logo
Tucker Carlson and Trump are falling out over the Iran war

Tucker Carlson and Trump are falling out over the Iran war

Vox17-06-2025
is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau.
Tucker Carlson has been one of the right's loudest voices urging the United States to stay out of Israel's war with Iran — part of a broader effort to overturn the GOP's hawkish consensus.
But now, as tensions rise amidst Israeli strikes, Carlson has had a setback to his project: a derogatory nickname from President Donald Trump.
''Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that,' IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!'' Trump posted on TruthSocial on Monday night.
This is more important than just a nickname; there are real stakes here. Trump's lashing out is a sign that, on this pivotal issue of potential war with Iran, he's turned against Carlson — a longtime close ally.
On Monday, I published a lengthy feature about the rise of an America First faction — including Carlson, Vice President JD Vance, and Donald Trump Jr. — that sought to overturn the Republican Party's foreign policy establishment. Famously, they want the US to stop supporting Ukraine against Russia. But they're also deeply suspicious of the US becoming embroiled in 'forever wars' in the Middle East.
For the few months of this administration, they appeared to have gained remarkable sway. The America Firsters were deeply influential in staffing the new administration. And when it came to Iran, Trump seemed to be following their counsel. For the first time, he pursued talks with Iran over its nuclear program, instead of the 'maximum pressure' sanctions approach of his first term.
Yet the hawks — strongly supportive of Israel, very hostile to Iran, and very skeptical any nuclear deal could be reached — remain very strong in the GOP. Every Republican senator except one (Rand Paul of Kentucky) signed a letter demanding Iran not be permitted any nuclear enrichment. Their belief is that Iran can never be 'allowed' to go nuclear — that the US must stop it, by force if necessary.
When I interviewed Carlson earlier this month (before the Israeli strikes), he disputed this logic. He argued that since Pakistan already had nuclear weapons, 'It's not without precedent that another Islamic nation gets the bomb.' And he argued that a war to try and stop Iran from getting nukes would be 'a true disaster' and 'would not stay in Iran, of course.'
Right now, the hawks are urging Trump to enter the war against Iran more directly, arguing that the US has the responsibility, the capability, and the opportunity to end Iran's nuclear program for the foreseeable future and perhaps even to topple its regime. The America Firsters are urging restraint, worrying that US entry to the war could unleash far worse consequences.
But Carlson suggested Trump had already done too much to support Israel's strikes. 'While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night's events,' he wrote in a newsletter Friday.
'Washington knew these attacks would happen,' Carlson added. 'They aided Israel in carrying them out. Politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it.'
Yet what's become clear is that, unlike many of the America Firsters, Trump doesn't truly want to withdraw from the world or stay out of foreign entanglements. He wants to accomplish and achieve big things on the global stage. He has declared that his goal is to force Iran to completely give up its nuclear ambitions. 'Remember, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,' Trump said Monday. 'They just can't have a nuclear weapon.'
The shifting currents could be seen in a long X post by Vance. Vance is a close Carlson ally and who (per the New York Times) worried internally that an Israeli strike could lead lead to a drawn-out war or spiral out of control. But, per his position and his political future, he's also obligated to defend the president.
So, pushing back Tuesday against what he called 'crazy stuff on social media' — the MAGA influencers and America First supporters dismayed or outraged over Trump being drawn into war — Vance blamed Iran for the collapse of negotiations and praised Trump for being 'amazingly consistent' and displaying 'remarkable restraint.'
'He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president,' Vance added. 'Of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue.'
Yet, with each new Truth Social post, the US risked getting drawn deeper into the conflict. By midday Tuesday, Trump was claiming that 'we' had gained 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' and warning Iranian leaders that 'our patience is wearing thin.' Carlson's warnings had been ignored — and the future of the America First faction was in serious doubt.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants to get rid of mail-in voting. It's become an increasingly important part of American elections.
Trump wants to get rid of mail-in voting. It's become an increasingly important part of American elections.

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump wants to get rid of mail-in voting. It's become an increasingly important part of American elections.

More and more voters, including Republicans, have been opting to cast their ballots through the mail. President Trump on Monday said he would lead a movement to get rid of mail-in voting, based on the false claim that they lead to widespread fraud. 'ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING,' he wrote in a post on Truth Social in which he also railed against voting machines used across the country. Trump wrote that he would be signing an executive order to 'to help bring HONESTY' to next year's midterm elections, but didn't share any details on what that order might include or what legal authority he would rely on to issue it. The Constitution gives states the power to control their own elections within the confines of laws set out by Congress. The president does not have the ability to unilaterally change voting laws. Trump has a long history of opposition to mail-in voting, also known as absentee voting. False claims about mail ballots being rife with fraud are central to his unfounded belief that the 2020 presidential election was rigged against him. 'We gotta stop mail-in voting and the Republicans have to lead the charge,' Trump told reporters at the White House Monday. 'If you [end] mail in voting, you're not gonna have many Democrats get elected.' It is true that Democrats voted by mail in much larger numbers than Republicans during the 2020 election, but that discrepancy was largely attributable to the unique circumstances of the COVID pandemic, along with Trump's persistent criticism of the practice in the months before Election Day. Historically, mail ballots have not given either party a strong partisan advantage. The GOP also closed, or in some states even flipped, the mail-in voting gap during last year's presidential race. Trump's renewed focus on mail-in voting seemed to come after his conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin during their summit in Alaska last week to discuss a potential end to the war in Ukraine. 'Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity in his first interview after the summit. During the Fox News interview, he also falsely claimed that the U.S. is 'the only country in the world' that allows mail-in voting because it's so rife with fraud. In fact, dozens of countries permit at least some voters to cast their ballots through the mail. Growing importance There has been limited use of absentee ballots since the earliest days of the United States, but the practice has become much more common in recent decades. The share of ballots cast by mail during presidential election years doubled between 2000 and 2016, reaching 21% during Trump's first successful presidential run, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Four years later, concerns about COVID infection and more permissive absentee ballot rules caused the use of mail-in voting to spike dramatically. More than 40% of ballots cast in the 2020 race were sent through the mail. Mail-in voting declined to 29% of all ballots last year, but that was still well above any previous non-pandemic year on record. Every state allows mail-in voting to a certain extent, but access to absentee ballots varies a lot. Some states require anyone who wants to vote by mail to provide a valid excuse for why they're unable to cast their ballot in person. About two dozen states allow anyone to apply for a mail-in ballot without providing a reason. A handful of states conduct what are known as 'all-mail' elections, where people can still vote in person if they choose, but ballots are automatically sent to all registered voters. States can also have very different rules for when absentee ballots must be requested, when they must be received and when they can be counted. Fraud in American elections is exceedingly rare, regardless of how votes are cast. Experts have found that mail-in ballots do have a slightly elevated rate of fraud compared to in-person voting, but the overall numbers are far too low to have had a meaningful effect on any election, let alone a presidential race in which more than 150 million ballots are cast. A database of known electoral fraud incidents compiled by the staunchly conservative Heritage Foundation found just 378 cases of mail-in voting fraud in the U.S. since 1982, a time period in which more than 1.2 billion votes were cast in presidential elections alone. GOP attitudes shifting Trump's opinion of mail-in voting hasn't changed, but that's not the case with members of his party. Republican voters have almost completely flipped their views on the practice over the past few years. Less than one in five GOP voters said they were confident that mail-in ballots were counted accurately in the wake of Trump's loss in 2020, according to the Pew Research Center. After his victory last year, however, 72% of Republicans said they had faith that mail-in votes were fairly counted. Confidence among Democrats also shifted, dropping from 95% in 2020 to 78% last year. It remains to be seen what will happen to public opinion in the wake of Trump's new attacks on mail-in voting. It's also unclear how much, if at all, he might be able to limit access to absentee ballots through executive action. Any steps he does attempt to take will likely face an immediate legal challenge.

Trump weaponization czar urged New York Attorney General James to resign over mortgage probe
Trump weaponization czar urged New York Attorney General James to resign over mortgage probe

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump weaponization czar urged New York Attorney General James to resign over mortgage probe

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's political weaponization czar sent a letter urging New York Attorney General Letitia James to resign from office 'as an act of good faith' four days after starting his mortgage fraud investigation of her. Then he showed up outside her house. Ed Martin, the director of the Justice Department's Weaponization Working Group, told James' lawyer on Aug. 12 the Democrat would best serve the 'good of the state and nation' by resigning and ending his probe into alleged paperwork discrepancies on her Brooklyn townhouse and a Virginia home. 'Her resignation from office would give the people of New York and America more peace than proceeding," Martin wrote. "I would take this as an act of good faith.' Then last Friday, Martin turned up outside James' Brooklyn townhouse in a 'Columbo'-esque trench coat, accompanied by an aide and New York Post journalists. He didn't meet with James or go inside the building. A Post writer saw him tell a neighbor: 'I'm just looking at houses, interesting houses. It's an important house.' James' lawyer Abbe Lowell shot back on Monday, telling Martin in a letter his blunt request for James' resignation defied Justice Department standards and codes of professional responsibility and legal ethics. The Justice Department 'has firm policies against using investigations and against using prosecutorial power for achieving political ends,' Lowell wrote. 'This is ever more the case when that demand is made to seek political revenge against a public official in the opposite party.' 'Let me be clear: that will not happen here,' Lowell added. Lowell also blasted Martin's visit to James' home as a 'truly bizarre, made-for-media stunt' and said it was 'outside the bounds' of Justice Department rules. He included an image from security camera footage showing Martin, in his trench coat, posing for a photo in front of James' townhouse. He said Martin looked as if he were on a 'visit to a tourist attraction.' The Associated Press obtained copies of both letters on Tuesday. A message seeking comment was left for Martin's spokesperson. James' office declined to comment. The letters were the latest salvos in a monthslong drama involving Trump's retribution campaign against James and others who've battled him in court and fought his policies. James has sued the Republican president and his administration dozens of times and last year won a $454 million judgment against Trump and his companies in a lawsuit alleging he lied about the value of his assets on financial statements given to banks. An appeals court has yet to rule on Trump's bid to overturn that verdict. Earlier this month, the AP reported, the Justice Department subpoenaed James for records related to the civil fraud lawsuit and a lawsuit she filed against the National Rifle Association. Martin's investigation stems from a letter Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte sent to Attorney General Pam Bondi in April asking her to investigate and consider prosecuting James, alleging she had 'falsified bank documents and property records." Pulte, whose agency regulates mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, cited 'media reports' claiming James had falsely listed a Virginia home as her principal residence, and he suggested she may have been trying to avoid higher interest rates that often apply to second homes. Records show James was listed as a co-borrower on a house her niece was buying in 2023. Lowell said records and correspondence easily disproved Pulte's allegation. While James signed a power-of-attorney form that, Lowell said, 'mistakenly stated the property to be Ms. James' principal residence," she sent an email to her mortgage loan broker around the same time that made clear the property 'WILL NOT be my primary residence.' Pulte also accused James of lying in property records about the number of apartments in the Brooklyn townhouse she has owned since 2001. A certificate of occupancy issued to a previous owner authorized up to five units in the building, where James lives and has rented out apartments. Other city records show the townhouse has four units, a number James has listed in building permit applications and mortgage documents. On Aug. 8, Bondi appointed Martin, a former Republican political operative, to investigate. Martin, the current U.S. pardon attorney and former acting U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., is also investigating mortgage fraud allegations against Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. Schiff's lawyer called the allegations 'transparently false, stale, and long debunked." Lowell said it appears the working group Martin leads 'is aptly named as it is 'weaponizing'" the Justice Department "to carry out the President's and Attorney General's threats.' Solve the daily Crossword

Alaska summit shows Trump always chickens out when facing Putin
Alaska summit shows Trump always chickens out when facing Putin

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Alaska summit shows Trump always chickens out when facing Putin

An important part of American political folklore is that presidents in trouble travel. So it wasn't terribly surprising that President Trump announced he was flying to Alaska to meet fellow strongman Vladimir Putin. Trump hoped the much-hyped trip would divert public attention from the Jeffrey Epstein sex scandal and allow him to come home a hero with a Noble Peace Prize for himself and a peace deal carving up Ukraine. A peace deal would have been a feather in his cap and a new chapter in his famous ghostwritten book, 'The Art of the Deal.' Instead, the meeting became an epilogue that could called 'The Art of the Kneel.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky learned the hard way about another old political proverb which reads, 'When you not at the table, you're on the menu.' Before the conference started, Trump announced he would take 'severe' measures against Russia if the former Soviet strongman didn't agree to a ceasefire. Then, the acronym 'TACO' took effect — Trump Always Chickens Out — when he declared after the meeting that he supported Putin's position for an immediate peace conference while the war still raged. Trump melted like hot butter in the warm Anchorage summer sun and threw Zelensky and millions of brave Ukrainians under the wheels of Russian tanks. Reportedly, Trump accepted Putin's demands for territorial annexations. All Ukrainians got from Trump's travels was a lousy tee shirt with the imprint 'Putin Came and Trump Caved.' Americans were lucky that the president didn't give back Alaska to Russia as a bon voyage gift to Putin. Even Fox News anchor Marie Harf declared that Putin 'steamrolled' Trump. Russian military forces are steadily making inroads into Ukraine. The absence of a ceasefire is a boon to Putin and a problem for the undermanned Ukrainians who have held off the invaders for years against all odds. Trump pulled the rug out from under them during the talks in Anchorage. Why didn't Trump stand up to Putin? Inquiring minds want to know. Did the former Soviet KGB agent gain access to dirt on the U.S. leader in the top-secret Epstein files? Does Trump for all his bully bluster just turn to jelly when he confronts a leader with a stronger will? Monday, Zelensky met the U.S. president in the White House along with European leaders who came along to help the Ukrainian leader stiffen Trump's spine against the Russian dictator. The all-star cast of Ukrainian supporters included French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The European contingent pushed Trump for U.S. guarantees against Russian expansion. Those leaders are rightfully fearful of Russian expansion into their backyards and don't trust Trump to keep the hungry bear at bay after it devours a slice of Ukraine. NATO heads of state still maintain a vivid memory of another fateful summit meeting long ago when British Prime Minster Neville Chamberlain went to Munich, homburg in hand, and surrendered Czechoslovakia to Adolf Hitler's not so tender mercies. That was the beginning of the end for the rest of continental Europe. Other countries could be on the menu to fill another dictator's insatiable appetite to reconstitute the old Soviet bloc that he so faithfully served for so many years. Letting the Russian strongman take Eastern Ukraine would simply reward Russian aggression and encourage him to take even more territory. Joining Trump at this meeting was his Vice President JD Vance who is a vocal opponent of military support for Ukraine. Before the Alaska meeting, the veep undermined his own president's bargaining power when he announced that we're out of the Ukraine war funding business. So, who does Putin fear from the United States in his relentless and reckless quest to return central Europe to the Soviet, excuse me Russian fold? Certainly not Trump or Vance. Most Americans don't pay much attention to national security problems. Especially when the cost of living is so high. But the public should worry and worry hard when it has a president who can't stand up to foreign dictators. Freedom abroad and democracy in the U.S. are not safe with Trump in charge. Federal troops occupy Washington, D.C. and Russian forces control the Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine. Tyranny is on the march across the world. Americans can't expect Trump to stop it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store