Germany's Wadephul visits Jerusalem Holocaust memorial ahead of talks
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on Sunday visited the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem.
Wadephul was due to lay a wreath at the site, which commemorates the 6 million Jews killed by Nazi regime in Germany.
The foreign minister, who took office earlier this week, is set for talks with his Israeli counterpart Gideon Saar and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later on Sunday before visiting Ramallah for dicussions with Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa.
Wadephul's visit to Israel takes place against the backdrop of celebrations marking 60 years of diplomatic relations between Germany and Israel.
After meeting with relatives of Israeli hostages held by Hamas following his arrival in the country on Saturday, he was given a demonstration of the Israeli Arrow 3 air defence system, which is due to deployed by Germany, early on Sunday.
The system can destroy approaching missiles at altitudes of up to over 100 kilometres.
The German Air Force is due to achieve operational readiness this year with the system, which is being deployed at three sites in Germany.
Wadephul's conversation with Netanyahu are set to include discussions on German arms deliveries for Israel, as well as a diplomatic initiative by the Netherlands announced earlier this week to review the EU-Israel Association Agreement on trade.
The proposed review, which is set to be discussed by EU foreign ministers, comes amid the ongoing Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip, where around two million Palestinians live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
How NYC is stepping up to stop attacks on Jews BEFORE they happen
They were young and idealistic, and devoted their lives to peace. Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim worked in diplomacy and conflict resolution at the Israeli Embassy in Washington. They were gunned down in cold blood last month, just steps from the US Capitol. Less than two weeks later, a Colorado man firebombed a peaceful demonstration calling for the release of Israeli hostages — injuring at least 12 people, including a Holocaust survivor. While the war in Gaza is thousands of miles away, its violence has sadly come home. The attacks in DC and Colorado were not isolated; they are the latest in a growing pattern of rhetoric shifting from outrage to incitement, from slogans to direct calls for violence in Western cities. And those calls are terrifyingly being answered, and are now being seen in cities across the nation. The NYPD is working relentlessly to prevent a future attack before it begins in New York City, because the assaults in DC and Colorado will likely inspire copycat attempts. History has shown that each one makes the next more likely — that's how contagion works. It's shocking, but not surprising. In the 20 months since Hamas' terrorist attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, hate has ricocheted across the globe. Just weeks after the attack, an Illinois man murdered his Palestinian-American tenants — a 6-year-old boy and his mother — in a brutal, hate-driven attack. More than 25 attacks or disrupted plots have targeted Israeli and US diplomatic sites. Just last month, a man was arrested at JFK for allegedly trying to firebomb the US Embassy in Tel Aviv. Nearly 40 additional incidents have targeted synagogues, schools and other visible parts of Jewish life across Europe and the United States. In September, the New York Joint Terrorism Task Force disrupted a mass-casualty plot against a Brooklyn synagogue allegedly planned for the first anniversary of Oct. 7. In December, a Virginia man was arrested for planning an attack against the Israeli consulate in Midtown. That's the terrorism. There's also the hate. Antisemitic hate crimes in the city were down 20% before Oct. 7, compared to that point in 2022. That changed almost overnight: By the end of 2023, they'd surged 80%. And while Jewish New Yorkers make up just over 10% of the city's population, they've accounted for more than half of all hate crime victims in that time. Hate crimes against the Muslim community are also up, more than 160% since Oct. 7. While the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza is undeniable, it doesn't excuse violence. Tragically, it may inspire more. Every high-profile attack raises the risk of another. Unfortunately, individuals already on the edge don't need instructions; they just need a spark. That's why the NYPD is acutely focused on prevention: to snuff out sparks before they catch, and to ensure that hate has no chance to spread like wildfire. We calibrate our presence to meet the threat — no matter where it lurks or whom it targets. Since Oct. 7, the NYPD has surged uniformed patrols around synagogues and other houses of worship, Jewish schools and cultural institutions, hardening soft targets whenever and wherever necessary. That's how we protect all New Yorkers. The NYPD's Intelligence and Counterterrorism Bureau closely tracks developments at home and abroad, and we don't fight terrorism and hate alone. Task forces. Shared intelligence. Constant coordination with all our partners — international, federal, state, local and private sector — to detect threats early. That's how this work gets done. Anything less won't cut it. Importantly, some of the most serious threats we've stopped originated from a tip from an observant member of the public, making your eyes and ears just as critical as enforcement. That's why 'if you see something, say something' is not just a slogan; it's our force multiplier that allows us to disrupt attacks before they start. While there are no known specific, credible threats to New York City at this time related to the horrific incidents in DC or Colorado, all of us — law enforcement, intelligence officials, the public and the communities we serve — must always be vigilant to stay ahead of this threat. That means acting early. Moving fast. And stopping the next one before it happens. Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim believed in something better. They built their lives around it — and they were killed for it. May their memories be a blessing. Eric Adams is mayor of New York. Jessica S. Tisch is NYPD commissioner.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
No Rational Aid Distribution System Should Work This Way
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is presiding over an unmitigated disaster, and everything about the U.S.- and Israel-backed group's failure was entirely predictable. After lifting a blockade on relief supplies to the Gaza Strip, Israeli authorities tapped GHF, which is barely months old, as the principal aid-delivery system for starving Palestinian residents. Since its operations began last week, dozens of civilians have been killed by gunfire while seeking to access the food-distribution centers. At least twice this week, GHF suspended its relief efforts in an attempt to improve security. Whatever you think of Israel's conduct during its war against Hamas in Gaza, you should understand that its delivery system for aid was doomed to fail. Israeli authorities and GHF had no realistic plan for what the logistics industry calls 'the last mile'—the process of getting goods from a distribution center to the customer, so to speak. GHF was founded in February and is already on its second leader, a Trump-supporting evangelical Christian public-relations executive. Among the firms that Israel engaged to provide security for distribution sites in southern Gaza is Safe Reach Solutions, a firm led by a former CIA official and staffed by former U.S. military and security contractors that was formed only in January. GHF and SRS are both mysterious, controversial entities whose financial backing is unclear. The organization has defended its work, claiming in a statement yesterday that 'almost 8.5 million meals have been delivered so far—without incident.' GHF also said it is still scaling up. 'Our top priority remains protecting the safety and dignity of those receiving aid,' the statement continued, 'especially as we continue to serve as the only reliable provider of humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza.' It's true that established aid agencies that have previously worked in Gaza's difficult conditions are not involved in the current effort. Israel cut ties with the UN Relief and Works Agency amid allegations that some of its staff had been involved with the October 7, 2023, terror attack by Hamas; the UN's World Food Program continues to work there but depleted all of its resources in late April. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has clashed with the International Committee of the Red Cross, which lost two of its personnel in an Israeli bombing in May. (The group's leader has called conditions in Gaza 'worse than hell.') World Central Kitchen, which lost seven people in an Israeli strike in Gaza in 2024, closed its soup kitchen in April because it could not deliver food there. With relief agencies either sidelined or unable to deliver resources because of Israel's blockade, Netanyahu then chose, with American backing, the new GHF. But its first leader resigned after a few weeks, citing a lack of 'humanitarian principles' in the Gaza relief effort. [Julie Beck: It should not be controversial to plead for Gaza's children] Perhaps to help solve logistical questions—and perhaps to add reputational gloss to its efforts—GHF hired the Boston Consulting Group. But after violence broke out, that company withdrew from the contract. Later that same day, GHF appointed its new executive chairman, Johnnie Moore, who insisted that his agency was 'demonstrating that it is possible to move vast quantities of food to people who need it most.' In all cases, an organization delivering goods must optimize distribution routes that align with the community it's delivering to. Israel's lack of trust for experienced relief groups doesn't justify ignoring what those operations learned about moving supplies. Many distribution systems rely on what are known as micro-fulfillment centers—local warehouses, delivery hubs, temporary facilities—to provide goods closer to where the community is. This is why, a few years ago, the COVID-vaccine-distribution efforts that drew so heavily on local doctors and pharmacies were prioritized over larger-scale efforts. Employing many small distribution sites promotes flexibility; the system can adapt to changes in demand. The GHF has provided only four distribution centers, presumably for security reasons, in all of Gaza, down from the 400 that the UN once managed; many Palestinians must now walk hours to have any hope of picking up a food package. No rational system of distribution, under any circumstances, would work this way. GHF increased the security risk by having fewer, not more, distribution sites. The organization also seemed unprepared when tens of thousands of people converged on those sites. Forgive the comparison, but American retail stores planning for Black Friday sales have come to understand—in some cases because of past tragedies at a 'crush point'—the need for information systems that collect data on where the demand is coming from and that help organizations meet that demand quickly. Surely Israel could have anticipated the sheer desperation of Gaza's Palestinians after it cut off relief efforts for months. Especially in hard circumstances, how the last mile will work must be clearly explained to those on the receiving end. In large-scale logistics efforts, the mechanics of how delivery will occur—who needs the information, when they need it, and through which communications channels it will be delivered—are all integral parts of the process. Whole systems of real-time tracking, delivery windows, and notifications are there for Israel to use, even against what it perceives as a hostile population. But information about food availability has been scarce by all accounts. Al Jazeera reported that some announcements last Sunday came from speakers mounted on military drones. The shortage of information led to a rush to the limited number of distribution sites. Business analogies only go so far. An aid site is not a Costco. Palestinian civilians are not retail customers. But perhaps if the Israeli government and its newly chosen relief entity had thought through any of the logistical matters that preoccupy established companies and experienced aid agencies alike, many more Palestinians would be receiving the food aid they badly need, faster and more safely. Article originally published at The Atlantic
WIRED
3 hours ago
- WIRED
'100% Stupid': MAGA World Is Cautiously Turning on Elon Musk
Much of the right-wing media ecosystem appeared unsure how to react to the seeming public implosion of the relationship between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk on Thursday and into Friday morning. Outlets and influencers that typically react savagely to criticism of Trump played the spat more or less down the middle. Even much of the criticism of Musk was relatively genteel. 'He's gotta let Trump be Trump,' former Fox News host Eric Bolling said on Steve Bannon's broadcast network, Real America's Voice. 'You can be First Bro,' he said of Musk, 'but you can't be de facto president." Behind the scenes, they tell WIRED, Republican operatives could not help but be entertained at the torrent of messages flooding their group chats. They tended to take Trump's side. One Trumpworld consultant tells WIRED that the entire episode reminded them of a line in a recent Wall Street Journal report, about how Trump had privately described Musk as '50% genius, 50% boy.' 'After today,' the consultant says, 'I think he's just 100% stupid.' (Musk did not immediately reply to a request for comment.) While Musk had been railing against the Republican budget reconciliation package formally known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act for several days on X, things turned ugly once Trump denounced the billionaire during an Oval Office appearance on Thursday with the German chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Trump said. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' Musk subsequently agreed with an X user who called for the president's impeachment. Still, some presented the conflict as a positive thing, even while calling for it to end.
