Tradie 'forced' to quit job after boss's controversial act
Commissioner Susie Allison found that while swearing was likely to be a part of the 'everyday work culture' of the tradie's employer, Melbourne small business DMG Building & Electrical Services, the language and behaviour directed at him were 'not appropriate or acceptable behaviour in any workplace'. She said the worker was 'reasonably concerned for his mental and physical safety' and had no 'real choice' but to resign.
McCabes Lawyers principal Tim McDonald told Yahoo Finance the case raised issues for both employees and employers.
RELATED
Right to disconnect warning as worker sues former employer for $800,000
ATO $1,519 cash boost heading for Aussies in weeks
Centrelink payment alert for 58,000 Aussies in caravans
'This sort of issue cuts both ways. It's a precedent in the sense that if there is swearing and so forth, yes, an employee can be entitled to take it that that type of behaviour can force them to resign,' he said.
'But on the flip side of the coin, it would also be the case that if a worker was engaging in that type of behaviour then it would be reasonable for the employer to treat it as a valid reason to terminate the employee.'
McDonald said the decision suggested the 'standards of behaviour' had changed and what might have been acceptable in the past was no longer acceptable today.
'It doesn't really matter what industry you're in, and even if you're in the construction industry what might have been okay 20 years ago, may not be the same,' he said.
The tradie had started working at DMH Building & Electrical Services in September, 2024.
The commission heard the DMG director had raised concerns about the tradie's work levels, along with his undertaking of religious prayer during work hours without informing the company.
The worker alleged there was a series of discussions where his boss swore. That included discussions over the worker using his personal phone to contact clients and a vehicle reversing into his company van while he was at a mosque.
The worker made a secret recording of his performance meeting with the director in November, where the director raised his voice and swore at him.
The boss raised concerns that the worker was 'self-absorbed' and 'not a team player', and said his not revealing he was taking time off to pray was 'deceitful'.
'There's two things I can't f***ing tolerate, its people who steal and people who lie. Right now you've done that,' he said.
'I don't want any negative Nancys running around my company f***ing becoming toxic to other blokes. It festers. What we do with those people, we f***ing weed them out... You need to be on the same page as everyone.'
The meeting ended with them discussing how the worker might take time off for his religious practices and make up work time. The director told the worker he was willing to work with him, but he needed to be clear on what times he would not be available.
But the next day, the tradie took personal leave due to mental health reasons. He then resigned the following day, alleging bullying, poor treatment and serious safety concerns.
DMG denied any inappropriate behaviour, with the director stating he addressed the situation in a normal manner that he would with any other employee.
Commissioner Allison ruled in the worker's favour.
She said she did not think that the boss intended the worker to resign. She acknowledged he was an employer who cared about his employees and listened to their concerns, including being open to flexible work arrangements.
Having said that, she said the language and behaviour was 'not appropriate or acceptable' and noted that they did not approach each other 'on a level playing field' as employer and employee.
She found the director was acting in an 'aggressive, confrontational and inappropriate way' that was likely to make the worker feel intimidated.
The matter will now proceed to mediation.
McDonald said there could be actionable consequences for swearing in the workplace.
If it falls into bullying, workers would have the right to seek orders from the Fair Work Commission if they were staying in their employment.
'This case would suggest that if there was a pattern of behaviour that was so terrible that it forced you to resign, then you could do that and say you were forced to resign and seek damages from the employer,' McCondald said.
'The other thing is where there is that type of inappropriate behaviour, you could bring in Safe Work alleging that there is a psychosocial hazard in the workplace.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aussie 'appalled' by $4,000 ATO bill after common tax return mistake
Welcome to legal column, where lawyers Alison and Jillian Barrett from Maurice Blackburn tackle problems everyday Aussies face — whether it be consumer, property, or money matters impacting relationships or work. This week, an Aussie is concerned about their tax return after finding out they owe the ATO money. Question I recently filled out my ATO tax return, fully expecting a rebate. I only earned $80,000 last year and I had loads of deductions to make. However, I was appalled to find out I actually owe the tax office money — it turned out I'd been on the wrong code all year. They also pushed back on a lot of my deductions and said they weren't tax-deductible work expenses. Now I have a bill for $4,000 and no means to pay it. Is there anything I can do to dispute my tax bill? Also, why aren't things like my work clothes and my travel to work claimable on tax when I wouldn't use them if I didn't work? RELATED Common neighbour problem plaguing Aussie houses: 'No right' Warning for working from home Aussies over common practice Little-known cryptocurrency detail that could impact millions: 'Lost forever' Answer Receiving an unexpected tax bill can be a distressing experience, particularly when you're anticipating a refund but instead are hit with a bill. Generally speaking, the amount of tax that is deducted should be accurate so that a person does not get a large tax bill or a large refund. There are exceptions to this, including if there are large legitimate deductions that can be made, which would result in a refund. However, if you've been on the wrong tax code throughout the year, insufficient tax would have been withheld from your income, resulting in a liability to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Your first step should be to understand the basis of the tax debt. If the ATO has rejected certain deductions or identified an incorrect withholding rate, you are entitled to request a detailed explanation. The ATO provides mechanisms for taxpayers to dispute assessments. You may lodge a formal objection under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953. The formal objection must be submitted in writing and within the prescribed time limits (generally within two years of the notice of assessment for individuals). The objection should clearly state the grounds on which you disagree with the assessment and include supporting documentation. What happens if you can't afford to fight an ATO debt? If you are experiencing financial hardship and cannot afford professional representation, you may be eligible for assistance through the National Tax Clinic program. These clinics, often run by universities, offer free help to individuals who need support navigating the tax system. Additionally, the ATO offers a service called Dispute Assist, which facilitates early resolution of disputes for unrepresented taxpayers. In cases where the issue stems from incorrect information in your tax return, such as misreported income or overlooked deductions, you may be able to amend your return online via myGov. This is often a faster and more straightforward process than lodging a formal objection. How can I know what is and isn't a work-related expense for the ATO? In relation to work-related expenses, the Australian tax law draws a clear line between deductible and non-deductible items. The general principle is that expenses must be incurred in the course of earning assessable income and must not be private or domestic in nature. Work clothing is only deductible if it is occupation-specific, protective, or a registered uniform. For example, knives for a chef or a high-visibility vest may qualify, but conventional business attire, even if required by your employer, does not. This is because such clothing can be worn outside of work and is therefore considered private. Similarly, travel between home and your regular place of employment is generally not deductible. This is classified as private travel, even if you perform work-related tasks during the commute. Exceptions exist for travel between multiple work sites or if you are required to transport bulky equipment and have no secure storage at your workplace. While the tax system may seem unforgiving, there are legal avenues available to dispute assessments and seek relief. Understanding the rules around deductions and engaging with the ATO through formal channels can help resolve your situation. If needed, seek professional advice or contact a tax clinic to ensure your rights are protected. This legal information is general in nature and should not be regarded as specific legal advice. If you need legal advice, you should consult a in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apprentice tradie forced to work 85 hours a week as dire pay issue exposed: 'Draining'
Thousands of apprentice tradespeople are being forced to take on second jobs or side hustles just to get by, and it's taking a huge toll on their mental health. It's no secret that tradies in training don't earn much money. However, with the rising cost of living, some are struggling to make ends meet. Aidan Garcia has been loving his mechanic apprenticeship, but the 18-year-old said it's impossible to live off his roughly $600 per week salary. "It's draining having barely any money," he told Yahoo Finance. RELATED Tradie apprentice shocks with $100,000 salary as she reveals reality of lucrative job Centrelink's 'balancing' move could provide cash boost or expose debt Commonwealth Bank's fresh alert for millions over mass text messages He has to pay $250 per week in rent, living with his brother, and around $110 per week in fuel. After also buying food and paying off his phone bill and other expenses, he has virtually nothing left at the end of each pay cycle to spend on hanging with friends, his partner, or even just squirrelling some cash into his savings. As a result, the second-year trainee has taken on a second job at a My Muscle Chef warehouse, where he does a variety of jobs like cooking food or packing meals into boxes. When he initially started that side gig, he was working eight-and-a-half-hour days at a mechanic shop starting at 7:30am, and then would do an overnight shift at the warehouse from 10:15pm to 6:15am. He did that five days a weekends, he picked up odd jobs on Airtasker, like removing rubbish and helping fix people's gearboxes. At his peak, he was working 85 hours a week. He's since dropped back to just three overnight shifts, but is still doing about 67 hours. He would try to squeeze in sleep whenever he could, whether that was on his lunch break, during his lessons at TAFE, or the few hours between shifts. "It does make you second-guess the apprenticeship," he said, adding that he's been close to dropping out several times. Extra gigs have doubled his income, but at what cost? Garcia admitted it has been a brutal slog, but the extra jobs have lifted his weekly wage from $600 to $1,400. It's given him more financial breathing room, but it meant he had next to zero downtime and is still only just getting by. He's keen to stick with his apprenticeship, as he'll soon be earning much more money. By the time he's fully qualified, his hourly rate is set to go up from the current $16 per hour to at least $28 per hour. But it still bothers him that he could be earning better money elsewhere. "My mates are all doing much better than me," he said. "Some are making good money in the Army and loving it. Another mate told me about a job where he works, and I can make more money there in just three shifts than for a whole week as an apprentice mechanic." But he's not alone. "Most of the people I know either had second jobs or would just be scraping the bottom of the barrel," he added. Research from Apprenticeships Are Us (ARU) has revealed more than 40 per cent of apprentices take on second jobs to help cover rising expenses. This results in extreme burnout and can cause many to drop out of their apprenticeship altogether. Low wages contributing to mass apprentice exodus Australia is in the midst of a trade shortage, and many experts have been sounding the alarm that the housing crisis could become even worse because there aren't enough young people picking up a trade. The National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) recently found there has been a 17.4 per cent drop in apprenticeship commencements, and the non-completion rate for apprenticeships sits at 60 per cent. Dennis Rodgers, apprentice employment manager at ARU, said with many trainees earning between $26,800 and $29,400 per year, it's no wonder some are dropping out. 'These young workers are forced to make tough choices about basic living costs. On top of that, they're expected to invest thousands of dollars into mandatory tools they need just to do their job,' he said. 'We're at real risk of losing the next generation of skilled workers altogether, and of our skills shortage worsening. "Many young people are simply walking away from apprenticeships because they can't see a viable path forward — financially or mentally.' Garcia said even the most basic toolkit that's essential for his job can cost from $4,000 up to $10,000. Some of his apprentice mates have taken out loans to get these tools, which has put them in further financial strife. The government has announced a $10,000 incentive for apprentices, which gets paid out in instalments over the four-year training program. Garcia said that would be a huge help, but said more needs to be done to help apprentices get paid more and not be forced into working around the clock to survive.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Future Queen of Norway Looks Like Your Everyday College Student in Start of School Year Pics
Princess Ingrid Alexandra is starting her studies at the University of Sydney Princess Ingrid Alexandra of Norway is swapping tiaras for textbooks. The 21-year-old royal is in Australia as she gets ready to start her studies at the University of Sydney. Although Princess Ingrid Alexandra is set to become queen of Norway one day, she looked like any other college student in new photos shared on the royal family's Instagram page on July 25. Dressed casually in jeans, sneakers and a blue sweater, she posed for photos around the University of Sydney. She said in a statement shared along with the images, "I'm looking forward to starting my studies at the University of Sydney. It will be exciting to become a student, and I'm looking forward to gaining new perspectives on both European and international politics. I'm sure that I will learn a lot." The palace announced in May that Princess Ingrid Alexandra will pursue a three-year Bachelor of Arts program with a focus on international relations and political economy. The palace added that she would be living in a student residence on campus. King Harald, 87, was recently asked about his granddaughter's decision to study abroad. He said, "You get this back with compound interest when she gets home, so I think that's just an advantage. She must be allowed to study and get an education before she starts representing," according to local newspaper VG. Both King Harald and his son and heir, Crown Prince Haakon, studied abroad as young adults as well. The King studied history, economics and politics at Balliol College, a constituent college of the University of Oxford in England, while Haakon studied at the University of California, Berkeley and the London School of Economics. Her studies at the University of Sydney come after Princess Ingrid Alexandra completed 15 months of military service with the Engineer Battalion in Brigade North in the spring. Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more! Just last month, Princess Ingrid Alexandra was sporting a very different look from her latest photos. The royal joined her parents, Crown Prince Haakon and Crown Princess Mette-Marit, and grandparents, King Harald and Queen Sonja, at a gala dinner during French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to Norway. For the event at the Royal Palace in Oslo, Princess Ingrid Alexandra wore a tiara paired with a red Vivienne Westwood gown and white opera gloves. She once again chose to wear Princess Ingeborg of Sweden and Denmark's Boucheron Pearl Circle Tiara. The Royal Watcher reports that Prince Carl, Duke of Västergötland, bought the accessory in Paris and gave it to Princess Ingeborg, who wore it over the next 58 years and also loaned it out to other royal women. Princess Ragnhild of Norway inherited the tiara, and Princess Ingrid Alexandra was gifted the headpiece in 2022. She's worn it on several occasions since, including her 18th birthday banquet. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword