Botswana Diamonds secures licences with AI exploration
The licences, which cover an area of 2,644km², have been granted for diamond exploration in strategically identified regions with high potential.
The awarded licenses – PL298, PL303, PL304 and PL305 – are valid until 2025 and span diverse locations including the Serowe area north-west of Mahalapye, near the South African border south-west of Jwaneng, north-east of Lerala in eastern Botswana, and close to the KX36 in the Kalahari.
The licence near Jwaneng Mine is particularly noteworthy due to its promising anomaly signatures, suggesting the presence of multiple potential kimberlite sources.
The AI models employed by Botswana Diamonds incorporated various factors indicative of diamond presence, such as mineral chemistry, proximity to major geological structures and specific geophysical anomalies.
The methodology also considered the presence of slightly abraded stones, shallow Kalahari cover and the characteristic low magnetic signatures of Group 2 kimberlites, which are typically ilmenite poor.
Beyond the diamond-focused licences, the AI exploration models have also identified non-diamond targets, leading to 11 polymetallic licence applications for minerals such as cobalt, copper, gold, nickel, platinum group metals, silver and zinc.
Some of these applications cover areas previously unexplored for copper-related signals.
The company has received provisional acceptance for these applications and anticipates further positive developments regarding their official granting.
"Botswana Diamonds secures licences with AI exploration" was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
a minute ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's unusual deal with Nvidia and AMD sparks concerns, legal questions
President Trump struck an unusual deal with Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices that allows the companies to sell certain chips to China in exchange for giving the U.S. government a 15% cut of those sales. But the unprecedented agreement also has raised concerns from politicians and legal experts over whether the deal is legal and would pose a national security threat. Questions also linger about exactly how the deal, which was announced Monday, would work because the U.S. Constitution bars taxes on exports, although some experts said Trump could find a workaround. The U.S. government might receive $3 billion from the revenue split if China's demand for Nvidia's H20 chip — which is less powerful than the company's highest-end artificial intelligence chip — reaches $20 billion, according to a note from Bernstein Research. 'It ties the fate of this chip manufacturer in a very particular way to this administration that is quite rare,' said Julia Powles, a professor and executive director of the UCLA Institute for Technology, Law & Policy. Trump's agreement with the world's most valuable company could put pressure on other tech companies and major exporters to strike similar deals with the U.S. government, but it's still unclear what the implications will be internationally, she said. The deal is the latest example of how tech companies are seeking to curry favor with the Trump administration, which has threatened to impose tariffs on semiconductor companies that don't commit to investing in the United States. Apple faced potential tariffs as well, but committed to investing $100 billion more in U.S. manufacturing after Trump criticized the company for expanding iPhone production in India. Trump also placed restrictions in April around the export of certain AI chips, including Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308, over national security concerns. He's called for the resignation of Intel Chief Executive Lip-Bu Tan, who has faced scrutiny over his reported investments in Chinese companies, but changed his tune after meeting the executive this week. Democratic and Republican lawmakers have criticized the idea that tech companies should split their sales with the U.S. government in exchange for export licenses that allow them to resume chip sales in China. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the Government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities,' Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), the chair of the House Select Committee on China, said in a statement. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, (D-Ill.), a ranking member of that committee, said in a statement that the deal raises questions about its legality and how the funds will be used. 'The administration cannot simultaneously treat semiconductor exports as both a national security threat and a revenue opportunity,' he said. 'By putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee.' The White House didn't answer questions about the agreement. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday that 'the legality of it, the mechanics of it, is still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce.' On Monday, Trump defended the deal with Nvidia, stating that the H20 chips are 'obsolete' and less powerful than the company's more high-end Blackwell chip. At a news conference, Trump said he met with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and initially asked for a 20% revenue split but they came down to 15%. 'We negotiate a little deal,' Trump said. 'So he's selling a essentially old chip.' Trump's remarks came after a report from the Financial Times over the weekend that Nvidia and AMD would pay 15% of their China chip revenue to the U.S. government. AMD didn't respond to a request for comment. An Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement that the company hasn't shipped H20 chips to China for months but it hopes that easing export restrictions will 'let America compete in China and worldwide.' 'America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race.' For Nvidia, the stakes are high. Huang said in a May interview with Stratechery, a newsletter and podcast, that the Chinese market is about $50 billion a year. Restricting H20 chip sales means that the company is walking away from profits that could be used to compete with China in the race to dominate AI. Taylar Rajic, an associate fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said she's skeptical that legal concerns would halt the arrangement because it's unclear who would sue. 'I can't identify who would bring that suit forward,' she said. 'It wouldn't be Nvidia because they're the ones who negotiated this deal.' Meanwhile, Chinese officials have their own fears that Nvidia's chips could have location tracking or remote shutdown capabilities, though the company has denied those accusations. 'China obviously has its own concerns and its own national security considerations that it wants to take into account,' Rajic said. 'It just depends on whether or not they want to buy it from us too.'
Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
AI boom may drive over 60% surge in US nuclear capacity by 2050
This article was written by Bloomberg Intelligence industry analyst Nikki Hsu, with contributing analysis by Scott J. Levine and Gabriela Privetera. It appeared first on the Bloomberg Terminal. US nuclear power is primed for a resurgence, with capacity rising 63% to 159 gigawatts by 2050 in our scenario — a $350 billion-plus build-out fueled by AI data centers' hunger for reliable, carbon-free energy. Policy support and narrowing cost gaps with renewables will spur growth, with early gains from plant upgrades and restarts, and small modular reactors scaling after 2035. AI demand, policy incentives power nuclear rise Net nuclear capacity may climb 52 GW from 2036-50 — a 2.7% compound annual growth rate — driven by policy support and AI data-center demand for clean, reliable power. Most additions arrive after 2035, as progress on small modular reactors (SMRs) may be constrained by permitting timelines, first-of-a-kind construction and financing risks and immature supply chains. BI's scenario assumes new reactors start by 2038, mirroring the 1970-90 pace of 4.5 GW a year. The high end reflects faster SMR adoption and favorable policy. The low end assumes delays on all fronts, resulting in more muted growth. We also factor in the retirement of 2 GW in 2049-50 as three reactors reach 80 years of operation. Overall, BI projects 61 GW of net additions in 2025-50, lifting nuclear's share of US power generation to 20% from 18% in 2024. Nuclear comeback: US may add 9 GW by 2035 US nuclear capacity is set to grow almost 9 GW through 2035 in our scenario, reaching just over 106 GW — an average of 800 megawatts a year, or a 0.8% CAGR. Gains may be limited to upgrades at existing plants, restarts of retired units and the completion of abandoned V.C. Summer reactors in South Carolina. Widespread SMR adoption is unlikely before 2035. Meanwhile, tech giants like Meta, Microsoft and have struck long-term nuclear deals to support AI and cloud operations. Three planned restarts could add about 2.3 GW by decade's end: Holtec Palisades (0.8 GW, this year), Constellation's Three Mile Island Unit 1 (0.8 GW, 2027) and NextEra's Duane Arnold (0.6 GW, 2028). Santee Cooper seeks buyers to finish the two V.C. Summer units (1.1 GW each), though they likely won't come online before the early 2030s.
Axios
22 minutes ago
- Axios
How Biden-era antitrust decisions are driving dealmaking
President Trump prides himself on being a dealmaker, but some eye-popping dealmaking of late comes thanks to his predecessor's administration. Why it matters: The Biden administration's antitrust crackdown, at the time sharply criticized by many in Silicon Valley, has now spawned a few interesting deal scenarios in tech. Driving the news: Biden-era antitrust appears to be helping fuel an audacious bid by AI startup Perplexity to acquire Google's Chrome browser for $34.5 billion, Axios' Dan Primack notes, confirming a scoop by The Wall Street Journal earlier Tuesday. The Biden Justice Department had proposed that Google be forced to sell Chrome after the company was found to have illegally abused its search monopoly. A federal judge is now considering that remedy, and Perplexity could be trying to indicate that there would be a buyer in that instance, the Journal said. Bidders with fatter wallets than Perplexity, including OpenAI, could emerge if Google is forced to sell. Google has said it will appeal the monopoly ruling. Case in point: For more signs of the Biden antitrust effect, look no further than the recent initial public offering of Figma. Its stock is up some 160% from its offering price of $33. The July 31 IPO was made possible after antitrust objections derailed a previously planned takeover by rival software design giant Adobe in 2023. The Figma IPO prompted former Federal Trade Commission chair Lina Khan to take a victory lap on social media, writing that Figma's market debut was "a great reminder that letting startups grow into independently successful businesses, rather than be bought up by existing giants, can generate enormous value." That said, it was the Justice Department's antitrust division, not the FTC, that examined the Figma-Adobe deal. Yes, but: The Biden administration's tough stance on mergers has not, with the benefit of hindsight, helped Spirit Airlines, which had sought to be acquired by JetBlue. That deal was blocked last year, and Spirit ended up in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, emerging from it just this past March. What we're watching: The Trump administration's approach to antitrust so far does not appear to differ significantly from the Biden administration's.
