ScotRail 'fixing' AI train announcer after artist claimed it was her voice
ScotRail is addressing issues with an AI train announcer following allegations it used a woman's voice without consent, the First Minister has announced.
John Swinney acknowledged there had been some "controversy" surrounding the matter after Scottish voiceover artist Gayanne Potter claimed the state-owned rail service modelled its AI announcer – known as Iona – on recordings she made in 2021.
The subject was brought up during First Minister's Questions at Holyrood, where Scottish Conservative MSP Dr Sandesh Gulhane questioned if this reflects the Scottish Government's support for actors since ScotRail came under public ownership in 2022.
Dr Gulhane continued to press Mr Swinney on the issue after Ms Potter, in a widely circulated Facebook post, accused ScotRail of ignoring her concerns.
She alleged that Iona's voice originated from voice data held by Swedish company ReadSpeaker, for whom she recorded in 2021, claiming that their use of her voice in an AI model breached the terms of her contract with them.
Ms Potter expressed her "distress" upon learning that Scotland had "installed the ReadSpeaker model 'Iona' that contains my biometric voice data as their new announcer on all their trains".
She emphasised: "I did not know. I was not asked. I did not consent."
Mr Swinney assured that he is "sure" ScotRail will "engage constructively with all concerned".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
a minute ago
- South Wales Argus
Nationwide has issued a £300 warning to certain parents
During this cost-of-living crisis, mums and dads will reportedly have to spend over £300 on a back-to-school shop this year. Parents are expecting to spend £329 per child on back-to-school items, up £137 (70%) compared to last year. Over a third of parents (36%) claim that social media is to blame for influencing the list of 'must-haves' for schoolchildren, such as designer bags and insulated water bottles. To help parents ease the financial pressure of back-to-school shopping, money-saving expert Sue Hayward shares her tips. Whether you want to speak to a real person in branch, or do your banking online, there are many ways you can bank with us. If you need support, get in touch: — Nationwide (@AskNationwide) January 2, 2025 One parent, Sophie Wilson, who has one child aged five, told the building society: 'This year we'll be spending around £200 on back-to-school items, with school trainers and shoes topping the list. 'We're very fortunate that our school has a great second-hand clothing shop, run by the Parents' Association, so I tend to buy all my daughter's school-branded items from there and then supplement them with additional t-shirts and tights bought during the high-street sales. 'I've also found reselling apps such as Vinted to be a way to save. I've often bought school shoes from Vinted because they tend to be hardly worn. "Usually, a parent has just bought the wrong size or the child has suddenly had a growth spurt, and they come in at about 50% of the cost!' Sue said: 'Back to school is an expensive time of year as research shows some parents spend over £300 kitting their children out for the new school term. Recommended reading: "Pester power caused by social media trends can bring an added financial headache for families with one in three saying they feel under pressure to spend beyond their means. "Cash strapped parents can save by stocking up on basics like polo tops, jumpers and stationery with supermarket deals, and it's also worth looking for 'nearly new' uniform on sites such as Vinted and eBay. "With branded uniform, buying 'outgrown' items through the school or your local Facebook group can also help save money. And local councils may offer financial help with school uniform costs, depending on where you live.'
Leader Live
6 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Nicola Sturgeon's ‘political instinct' to back a united Ireland
However, the former Scottish first minister insisted the issue of Northern Ireland's future is for people there to decide. She stressed that was the case because she said she could 'get bit prickly if people from outside Scotland start to say what's best for Scotland'. However, speaking to the Nolan Show on BBC Radio Ulster, she stated: 'My political instinct would be in favour of a united Ireland. 'But that's not a matter for me.' Ms Sturgeon continued that as a supporter of Scottish independence, she believes that 'Westminster governance has not served Scotland well', adding that she is 'not sure it will have served Northern Ireland well'. The former SNP leader said: 'I think what Brexit did to Northern Ireland and has done to Scotland is probably an example of the downsides of Westminster governments.' However, she that 'detailed assessments' over whether the province's future should be in the UK or as part of a united Ireland were 'for people in Northern Ireland to make'.
The National
29 minutes ago
- The National
Labour are flouting FOI rules to keep Israel files secret. Here's how
As The National reported on Tuesday evening, the Foreign Office has now refused to release documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act – linked to a secret meeting between Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar in April – no less than four times. The standard legal response time passed back in May. The extended one expired in June. Now, the Foreign Office is saying we have to sit tight until September 16 – when it looks likely we will just be told to wait another month. READ MORE: Scottish university ranked among worst in the UK for Palestine repression Here's the thing: if the UK Government aren't technically breaking any rules, they are bending them beyond all recognition. We have requested an internal review – but that is likely to be a case of 'marking your own homework'. Our next and final step would be escalating to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). We have not yet done so, but it's worth taking a look at what that watchdog's guidance for public bodies has to say. It's lengthy, but worth quoting at length. This is, after all, the point on which the whole matter hinges: In most cases you will not need additional time to assess where the balance of the public interest lies … You can only extend the 20-working-day limit up to a 'reasonable' time. While FOIA does not define what a 'reasonable' extension of time might be, the section 45 Code of Practice confirms that this should generally be for no more than an additional 20 working days to consider the public interest. This means the total time spent dealing with the request should not exceed 40 working days. Any extension beyond this should be exceptional. Examples of such circumstances could include exceptional levels of complexity involving a number of external parties. You will need to demonstrate that the length of any time extension is justified for further consideration of the public interest. You should be prepared to explain to the Information Commissioner why you were unable to decide on the public interest within the original 20 working days. This is particularly the case in any extensions beyond an additional 20 working days, which will be reasonable only in exceptional cases, and you must be able to justify fully any such extensions. So, Labour have tacitly admitted that this case is 'exceptional'. While the official guidance says the consideration time should not exceed 40 days, it has already been 120. By their September deadline, it will have been 147. Even if you remember the "working day" caveat, they are so far beyond the deadline as to make a mockery of its existence. But there is another interesting detail here. The ICO says cases could go beyond the 40-day limit if there are 'a number of external parties' involved. In this example, who could the external parties be? Labour wouldn't be consulting Israel on whether it can release information to the UK public, would they? This is unclear. But we have another tool on hand to find out. Well, the same tool as before really: freedom of information laws. David Lammy meeting Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar in Israel (Image: Gideon Sa'ar/Twitter) In what could be termed a meta-FOI, The National has now submitted a request for the release of 'copies of all records held by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office that concern or make reference to' our first FOI request. If Labour are willing to openly flout the conventions governing freedom of information, we deserve to find out why. Ultimately, this is what Labour are taking months to decide: is your right to information outweighed by their desire to keep Israel sweet? They admitted as much when they put in writing that public interest was being considered against 'international relations'. Where do you think the public interest lies? In keeping UK Government documents on a secret meeting with a top Israeli minister locked up – or in letting voters see what Labour are truly up to behind closed Whitehall doors? Don't worry, you don't have to answer that immediately. Take five months if you need to. The UK Government has.
