HC hears final arguments on SI exam 2021
Rajasthan High Court
Friday heard the final arguments of the petitioners, who urged the cancellation of the Sub-Inspector Recruitment Exam 2021.
The petitioners argued that the process was compromised, as the paper leak involved Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) members and their families.
They warned that retaining those who cleared the exam unfairly would affect law and order. The high court is set to hear responses Monday, with final hearings likely to conclude next week. TNN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
U.S. approves potential $346 million weapons sale to Nigeria to bolster security
The U.S. State Department approved a possible $346 million weapons sale to Nigeria to help improve security in the sub-Saharan country, the Pentagon said on Wednesday (August 13, 2025). Congress was notified and would need to approve the sale, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a statement. The agency is a division of the Department of Defense body that provides technical assistance and oversees transfers of defense equipment. The weapons requested by Nigeria include munitions, bombs and rockets. A resurgence of attacks by Boko Haram, Nigeria's homegrown jihadist group, has shaken Nigeria's northeast. The group took up arms in 2009 to fight Western education and impose its radical version of Islamic law. In recent months, Islamic extremists have repeatedly overrun military outposts, mined roads with bombs and raided civilian communities, raising fears of a possible return to the peak insecurity of the Boko Haram era despite the military's claims of success against them. The conflict, which has spread into Nigeria's northern neighbours, has claimed about 35,000 civilian lives and displaced more than 2 million people in the country's northeastern region, according to the U.N. Apart from the insurgency in the northeast, Africa's most populous country also faces serious security challenges in the north-central and northwest regions, where hundreds have been killed and injured in recent months. 'The proposed sale will improve Nigeria's capability to meet current and future threats through operations against terrorist organizations and to counter illicit trafficking in Nigeria and the Gulf of Guinea,' the Pentagon said on Wednesday (August 13, 2025). 'There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.' In the past 10 years, Nigeria has bought military equipment from the U.S. on several occasions. Most recently, the U.S. approved a $997-million weapons sale in 2022.
NDTV
4 days ago
- NDTV
"Not Going To Lose Our Cool": Supreme Court On Another Faulty High Court Order
Days after controversy over Allahabad High Court judge's faulty order, the Supreme Court bench of Justices JB Pardiwallah and R Mahadevan on Wednesday set aside a Rajasthan High Court order denying anticipatory bail to a couple in a case which was found to be a civil dispute but was given a criminal colour. Justice JB Pardiwallah remarked that he was "controlling like anything" and would laugh it off this time. "We are not going to lose our cool today. Today, we are controlling like anything. The medicine is to laugh," he said, before bursting into laughter on reading the case file with the same mistake that had triggered him to bar a high court judge from hearing criminal cases till he retires. The Supreme Court last week slammed Justice Prashant Kumar of the Allahabad High Court for his remarks made in a judgment suggesting that criminal prosecution may be permitted to recover money as an alternative remedy in a civil suit. The same bench of Justice JB Pardiwallah had ordered the removal of criminal cases from Justice Kumar's roster after finding that he had allowed criminal prosecution to continue in a purely civil dispute. This move had sparked controversy as 13 judges from the Allahabad High Court then wrote to Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, saying that a Chief Justice of a high court is the master of the roster in the high court and Justice Pardiwallah's order was a judicial overreach. CJI Gavai then sent the case back to Justice Pardiwallah's bench of reconsideration. On August 4, the bench of Justice Pardiwallah rolled back the directive that had barred the Allahabad high court judge from hearing any criminal cases for the remainder of his tenure and ordered him to sit with a senior colleague to "learn the nuances of law." The controversy had barely subsided when another such case, this time from the Rajasthan High Court, came in front of the same bench. The top court was hearing an appeal by a couple against the Rajasthan High Court's refusal to grant them anticipatory bail in a case arising from an alleged unpaid amount for a plywood consignment. The complaint claimed Rs 3.5 lakh had been paid, but the balance of Rs 12.5 lakh remained unpaid. A first information report (FIR) was registered against the couple under Sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust), and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code. The top court noted that even on a plain reading of the case, the only possible allegation was cheating. It was observed that the offence of criminal breach of trust could not arise once there was a sale transaction. "It is but obvious that the only submission before the High Court could be that it is a case of civil dispute. There is no question of criminal breach of trust once there is a sale transaction. This is a settled position of law," the court said. The judges expressed disappointment with the reasoning in the High Court order, particularly the part that recorded the submission of the public prosecutor that recovery of the Rs 12.5 lakh balance could not be effected because the accused were protected from arrest. Justice Pardiwallah laughed again and said, "What we have understood is that according to the State, police machinery is required for the purpose of recovery of the balance amount. We need not say anything further in the matter. Ordinarily, we do not set aside orders of the High Court denying bail. But this is an order we deem fit to set aside."
Indian Express
4 days ago
- Indian Express
Can't hold student union elections this academic year, Rajasthan govt tells High Court, citing NEP
The Bhajan Lal Sharma government has submitted in the Rajasthan High Court that it can't hold student union elections in the current academic year. The submission has been made in the matter of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a Rajasthan University post-graduate student Jai Rao. Rao's counsel, advocate Shantanu Pareek, said that the state government 'submitted its reply today in the student union election PIL where it has submitted that it won't hold student union elections for 2025-26 (academic year)'. 'The state government has cited the meeting of Vice Chancellors on August 6 and April 12, where the VCs said that they are focusing on implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP). They said that if student union elections are held, they will not be able to implement the NEP and hence, the VCs submitted that student union elections should not be held in the current circumstances,' Pareek said. As per the VCs' meeting on August 6 — where at least nine VCs were present – one of the VCs said that the student union elections will be a hindrance to timely implementation of NEP. Another VC said that the elections will adversely affect the semester system. A third VC said that elections affect studies and the semester system, which in turn delays the results, and deprives students from taking admission in other states. Other VCs said that student union elections affect about two months' time-table and that a mandatory 90 days' teaching in each semester under the Choice Based Credit System (CBCS) makes it difficult to hold student union elections. Interestingly, the Bhajan Lal Sharma government has followed a pattern similar to the Ashok Gehlot government in 2023, a state election year, when the Congress party was still smarting from NSUI having failed to win any president post in the student union election held a year ago in 2022. Like the Gehlot government, the Sharma government has cited the NEP and violation of Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations. In his petition, Rao had said that the 'right to choose representative through the student union elections has been categorized as a fundamental right by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.' He had said that as per the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations, the state government and Rajasthan University are 'constitutionally duty bound to issue such circular/notification within 6-8 weeks from the commencement of the academic session' with regards to the student union election but that none has been issued yet. Apart from Rao, at least two other petitions were filed with regards to student union elections. The matter is scheduled to come up for hearing on Thursday, August 14.
