
Bedding among 3 household items to ‘avoid at all costs' after links to stroke, cancer and 356,000 deaths in just 1 year
Repeated exposure could lead to cancer, infertility, and strokes, she warns.
3
Dr Shanna Swan, a reproductive epidemiologist and member of the Plastic Health Council, says Brits are being exposed just by eating, sleeping, and showering.
This is because many household items contain microplastics - tiny fragments of plastic less than 5mm in size.
These particles have now been found throughout the human body, including the brain, lungs, blood, and even unborn babies.
Studies have linked them to a range of potential health issues, including reproductive problems, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological effects.
They can also contribute to inflammation, cell damage, and disrupt the gut microbiome.
One plastic chemical alone, a phthalate called DEHP, was linked to more than 356,000 deaths worldwide in a single year, according to a study by Professor Leonardo Trasande from New York University, US.
Phthalates are chemicals used to make plastic more flexible and durable.
They've been linked to hormone disruption, fertility problems, developmental issues, and a higher risk of certain cancers.
Studies have also connected phthalate exposure to asthma, ADHD, obesity, and type 2 diabetes.
"Every day that passes more plastic chemicals enter our bodies through items many consider safe and normal," Dr Shanna says.
The 6 everyday items 'poisoning' you with toxic plastics linked to cancer
'Whilst there are some plastic products we should aim to avoid at all costs we need regulatory action if we are to see real change.
"We must phase out toxic plastics and prioritise health in every part of the plastics supply chain.'
The three items Dr Swan and other experts are most concerned about are food containers, bedding, and personal care products.
Plastic containers used for microwave meals, takeaway packaging, and clingfilm can release phthalates when heated or frozen, previous research has found.
Synthetic bedding, like memory foam pillows, polyester sheets, and mattresses, may contain flame retardants and water-resistant coatings known as PFAS.
PFAS are a large group of synthetic chemicals used in consumer products worldwide since the 1950s.
Exposure has been linked to increased risk of certain cancers, altered immune function, liver damage, and reproductive and developmental issues.
Some studies also suggest links between PFAS and thyroid disease, changes in cholesterol levels, and behavioural problems in children.
These chemicals can be absorbed through the skin, especially during long hours of sleep.
Toiletries, including shower gel, shampoo and moisturiser, may also contain phthalates as well as other plastic-based chemicals such as acrylates and thickeners.
These substances can be absorbed through the skin, potentially causing irritation, hormonal disruption, and long-term health effects.
'Plastic is not inert," Sian Sutherland co-founder of the Plastic Health Council and campaign group A Plastic Planet said. "It is a toxic mixture of chemicals".
She added: "If governments and industry refuse to protect us we need to take charge of our own health and demand to know why when the science has been so clear for decades are our babies now born pre-polluted. When will enough be enough.'
The warning comes as world leaders gather in Geneva to finalise the UN Global Plastics Treaty which aims to reduce plastic production and ban toxic chemicals from everyday products.
Most nations back strong measures but a small group of oil-producing countries and the plastics industry have delayed progress.
The Plastic Health Council is calling for a cap on plastic production, a ban on harmful substances and mandatory chemical testing of all plastic products before they reach consumers.
What are microplastics and why are they a worry?
Microplastics are tiny plastic particles less than five millimetres in diameter.
They come from a variety of sources in our everyday life, from larger pieces of plastic debris, such as from the degradation of bottles, to the tiny beads in personal care products like toothpaste and exfoliants, and synthetic fibres from textiles like polyester and nylon.
We can either ingest them, for example in food and water contaminated with them, or inhale them from the air.
There is growing concern about the potential health impacts of microplastics on both the environment and human health.
When ingested or inhaled, microplastics can cause physical and chemical damage to living organisms.
Studies have shown that they may be involved in inflammation in the body by leading to the release of proteins called inflammatory cytokines.
While these studies are typically small and in animals or cells, inflammation is linked to a range of chronic diseases, including heart disease, autoimmune disorders, and cancer.
Cellular damage has been a key focus of studies on microplastics.
The tiny pieces of plastic have been shown to cause cell death, cause damage via oxidative stress, and interfere with hormone function.
There is also evidence to suggest that microplastics can cause genotoxic effects, meaning they can damage genetic material within cells - raising fears they can contribute to cancer.
The evidence is still evolving for these tiny particles that are barely visible to the naked eye
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
Chesterfield heartbreakingly announce owner Phil Kirk's cancer treatment hasn't worked and he'll enter palliative care
CHESTERFIELD have confirmed the tragic news that owner Phil Kirk's cancer treatment has not been successful. Phil, who co-owns the League Two club with brother Ashley Kirk, will now enter palliative care. 4 A club statement announcing the heartbreaking news read: "Chesterfield Football Club owner Phil Kirk has been undergoing treatment for cancer in recent months. "Sadly, despite the best efforts of his medical team, the treatment has not been successful. Phil is now entering a period of palliative care. "Phil and his family remain deeply committed to the ongoing support of the club and its community. "The club will continue to operate as normal, and we are united in ensuring Phil's vision and values remain at the heart of everything we do." Phil was diagnosed with inoperable cancer in March. The outlook at the time was grim, and sadly the latest updates confirmed the club's worst fears. A club statement at the beginning of his treatment stated: "Over the next few months, he will be receiving treatment to prolong his life, but this is not expected to deliver a cure." 4 Fans and clubs from around the EFL have come forward with their condolences following the heartbreaking update. One Spireite fan gave testimony on X of the positive influence Phil and Ashley have had on the club since taking over in 2022. They said: "In all the 72 years of watching Chesterfield FC this is the saddest news I can ever remember coming from our club. "This man has made this club loved by young and old Phil this club and fans will never forget you." 4 4 Another fan added: This is deeply sad news. Phil, Ashley & everyone involved should be proud of the work done at town since their involvement. "His legacy will continue and town are in a much better place than when the Kirk family invested. Thoughts go to all." Since taking over, the brothers have invested over a million pounds on their way to earning the club promotion to the EFL at the end of the 2023-24 season. Their impressive campaign last season, their first in the EFL in six years, saw them earn their way into the playoffs with a seventh-place finish, where they were knocked out by Walsall. Their steady rise through the footballing pyramid, and the number of touching tributes from fans and rivals, is symbolic of the passion and the positive influence that the brothers have brought to the community in their limited time with the club thus far.


The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why do people sometimes lose their appetite as they get older?
Loss of appetite is not uncommon as people age and can indicate underlying physical health problems or emotional wellbeing, potentially leading to malnutrition and reduced vitality. Dr Nick Thompson, a consultant gastroenterologist, identifies seven key reasons for decreased appetite in older individuals, including limited access to fresh food due to mobility issues, poor dental health, and depression. Other significant factors contributing to appetite loss include the side effects of multiple medications (polypharmacy), social isolation and loneliness, and various illnesses common in later life, such as gut issues or constipation. To manage reduced appetite, practical strategies include making eating a social activity and consulting a GP to review medications that might be impacting appetite. Maintaining regular physical activity to preserve mobility and strength, and addressing dietary deficiencies, particularly in vitamins like vitamin D, are also recommended.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Don't turn new drivers into amateur ambulances
New rules from the DVSA will ensure that new drivers will be tested on their CPR skills in order to get their licence. I would refresh readers on what CPR is, but two-thirds of Britons already know how to perform this first aid function. Yet, new drivers will be forced to undertake testing on the subject in order to do what they took the test for in the first place. To drive. Already, the RAC estimates that the total cost of learning to drive can exceed £2,000. With waiting lists for tests exceeding five months, and an ongoing reform package not expected to take a hold until the summer of next year, these new changes needlessly add extra strains to an already rigorous driving examination. Since 2020, it has been mandatory to undertake first aid and CPR training as part of our school curriculum. In primary school, basic wound dressing and speaking to emergency services is taught, whilst in the secondary stages, rubber mannequins are deployed. Often St John's Ambulance or qualified staff will step in to rigorously teach compressions, breaths, and the Bee Gees (Staying Alive) in classrooms. In extra curricular activities, such as the Scouts, Cadets, or sports teams, first aid courses are also encouraged, or even form part of the participation tests. This is important – heart attacks happen on the pitch and in the pool, and there has been a very successful campaign to deploy 100,000 defibrillators across the UK in recent years, which is equivalent to the number of heart attacks per year. However, we do not know whether adding additional tests for young drivers will do anything to change the status quo to save more lives. Most people injured or killed in a car crash do not suffer from cardiac arrest. Rather it is blunt force trauma, deep lacerations and contusions, and shock that brings passengers, drivers, and pedestrians to the hospital. It is the inadequacies of the health service that is the central problem. Most ambulances still arrive past their targets, putting pressure on drivers to pick up the slack. But CPR, even if performed properly, can only do so much for major incidents. It cannot be incumbent upon drivers to take up the job of paramedics and rush to the nearest mangled car collision and provide the necessary treatment. Indeed, there is additional risk to encouraging young drivers, especially if they're shocked following an accident they've been involved in, to provide CPR. Poorly given CPR could result in battery charges, and could endanger the very person they are trying to resuscitate. Enough news stories about these amateur ambulance drivers and headlines of litigations, it may put even the most CPR-qualified drivers off leaping into the fray. If the Government wants to get serious about preventing driving accidents, they must start with the quality of our roads. Highways maintenance will only rise by £200m by the end of this Parliament, far short of what is required to fix the potted pavements and decaying road-signs that blight our tarmac. Likewise, the consideration should be given to the Government's continual pressure towards heavier electric vehicles (which are on average 400kg heavier than their hydrocarbon counterparts). These monstering hulks, which tear up our roads, and collide with more force, will do more damage to a driver or pedestrian than CPR could possible hope to recover.