Firefighters tackle blaze at New Forest house under construction
Firefighters have tackled a fire at a house being built in the New Forest.The fire broke out at the partially built home in Vereley, Burley, near Ringwood on Thursday at about 20:00 BST.Firefighters from Burley, Ringwood and Fordingbridge worked together with crews from Dorset & Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service to put the fire out shortly before midnight.Hampshire & Isle of Wight Fire & Rescue said firefighters remained at the building to monitor and dampen down through the early hours. The cause of the fire is currently unknown.
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bournemouth late night fire near bars and clubs extinguished
Fire crews have extinguished a large late night blaze in a commercial property on a busy road near bars and and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service (DWFRS) said it was called to the fire on Old Christchurch Road, in Bournemouth, at about 00:50 BST on said 10 crews from across the county, alongside the aerial platform unit and a Hampshire-based crew, responded to the fire in a ground-floor Police said its officers also attended the incident to assist with road closures and evacuating the property involved and neighbouring properties. Fire crews from Springbourne, Redhill Park, Westbourne, Christchurch, Poole, Hamworthy, Wimborne, Blandford, Verwood and Ringwood responded to the said that on arrival, residents from the neighbouring flats had already fire was "quickly" brought under control, with eight breathing apparatus wearers using one main line and two hose reel jets to extinguish the stop came in at 02:31, with no casualties reported, DWFRS added. You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Couple locked in bitter feud with builder neighbour claim they have spent over £200k fixing home renovation gone wrong
It was supposed to be a simple extension that would turn a small 1930s bungalow into one couple's dream home. But for Samantha Wright, 46, and her partner Craig Smith, 54, their routine build turned into a toxic two-year-long nightmare that has left them facing a £200,000 bill due to the alleged fault of their own neighbour. The couple from Grimsby, Lincolnshire, say contractor Cristian Wooller, who has strongly denied the allegations, abandoned the job before it was finished. They claim not only was their house left as a building site, they have had to tear up the work that was done and start again. Therefore despite saying they paid their nextdoor neighboor £90,000 for the work, they have had to fork out another £140,000 to have it all redone brick by brick. Mr Wooller has disputed Samantha and Craig's version of events, saying the fee was not paid in full and he was pushed off the job. He also says all the work he did was cleared by building inspectors. Now, nearly two years after they started the work, the couple are yet to move into their new home and are filled with trepidation for when they do as the builder they blame for their problems is still living next door. Samantha, who has called for greater regulation of the building industry, said: 'The mental impact of it has been absolutely terrible. 'I struggle to concentrate and have a lack of trust. There's been times when I have been at the property and I've been properly shaking. 'I've said to my work colleague that you need to come with me just to collect post from the property.' Samantha explained that the issues began when they bought an old bungalow in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, after saving up for five years. They planned to put in a first-floor extension and transform the property into their 'dream home' in September 2023. Samantha said they also wanted to increase the ground-floor footprint by around five metres and update the roof. The 46-year-old told MailOnline: 'We spoke to a number of local builders, they gave us rough ideas of the price. 'Our actual neighbour was also a builder and we had been friends with him for nearly two years. 'He told us about what he'd done in the past. He initially said that he wasn't prepared to take on just doing an extension for somebody. Then he changed his mind.' However, Samantha said the problems with Mr Wooller first arose when it came to agreeing the price of the extension. 'It was supposed to be £85,000. Then the cost went from £85,000 to £89,000,' she said. 'Then there were issues found with the building allegedly and the cost went to £106,000. Then he tried to put it up to over £130,000. 'We had saved money and he knew that because he had lived next to us for a couple of years. 'We said look, we can't afford to keep this bill to keep increasing. We've agreed £106,000 in writing. That's that. 'Then the job went back on track but within two weeks it was the same situation - where he tried to increase the price again. 'This time it worked out to be something like £148,000. We said, no, this is what happened. You agreed £106,000.' It was at this point Samantha claimed their nextdoor neighbour walked away from the job, although he disputes this, leaving them in 'absolute shock'. She said: 'We'd spent £90,000 of the money that we'd saved up. We only had a bit left to try to finish the property. 'We then went down the route of trying to find new builders and had meetings with building control. 'In the end, the issues with the property were so bad it had to be taken down a bit at a time and then rebuilt. 'It was just so unsafe. Everything was wrong with it. 'The insulation was put in wrong so the house didn't have a roof, windows or doors, but did have rising damp already.' She added: 'Because he'd been our neighbour stupidly, we thought, you know, he's not going to do a bad job. He lives literally next door to us. 'Then things started to go wrong, and we double checked everything. 'He comes from the Leeds area and had been taken to court by another person I got in touch with. 'They won their case and then he bankrupted himself and was banned from being a company director. 'But that doesn't stop you from being a sole trader. 'There isn't any regulation in place. There's nothing that stops this guy from being a builder in this country at all. 'The government needs to do something. I used to be a bank manager years ago. If I had complaints against me I would be struck off. 'My sister works for a care home, and if she got complaints against her, she would be struck off.' Samantha said that she did consider taking the builder to court but there was no guarantee they would get their money back even if they did win. 'In the meantime, he actually tried to take me to court. After we only paid the £90,000 we took legal advice on whether we should pay the rest,' she explained. 'The advice was absolutely not, so we didn't pay it. 'He then tried to take me personally to small claims court on the grounds that we hadn't done that. 'So that cost me in excess of £5,000 to defend the claim.' Speaking about why she and Craig still want to move back into the bungalow, Samantha said: 'A question that gets asked a lot is surely you wouldn't want to move back in next to him. 'Me and my partner will always say, but we haven't done anything wrong. 'It's our dream house so that is the stance we are taking.' Mr Wooller has strongly denied all the allegations against him. He told MailOnline: 'The amount paid to us was £53,000 for labour and materials over the period we worked on the house. 'As requested, Sam was provided a full breakdown of everything and she was extremely involved throughout the 12 week period. 'This was a no-profit "mates rates" job, as her neighbours and friends, all materials were paid at cost and receipts forwarded to Sam so we all knew the costings. 'Problems arose as it became clear her original house was in an almost derelict state and this caused a lot of extra work, hence the original estimate given at the start changed by approximately £30,000. 'Ultimately they said they had run out of funds. 'Sam then became very difficult to communicate with and then threw us off the job. In front of witnesses she said if ever we went back on her property she would have us "done for trespassing". 'This had all come out of the blue and I did not even have my tools. The building then stood untouched for a year. 'Because of its unfinished state and the fact they declined advice to strengthen foundations and a harsh winter, with seven storms and gale force winds, the house it seems took some damage. 'I must also express that every stage of the build while we were on it was passed by the Building Inspectors. 'It's very hard to finish a job when you've been thrown off, threatened with trespass, not paid and ,ignored when you try to communicate and offer a way out which I did multiple times to no avail. 'Sam knows she is welcome to put any questions she has to us directly but she refuses to communicate. 'We did start proceedings through the small claims court for the final invoice including expenses such as machine hire totalling nearly £4,000 however due to costs we found it too emotionally draining and ineffective financially. 'The system seems unfair to builders who have been badly treated by customers. Our solicitor received a list of points they were claiming were wrong, and I answered every single one. 'These are still available for her should she wish to have them. We gave up on going to court and a drop hands offer was sent however yet again there was no response from Sam or her solicitor.'
BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Portsmouth navy veterans' lives 'blighted' by gay ban
"You were living a double life, always looking over your shoulder."As Portsmouth finds itself at the heart of UK Pride this weekend, an iconic war vessel in the Hampshire city has been covered in rainbow colours to also mark 25 years since a ban on LGBT people serving in the military was Historic Quarter and military charity Fighting with Pride came together last month to celebrate LGBTQ+ veterans, by wrapping Landing Craft F8 in rainbow navy veterans have been speaking to the BBC about their experiences serving in the military under the ban. Until January 2000, the "gay ban" saw many LGBT people who served their country face dishonourable discharge, loss of medals and criminal charges because of their sexuality. Roly Woods is a former Sub Lt in the Royal Navy who served on HMS Leeds Castle during the Falklands said he hid his sexuality so that he could continue his military career."At one stage during my naval career, I was challenged by my commanding officer, who heard rumours that I had been seen by officers with a man," he said."I was called up to his office, sat down, and plainly asked – 'are you gay?'."Right there and then I had to decide, 'do I throw everything away, or do I lie?'.Choosing "in that split second" to lie, he said he "got away with it"."But it was an extremely difficult situation to deal with, both professionally and personally, and I wrestled with it for many years," he said. He said when he joined the navy "all the services in the UK Armed Forces were institutionally homophobic"."You were living a double life, always looking over your shoulder," he said. "I couldn't be out and open with my closest colleagues and friends."Not because I thought they would out me but I didn't want to put them in the position of having to choose - once they knew, they were culpable as well for not declaring it."He said "bottling it all up for decades" is not something that can be switched off overnight."There are other veterans who are completely broken, whose lives were blighted by this ban - they were dismissed, lost their family, lost their income, many lost their homes, some took their own lives," he said. 'Degree of guilt' When the gay ban was in place, the Royal Navy Special Investigation Branch (SIB) was responsible for investigating criminal offences within the navy, which included being Master at Arms in the Royal Navy Gavin Moulds served in the SIB from 1994 to said: "The ban, the way it was enforced, and to the level it was enforced, was never something I agreed with. "However, I cannot help but still feel a degree of guilt for my involvement – an apology would not be enough." But Mr Moulds said there was a "mental detachment and a professional requirement" in working for the SIB."In my experience, we behaved professionally towards any person that we dealt with," he Moulds said of the ban: "It was wrong. It's wrong today, it was wrong then and it should never have happened."The way some of those people were treated was horrendous." You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
