Council of EU imposes steep tariffs on Russian and Belarusian agricultural goods
The Council of the European Union has adopted new tariffs targeting agricultural products and fertilisers from Russia and Belarus that were not previously subject to additional duties.
Source: press service for the Council, as reported by European Pravda
Details: The measures aim to lessen European countries' reliance on imports from Belarus and Russia, as well as to cut down on Moscow's budget and its capacity to fund its war against Ukraine. Furthermore, it has the potential to boost EU output.
"The implementation of these tariffs will be closely monitored to ensure that the EU fertiliser industry and farmers are protected. The tariff increases on fertilisers will take place gradually, over a transition period of three years," the EU Council stated.
With the entry into force of these changes on 1 July 2025, EU tariffs will apply to all agricultural products from Russia.
The categories subject to the new tariffs cover about 15% of all agricultural imports from Russia to the EU as of 2023.
For fertilisers from Russia, in 2023, the categories to which duties were applied accounted for 25% of imports in this sector, approximately 3.6 million tonnes worth €1.28 billion.
Background:
At the end of May, the European Parliament supported the introduction of tariffs for these categories of products from Russia and Belarus. These tariffs are expected to effectively stop the import of these goods to the EU.
Tariffs on most agricultural products from Russia and Belarus have been in force in the EU since July 2024.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘If you're a fascist, then get a Tesla': Neil Young's new album takes potshots Elon Musk
After weighing in behind Bruce Springsteen in his internationally reported takedown of President Trump's government onstage at Manchester Arena last month, this other left-leaning giant of American rock from the 1970s voiced fears that he, having been a consistent critic of Trump, chiefly over the issue of climate-change denial, may face problems regaining entry to his home nation following his European tour this summer. At this febrile moment, one might've expected Young, now 79, and as outspoken as ever – he made headlines last year after apparently refusing to sign up for Glastonbury 2025 on account of its BBC-driven corporatisation (he now appears to be headlining on Saturday night!) – to fill his latest long-player, his 46th studio outing, with polemical rantings, but as any long-standing fan knows, Young remains creatively wilful, and rarely serves up what might be expected of him at a given time. In recent years, he has been deluging the collector's market with archival releases, many of them 'new' old albums which he shelved years ago. In amongst all that, however, interested parties may be forgiven for not having noticed that Young had found a productive groove with a reconstituted line-up of his beloved, amps-on-11 backing band, Crazy Horse, releasing three new records with them, culminating with 2022's Rick Rubin-produced World Record. There, on Chevrolet, this unflagging automobile enthusiast wrung his hands about lusting after a vintage gas-guzzler. Further back, around his investment in a hybrid-electric model Lincoln, he wrote at length about the driver's responsibility to their children's health and survival on 2009's Fork In The Road, and perhaps the most immediately ear-catching moment on Talkin To The Trees arrives on Let's Roll Again, where, against clanging electric guitar chords, he urges America's automobile manufacturing giants, by name – Ford, GM and Chrysler – 'to build us something useful, something that won't kill our kids – come on America, let's roll again…on down the highway'. Alongside that responsible, depoliticised messaging, Young suddenly seems to find it hard to avoid needling at the Trump administration. 'China's way ahead, they're building clean cars,' he adds, knowing the mention of China will not be music to the president's ears. 'C'mon America, let's cover our backs, protect our children,' he goes on, before taking a clear potshot at Elon Musk. 'If you're a fascist, then get a Tesla: if it's electric then it doesn't matter. If you're a democrat: then chase your freedom, get whatever you want and taste your freedom.' Behind those words, of course, Young easily could've ramped up explicit themes of political dissent. Instead, his mind seems to be focused on enjoying the natural wonders of his ranch in Northern California, as well as, in the track Family Life, the domestic happiness he finds surrounded by his children and grandkids as he writes songs, and sings them for their approval, ' and also 'singing for my best wife ever, the best cook in the world' – a great review, indeed, for Darryl Hannah, the movie actor and activist, whom he married in 2018. Though second track Dark Mirage finds his 'new' band The Chrome Hearts – a mutation of his other one of late, Promise of the Real, with master soul keyboardist Spooner Oldham added – squalling into fierce feedback, as Young momentarily dips into lingering anger from his mid-'10s divorce – by and large, The Chrome Hearts are entrusted with summoning the kind of golden country-rock sound usually associated with Young's Harvest series – rustling acoustic guitars, blissful ivory-tinkling topped with Neil's wheezing harmonica, which light up rustic gems like First Fire Of Winter, the exquisite title track and the warm-hearted Thankful, As such, there's so much to enjoy here for long-standing fans – a mellow soundtrack perhaps for the four-wheel pilgrimage down to Glastonbury, with some fittingly thought-provoking messaging on automotive responsibility going forwards. In a week that has seen the passing of two of Young's West Coast peers, it's great to hear him sounding invigorated, domestically happy and creatively on song. Andrew Perry Prior to a brace of covers albums in 2023, it's fair to say that Belfast singer Van Morrison was in his 'late life super-grumpy' phase. Railing against everything from lockdown to scientists, he didn't hold back. My personal favourite from this era was a 2021 song called Why Are You on Facebook?, which contained the lines 'Why do you need second-hand friends? … Get a life.' And this from the sage who gave us Into The Mystic. Well, Van the Man is back doing what he does best. Remembering Now, his 47th album, is 14 songs of beautiful and reflective music addressing aging, romance and a sense of yearning for the landscapes and landmarks that made us who we are. It's 64 minutes of soulful blues and country folk, augmented by string arrangements by Fiachra Trench, who wrote the string parts for The Pogues' Fairytale of New York and worked with Morrison on his 1989 classic Avalon Sunset, to which Remembering Now can easily be compared. Folk star Seth Lakeman adds violin to three tracks. The album opens with Down to Joy, which soundtracked Kenneth Branagh's 2021 film Belfast and was nominated for a 'best original song' Oscar (Morrison lost out to Billie Eilish's Bond theme). Once In A Lifetime Feelings is one of three tracks with lyrics by Don Black, who's written for everyone from Meat Loaf to Michael Jackson. The song finds Morrison driving down to Monte Carlo with 'so much to say' to a loved one. It's fantastic. Stomping Ground sees the 79-year-old pleading to return to Belfast, while the closing nine-minute Stretching Out is simply swooning. The highlight is Haven't Lost My Sense of Wonder, which has touches of the awe that late songwriter Bill Fay saw in the world as he aged. 'Had my fill, 'cause I've been through the mill/ Now I'm saying 'Peace, be still,'' Morrison sings over lavish gospel-tinged soul. Under (hopefully) sunny skies, these songs will sound a treat when Morrison supports Neil Young in Hyde Park next month (along with Yusuf/ Cat Stevens). A lush return to form. James Hall Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
This Airline Is Going to Start Handing Out $675 Fines to 'Unruly' Passengers: 'It Is Unacceptable'
European airline Ryanair has announced that passengers it removes from its flights for "unruly behavior" will now face an additional fine The fine for £500 — more than $675 — will be presented to anyone whose behavior "results in them being offloaded from the aircraft" 'It is unacceptable that passengers are made to suffer unnecessary disruption because of one unruly passenger's behavior," an airline spokesperson said in a statementA major European airline announced this week that passengers who are removed from flights for "unruly behavior" will now face an additional fine in an effort to crack down on what it calls "unacceptable behavior." On Thursday, June 12, Irish airline Ryanair revealed that it is introducing a £500 fine — more than $675 — to any passenger "whose unruly behavior results in them being offloaded from the aircraft." The newly implemented fines from Ryanair, which calls itself Europe's "most punctual airline," take on an "industry-wide issue affecting all airlines," the airline said in its release. The "minimum" fine comes as the airline vows to "continue to pursue disruptive passengers for civil damages." 'It is unacceptable that passengers are made [to] suffer unnecessary disruption because of one unruly passenger's behavior," a spokesperson for the airline said in a statement. "To help ensure that our passengers and crew travel in a comfortable and stress-free environment, without unnecessary disruption caused by a tiny number of unruly passengers, we have introduced a £500 fine, which will be issued to any passengers offloaded from aircraft as a result of their misconduct." "While these are isolated events which happen across all airlines, disruptive behavior in such a confined shared space is unacceptable, and we hope that our proactive approach will act as a deterrent to eliminate this unacceptable behavior onboard our aircraft," the spokesperson added. PEOPLE reached out to Ryanair for comment but did not receive an immediate response. Michael O'Leary, Ryanair's CEO, previously argued that passengers should be limited to two drinks at airports, telling the Daily Telegraph in August that authorities "don't allow people to drink-drive, yet we keep putting them up in aircraft at 33,000ft." "In the old days, people who drank too much would eventually fall over or fall asleep. But now those passengers are also on tablets and powder," he said. "It's the mix. You get much more aggressive behavior that becomes very difficult to manage." Back in January, the airline took legal action against a passenger in Ireland, seeking £12,500 — or roughly $17,000 — claiming that they disrupted a flight to the Canary Islands, per The Guardian. The 160 passengers on board had to 'face unnecessary disruption as well as [lose] a full day of their holiday," the company said at the time, according to the outlet. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Over in the U.S., unruly passenger incidents reported to the Federal Aviation Administration peaked in 2021, when 5,973 were reported. A total of 2,102 were reported in 2024, with 699 accounted for so far in 2025. From 2021 to 2023, the FAA levied a total of $20.9 million in fines against "unruly" passengers. Unruly passengers can face a felony conviction if referred to the FBI, fines of up to $37,000 per violation and be placed on an airline's internal no-fly list. "Former FAA Administrator Mike Whitaker reiterates that the FAA has zero tolerance for unruly passenger behavior. Dangerous passengers put everyone at risk," the agency shared in a statement on its website. "Threatening or violent behavior can distract and disrupt crew members from their primary responsibility — to ensure the safety of all passengers." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks NYC mayor's office from bringing ICE agents onto Rikers Island
NEW YORK — A Manhattan Supreme Court justice on Friday blocked the Adams administration from bringing federal immigration officers onto Rikers Island. The preliminary injunction will prevent agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies from setting up shop at the jail complex until the case, filed by the New York City Council against the mayor and his administration, is resolved. 'New York City, which thrives as a global hub due in large part to its reputation as being a welcoming home for immigrant communities from around the world, risks having this goodwill and invaluable reputation irreparably damaged as a result of an Executive Order borne out of Mayor Adams' alleged conflict of interest,' Justice Mary Rosado wrote in her decision. The mayor's top deputy, Randy Mastro, signed an executive order in April to give the green light to federal agents to operate offices on Rikers. The Council filed the suit challenging it a week later, arguing that the order was unlawful and the 'poisoned fruit' of a corrupt deal with the Trump administration. Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who is currently running for mayor, said in a statement that the decision was a 'victory' that would protect New Yorkers from Trump's immigration 'overreach.' 'New Yorkers are counting on our city to protect their civil rights, and yet, Mayor Adams has attempted to betray this obligation by handing power over our city to Trump's ICE because he is compromised,' she said. 'This attempted corrupt bargain to allow ICE to set up a center on Rikers would only make our city, and all New Yorkers, less safe.' 'We disagree with the judge's decision, and we remain confident we will ultimately prevail in this case,' Mastro said in a statement. 'At no point does the judge dispute that the substance of our executive order fully complies with local law — that's because it does. Furthermore, there is no actual conflict of interest here, and the mayor responded to the appearance of a conflict by delegating this issue to me as his first deputy mayor — whom the judge herself described as an 'accomplished and highly educated attorney' — and I acted entirely independently of the mayor.' Trump's deportation efforts in New York have ramped up in recent weeks, with agents lurking in the city's immigration courthouses to arrest immigrants checking in for routine court proceedings in their asylum cases. The mayor's attorneys have argued that any risks of imminent harm are no more than speculation. The judge wrote that she found that argument 'disingenuous.' 'It is akin to the police telling a 911 caller that they will not assist a victim who calls while a burglar attempts to enter her house but will be helped once the burglar enters her house,' Rosado wrote. The judge also wrote that the Council was likely to succeed in showing that, at the very least, the mayor appeared to be executing a corrupt deal with the Trump administration by agreeing to bring ICE back onto Rikers. The mayor was indicted on bribery charges in September, and was set to go on trial in April until President Trump's Department of Justice ordered the charges dropped, in part because they impeded Adams' ability to help carry out the president's hardline immigration agenda. That directive prompted waves of resignations within Manhattan Federal Court, including that of then-U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon — who alleged there was a quid pro quo between Adams and Trump. Murad Awawdeh, the president of the New York Immigration Coalition, said that the ruling would prevent 'thousands' of those in pretrial detention at Rikers from being deported: 'New York City should not be in the business of carrying out Donald Trump's mass disappearance agenda, which is in fact illegal under our local laws,' Awawdeh said. ________
