Israel Expands Campaign In Gaza Ahead Of Netanyahu's US Visit
The intensified operations came after days of mounting calls for a ceasefire, with US President Donald Trump -- whom Netanyahu is slated to meet with next week -- among those urging Israel to strike a new deal to halt the war and bring home the hostages still held in Gaza.
Israel's campaign to destroy the Palestinian militant group Hamas has continued unabated, however, with Gaza's civil defence agency reporting Israeli forces killed 17 people on Tuesday.
In response to reports of deadly strikes in the north and south of the territory, the Israeli army told AFP it was "operating to dismantle Hamas military capabilities".
Separately, it said Tuesday morning that in recent days it had "expanded its operations to additional areas within the Gaza Strip, eliminating dozens of terrorists, and dismantling hundreds of terror infrastructure sites both above and below ground".
Raafat Halles, 39, from the Shujaiya district of Gaza City district, said "air strikes and shelling have intensified over the past week", and tanks have been advancing.
"I believe that every time negotiations or a potential ceasefire are mentioned, the army escalates crimes and massacres on the ground," he said. "I don't know why."
Amer Daloul, a 44-year-old resident of Gaza City, also reported fiercer clashes between Israeli forces and militants in recent days, telling AFP that he and his family were forced to flee the tent they were living in at dawn on Tuesday "due to heavy and random gunfire and shelling".
In the southern city of Rafah, resident Mohammed Abdel Aal, 41, said "tanks are present" in most parts of town.
Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that eight people were killed near aid distribution sites in central and southern Gaza Tuesday, in the latest in a long-running spate of deadly attacks on those seeking food.
One person was killed and 50 wounded when tanks and drones opened fire as crowds were waiting to collect aid near the Wadi Gaza Bridge in the middle of the territory, Bassal said.
The civil defence said another six people were killed nearby while trying to reach the same aid centre.
Asked for comment, the Israeli military told AFP its forces "fired warning shots to distance suspects who approached the troops", adding it was not aware of any injuries but would review the incident.
At least one more person was killed near another aid centre in Rafah, the civil defence said.
Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by rescuers.
A group of 169 aid organisations called Monday for an end to Gaza's "deadly" new US- and Israeli-backed aid distribution scheme, which they said forced starving civilians to "trek for hours through dangerous terrain and active conflict zones, only to face a violent, chaotic race" for food.
They urged a return to the UN-led aid mechanism that existed until March, when Israel imposed a full blockade on humanitarian assistance entering Gaza during an impasse in truce talks with Hamas.
The new scheme's administrator, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), has distanced itself from reports of aid seekers being killed near its centres.
The Israeli army said it had also opened a review into a strike on a seafront Gaza cafe on Monday that it said had targeted militants.
The civil defence agency reported that the attack killed 24 people.
Maher Al-Baqa, 40, the brother of the owner of the cafe, told AFP that several of his relatives including two nephews were killed in the strike.
"It's one of the most well-known cafes on the Gaza coast, frequented by educated youth, journalists, artists, doctors, engineers and hardworking people," he said.
"They used to feel free and safe there -- it was like a second home to them."
The military maintained it had taken steps "to mitigate the risk of harming civilians using aerial surveillance".
Netanyahu announced he would visit Trump and senior US security officials next week, after previously saying Israel's campaign against Iran had created "opportunities", including for freeing hostages held in Gaza.
Israel's declaration of victory in the recent 12-day war has raised pressure on it to put a similar end to more than 20 months of devastating fighting in Gaza.
"Taking advantage of the success is no less important than achieving the success," Netanyahu said at the start of a cabinet meeting on Tuesday.
Hamas official Taher al-Nunu told AFP the group is "ready to agree to any proposal if it will lead to an end to the war and a permanent ceasefire and a complete withdrawal of occupation forces".
"So far, there has been no breakthrough." A Palestinian man examines the damage to a house in Deir el-Balah on Tuesday following overnight Israeli strikes AFP A seaside cafe near Gaza City lies in ruins after an Israeli strike that rescuers say killed 24 people AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Middle East: Charities urge end to US-backed GHF aid system – DW – 07/01/2025
Dozens of charities have called for an Israeli and US-backed Gaza aid group to be disbanded. Hundreds have been killed at or near sites guarded by the Israeli military since the group started its operations. DW has more. Aid groups and charities have called for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to be disbanded. The GHF relies on private US security and logistics firms to bring supplies into Gaza, largely bypassing a UN-led system that Israel says allowed militants to divert aid. Since it began its work in late May, hundreds of people have been killed by gunfire at or around sites run by the group and guarded by the Israeli the Israeli army says it has launched a review into an airstrike on a popular Gaza seafront cafe that rescuers say has left 24 dead. Israel said it was targeting militants., At least seven Palestinians are confirmed dead after trying to reach aid late Monday and early Tuesday, hospitals report. Three people were shot dead by Israeli fire in Khan Younis in southern Gaza, while four others were killed in central Gaza. More than 65 people were wounded, according to Awda hospital in the Nuseirat refugee camp and Al-Quds hospital in Gaza City, which took in the casualties. Local health officials say Israeli gunfire and airstrikes across the enclave have killed at least 112 people and injured more than 400 in the past 24 hours. Clusters of houses have been reported destroyed in Gaza City's Shejaia and Zeitoun districts, east of Khan Younis, and in the southern city of Rafah. More than 170 non-governmental organizations are calling today for a US- and Israeli-backed food aid plan in Gaza to be dismantled, saying it is putting civilians at risk of death and injury. Medical authorities in Gaza say more than 500 people have been killed in mass shootings near aid distribution centers or transport routes guarded by Israeli forces since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operating in late May. The GHF relies on private US security and logistics firms to bring supplies into Gaza, largely bypassing a UN-led system that Israel says allowed militants to divert aid. The United Nations has called the plan "inherently unsafe" and a breach of humanitarian impartiality rules. By early afternoon in Geneva on Tuesday, where the joint declaration was released, 171 charities had signed the call for countries to press Israel to stop the GHF scheme and return to UN-coordinated aid deliveries. "Palestinians in Gaza face an impossible choice: starve or risk being shot while trying desperately to reach food to feed their families," the statement said. Groups backing it include Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders, Save the Children, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Amnesty International. In response, the GHF told Reuters it has delivered more than 52 million meals in five weeks and said other humanitarian groups have had "nearly all of their aid looted." "Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza," the GHF said. The NGOs accuse the GHF of forcing hungry and weak people to trek for hours, sometimes through active conflict zones, to reach food aid. The Israeli military acknowledged on Monday that Palestinian civilians have been harmed at aid distribution centers in Gaza, saying Israeli forces have been given new instructions after what it called "lessons learned." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Thanks for joining our Middle East blog!More than 170 charities have been calling for the US- and Israeli-backed food aid plan in Gaza to be scrapped, warning it's putting civilians in grave danger. Medical teams in Gaza have been reporting more than 500 deaths near aid routes since the private-run scheme began, with the UN insisting the plan has been breaching humanitarian rules. Meanwhile, the Israel Defense Forces says it is reviewing an airstrike on a Gaza beach cafe that killed 24 people. This blog will bring you the latest on the situation in the Middle East, including in Iran, Israel and Gaza.
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
GOP Senate Pushes Through $3.3 Trillion Tax And Spending Overhaul
In a vote that underscored deep divisions on Capitol Hill, Senate Republicans pushed through a sweeping $3.3 trillion fiscal package early Tuesday, narrowly passing the legislation that has become a centerpiece of Donald Trump's revived economic agenda. Vice President J.D. Vance cast the tie-breaking vote in a 50-50 split just before dawn, ending hours of high-stakes debate over a bill Republicans have branded the American Prosperity, Security, and Taxpayer Relief Act—but which Trump has repeatedly promoted as the "Big Beautiful Bill." The legislation now heads to the House, where GOP leaders are aiming for final passage ahead of the July 4 recess. Inside the Bill: Tax Relief, Program Cuts, and Border Security At the heart of the measure are permanent extensions to the 2017 tax cuts, a lower corporate tax rate of 17%, and fresh incentives for companies investing in U.S.-based manufacturing, artificial intelligence and advanced technology infrastructure. To help offset the price tag, the bill slashes federal outlays on health care and social programs, including Medicaid, food assistance and student loan subsidies. Work requirements for recipients of federal aid would also expand under the plan. Other major components include: $80 billion in new border security funding , earmarked for construction, surveillance, and expanded immigration enforcement. , earmarked for construction, surveillance, and expanded immigration enforcement. A rollback of climate-related tax credits, including incentives for electric vehicles and clean energy projects. A freeze on new federal hires and cuts to agency discretionary budgets. Reactions: Applause, Warnings and Dissent Republicans hailed the bill as a "return to common-sense economics," arguing it would reinvigorate U.S. industry and rein in bloated federal programs. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called the legislation "a long-overdue course correction for a government that spends too much and delivers too little." But Democrats and advocacy groups condemned the package, describing it as a handout to corporations at the expense of vulnerable families. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said the cuts would "gut the middle class in exchange for boardroom bonuses." Even within GOP ranks, dissent emerged. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) opposed the bill over cuts to health programs in rural states, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) raised alarms about long-term deficit growth. Markets Cautious, Fed Eyes Inflation Risks Investor sentiment was mixed Tuesday morning, as markets weighed the prospect of aggressive tax cuts against the risk of renewed inflation. The U.S. dollar slid to a multi-year low, while Treasury yields rose slightly in early trading. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell issued a brief statement warning that "unbalanced fiscal momentum" could complicate the central bank's ability to ease interest rates later this year. On Wall Street, clean energy firms slipped on fears of subsidy losses, while cloud and AI-related stocks saw gains in anticipation of corporate tax relief and tech-focused incentives. Experts Divided on Economic Impact Economists remain split on the bill's long-term implications. "This is not just a tax cut—it's a reordering of federal priorities," said Angela Tse, a policy analyst at the Brookings Institution. "While it may boost near-term corporate activity, the social cost could be substantial." Others argue the bill could deliver real gains for U.S. competitiveness, especially in the face of global economic shifts. "If implemented effectively, it could position the U.S. as a dominant force in the next wave of innovation," said Mark Leighton, a senior economist at Deloitte. However, early scoring from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that the legislation would add nearly $900 billion to the deficit over the next 10 years, even after accounting for reduced spending. A Political Stakes Game Ahead of 2025 Elections With Trump expected to formally accept the Republican nomination in August, the "Big Beautiful Bill" has become a signature part of his pitch to voters: tough on immigration, friendly to business, and tough on what he calls "wasteful welfare." Democrats have vowed to make the bill a central issue in swing states, targeting its effects on health care access, public education, and clean energy jobs. House Republicans plan to bring the bill to a vote by Friday, hoping to avoid any internal splintering and give Trump a legislative win as campaign season intensifies.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Can Elon Musk's dream of a third party succeed in the US? – DW – 07/01/2025
Elon Musk wants to shake up U.S. politics after clashing with Donald Trump — but history hasn't been kind to third parties. The world's wealthiest person has apparently set his mind to a new startup: his own political party. As the ongoing public fracturing of the relationship between the US President Donald Trump and his top election financier continues to play out in public, Elon Musk has again vented his opposition to the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill," a tax and spending bill, which he believes undoes the efficiency mantra he sought to instill in Washington. Musk has gone as far to warn Republican lawmakers who pass the bill that he'll run candidates against them in next year's primaries. And he also threatened the broader US two-party system with the promise he'll form a faction of his own. "If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day," he wrote on X. "Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE." A genuinely competitive third party would upend more than a century of Democrats-Republicans dominance at all levels of government. Yet few have come close, despite dozens of minor parties operating across the US for decades. The Libertarian Party, established in 1971, is the third biggest in America. Campaigning for free markets, small government and personal freedoms, it had its best presidential election performance in 2016 with candidate Gary Johnson, who won 3.27% of the nationwide vote. But that's a long way from the tens of millions of votes needed to win the White House, a governorship or even a state legislature seat. The Green Party is another long-running party which has run candidates in state and federal races. Like the Libertarians, it too holds no seats in government. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The very nature of the American political system is the "winner takes all" principle thorough the widespread use of a "first past the post" voting system. This delivers victory to candidates with the most votes — almost always a Republican or Democrat. There are other factors hampering third party success, according to Bernard Tamas, a political scientist at Valdosta State University, US, who has written extensively on the subject. Tamas said it's fundamental for a third party to tap into popular unrest — a large number of people who are dissatisfied with the current political options — and build a groundswell grassroots movement. "One of the biggest problems with the parties that have emerged is that they're not really tapping into that anger," Tamas said. Upstart parties instead "tend to be more wishy-washy and [are] not really focusing in on that strong urge for change." If tapping into grassroots is essential, so is money. Parties spend billions of dollars to get their candidates elected. According to donations watchdog OpenSecrets, nearly $16 billion (about €13.58 billion) was spent across the 2024 presidential and congressional races. Musk himself was the biggest donor in the 2023-24 election cycle. He gave more than $291 million (€247.1m) to Republicans across all races. Massive campaign war chests help parties "get out the vote" — buying the advertising and campaigning materials that expose candidates to the public and earn their vote. It doesn't guarantee a win — the Democrats spent more than the Republicans in 2024 — but it certainly helps. "You need money for things like ballot access and a number of other things, but no third party would ever have enough money to compete against the Republicans and Democrats on their own terms," said Tamas. Could a genuine third party supplant the Democrats or Republicans? It's unlikely in Tamas's view. Instead of winning seats and building long-term success, Tamas said they instead "sting like a bee." "They emerge very quickly, they run a bunch of candidates all over the country and then they cause one or both major parties major pain," Tamas said. "They basically are pulling away votes." This is called the "spoiler effect", where protest candidates leech votes away from an often ideologically similar mainstream candidate. In some cases, they could pull away enough votes that a frontrunner loses the lead and falls to second place. It's the fear of a third party groundswell that causes the major parties to alter their policies to appease these voters. Once the change is achieved, like a bee that's stung its victim. "It dies." "The most successful third parties in America last about a decade. Once they become too much of a threat, the major parties start stealing their rhetoric, their ideology," said Tamas. Not all Americans are happy with their options. Donald Trump's net approval rating is in negative territory, YouGov's latest polls found almost 3 in 5 Americans view the Democratic Party unfavorably. In 2022, a Pew Research analysis found overall support for more parties in the political system. But it doesn't mean a new party would succeed. A study by two US political scientists in May 2024 found "disaffected partisans" — Republicans and Democrats unsatisfied with their own parties — were less likely to vote for a third, more centrist alternative. Tapping into popular anger and frustration with the status-quo, Tamas said, is the fastest pathway to success. For a person like Musk, he might do well to look towards the "Fight Oligarchy" movement of left-wing opponents like Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders currently touring America, or the original MAGA movement, if he wants to start a party. "These are very good examples to follow… the tapping into people's grievances is really it," Tamas said. "They force the [major] parties to respond by threatening their careers, and their livelihood."
