Castle-owning 'lady of the manor' who has changed gender three times says she is victim of council 'lynch mob'
A self-styled lady of the manor is planning a legal battle against her local community council after it disbanded in an attempt to remove her.
At a meeting on Thursday it was unanimously decided to dissolve Ardgay and District Community Council in Sutherland.
However, moments later a petition was lodged for it to be reformed.
Samantha Kane – a member of the now dissolved community council – claims the move was fuelled by bias against her.
The landowner wants Scotland's top court to declare the decision unlawful.
Ms Kane, who owns the 19-bedroom Carbisdale Castle in Culrain, Ardgay, claimed she was the victim of a discriminatory 'lynch mob' and claimed her human rights had been breached.
The barrister, who named herself Lady Carbisdale after buying the dilapidated property for £1.2million in 2022, is believed to be the only person in the UK to have changed gender three times.
After this week's decision to dissolve the council, a furious Ms Kane vowed to fight the decision. She claimed: 'The meeting was pre-determined with the sole purpose of getting me out, which is discriminatory and undemocratic.
'I am petitioning the Outer House of the Court of Session to declare both the meeting which decided to put the motion and thepublic meeting last night unlawful. It was predetermined by bias against me.
'My human rights hav ealso been infringed by being deprived of representing the area as a councillor. I was not even allowed to put my case to the public meeting.
'I have never seen such a lynch mob – all that was missing were the pitchforks.
'A lot of the so-called public were not from the area and thus not eligible to vote. I believe that only 30 of those present were eligible to vote – out of a population of 800.'
Campaigners hope to reform the council without Ms Kane.
It comes amid ongoingskirmishes at the community council and a bitter row between Ms Kane and locals after she claimed the area was 'not ready' for atransgender custodian ofthe castle.
The latest move to disband the community council marks the second time it has been dissolved. It reformed in October after seven new members were elected – months after being dissolved by Highland Council when four of its five members quit.
The newly-elected community councillors had joined existing member Ms Kane, but at the body's monthly meeting on April 17 a motion to dissolve the council was passed.
Chairman Les Waugh said the community council had received written and verbal complaints about Ms Kane's behaviour at meetings.
He has previously criticised her behaviour at meetings as 'appalling', and said: 'She sometimes behaves like a six-year-old child who has been scolded, shouting at people, stamping her feet and banging her walking stick on the floor like a football hooligan.'
Thursday's meeting was attended by 150 people, who voted unanimously for the move.
Born in Iraq as a male named Sam Hashimi, the barrister had surgery in 1997 to become Samantha, before a second operation in 2004 when she changed her name to Charles Kane, and then a third surgery to become Samantha again in 2018.
The wealthy barrister has ploughed millions into restoring 118-year-old Carbisdale Castle after fulfilling her dream of becoming a 'princess in her own fairytale' by buying the property.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Scottish ministers 'in the dark' over winter fuel payment U-turn
The Scottish government says it has been left in the dark over a surprise decision to reinstate winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners in England and Wales Scotland's Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said ministers were not consulted on the major U-turn announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves. More than 75% of pensioners in England and Wales will be entitled to the new annual payment of up to £300 after the UK government abandoned one of its first - and most controversial - has already created a devolved benefit of £100 for all pensioner households, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of Scots worse off than their counterparts in England and Wales. Last July, Reeves drew widespread criticism over cuts to the winter fuel payment - a lump sum of £200 a year for households with a pensioner under 80, or £300 for households with a pensioner over 80 - in a bid to save an estimated £ response, the Scottish government introduced a new scheme offering those in receipt of qualifying benefits like Pension Credit £200 or £300 depending on their age, and £100 for all other pensioner while the benefit for pensioners above the income threshold will be clawed back through tax, richer pensioners in Scotland will be able to keep the payment. Following the latest announcement from Westminster, Scottish pensioners who do not get pension credit but whose income is below that £35,000 threshold are expected to receive £100 less than if they lived in England or Wales. There are 1.1 million pensioners in Scotland living in 751,000 pensioner households. Almost 17% of these households receive pension credit. The Treasury has said the "uplift" for the Scottish government will be £250m, delivered in the usual autumn budget. Shirley-Anne Somerville said Scotland introduced a winter heating payment for all pensioners because of the UK government's "betrayal of millions of pensioners".She said the Scottish government welcomed the U-turn, but "there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that".The social justice secretary said: "We have once again not been consulted on the policy and its implications in Scotland and will scrutinise the proposals carefully when they are announced. "I would therefore urge the UK government to ensure the Scottish government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible."Scottish Labour has called on the SNP to ensure Scots are not "left behind"."The SNP must not go ahead with plans that would rob poorer pensioners in order to fund payments for millionaires," Labour MSP Paul O'Kane said."The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans." Does Scotland have to change its winter payment plans? The Scottish government now has a decision to had announced a devolved benefit for this winter which meant every pensioner household would get a minimum of £100 this new UK government announcement means that households in England and Wales, where someone's income is less than £35,000, are due a payment of £200 (or £300 for households with a pensioner over 80).It's important to note that the Scottish payment is universal. The English and Welsh one is all of a sudden, a cohort of Scottish pensioners – who don't get pension credit, but whose income is below that £35,000 threshold – are getting less than their English/Welsh puts some pressure on Scottish ministers. Do they have to change what they're planning to pay out?After some conversations with people in the Scottish government, it seems they're still digesting the implications of all of it looks like they'll get extra money off the back of today's announcement (known as Barnett consequentials).There are already calls for that all to be used to make their payment more generous.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
SNP came ‘frustratingly close' to victory in Hamilton, says Swinney
The SNP came 'frustratingly close' to winning the Hamilton by-election, First Minister John Swinney has said. Scottish Labour's Davy Russell won a surprise victory on Thursday, with the SNP coming second and Reform in third. The by-election had been sparked by the death of Scottish Government minister and SNP MSP, Christina McKelvie, who had held the seat since 2011, with the party hoping to keep it in the fold. Despite the First Minister's claim that the contest was a straight fight between the SNP and Nigel Farage's surging Reform UK, the Labour candidate won with 8,559 votes to the 7,957 of the SNP's Katy Loudon. Speaking to the PA news agency in Glasgow, the First Minister said the party had made 'modest progress' since its collapse at last year's general election – when it dropped from 48 MPs to just nine – but had further to go. 'We had a very strong campaign in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse,' he said. 'We had hundreds of members of the party that came to make their contribution to the by-election campaign – we've got to build on that. 'We've got to learn the lessons of the by-election. 'We came very close, it was frustratingly close.' Coming second in the vote, the First Minister said, is an 'indication that we are still able to perform strongly electorally'. The First Minister added that his party lost the overlapping seat at Westminster – Hamilton and Clyde Valley – by 9,000 votes last year and by just 600 on Thursday. 'So, we are quite clearly in a position where we can achieve electoral success, but we have got to build on that and make sure we're stronger for 2026,' he said. In the final weeks of the campaign, the First Minister predicted the contest would be between his party and Reform UK but, asked if such an assertion – which turned out to be wrong – cast doubt on the data used by the SNP, he appeared to suggest it was based on his own perception. 'I'm just making two points about the by-election, two observations,' he said. 'One was that Labour support was collapsing, and from last year to Thursday, Labour support collapsed by 20%, came down from 50% to 30%. 'And I observed, secondly, that Reform support was surging and it was, so my analysis of the by-election was absolutely correct. 'I simply said to people if you want to stop Reform, vote for the SNP.' Despite the by-election loss, the party continues to lead in the polls ahead of next year, with Mr Swinney saying the Government must 'deliver on the priorities of the people of Scotland'.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Lack of recent meetings with Treasury an ‘issue of concern', says Swinney
A lack of recent meetings between the Scottish Government and the Treasury is an 'issue of concern', First Minister John Swinney has said ahead of the Chancellor's spending review. Rachel Reeves will lay out her spending priorities on Wednesday, with funding increases expected for the NHS and education – which will result in greater cash for Scotland. But speaking to the PA news agency in Glasgow on Monday, First Minister John Swinney said his Finance Secretary Shona Robison had not recently spoken to the Treasury about the Scottish Government's requests for the review. 'The Finance Secretary has had discussions with the Chief Secretary, but not recently,' he said. 'That's been an issue of concern to us that there hasn't been an ongoing dialogue. 'I raised our aspirations about the spending review with the Prime Minister when I met him a couple of weeks ago in London and have set out, particularly, the importance of the investment in public services and the necessity of that decision on the Acorn carbon capture and storage project, because that is crucial for us finding a way forward to address some of the challenges that we faced at the Grangemouth site.' The Acorn project has been overlooked for funding by successive UK Governments, angering Scottish ministers. As well as Acorn, Mr Swinney also urged the Chancellor to commit to lifting the two-child benefit cap. 'After all the year's of Conservative austerity, I want to see a decision to lift the two-child cap from the benefit system, which is forcing more and more families into poverty and children into poverty,' he said. The Scottish Government has pledged to mitigate the impact of the two-child cap north of the border, but has consistently pushed for the policy to be scrapped at UK level. The First Minister also pushed for a 'different approach on welfare reform', after the UK Government announced a £5 billion cut to benefits earlier this year.
