurers, this can make a meaningful difference in terms of cost.
2. Check charging small print
When selecting a policy, review the charging details. Insurers may ask if the EV is charged at home or in public, since street charging can increase risk of vandalism or theft.
3. Compare quotes
A simple one but make sure you compare quotes to get the right cover at the best price.
Freda Lewis-Stempel adds: So, while you're not wrong David that insurance will indeed be higher for an EV, it's not 'astronomically' higher as you feared.
In fact insuring a used EV (which is the case for your daughter) tends to be cheaper than insuring a brand-new one, mainly due to depreciation.
Ms Hempstead also said that adding an experienced driver like a parent (in this case your wife) to the policy can reduce the premium as it's seen as lower risk by insurers.
But she warns that while it's fine if the parent occasionally uses the car, the main driver must be accurately listed on the policy or it will be viewed as 'fronting' which is illegal. If the main driver is your daughter then make sure she's named as such.
She also points out that newer EVs often have the latest safety technology including automatic emergency braking, lane assist and crash avoidance systems which 'can help reduce the likelihood of accidents and may be rewarded with slightly lower premiums'. These safety devices can also lower your amount of 'dad worrying' too.
Is it a bad idea to learn in an EV rather than a manual?
A major concern is that passing your test in an EV is likely to mean not being able to drive a manual car.
It's true that your daughter won't master manual car skills including clutch control, stalling or hill starts because EVs don't have a manual transmission or clutch pedal, but Geraint Lewis, Head of Training at Red Driver Training said there are 'benefits' to EVs too.
He comments: 'The quiet operation of an EV allows students to better focus on instructions and the road environment. Many EVs feature regenerative braking, which slows the car when you lift off the accelerator.
'This helps learners understand braking dynamics and can reduce reliance on the brake pedal. Some models even let you adjust how strong the regenerative braking feels.
'Driving instructors teach students how to respond to the EV just as they would with any car, so learners quickly adapt to the different feel.'
Geraint added that while EVs deliver instant torque and smooth acceleration 'many EVs include settings that reduce throttle sensitivity, making it easier for beginners to control the car while they're learning.'
What are the wider benefits to learning to drive in an EV?
RED Driver Training comments:
1. EVs are easier to maintain
With fewer moving parts and no need for oil changes, routine maintenance is generally simpler and cheaper than for petrol or diesel cars.
2. Environmentally cleaner
EVs produce no exhaust emissions, helping to reduce local air pollution and greenhouse gas output.
Furthermore, quiet operation also contributes to less noise pollution, creating a calmer driving environment.
3. Reduce family costs
EVs have fewer moving parts, meaning less routine maintenance, and electricity is generally cheaper than petrol or diesel per mile.
This can be particularly beneficial to families trying to reduce costs and young drivers.
Which are the best EV models for learners?
We asked our friends at Auto Trader to recommend some great learner EVs, so you can feel confident you're buying your daughter the right set of wheels.
Erin Baker, of Auto Trader, said: 'For learners, affordable models like the VW e-Up! and Mini Hatch, or the T03 from new brand player Leapmotor are all excellent options.
'The electric versions of learner favourites like the Vauxhall Corsa are also great choices for new drivers on a budget.
'The Hyundai Ioniq is another great choice for value, with it being praised for its spacious practicality and smooth ride, which is also ideal for new drivers. What's more, the car is very sustainable due to their battery life being incredibly long. A full charge can be achieved in around 35 minutes, and even a quick 7 minute top-up can add 30 miles of range.'
Asmart home charger and an EV tariff can save a lot of money.
EV charging – is it cheap?
You've mentioned that you're getting a home EV charger, so before we get into how safe public charging is, let's address home charging.
EV home charger provider Ohme looked into the home charging cost savings to be made for us.
Ohme charging specialist Nat Barnes says: 'Charging at home will always be the cheapest place to charge your car – especially if you are on a smart home energy tariff such as Intelligent Octopus Go and have a compatible charger such as those from Ohme. That gives you electricity at just 7p/kWh compared to the standard rate of 25.73p/kWh.
'That's the difference of a full charge for a Vauxhall Corsa Electric [a popular learner EV] costing £3.57 or £13.13 for its 266 mile range and 51kWh battery. By comparison an equivalent petrol car over 266 miles would cost more than £40 at 40mpg average fuel economy.'
Savings from home charging: Ohme compares the cost of annual driving in the UK when filling up with fuel or using an EV tariff
Freda Lewis-Stempel adds: Costs aside, from a safety point of view if your daughter is mainly charging from home then that is of course as safe as it gets.
For when she does occasionally charge on the go it's unlikely that this will be late at night or at remote locations.
But as a young woman charging myself, I will say that there's been a huge step to ensure safe EV charging all times of the day in recent years.
The new InstaVolt Superhub at Winchester that I visited recently is a great example. It has 'comprehensive security features', which include 24/7 CCTV site surveillance on high-performance 8MP cameras.
There is on-site security when the on-site coffee facilities are closed, lighting illuminating all walkways, charging bays, and parking areas, as well as intelligent monitoring advanced recognition cameras, ANPR-enabled cameras that instantly detect and notify InstaVolt of any blacklisted vehicles, and remote monitoring of the entire site managed by InstaVolt's head office.
I appreciate that sounds like a list for Mission Impossible's Ethan Hunt, but it really goes to show how advanced EV charging safety is becoming – far better than most petrol stations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
What are the pros and cons of introducing digital identity cards?
The prime minister is said to be 'seriously considering' a national system of digital identification, both to make it easier to access online services, including government ones, and to clamp down on illegal working by irregular migrants. Given the push to introduce artificial intelligence in so many areas of our lives, it may be an idea whose time has come. But there are political, as well as practical, complications. What is digital ID? It would in essence be a virtual ID card, and using it in the existing, and enhanced, Government Gateway would make it easier for people to manage everything from tax records and social security entitlements to driving licences, education, citizenship and probate – a vast array of areas in which the individual has dealings with the state. It could also be used, as a passport or driving licence is now, to help with all sorts of other activities, such as banking or getting a job. There is a separate, and obviously sensitive, question about whether digital ID should also encompass someone's medical history, voluntarily or otherwise. Why digital ID now? According to the briefings, the aim is to reduce the cost and increase the efficiency of the government machine, so that, for example, people don't have to spend hours on hold when contacting a government agency. Unavoidably, though, it is also a way to detect people who shouldn't be in the country or working in the UK. That, the theory goes, means less of a 'pull factor' for certain sorts of migrant. Would it work? In a sense it is working already, in that almost everyone must have a unique tax reference, a national insurance number, a driving licence number, an NHS number and so on, and can, if they wish, share this information with others. But at the moment the system is compartmentalised and clunky, even if more and more interactions are taking place online and with chatbots. What stage are we at? Reports emanating from a 'senior minister' say that the prime minister has ordered a 'comprehensive and expansive look' at the proposal: 'Keir is leading on it,' they said. 'This is a serious piece of work. After a year in government, it is clear that technology is underpinning everything. Digital ID is foundational. Things are moving forward.' Didn't we have identity cards before? They were introduced as plain cardboard documents during the Second World War as a national security measure. People had to use them to get rationed food and petrol, and had to be ready to produce them on demand, a serious infringement of the traditional British way of doing things. The request for 'Papers, please' has always been regarded as an alien phenomenon. In the words of Boris Johnson in 2004: 'If I am ever asked, on the streets of London, or in any other venue, public or private, to produce my ID card as evidence that I am who I say I am ... then I will take that card out of my wallet and physically eat it in the presence of whatever emanation of the state has demanded that I produce it.' (He subsequently brought in compulsory photo ID for elections.) Even now, a driver stopped by the police is granted 14 days to produce their driving licence at a police station. The wartime measures were resented, and were abolished in 1952. Mandatory ID would be a minor revolution. What about the ID cards Tony Blair wanted? He still does, by the way. Much of the present momentum for change comes from the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), as if the former PM has never given up the struggle. At any rate, the current prime minister's chief aide, Morgan McSweeney, commissioned the TBI to produce proposals, and is said to be 'forceful' in making the case for them to No 10. Certainly, a more primitive version of this project was very much 'on the cards 20 years ago' when the Blair administration tried to bring in ID cards, but it ran into enormous resistance and administrative problems. The motives, in essence, were no different from today. In 2003, the then home secretary, David Blunkett, argued that cards with biometric data were needed so that 'people don't work if they are not entitled to work, they don't draw on services which are free in this country, including health, unless they are entitled to', and that 'when we find people we can identify quickly that they are not entitled and get them out'. When a limited, entirely voluntary ID card was introduced in 2010, some 15,000 were in circulation, but the incoming Conservative-Liberal Democrat government scrapped the entire scheme, after £5bn had been spent. A voluntary biometric residence permit is available as an option for foreign students or workers. Official photo ID cards for voting have also been introduced in recent years. What does the opposition say? Despite showing little interest in it while in government, earlier this year the shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, conceded that digital ID could help tackle 'illegal' immigration. But Nigel Farage remains stubbornly libertarian, and opposes digital ID because he 'doesn't trust this government' and claims that it 'hurts law-abiding citizens'. Labour, and the Tories, could use his reluctance to argue that, given he is not prepared to use every possible measure in the fight against irregular migration, Farage wouldn't succeed in his own ambition to stop the boats. Will it happen? With 40 Labour backbenchers recently calling for change and the Conservatives warming to the idea, alongside the trend towards digitising everything, it feels pretty inevitable, like it or not. Will it work? To some extent, but there are ways to get around any system, and digital is no different from paper in that respect. It could make things worse for some. If a fraudster managed to 'steal' a vulnerable person's digital ID, for example, then it would be 'open sesame' on their entire life, and comprehensive identity theft might become more common. Leaks cannot be ruled out. There's also the grim possibility that a migrant who wanted to come to the UK to work, deprived of any ID, would just melt into the underground economy, and become even more exposed to crime and exploitation. In a worst-case scenario, some criminals or a malign foreign government could execute a mega-hack in which millions of people's data is stolen or frozen and held to ransom. Last, we must reflect on British governments' past lamentable record on grand digital integration schemes – and the fact that the current proposal, which would potentially bring together HMRC, the DWP, the DVLA, the Passport Office, criminal records, local authority records, and the NHS database, would be hugely more ambitious, and hazardous, than anything attempted before.
Finextra
30 minutes ago
- Finextra
PayPoint launches open banking payments in the housing sector
PayPoint is proud to support Thirteen who are leading the way in the housing sector with Open Banking. This trailblazing move marks a significant leap forward in how Thirteen customers manage and pay their rent, adding a new way to pay which is faster, safer and more convenient than traditional card payments. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. PayPoint are proud to be offering this pioneering technology to the sector and driving wider adoption. This initiative builds upon an already successful partnership between PayPoint and Thirteen, which was first established in June 2024. At the core of the partnership, is ensuring customers have more control, more choice and a simpler way to manage their money. Not only does this innovation streamline the payment experience, but it has the opportunity to reduce transaction costs to Thirteen by bypassing card-processing channels. The first year of the partnership saw the introduction of a range of additional payment channels, including PayByLink, which enables Thirteen staff to send pre-populated payment request links via SMS to customers. Since implementation, the feature has been met with positive feedback with a dedicated payments app subsequently launched, enabling customers to easily make payments through their own device. Since the app's launch, Thirteen have seen cash transactions reduce by 14%, demonstrating a customer preference for the convenience of self-service tools. The app also enables barcode generation to support transactions at over 30,000 PayPoint stores nationwide, allowing Thirteen to move away from expensive, plastic rent cards. Jo Toolan, Managing Director of Payments and Banking at PayPoint, commented: 'The expansion of our open banking technology into the housing sector showcases the flexibility and diverse applications of our technology, and marks a strategic milestone for PayPoint. It's a very exciting moment for us and exemplifies our commitment to leveraging technology to improve service delivery and support digital transformation across sectors.' Rob Thompson, Strategic Lead for Rent and Income Services at Thirteen, added: 'Working with PayPoint has allowed us to elevate our payment solutions, providing residents with more accessible and modernised options. The integration of Open Banking is the next step in this partnership, which will offer a smooth and secure payment experience for our residents. This advancement will streamline our operations and ultimately enable us to deliver more efficient services to our community.'
Finextra
30 minutes ago
- Finextra
GoCardless rolls out AI tool for same-day direct debit settlement
Bank payment company GoCardless has announced the launch of a groundbreaking new feature to redefine same-day settlement for Direct Debit. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. The tool, Same Day Settlement+, leverages proprietary machine learning algorithms and transaction data from over 38 million accounts to significantly cut payout times and reduce late payment failures by over 80%. Thanks to this enhanced predictive capability, more than 96%, on average, of successfully collected payments can now be paid out on the same day. This not only drastically cuts the typical two-day BACS settlement time, but it also solves a critical industry challenge by reducing the cost and frustration of late payment failures. Over half (58%) of merchants say same-day settlement would be extremely beneficial to their business, enabling quicker access to funds and greater clarity over their cash flow. Additionally, 85% of merchants believe that receiving their money sooner will strengthen their relationships with customers and suppliers. The tool is currently available to a select group of GoCardless customers. This initial phase allows the system to train on diverse data, creating bespoke models. The introduction of Same Day Settlement+ cements GoCardless's position as a leading end-to-end bank payment provider, setting a new standard in how businesses collect and send both recurring and one-off payments. John Cooper, Managing Director at Communicate Telecoms said: "The same-day settlement service has been a game-changer for our monthly bill run. Like many small businesses, cash flow is one of our biggest challenges, and this service has made it significantly more manageable to get our funds at speed. This provides a massive boost to our finances." Shaun Puckrin, Chief Product Officer at GoCardless, said: "We're constantly innovating to make bank payments simpler and more efficient for businesses. Our new feature is a testament to that commitment, and a true differentiator for Direct Debit in the market. By combining payout speed with significantly reduced late failure rates, merchants can now enjoy the best of both worlds.'
