
Reformed version of Paid Family and Medical Leave Act moves forward
After a four-hour debate, the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee voted 6-5 to move the legislation along. Rep. Marian Matthews, D-Albuquerque, joined committee Republicans in voting against the bill.
Under the revised bill, businesses and employees would no longer be taxed to pay for parental leave; rather, the state's Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) would front the cost. Employers with five or more workers and employees would still pay into a wellness fund for medical or sexual harassment safety leave, with employers paying a 0.15% premium — $1.50 for every $1,000 earned — and employees paying a 0.2% premium — $2 for every $1,000 earned.
The committee substitute bill also reduces the amount of paid leave for bereavement, foster, medical, exigency or safety purposes to six weeks rather than nine weeks. Parents could still get up to 12 weeks of paid time off with a $3,000 monthly benefit per child from the separate ECECD fund.
The state would start assessing premiums on employees and employers in 2027, and workers could start taking paid leave in 2028.
"There's an old saying that you know it's a compromise when everyone's a little bit unhappy," said bill sponsor Rep. Linda Serrato, D-Santa Fe, speaking to the two main changes in the bill decreasing the amount of medical time off and lowering premium rates by 0.55%.
Thirteen other states and Washington, D.C., offer paid family and medical leave, but House Speaker Javier Martínez, D-Albuquerque, noted in a news conference before the committee meeting that this approach would be unique to New Mexico.
"It's a win-win," Martínez said. "It's a win for the families, it's a win for the workers, it's a win for the babies and it's a win for the small business community."
The changes to HB11 didn't sway Republicans or business leaders who have stood in steady opposition to the Paid Family and Medical Leave Act, many of whom voiced concerns about having to fill workforce gaps.
Minority Floor Leader Gail Armstrong, R-Magdalena, still labeled the bill as burdensome and called it the "largest health tax increase" in New Mexico's history.
"The more taxes that we implement and the more mandates that we put on employers and employees take away the ability for employers to help make those decisions as a group, with the people that they care about that are doing a fantastic job," she said.
Democrats have been working on the bill's changes for the past couple of weeks, signaling a reason the legislation hasn't moved at all since passing its first committee in January. It now has about a month to pass the House floor, then the Senate.
The bill has made it through the Senate side twice in past years, always dying on the House side. The legislation failed to pass the House chamber by two votes last year, and three Democrats who voted against the bill all lost their seats in the 2024 election cycle.
Matthews pointed out in her closing remarks that she won her election despite voting against the Paid Family and Medical Leave Act last year, when she also proposed her own narrower version of the bill that died.
The committee tabled an amendment she introduced largely aimed at exempting caregiving employers from having to pay the premium, an industry for which Matthews has said she's particularly concerned.
"I will remain a 'no' vote on this until and unless we start to treat these people (well)," she said after the vote.
Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart, D-Albuquerque, earlier this week told the Journal the proposal, if it makes it to the Senate, could pass with unanimous Democratic support in the chamber.
But she also said she decided not to file a Senate bill on the subject this year, after passing the bill through the chamber the last two years.
"I got tired of being the straw man," Stewart said.
It's now up to Martínez when to schedule the bill to be heard on the House floor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
16 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
On Putin's advice, Trump launches assault on mail-in ballots and voting machines
President Trump said Monday he would renew his assault on mail-in voting after Russia's autocratic leader, Vladimir Putin, told him to do so at their meeting in Alaska last week. The president provided few details, but wrote on social media that he would 'lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES.' Already in March, Trump had issued an executive order directing the Justice Department to 'take all necessary action' to prevent mail-in ballots received after election day from being counted. The order also attempted to impose a proof of citizenship requirement for voter registration. Those portions of the executive action has been enjoined by courts over constitutional concerns. But another provision, directing the independent U.S. Election Assistance Commission to shift its guidance on voting machines banning the use of certain bar codes and quick-response codes, has been allowed to proceed. The U.S. Constitution states that the timing, place and manner of elections 'shall be prescribed in each state' by local legislatures, and that Congress has the ability to pass laws altering state election regulations. The president is given no authority to prescribe or govern election procedures. Trump's action comes on the heels of his meeting with Putin in Anchorage, where the Russian leader told him that mail-in ballots led to his electoral defeat in 2020, according to the president. The U.S. intelligence community has assessed that Putin attempted to influence the last three U.S. presidential elections in Trump's favor. 'Vladimir Putin said something — one of the most interesting things. He said, 'Your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting,'' Trump told Fox News in an interview. Trump has criticized mail-in voting since entering politics in 2015. But his presidential campaign embraced the practice leading up to the 2024 election, encouraging his supporters — especially those affected by Hurricane Helene in North Carolina — to take advantage of mail-in voting opportunities. 'Absentee voting, early voting and election day voting are all good options,' Trump said at the time. 'Republicans must make a plan, register and vote!'


Los Angeles Times
16 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Texas Dems return to Capitol for Republicans' U.S. House map overhaul as California Democrats counter
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas Democrats said Monday that they were ending a two-week walkout that stalled Republican efforts to redraw congressional districts as part of a national partisan brawl over President Donald Trump's desire to reshape U.S. House maps to his advantage. Their return will allow the Republican-run Legislature to proceed as California Democrats advance a counter-effort to redraw their congressional boundaries in retaliation — a tit-for-tat that puts the nation's two most populous states at the center of an expanding fight over control of Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Dozens of Texas House Democrats left the state more than two weeks ago to deny their Republican-majority colleagues the attendance necessary to vote on redrawn maps intended to send five more Texas Republicans to Washington. They declared victory after Republicans adjourned that first special session, and Democrats around rallied in opposition to the Trump-led gerrymandering effort. They pointed specifically to California's release of proposed maps intended to increase Democrats' U.S. House advantage by five seats, effectively neutralizing any Republican gains in Texas. 'We killed the corrupt special session, withstood unprecedented surveillance and intimidation, and rallied Democrats nationwide to join this existential fight for fair representation — reshaping the entire 2026 landscape,' said Texas House of Representatives Minority Leader Gene Wu in a statement. Trump has pressured other Republican-run states to consider redistricting, while Democratic governors in multiple statehouses have indicated they would follow California's lead in response. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said that his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts. The president wants to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of the 2018 midterms during his first presidency, when Democrats regained House control and used their majority to stymie his agenda and twice impeach him. On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott jumped to the president's aid, adding redistricting to the agenda of an initial special session agenda that included a number of issues, but most notably a package of bills responding to devastating floods that killed more than 130 people last month. Abbott has blamed Democrats' absence for delaying action on those measures. Democrats have answered that Abbott's capitulation to Trump is responsible for the delay because he insisted on effectively linking the hyper-partisan matter to the nonpartisan flood relief. Redistricting typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions with the task. The Texas House is scheduled to convene Monday at noon CDT. Barrow and Figueroa write for the Associated Press. Barrow reported from Atlanta.


The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pennsylvania GOP treasurer launches challenge to Shapiro
Pennsylvania state Treasurer Stacy Garrity (R) is entering the gubernatorial race to challenge Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) as he seeks reelection next year. Garrity announced her candidacy on Monday in a video posted on X, making her the first major Republican seeking to face off against Shapiro in 2026. The video accuses Shapiro, viewed as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, of focusing on a potential White House run and fundraising in other states instead of addressing problems in the Keystone State like delays approving the state budget. 'Today, I'm announcing that I'm running to become Pennsylvania's next governor, and I'm giving you and your family my solemn oath that I will work hard every day to fix the problems Josh Shapiro has created,' Garrity said. The video emphasizes Garrity's status as a veteran, having served in Iraq and reaching the rank of colonel. It also promotes ties between Garrity and President Trump, calling her a 'strong ally' of the president. The state Treasurer said she wants to work to make Pennsylvania more affordable and attract more jobs so young adults choose to stay. 'I'm not just going to ask for your support,' she said. 'I'm going to work hard every day to earn it.' Garrity is the first major Republican to jump into the gubernatorial race, but others could join. State Sen. Doug Mastriano (R), who was the GOP nominee against Shapiro in 2022, is considering another run. Mastriano had received significant attention over his far-right views and struggled in both fundraising and polling. Having been Democrats' preferred choice and viewed as easier to beat in the general election, Mastriano lost by nearly 15 points. But he could still gain traction in a Republican primary. A few possible candidates have already ruled out bids, including Rep. Dan Meuser (R), whom Trump had said would have his support. An endorsement in the Republican primary from the president would be critical in boosting a candidate's chances of the nomination. Still, Shapiro will be difficult to beat. He's demonstrated himself to be a strong fundraiser and has enjoyed significant popularity through his term as governor. He was asked on Friday about his views on Garrity's possible run, but he said he wouldn't get involved in Republicans' 'intramural fight.' 'You know what I'm going to do? I'm going to keep creating jobs here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,' he said. 'I'm going to fund our kids' schools. I'm going to make sure that we have more cops on the beat, and I'm going to focus on doing my job of bringing Republicans and Democrats together to get stuff done. That's my focus.'