logo
History Today: When the 'Night of the Long Knives' made Hitler synonymous with Nazi power

History Today: When the 'Night of the Long Knives' made Hitler synonymous with Nazi power

First Post30-06-2025
On June 30, 1934, Hitler unleashed the Night of the Long Knives, a ruthless purge that eliminated internal threats, silenced rivals and secured the Reichswehr's loyalty — cementing his grip on power and setting the course for the authoritarian Third Reich read more
A picture dated 1939 shows German Nazi Chancellor Adolf Hitler giving the Bazi salute during a rally next to "Deputy Furhrer" Rudolf Hess. File Image/AFP
As part of Firstpost's History Today series we take a look at events that occurred on June 30.
Most grimly remembered is the Night of the Long Knives in 1934, when Adolf Hitler carried out a violent political purge to consolidate his dictatorship in Nazi Germany.
This same date also witnessed the birth of groundbreaking science in 1905, when Albert Einstein published his theory of special relativity.
In 2019, US President Donald Trump made history by stepping into North Korea to greet Kim Jong Un.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
And in 1936, the literary classic Gone with the Wind was released.
The Night of the Long Knives
In the early hours of June 30, 1934, Adolf Hitler unleashed a brutal, premeditated purge known as the Night of the Long Knives (Nacht der langen Messer), eradicating real and perceived threats within his own party and cementing his grip on power in Nazi Germany.
This carefully orchestrated massacre, carried out by Hitler's loyal SS and Gestapo forces, extended through July 2 and resulted in widespread fear, a shift in loyalty and the establishment of unchecked authoritarian rule.
Following Hitler's ascension to chancellorship in January 1933 and the passage of the Enabling Act in March — transferring legislative power to him — Germany was under Nazi dominance.
Yet internal tensions simmered.
The Sturmabteilung (SA), the Nazi Party's paramilitary 'Brownshirts' led by Ernst Röhm, had grown to some 3 million loyalists.
Having played a key role in Hitler's rise, Röhm now aspired to integrate the SA with the regular military, demanding a second, social-revolutionary purge that alarmed conservative elites.
This clashed with the priorities of Germany's traditional power holders — the Reichswehr (army), industrial magnates and right-wing officials — who saw the SA's socialist rhetoric and street violence as dangerous.
Hitler faced a perilous contradiction: restrain Röhm and the SA to placate the army, or risk fracturing his regime.
The SA issue threatened Hitler's alliance with military and economic leaders, essential for his Nazi agenda moving forward.
Elements within Hitler's circle, especially Heinrich Himmler, Reinhard Heydrich and Hermann Göring, fuelled rumors that Röhm was planning a coup with the SA.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
They shared intelligence — likely overstated — claiming Röhm's complacency with betrayal, including involvement with Catholic groups or foreign powers.
Göring tasked Gestapo chief Rudolf Diels to gather compromising material, including allegations of SA corruption, homosexual activity and conspiracies with Kurt von Schleicher.
Hitler privately cautioned Röhm in February 1934: 'Only the Reichswehr is entitled to bear weapons.'
A June 4 meeting reaffirmed the rift. Although Höhrer efforts faltered, Hitler was already leaning toward eliminating Röhm to establish control.
On June 30, Hitler, thoroughly advised by Göring and Himmler, deployed SS and Gestapo teams to arrest Röhm and other SA leaders at Bad Wiessee. They seized men by surprise during a holiday retreat.
Röhm and his colleagues were forced to sign undated statements claiming to revolt imminently. Röhm was imprisoned in Munich's Stadelheim Prison.
Over the next two days, SS units across Germany executed upwards of 85 individuals — potentially more, by some estimates — as loyalist forces swept through SA strongholds and political opponents, even killing Gregor Strasser, Kurt von Schleicher, Franz von Papen's staff, Catholic leaders like Adalbert Probst, and dissident journalists.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Röhm declined to commit suicide. On July 1, he faced execution by SS officers Theodor Eicke and Michael Lippert. The circumstances of his death remained murky — but definitive.
A law passed on July 3 retroactively validated the purge by framing it as emergency self-defence.
Hitler, in a Reichstag speech on July 13, claimed authority as 'the supreme judge of the German people.'
This manoeuver dismantled the rule of law. Courts and legislators acquiesced, establishing a precedent that violence by Hitler's regime was inherently legitimate .
The purge's immediate effects included:
Neutralisation of the SA's threat; the organization was sidelined to minor political policing under new leader Viktor Lutze.
Expansion of SS authority under Himmler and Heydrich; the SS emerged as the regime's chief instrument of terror.
Securing the army's loyalty; the Reichswehr leadership saw Hitler as the protector of traditional order.
It entrenched Hitler's status, and solidified a totalitarian apparatus willing — and legally empowered — to eliminate dissent at will.
The Night of the Long Knives was not mere internal politics — it was the defining moment that eliminated collective power threats within Nazi Germany and formalised Hitler's right to extrajudicial violence.
Invoking legality to justify murder, dismantling institutional opposition and empowering single-man rule, the purge shaped the dictatorship, enabling it to wage war and genocide.
It is a stark example of legal authoritarianism and the fragility of democracy under systemic deception.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Einstein publishes his special Theory of Relativity
On June 30, 1905, Albert Einstein's paper 'Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper' (On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies) was published in Annalen der Physik, introducing Special Relativity — a framework reshaping physics.
Einstein discarded the ether concept and proposed:
The laws of physics are invariant in all inertial frames.
The speed of light in a vacuum is constant.
He derived iconic formulas like E=mc², introduced time dilation and length contraction, and unified space and time into spacetime.
Though initially overlooked, his theory changed physics — leading to GPS, nuclear energy and deeper cosmological insights. This paper is central to what Einstein likened as his annus mirabilis, launching him to lasting fame.
Trump walks into North Korea at the DMZ
On June 30, 2019, United States President Donald Trump became the first sitting US president to step into North Korea, walking across the border at Panmunjom, DMZ.
Trump and Kim Jong Un shook hands before beginning informal talks alongside South Korea's Moon Jae-in.
Trump described it as 'a great day,' though it accomplished little regarding denuclearisation.
The historic moment was widely seen as symbolic diplomacy. Critics argued it granted legitimacy to Kim's authoritarian regime, while supporters highlighted its potential to thaw relations.
Gone with the Wind is released
On June 30, 1936, Margaret Mitchell's epic novel Gone with the Wind was published by Macmillan in Atlanta and nationwide.
Set during the Civil War and Reconstruction, the thousand-page saga quickly became a bestseller. Over 20,000 copies sold in advance; by Christmas, over a million were in circulation.
Mitchell received the 1937 Pulitzer Prize, and David O. Selznick's 1939 film adaptation became a monumental box-office and cultural phenomenon.
While celebrated, the novel has faced criticism over its nostalgic portrayal of the antebellum South and minimised depiction of slavery.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Still, its enduring impact on American literature and cinema is undeniable.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Awards to ‘The Kerala Story': Are the Awards worth fighting for — or fighting over — anymore?
National Awards to ‘The Kerala Story': Are the Awards worth fighting for — or fighting over — anymore?

Indian Express

time43 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

National Awards to ‘The Kerala Story': Are the Awards worth fighting for — or fighting over — anymore?

The kindest thing that one can say about The Kerala Story (2023) is that it is no Triumph of the Will (1935). Unlike the latter, produced and directed by Leni Riefenstahl, a close collaborator of Hitler's Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels, Sudipto Sen's film at least packages its indefensible message in something like a plot — a poison pill coated in sugar. Like the truth, lies too are easier to swallow that way. Triumph of the Will was, as evident from the name, a 'triumphal' declaration of a great untruth, that a work built on the dehumanisation and debasement of any section of people could make for transcendental art. A two-hour-long film cut from over 61 hours of footage shot at the 1934 Nazi Party Congress in Nuremberg, Riefenstahl's film was propaganda in its baldest, take-it-or-leave-it form. It attempted not to persuade, but bludgeon in its view of Germany as a great power led by a great man. Yet, one of the unkindest things that can be said about The Kerala Story is also that it is no Triumph of the Will. The latter was technically brilliant, the terrible beauty of its images — those roaring crowds, those marching boots, a wildly gesticulating Fuhrer — ensuring that it lives on in cultural memory as a prime example of how art, too, can be used to serve humanity's basest instincts. The Kerala Story, on the other hand, has all but guaranteed that its relevance won't outlast this particular political — and cultural — moment. One is hard put to find anything about its technical and artistic aspects, whether it's the overwrought direction and acting or the pedestrian cinematography and editing, that ensures its place in cinema history. Which is why it's so baffling that it has managed to win not one but two National Film Awards — for Best Director and Best Cinematographer. Many an angry Malayali (including this writer) might agree with Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan's assertion that The Kerala Story's 'love jihad' fiction is dangerous misinformation, 'sowing the seeds of communal hatred' in a state that, by and large, has been insulated from the kind of religious polarisation and violence seen in other parts of the country. But that is politics and films, like people, are allowed to be political. They are, like all art forms, allowed to be propaganda. Surely, though, if even a blatantly propagandist film is given a prestigious award or two, it should be because it meets a certain artistic standard? The National Film Awards are, after all, aimed at 'the production of films of aesthetic and technical excellence' and 'encouraging the study and appreciation of cinema as an art form'. Can The Kerala Story, bestowed with honours that have earlier gone to films like Perumthachan (1990), Nayakan (1987), Akaler Shandhaney (1982), Mr and Mrs Iyer (2002) and Shatranj Ke Khiladi (1977), truly be said to meet these standards? In every film award, there are certain categories that are manufactured entirely to appease egos and placate prevailing political sentiments. The National Film Awards have their own such categories, like Best Popular Film Providing Wholesome Entertainment. These distinctions between what is an artistic honour and what is a please-don't-be-angry trophy are important to maintain if a film award is to maintain any credibility. This is not the first time, of course, that the clear lines between the artistic and the hacky have been blurred. But with each passing year, as more and more films of little merit and dangerous ideas are heaped with awards, one is reminded of Pablo Picasso's warning about the dangers of propaganda: 'If art is ever given the keys to the city, it will be because it's been so watered down, rendered so impotent, that it's not worth fighting for.' Are the National Film Awards worth fighting for — or fighting over — anymore?

Elon Musk's politics hit Tesla sales in Europe's biggest car markets
Elon Musk's politics hit Tesla sales in Europe's biggest car markets

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Elon Musk's politics hit Tesla sales in Europe's biggest car markets

Tesla's new car registrations in Britain and Germany, Europe's biggest auto markets, more than halved in July from a year earlier, as CEO Elon Musk's political views deter buyers and the company grapples with regulatory challenges. Competition has also increased and sales of EVs made by China's BYD rose nearly five-fold in Germany and over four-fold in Britain in July, official industry data showed on Tuesday. Data last week showed a revamp of Tesla's signature Model Y had failed to reverse a fall in sales in major European markets. A Reuters report on Monday found enthusiasm for the brand has plunged since Musk endorsed Donald Trump in the run-up to his re-election last year. Tesla's July registrations - a proxy for sales - dropped by nearly 60% to 987 units in Britain and by over 55% to 1,110 in Germany, official industry data showed on Tuesday, taking the brand's decline in the month to 45% in 10 European markets that together accounted for over 80% of Tesla's first-half sales in the European Union, the UK and the European Free Trade Association. "That markets shrug at poor sales numbers suggests the company's fortunes rest on their ability to bring forward workable self-driving vehicles", said Ben Nelmes, founder of EV data analysis firm New AutoMotive. Since last year, Musk has shifted Tesla's focus to developing self-driving technology from new, affordable models for human drivers. Overall, the total number of newly registered cars in Germany rose by 11.1% to 264,802 vehicles, with sales of electric vehicles up 58% in July to 48,614 units, the German road traffic agency KBA said. The agency also said the sales volumes of Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer BYD jumped almost fivefold in July to 1,126 units and more than fivefold to 7,449 units since the beginning of the year. New car registrations in Britain fell about 5% year-on-year in July to 140,154 units, with growth in battery electric vehicle sales moderating to 9.1% in the month, figures from industry body Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders showed. BYD sales in the country were up over 300% to 3,184 cars sold in the month. Battery electric vehicles are now projected to account for 23.8% of new registrations in 2025, slightly up from the society's previous forecast of 23.5%. "July's dip shows yet again the new car market's sensitivity to external factors, and the pressing need for consumer certainty," SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said in a statement. The new electric car grant offers financial help to encourage people to buy BEVs. However, it's still unclear which models will be eligible, so some buyers are waiting, the SMMT said.

Who is Elizaveta Krivonogikh? Vladimir Putin's rumoured daughter speaks about ‘the man who took million lives'
Who is Elizaveta Krivonogikh? Vladimir Putin's rumoured daughter speaks about ‘the man who took million lives'

Mint

time4 hours ago

  • Mint

Who is Elizaveta Krivonogikh? Vladimir Putin's rumoured daughter speaks about ‘the man who took million lives'

Elizaveta Krivonogikh, who is also known through her social media name Luiza Rozova, has long been rumoured to be the illegitimate daughter of Russian President Vladimir Putin. At 22, she is again in the spotlight for a series of Telegram posts shared under her alias, about a man who 'destroyed' her and 'took millions of lives'. According to several reports, Krivonogikh was referring to her rumoured father, Vladimir Putin. In one of her posts, published by German newspaper Bild, she wrote, 'It's liberating to be able to show my face to the world again. It reminds me of who I am and who destroyed my life.' 'The man who took millions of lives and destroyed mine,' she wrote in another, without taking anyone's name this time too. Elizaveta Krivonogikh once regularly posted about her lavish lifestyle on social media, surrounded by private jets, nighclubs, luxury fashion and more. However, she largely remained silent since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Elizaveta Krivonogikh is rumoured to be the illegetimate daughter of Vladimir Putin and his former cleaner Svetlana Krivonogikh. Born in St Petersburg in 2003, she had largely kept her lavish life documented in social media but went silent following the Russia-Ukraine war, according to The Times. She first came into the limelight when Russian investigative outlet Proekt claimed that Elizaveta Krivonogikh after probing the wealth of Svetlana. The report also claimed that she had a stark similarity to Putin in terms of looks. Elizaveta is reported to have graduated in 2024 from ICART, an institution in Paris that specialises in arts and cultural management. According to a report by The Economic Times, she works under the name Elizaveta Rudnova at L Galerie in Belleville and Espace Albatros in Montreuil. Elizaveta's mother Svetlana reportedly rose from being a cleaner at St Petersburg to becoming a major shareholder in key Russian businesses. She was sanctioned by the UK government in 2023 due to her alleged ties in the inner circle of Putin.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store