logo
Will Supreme Court Overturn Same-Sex Marriage? Here's What To Know As SCOTUS Hasn't Acted Yet

Will Supreme Court Overturn Same-Sex Marriage? Here's What To Know As SCOTUS Hasn't Acted Yet

Forbes3 days ago
The Supreme Court could consider whether to overturn its landmark ruling legalizing same-sex marriage this term after the court was asked to hear a case on the issue—but the court hasn't yet taken any action on the case, and it remains to be seen whether they'll take it up, which they're not required to do.
Joseph Fons holds a LGBTQ Pride Flag in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, DC, June 15, 2020. Getty Images
A case was filed at the Supreme Court in July that expressly asks the court to overturn its precedent in Obergefell v. Hodges, a 2015 ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
The case was brought by Kim Davis, a Christian former clerk who gained notoriety and briefly landed in jail in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage certificates to same-sex couples following the Obergefell ruling.
Davis has asked the court to determine whether Obergefell should be overturned, as part of a lawsuit that protests the alleged discrimination against her for refusing to issue same-sex marriage certificates.
The case has been filed at the Supreme Court, but that is not an indication that the case will actually be decided by the justices, as the court only takes up a small fraction of the total cases it's asked to hear.
The court has scheduled the case to be considered at the justices' conference on September 29, meaning a decision on whether or not the court will hear the case won't come until October at the earliest.
It's unclear. After ABC News reported Monday on Davis' petition, numerous posts online claimed the Supreme Court was set to decide the issue, including by prediction market Polymarket. But that's not accurate, as justices have so far given no indication either way on whether or not they'll hear the case. The court previously rejected Davis' last petition to the Supreme Court in 2020, which challenged her punishment for refusing to perform same-sex marriages. When Could The Supreme Court Decide The Same-Sex Marriage Case?
Though Davis' case is set to be discussed at the court's conference in late September, it's unclear when a decision could come out about whether justices will hear the case. The court will often re-list particularly controversial cases so they're considered at multiple conferences, meaning the court could spend weeks to months deciding whether the case should be heard. If justices do decide to take up the case, oral arguments would take place likely at the end of 2025 or in early 2026, with a decision coming out before the court's term ends in late June or early July 2026.
Some of the court's most conservative justices have suggested they're eager to review the court's precedent on same-sex marriage, but there's so far no clear indication that a majority of justices on the 6-3 conservative court would vote to overturn the landmark case. In a concurring opinion when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and its protections on abortion in 2022, Justice Clarence Thomas suggested Obergefell and other landmark cases could be overturned next, noting the same-sex marriage case was based on the same legal theory as Roe. Though Justice Samuel Alito's opinion overturning made clear the court's ruling only applied to abortion and not to other cases, Thomas said the same-sex marriage case and others relying on the same legal arguments are 'erroneous' and the court has 'a duty to 'correct the error' established in those precedents.' When the Supreme Court rejected a previous petition Davis submitted to the court in 2020, Thomas and Alito also filed an opinion decrying the Obergefell ruling, saying it 'threaten[s] religious liberty.' Because of the decision, 'those with sincerely held religious beliefs concerning marriage will find it increasingly difficult to participate in society without running afoul of Obergefell and its effect on other antidiscrimination laws,' Alito and Thomas wrote. What Happens If Same-Sex Marriage Is Overturned?
If Obergefell v. Hodges is overturned, same-sex marriages will still have some federal protections. Congress passed the Respect for Marriage Act in 2022, which requires all states to recognize same-sex marriages, as long as they were performed legally in a state where same-sex marriage was allowed. It also requires states to recognize marriages despite race or ethnicity, and repealed a previous law that denied federal spousal benefits to same-sex couples. Obergefell getting repealed would mean states would no longer be required to allow same-sex marriages to take place in the state, however, meaning same-sex couples may only be able to get married in certain states, even if their marriage could be legally recognized across the country. Key Background
Democrats and LGBTQ advocates have been fearful of what will happen to protections for same-sex marriage since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 and allowed states to outlaw abortion. Public trust in the Supreme Court has plummeted as the conservative-leaning court has issued a number of decisions in recent years that align with right-wing priorities, including giving more legal cover to President Donald Trump, loosening gun restrictions and letting business owners deny services to LGBTQ customers. Davis' petition to the Supreme Court comes as the Trump administration has broadly taken aim at LGBTQ rights in recent months, including by passing orders that restrict transgender rights—including reinstating the transgender military ban—attacking diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and taking steps like ending support for LGBTQ callers to the national suicide prevention hotline. Further Reading Forbes Clarence Thomas: Court Should Reconsider Gay Marriage, Birth Control Decisions Next After Overturning Roe By Alison Durkee Forbes Thomas, Alito Urge Supreme Court To 'Fix' Decision Legalizing Marriage Equality By Alison Durkee Forbes Biden Signs Same-Sex Marriage Protections Into Law By Sara Dorn
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway
Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway

Investors are in wait-and-see mode. Fed watchers have had quite a week, getting a hot Producer Price Index, a tame Consumer Price Index, and solid retail sales data out today. As it stands, markets are still betting on that September rate cut from the Jerome Powell-led Federal Reserve. There have been a few earnings stumbles in CoreWeave (CRWV), Applied Materials (AMAT), and Cava (CAVA), but a few bright spots from the likes of Cisco (CSCO). The Bullish (BLSH) IPO saw an enthusiastic response. And now markets cast their gaze to the highly anticipated meeting today between President Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. The outcome of this meeting could have a host of surprises that bullish investors haven't even thought about! Stock analysis: Intel The Trump administration is reportedly in talks to have the US government take a stake in Intel (INTC). An Intel spokesperson didn't comment directly on this to me, but offered this: "Intel is deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership. We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump Administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation.' The questions here are numerous. Why would the administration even want a stake in an Intel that is far behind chief rivals Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)? I encourage Trump to compare Nvidia's earnings report on Aug. 27 to the last disaster from Intel a few weeks ago. The president isn't known to hitch his ride to losers. Intel has been a loser and may stay that way in the chip game for some time. Then again, why would Intel want to get in bed with the government when embattled CEO Lip-Bu Tan and the board must act quickly to reorganize the company? I find it hard to believe the government will be a quiet minority shareholder! Intel has billions in cash and doesn't need the money that comes with terms from any government deal. There is a lot at stake here, as Intel should be a beacon of US chip-making, not the punching bag in tech circles. The company's financials have taken a major hit, with sales down for more than three straight years and earnings evaporating in the process. "[A stake would] be a big step for Intel, but right now Intel is on a horse and buggy compared to the Godfather of AI Jensen [Huang] and Nvidia," Wedbush tech analyst Dan Ives told me. Roundtable analysis: More tech When a Wall Street analyst who has been a bear on a stock for a while suddenly issues an upgrade, it always catches my attention. Today, we have that situation on Salesforce (CRM). DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria lifted his rating on Salesforce to Neutral from Underperform. Luria said investor sentiment has declined sharply on Salesforce in recent months as questions mount around the company's acquisition strategy and near-term margins. But what may not be factored into the stock is new activist investor activity, Luria said. Luria pointed out that noted activist investor Starboard Value — led by Jeff Smith — increased its stake in Salesforce by 47% this quarter, according to new 13F filings. Starboard pushed for big changes at Salesforce three years ago, which ultimately led to a new focus on margin expansion by CEO and co-founder Marc Benioff. Luria said, "We believe this is a signal there will be another round of investor activism and increased pressure on management to refocus on growth of the core business, additional margin expansion and hold off on dilutive M&A." Meanwhile, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold 20 million shares of Apple (AAPL) during the period, according to a new 13F filing. Berkshire's Apple holdings remain its largest equity stake by market value, despite dropping by about $9.2 billion in the second quarter. Is Buffett signaling he is concerned about Apple's tariff exposure? Perhaps. After all, Apple did warn tariffs would hit its profits by $1.1 billion in the current quarter. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Why Trump might push for a US gov't. stake in Intel
Why Trump might push for a US gov't. stake in Intel

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Trump might push for a US gov't. stake in Intel

Intel (INTC) stock is popping following reports that the US government is considering taking a stake in the legacy chipmaker after Trump's meeting with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. Slatestone Wealth chief market strategist and host of Yahoo Finance's Trader Talk, Kenny Polcari, and Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Allie Canal join Opening Bid to take a closer look at what the reported government partnership could mean for the US, Intel, and the evolving chip landscape. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. All right, let's fire up, uh, my stock of the day. The Trump administration is reportedly in talks with Intel to have the US government take a stake. Uh, Intel declined to comment specifically on this to me, but they did say this, uh, quote, Intel's deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. Uh, the questions here are many though. One, why would the administration even want to stake in an Intel that is scary behind chief rivals Nvidia and AMD? President Trump has interacted a lot with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and has got a taste as to what it means to be a leader in semiconductors. Two, why would Intel want to get in bed with the government at a time in which CEO Lipu Tang and the board must act quickly to reorganize the company. I find it hard to believe the government will be a quiet minority shareholder. There's a lot of stake here, as Intel is and should be a beacon of US chip making, not the punching bag it has become. The company's financials have taken a major hit with sales down for more than three straight years and earnings evaporating in the process. A lot going on there. Still with me, my round table, Kenny, Paul Kerry, uh, Slate Stone Wealth chief market strategist, David Seif, Nomora chief economist, and Yahoo Finance reporter, senior reporter, Allie Canal. Kenny, I want to go over to you. Um, any interest in going long in Intel on news like this, uh, even in the, uh, keeping the back of your mind, or maybe just putting the front of your mind that this is a fundamentally, uh, just wrong company. I mean, nothing's going right for them. Uh, uh, agree. So Intel's not a name that I've ever owned, uh, and we don't own it here. But look, I it's certainly has a pop because of the news. But is the pop temporary? I'm not even sure. And I agree with you. Why would you want to get, why would the government want to now be partners with Intel? Why would Intel want to be partners with the government? And what does that say about future opportunities? Is the government now going to start this Trump going to start the stick his hand in other companies? Kenny, it's like the auto bailout. I mean, it reminds me of when they took a stake in GM, what, 15, 20 years ago. 100%. And so I'm a little bit I'm a little bit confused about that. But Intel's not a name that I ever owned at all. I think there's other places to put your money in the space. But so this news does nothing in terms of getting me excited about, oh, I got to jump on this Intel bandwagon. I do not. David, does the, does it benefit, um, the US economy to have a healthy Intel? Or at this point, the semiconductor industry led by Nvidia, AMD, and of course, Taiwan semiconductor, they have just passed this company by, and our economy can go chugging along relying on chips from these three companies. Yeah, I mean, you know, I don't have much to say about individual companies, but certainly, um, you know, the US has a multi-century track record of doing well by sort of not sticking its nose into things and allowing, allowing the private market to go where it may. Um, to the extent that Intel has been lagging behind, uh, it it may be the best thing for the economy to simply allow it to, uh, continue to either wither or sink or swim, so to speak, um, and allow the current leaders to continue to lead and only lose their lead if they actually get out competed. Uh, Allie, uh, we're just about almost two weeks away from that Nvidia earnings report. And it will look starkly different to what Intel put up a few weeks ago. And it's night and day. I mean, these are, these companies both might be making computer chips, but they couldn't be more different. Couldn't be more different. And Intel, I just feel like it's too late for the company to really catch up to AMD, to Nvidia. Of course, for the Trump administration, they're viewing this as an issue of national security, that they really want to make sure that Intel can survive through this volatile time. We did have the that CEO meeting with President Trump, and really we've seen that across the board of big tech, right? Apple CEO, Tim Cook, met with Trump recently. And then out of that meeting was a $100 billion investment in the US. So that is President Trump's goal. He wants to bring manufacturing production, all the things, including all the chip makers back onto the domestic soil. But they also have other types of agreements that they're rolling out that are very unique and really unprecedented. One of those being that revenue share agreement with Nvidia and AMD. They're letting them sell some of their chips to China for a kickback, for some of the revenue to the federal government. So there's just a lot of moving parts and moving pieces to this. It's still an unconfirmed report. Intel did say that they are looking forward to working with the government, but they didn't confirm whether or not this was actually happening. So it feels like the US is just going to continue to be involved in some of these companies, at least throughout the term of Trump's presidency. What ultimately comes from that and the legacy that leads and how it really changes what we view the the chip supply chain as at this current moment, that remains to be seen. Related Videos How Trump's meeting with Putin impacts investors Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold Apple shares. Should you? Intel Soars as Trump Considers US Stake in Chipmaker 3 AI chip stocks that are best positioned right now Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Over two-thirds of Vermonters disapprove of Trump, the most of any state: See recent polls
Over two-thirds of Vermonters disapprove of Trump, the most of any state: See recent polls

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Over two-thirds of Vermonters disapprove of Trump, the most of any state: See recent polls

Out of all 50 states, President Donald Trump is the least popular in Vermont, a new poll reveals. According to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters, Trump has the lowest approval rating in the country in Vermont. There, he has a net approval rating of -32, with 64% disapproving of his job performance. This aligns with polls taken earlier this year, too: a University of New Hampshire Survey Center poll conducted in June found Trump's net approval in Vermont at -41. Trump isn't popular in any of the New England states: the poll found Massachusetts was tied with Maryland for the second lowest net approval nationally with -26. Trump saw his highest approval in New England in Maine: -14. What is Trump's approval rating in New England? According to Morning Consult, this is Trump's net approval rating in each New England state: Connecticut: -19 Maine: -14 Massachusetts: -26 New Hampshire: -16 Rhode Island: -21 Vermont: -32 Where is Trump the most popular? Trump's approval rating is above water in 27 states, according to Morning Consult. The poll found him to be most popular in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance. What is Trump's approval rating overall? An average of recent polls from the New York Times shows that Trump's approval rating as of Aug. 14 is 44%, with 53% disapproving of his performance. This average has remained largely steady over the past month, but some individual polls have shown his support dropping to near-record lows as voters seem frustrated with Trump's August tariffs and his sweeping budget bill passed in early July. What is Trump's current presidential approval rating?Disapprove +22 (38% approve, 60% disapprove) Poll taken Aug. 4-10 3,505 registered votersDisapprove +12 (42% approve, 54% disapprove) Poll taken Aug. 9-11 1,635 adults Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies Disapprove +5 (46% approve, 51% disapprove) Poll taken July 29 – Aug. 3 1,000 adultsDisapprove +16 (40% approve, 56% disapprove) Poll taken July 25-27 1,023 adults1,400 registered voters Disapprove +1 (46% approve, 47% disapprove) Poll taken July 21-22 Contributing: Kinsey Crowley This article originally appeared on Burlington Free Press: Trump's approval rating is lowest in Vermont, poll says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store