Trump UN envoy pick chastised for discussing bombing on Signal
President Donald Trump's former national security advisor Mike Waltz on Tuesday defiantly defended his use of a group chat to discuss military plans as he faced accusations of lying during a hearing to be US ambassador to the United Nations.
The editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine said in March that Waltz had mistakenly added him to a chat among top US officials on commercial messaging app Signal about the imminent US bombing of Yemen.
Senator Cory Booker of the rival Democratic Party accused Waltz of deliberately maligning the journalist by falsely saying that he infiltrated the group.
"I've seen you not only fail to stand up, but lie," Booker told Waltz.
"I have nothing but deep disappointment in what I consider a failure of leadership on your part," Booker told Waltz.
Waltz pointed to guidance under former president Joe Biden that allowed the use of Signal, which is encrypted, and said the White House has not taken disciplinary action.
"The use of Signal was not only authorized, it's still authorized and highly recommended," Waltz said, while insisting the chat did not exchange "classified" information.
Senator Chris Coons, another Democrat, was incredulous over his explanation and voiced alarm that the White House has not taken any corrective action.
"You were sharing details about an upcoming airstrike -- the time of launch and the potential targets. I mean, this was demonstrably sensitive information."
Waltz, a former congressman and special forces officer, survived little more than three months as national security advisor before Trump on May 1 replaced him with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is juggling both jobs.
Waltz did not deny he has kept taking his salary, saying he was not "fired" and still served as "an advisor."
Senator Jacky Rosen, raising the salary issue, contrasted Waltz's actions with his vow to "root out waste and unnecessary overhead at the UN."
Trump has aggressively cut US assistance overseas and pulled the United States out of several UN-backed bodies.
Waltz vowed to press for reforms at the United Nations, accusing it of "anti-Semitism" and "radical politicization" for criticisms of Israel and the United States, even though the United States is the organization's largest funder.
The United Nations, he said, has "drifted from its core mission of peacemaking."
"The UN's overall revenue has quadrupled in the last 20 years, yet I would argue we have not seen a quadrupling of world peace," Waltz said.
sct/ksb
Originally published as Trump UN envoy pick chastised for discussing bombing on Signal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
18 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
There's no free lunch with Xi, as Trump will surely remind Albanese
It shouldn't be remotely surprising that Anthony Albanese's trip to Beijing this week has turned out to be as much about Donald Trump's America as it has been about Xi Jinping's China. Trump's chaotic, look-at-me style of governing is designed precisely to that end, to ensure everyone else is focused on his policy priorities and has been positioned to accede to them. For once, though, it wasn't Trump who was disrupting a comfortable narrative of an Australian leader confidently rebuilding ties with China without first having broken bread with a new White House in Washington. The skunk at Albanese's party was Trump's top policy official in the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, with demands that Australia commit to joint war planning over Taiwan as part of the AUKUS deal to buy US nuclear-powered submarines. On Friday, Albanese concludes a six-day, three-city visit to China, where he has met and lunched with Xi Jinping, courted up-and-coming Politburo members in Shanghai and promoted trade everywhere. In between serious matters of state, Albanese has flaunted all the retro, Whitlam-era tropes of a traditional trip to the Middle Kingdom, including a visit to the Great Wall outside of Beijing and hugging pandas in sanctuaries in the west. On such a trip, there scarcely could have been a more incendiary issue to land in Albanese's lap than suggestions that Australia was signing up to a US plan to defend Taiwan. Loading To be fair to Colby, his demands were leaked to the Financial Times, not deliberately laid out in public by him to purposely upend Albanese's visit. But the effect was the same. Similar reports about Colby's initiatives had already appeared in The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age. Albanese's advisers don't need any reminding about Taiwan. I was among guests at a banquet in Shanghai earlier this year when a senior Chinese official forcibly reinforced Beijing's message on sovereignty claims to an Australian delegation. He told Canberra to cease flights near islands in the South China Sea claimed by Beijing. The Australian planes were in Chinese airspace for six minutes near the Paracel Islands, he said, before adding: 'If you flew over Hainan Island, you wouldn't last six seconds!' This was, by the way, at an ostensibly friendly diplomatic dinner designed to lay the ground for a more trusting bilateral dialogue. The message, delivered over dinner in Shanghai, applies on steroids to Taiwan, which Beijing regards as its own sovereign territory, and over which it would fight without hesitation should it declare independence.
The Age
18 minutes ago
- The Age
There's no free lunch with Xi, as Trump will surely remind Albanese
It shouldn't be remotely surprising that Anthony Albanese's trip to Beijing this week has turned out to be as much about Donald Trump's America as it has been about Xi Jinping's China. Trump's chaotic, look-at-me style of governing is designed precisely to that end, to ensure everyone else is focused on his policy priorities and has been positioned to accede to them. For once, though, it wasn't Trump who was disrupting a comfortable narrative of an Australian leader confidently rebuilding ties with China without first having broken bread with a new White House in Washington. The skunk at Albanese's party was Trump's top policy official in the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, with demands that Australia commit to joint war planning over Taiwan as part of the AUKUS deal to buy US nuclear-powered submarines. On Friday, Albanese concludes a six-day, three-city visit to China, where he has met and lunched with Xi Jinping, courted up-and-coming Politburo members in Shanghai and promoted trade everywhere. In between serious matters of state, Albanese has flaunted all the retro, Whitlam-era tropes of a traditional trip to the Middle Kingdom, including a visit to the Great Wall outside of Beijing and hugging pandas in sanctuaries in the west. On such a trip, there scarcely could have been a more incendiary issue to land in Albanese's lap than suggestions that Australia was signing up to a US plan to defend Taiwan. Loading To be fair to Colby, his demands were leaked to the Financial Times, not deliberately laid out in public by him to purposely upend Albanese's visit. But the effect was the same. Similar reports about Colby's initiatives had already appeared in The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age. Albanese's advisers don't need any reminding about Taiwan. I was among guests at a banquet in Shanghai earlier this year when a senior Chinese official forcibly reinforced Beijing's message on sovereignty claims to an Australian delegation. He told Canberra to cease flights near islands in the South China Sea claimed by Beijing. The Australian planes were in Chinese airspace for six minutes near the Paracel Islands, he said, before adding: 'If you flew over Hainan Island, you wouldn't last six seconds!' This was, by the way, at an ostensibly friendly diplomatic dinner designed to lay the ground for a more trusting bilateral dialogue. The message, delivered over dinner in Shanghai, applies on steroids to Taiwan, which Beijing regards as its own sovereign territory, and over which it would fight without hesitation should it declare independence.
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Peter Varghese is wrong. AUKUS is our path to defence self-reliance
AUKUS has dominated headlines since its 2021 launch, and new leaks about the Trump administration 'wanting more' have reignited anxieties. Australia should not concede to every US request, but quitting would be reckless. A capable navy, centred on nuclear-powered submarines, underwrites our security and economy. Former diplomat Peter Varghese may hanker for the pact's demise, yet that view ignores the blunt military facts of defending an island continent. This is precisely the moment to steady the course on AUKUS, not abandon it.
