Eurofins: Purchases of Own Shares From July 7th to July 11th 2025
Eurofins (Paris:ERF):
Transaction details
In accordance with Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) N° 596/2014 (the Market Abuse Regulation) a full breakdown of the individual trades are disclosed on Eurofins Scientific SE website: https://www.eurofins.com/investors/share-buy-back-programmes
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK parliamentary crypto group reformed amid push for regulatory clarity
On Monday, the All-Party Parliamentary Group, or APPG, for crypto and digital assets was relaunched as the industry is clamouring for regulatory clarity. While it's not part of the official legislative machinery, the group functions as a forum for Members of Parliament to liaise with government regulators over crypto regulations. The group will be supported by CryptoUK, a notable crypto lobby organisation that represents over 150 market stakeholders. The cross-party coalition will be chaired by Gurinder Josan, a Labour Party MP, and Ed Vaizey, a Conservative member of the House of Lords, according to an announcement. Vaizey is a former government minister for the digital economy. 'Our goal is to make the UK the safest place for consumers and the best place for businesses to invest and build,' Josan said. 'That means establishing robust, fair and future-focused rules.' With crypto ownership in the UK on the rise, according to research by the Financial Conduct Authority, the relaunched APPG says it wants to explore ways to close the gap between the expanding crypto adoption in the UK and the lack of a fully operational regulatory regime for digital assets. The newly reformed group comes as market participants are still waiting for concrete moves from the government in terms of crypto regulations. In April, UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves published draft legislation for crypto regulations and invited public comments. Still, industry participants in Britain have become even more anxious for clear-cut crypto regulations, especially with developments on that front happening in the US and the EU. In May, HMRC, the UK's tax authority, announced plans to enact new reporting requirements for crypto companies from next year. Regulators have also tightened crypto ad rules. Some have criticised the proposed rules as being too strict on the background checks that they'll force crypto firms to comply in order to operate in the UK. Su Carpenter, executive director of CryptoUK, has hit back against that criticism. 'If you didn't expect that you would have to be in this position to meet these levels of compliance and to operate within these frameworks — where have you been for the last few years?' Carpenter told DL News in May. Crypto market movers Bitcoin has dropped 0.5% in value over the past 24 hours and is trading at $117,893. Ethereum also shed 1.6% in the same period to $3,760. What we're reading revenue falls to 10-month low amid competition, memecoin slump — DL News Interactive Brokers Considers Stablecoin Launch: Report — Unchained Why this 'dead' token isn't dead— Milk Road Plasma Public Sale Ends With $373 Million in XPL Commitments — Unchained Ethereum investors want treasuries to buy more Ether. BitMine just hinted at the opposite — DL News Osato Avan-Nomayo is our Nigeria-based DeFi correspondent. He covers DeFi and tech. Got a tip? Please contact him atosato@
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
The Government has defended the Online Safety Act after Elon Musk's X said the legislation was threatening free speech. In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
The Government has defended the Online Safety Act after Elon Musk's X said the legislation was threatening free speech. In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.
