Criminals turn to drones and social media to sell illegal cigarettes
LONDON, June 11 (Reuters) - Tobacco smugglers and black market salesmen are increasingly using technologies such as social media and drones to deliver cigarettes to smokers in Europe and avoid law enforcers, a report by consulting group KPMG published on Wednesday found.
The report, produced annually and commissioned by Philip Morris International (PM.N), opens new tab, looks at illegal consumption of cigarettes on the continent - which big tobacco companies say costs them sales and authorities say costs them tax revenues.
In 2024, KPMG found that almost 40 billion illicit cigarettes were consumed across 38 European nations, based in part on a study of empty packs collected in those countries. It also cited interviews with law enforcement.
The gangs' flexible strategies have helped to drive a 10.8% increase in illicit consumption versus 2023, according to KPMG, which also attributed the rise to higher taxes and prices in markets including France and the Netherlands.
The report said criminal groups had shifted towards smuggling smaller packages, more often, via budget airlines.
They are also making greater use of rail and drones, and are increasingly bypassing physical stores to sell directly to consumers on social media, it continued.
The more recent change in tactics follows another shift from 2020, when the groups moved production closer to end-markets, partly in response to the pandemic disruption, but also reducing the chance of detection.
KPMG said in 2024 the groups had also begun holding less inventory, which is reflected in a decrease in the size of illicit cigarette seizures as the gangs mitigate their risks and reduce the impact of raids by law enforcers.
Big tobacco companies say tax increases have driven growth in illicit cigarette consumption.
Public health campaigners and institutions such as the World Bank, however, have said such claims are overblown and that high taxes can support public health by reducing tobacco consumption, while generating revenues for governments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tax hikes ‘almost certainly' to come if economy worsens, IFS says
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned that further negative economic news will 'almost certainly' lead to more tax increases, putting pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves. Council tax is projected to rise at its fastest rate in 20 years, with potential annual increases of up to 5 per cent as local governments struggle to close funding gaps. The IFS suggested more people may be forced to pay higher income tax rates due to 'fiscal drag,' potentially generating an additional £10bn a year by 2029. Government sources did not deny the possibility of extending the freeze on tax thresholds, stating that future tax decisions will be made at the Budget. IFS director Paul Johnson criticised the Treasury for 'making up the numbers' and described Chancellor Reeves' recent speech as 'baffling,' while also expressing concerns about the cost of Labour's childcare promises.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Donald Trump ally bids for £170m Crystal Palace stake
John Textor is considering three sale offers to rescue Crystal Palace 's Europa League place – including one from Donald Trump ally Woody Johnson. Telegraph Sport understands the New York Jets owner tabled a 43 per cent purchase proposal, marginally less in overall value than two others being discussed. Raine Group, the New York broker which secured sales for Chelsea and Manchester United, had been in discussion with parties on behalf of Textor since last year. However, the American is conscious of the club's need to now secure a quick transaction to guarantee European competition next season. A quick sale for as little as £170 million has been mooted for Eagle Football Holdings' 43 per cent stake as Textor's ownership of Lyon leaves Palace facing the threat of expulsion from Europe's second tier. Industry insiders believe a purchase of Textor's shares by the current co-owners, Josh Harris and David Blitzer, is the most likely outcome this summer. However, options include at least two other proposals from the US, one of which has been established for months. A deal with Johnson, 78, is viewed as an outside shot. He is a controversial figure in US sport, with the New York Jets facing scrutiny last year following reports of 'controversial and dysfunctional practices' under his watch. Johnson bought the New York Jets in 2000, with the NFL franchise now estimated to be worth around $6.9 billion. The Jets' $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium will hold next year's World Cup final. Johnson is also well-known in UK politics. The long-time Republican Party donor was appointed as US ambassador to the UK during Trump's first term. His brother, Christopher, took over Jets operations during his post. The American businessman has long been interested in buying a Premier League club, having approached Raine about Chelsea in 2022. Other suitors for Palace, meanwhile, are believed to include NBA star Jimmy Butler, part of a consortium of sport and entertainment executives that is expected to make an offer. That separate proposal was first reported by The Athletic on Wednesday night. Another international consortium advised by the veteran football financier Keith Harris also previously expressed interest. Mr Harris's group would probably execute its deal through the recently incorporated Sportbank vehicle. The Sportsbank consortium – worth upwards of £200 million – is said to be made up of a collection of investors from North America, Canada, Europe and the Gulf. Textor, who previously expressed interest in buying Everton, is willing to find another club as soon as possible. Textor acquired his holding in Palace in 2021 for about £90 million. His multi-club network Eagle Football also includes French club Olympique Lyonnais, Rio-based Botafogo and RWD Molenbeek in Belgium. His priority is to pursue a club which can accept players across the group. Crystal Palace's overall value is said to be around £500 million – around the same price that Everton was valued at, minus debt, during Farhad Moshiri's protracted sale. Stanley Tang, of the US-based food delivery company DoorDash, denied suggestions that he was also in discussions to buy Textor's stake. Chairman Steve Parish, Textor and his fellow US businessmen Harris and Blitzer oversee the running of the Selhurst Park club as general partners. However, Textor has repeatedly hinted at frustrations that he does not exert as much club control as he would like. Uefa is set to inform Palace whether they are in breach of its multi-club ownership rules by June 30 – although the matter may then be taken to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) which would delay a final verdict. The FA Cup winners met Uefa officials last week in a two-hour meeting in an attempt to avoid being barred. Palace insist there is no sharing of information or staff or facilities with the French side. The club argue that despite Textor's shareholding, he has no say in the day-to-day running and has just 25 per cent of voting rights. Indeed, Textor has previously spoken about his annoyance at the lack of say he has at Palace and has been trying to sell his shares. Textor reiterated this after last week's meeting in Nyon. However, Nottingham Forest have written a letter to Uefa expressing their position and asking for clarification over whether Palace will be involved.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ben Wallace accuses Labour of ‘conning' public over defence spending boost claim
Former defence secretary Ben Wallace has branded Labour's claims that it has boosted military spending 'a con' after concerns were raised over how the figures are being calculated. The row has exploded following Rachel Reeves' spending review on Wednesday where she boasted that defence spending would be 2.6 per cent of GDP. But this included wrapping in security and intelligence spending for the first time. Earlier this year prime minister Sir Keir Starmer controversially slashed international aid to boost defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, two years ahead of schedule. At the time he also promised it would rise to 3 per cent by 2034. However, since then the 3 per cent pledge has been qualified to 'if economic circumstances allow', while the new calculation on defence spending has left questions over whether the boost is as big as first claimed. According to the spending review, in 2027/28, Defence is £71bn and the security and intelligence is £5.1bn, making a combined total of 76.1bn, which was cited as '2.6 per cent of GDP.' However, the Tories noted that security and intelligence element equated to 0.186 per cent of that total GDP number as opposed to 0.1 per cent suggesting defence spending would below 2.5 per cent. Added to that there was nothing in the spending review about spending for the Chagos deal could cost as much as £30bn over 99 years, according to some estimates. Sir Ben Wallace, respected former Tory defence secretary who criticised his own government for not investing in the military enough, posted: 'As Rachel Reeves tries to con us all with her Defence GDP definition it is worth reading NATO's guidelines on what can count. 'If you claim other forces/police or intelligence you can only do so if, 'In such cases, expenditure is included only in proportion to the forces that are trained in military tactics, are equipped as a military force, can operate under direct military authority in deployed operations.'' He added: 'I'd like to be in the room when someone tells the workforce of MI6, GCHQ and MI5 they are about to be conscripted and go through military training .' Ms Reeves was challenged on LBC over whether her new calculations were 'trying to pull the wool over people's eyes.' She responded: 'No. Our commitment is to get to 2.5 per cent. We have not included all intelligence spending. We have [included some] under the Nato definition because obviously intelligence is an important part of our defence.' However, it was pointed out that according to its guidelines NATO defines defence spending as 'expenditure as payments made by a national government specifically to meet the needs of its armed forces, those of Allies or of the Alliance.' The explanation was not accepted by political opponents. Tory shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: 'Labour promised to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on Defence- but it already looks like they won't even deliver that- and that's before factoring in the potential cost of the Chagos settlement, which could strip hundreds of millions from the Defence budget in this spending review.'
