
'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' would mean cuts to taxes, social programs
In this second installment of our series exploring the ways President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' could impact people on the local level, The Commercial-News takes a deeper look at how the bill, if passed by the Senate, would cut taxes for some and implement work requirements for SNAP and Medicaid programs. The bill was passed by the House of Representatives on May 22 and is currently being debated by the U.S. Senate, who is expected to vote on the bill sometime this summer.
For families with children, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (OBBBA) would mean an increase in the Child Tax Credit.
Established in 1997 as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act, the goal of the Child Tax Credit (CTC) is to enhance the economic security of families with children, particularly those in lower- to middle-income brackets.
The dollar amount of the tax credits is based on the number of dependent children, as well as income level and marital status, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
In other words, those who claim their children on their federal tax return — and some state returns, including Illinois — are not taxed on their entire income, thanks to those deductions. That means families could save hundreds or even thousands in taxes they would otherwise be required to pay.
It's important to note that these changes would only remain in effect until 2028, when the CTC would be reduced back down to the current $2,00 per child.
Elimination of taxes on tips and overtime
Another group who could benefit from the OBBBA are servers or bartenders, who may see a bump in their net pay thanks to the elimination of taxes on tips and overtime.
According to Indeed.com, some bartenders in Illinois make as much as $150 a day in tips, all of which counts toward their taxable income as the law stands today.
Should the OBBBA pass the Senate, tips and overtime hours would no longer be taxed, meaning more money would stay in the pockets of bartenders, servers, baristas, and anyone else who relies on tips.
The actual change would take place as a deduction, like the child tax credit, in which taxpayers who receive tips would receive 'a deduction in an amount equal to the qualified tips received during the taxable year that are included on statements furnished to the individual.'
The same goes for those who worked beyond their required hours across the year. Overtime hours would not be taxed, thanks to a deduction 'in an amount equal to the qualified overtime compensation received during the taxable year.'
For Seniors
Those who are 65 years or older would also see an increased standard deduction to their taxable income as a way to ease the burden on fixed-income retirees.
Should the bill pass Senate, standard deduction amounts for 2025 through 2028 would be increased by an additional $4,000 for seniors 65 and older who meet certain income limits.
For Small Business Owners
Those who own small businesses could see an expanded QBI (Qualified Business Income) deduction.
The QBI allows eligible businesses — like S corporations, partnerships, and limited liability companies (LLCs), as well as sole proprietors and self-employed individuals — to deduct up to 20% of their qualified business income, lowering their taxable income and saving them money.
Cuts to Social Programs — Who's at Risk? Medicaid Work Requirements
Around 3.9 million people in Illinois, including low-income adults, children, pregnant women, and people with disabilities, have their health needs currently covered by Medicaid. 44% of that 3.9 million were children, 9% were seniors, and 7% were adults with disabilities, according to The Civic Federation.
Should the OBBBA pass the Senate, it would be harder for people to meet eligibility requirements for Medicaid coverage.
The new bill would impose work or job-training requirements for able-bodied adults as part of a requirement to 'demonstrate community engagement.'
Applicants must either prove that in the month leading up to their application, they've worked at least 80 hours, participated in 80 hours of community service, or been enrolled in an educational program at least half-time, or some combination of these, totaling 80 hours.
In Vermilion County, 1,310 adults, or 4.3% of the applicable population, were unemployed as of April 2025, according to the U.S. Census.
To ensure people covered by Medicaid continue to remain employed or otherwise 'engaged' in the community, the OBBBA gives the federal government access to payroll data.
Exceptions would be made for people under 19 years of age and pregnant people or those entitled to post-partum medical assistance.
People who have been released from a public institution within three months before they applied for Medicaid are also exempt from the community engagement requirement.
For those who would not qualify for Medicaid but who cannot afford to pay for their own emergency care, local hospitals and clinics may bear the burden, especially those in more rural areas where a higher percentage of the population depends on Medicaid.
It's not just individuals and families who could be impacted by cuts, as many public schools receive Medicaid funding as a reimbursement for school nurses and counsellors.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that up to 1.35 million could be at risk of losing Medicaid coverage under the OBBBA.
SNAP (Food Stamp) Changes
As part of the OBBBA, a new plan called 'the Thrifty Food Plan' would take effect, wherein able-bodied adults without dependents would have to maintain the same work requirements for Medicaid recipients.
Children under 18 or seniors over 65, as well as those people who are 'medically certified as physically or mentally unfit for employment,' and parents or other members of a household with responsibility for a dependent child under 7 years of age, would be excluded from the work requirement.
Pregnant women, someone who is currently unhoused, a veteran, those under 24 who were previously cared for in foster care, and someone married to someone who fits the above requirements.
In 2022, there were 20,733 individuals in Vermilion County receiving SNAP benefits, or supplemental nutrition assistance program, according to the U.S. Census. If even a portion of those recipients were to lose their SNAP benefits, local food pantries would see a surge in demand.
What to Watch and What to Do
If the OBBBA passes the Senate, many provisions would go into effect over the next 1–2 years. It would be up to state and local agencies to determine how to implement certain aspects of those provisions.
For those concerned with how the OBBBA could impact them, speak with a tax advisor or social worker.
Those struggling with food insecurity can reach out to the Illinois' Hunger Hotline at 1-800-359-2163, for assistance with SNAP application, case management, and food pantry referrals.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg Daybreak: Trump-Musk Feud
On today's podcast: 1) Elon Musk and President Donald Trump engage in a public dispute the traded personal barbs and weighed down Tesla stock and Musk's personal wealth. The dispute began over differences on the GOP tax legislation, with Musk opposing the bill and Trump accusing Musk of being motivated by self-interest. After Tesla shares tanked 14% and Musk's personal wealth dropped by $34 billion, Musk signaled a willingness to cool tensions with Trump, responding to a user's advice to "cool off and take a step back for a couple days" with "Good advice." 2) Tensions appear to be easing between the US and China. President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to further trade talks to resolve disputes over tariffs and rare earth minerals. The two leaders had a 90-minute call, during which Trump acknowledged that the trade relationship with China had gotten "a little off track" but said they are now "in very good shape" with a trade deal. 3) Investors brace for a critical May Jobs Report. Traders are awaiting the key monthly nonfarm payrolls report, which may reinforce expectations that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at least twice this year.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me.
Despite declarations that something needs to be done about the declining birth rate in the United States, neither President Donald Trump nor the Republican Party has the desire to protect pregnant people. If they did, the Trump administration wouldn't have made its latest move to restrict abortion nationwide. On Tuesday, June 3, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services rescinded a Biden-era policy that directed hospitals to provide emergency abortions if it was needed to stabilize a pregnant patient. The guidance and communications on it apparently 'do not reflect the policy of this Administration.' I, like many people who support abortion rights, know what this will lead to. It means more pregnant people will die. Does that reflect the policy of the administration? The Biden policy was implemented in 2022, following the fall of Roe v. Wade, and argued that hospitals receiving Medicare funding had to comply with the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). The former administration argued that this included providing emergency abortions when they were needed to stabilize a patient, even in states that had severe abortion restrictions. Opinion: A brain dead pregnant Georgia woman is a horror story. It's Republicans' fault. This wasn't entirely a surprise. In 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas could ban virtually all abortions in the state, including abortions that would have occurred under the old EMTALA guidelines. Still, it's terrifying to see this crucial policy eliminated. It's already dangerous to be pregnant in the United States. Our maternal mortality rate is much higher than in other wealthy countries. Same with our infant mortality rate. This will only exacerbate these tragedies. In states with abortion bans, the risks are even greater. A study from the Gender Equity Policy Institute found that people living in states with abortion bans were twice as likely to die during or shortly after childbirth. This is also backed by anecdotal evidence, including the 2022 deaths of two women in Georgia after the state passed a six-week ban. A different study found that infant mortality rates increased in states with severe restrictions on abortion, including an increase in deaths due to congenital anomalies. The Trump administration does not care about what is medically necessary to save someone's life. They don't care about whether the children supposedly saved by rescinding this policy will grow up without their mother. They care about their perceived moral superiority. They care about controlling women. Why would anybody want to have a child under that Republican way of thinking? Opinion: We're worrying about the wrong thing. Low birth rate isn't the crisis: Child care is. I want to say I'm surprised that the Trump administration would allow women in need of emergency care to die. Yet this is clearly aligned with the Republican stance on abortion, just like it's aligned with the actions that the party has taken to make it harder for women to access necessary care. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Whether you like it or not, abortion is a necessary part of health care. It saves lives. Alexis McGill Johnson, the president and CEO of Planned Parenthood, laid it out plainly. 'Women have died because they couldn't get the lifesaving abortion care they needed,' she said in a statement. 'The Trump administration is willing to let pregnant people die, and that is exactly what we can expect." Again, this is the administration that wants young women like me to have children and improve the country's birth rate. This is an administration that claims to care about women and children. I know I wouldn't want to have a child while Trump continues to make it unsafe to be pregnant and give birth. I hate that this is the reality. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump just made healthcare more dangerous for pregnant women | Opinion
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 2026 Budget Proposal: 4 Things Retirees Need To Know
President Donald Trump's 2026 budget proposal, known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' introduces significant changes to federal spending and tax policies. Read Next: Try This: While aiming to reduce non-defense discretionary spending and extend tax cuts, the proposal has raised concerns about its potential impact on retirees who rely on federal programs for income, healthcare and essential services. 'These potential shifts could slow benefit growth, raise Medicare premiums or target higher earners with stricter eligibility or tax rules,' said Aaron Cirksena, founder and CEO of MDRN Capital. 'The biggest concern is uncertainty right now, and retirees rely on predictability, so even these small changes can have a big impact on them.' Here are four things retirees need to know about Trump's 2026 budget proposal. According to Congressional Budget Office analysis, if Trump's budget proposal, currently being debated in Congress, raises the federal deficit by $2.3 trillion over the next decade, it would automatically trigger spending cuts, including a projected $500 billion cut to Medicare. Such cuts may lead to reduced payments to providers, potentially affecting seniors' access to healthcare services. An analysis by the Medicare Rights Center, an advocacy organization, found that the 'bill would undermine access to long-term care by shifting costs to states, likely resulting in cuts to HCBS (Home-and Community-Based Services). It would also make it harder for people to qualify for Medicaid coverage and avoid gaps in care.' Find Out: Key programs under the Older Americans Act, such as nutrition services and caregiver support, are at risk of significant funding reductions or elimination. For example, the National Council on Aging found that the Trump administration proposes to move the Aging Network Support program to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and reduce the program's funding by over 40%. The program allows seniors to live independently in their homes. This matters for individuals saving for retirement, because adult children often incur significant costs for caring for their parents. According to an AARP study, 'On average, caregivers spend 26% of their personal income on caregiving expenses. One in three dips into their personal savings, like bank accounts, to cover costs, and 12% take out a loan or borrow from family or friends.' The budget proposes substantial cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which could disproportionately affect low-income seniors who depend on these programs for healthcare and food security. According to NPR, 'If approved, starting in fiscal year 2028, states would be required to pay between 5% and 25% of food benefit costs for the first time. … In addition, states would receive less federal support to administer SNAP. The proposed changes would decrease the federal reimbursement rate for administrative costs to run SNAP from 50% to 25%.' An analysis of the Medicaid and SNAP cuts by The Commonwealth Fund found that these changes create ripple effects that affect the economies of entire communities, not just low-income households. 'For example, some of the food purchased in Georgia may have been grown in Kansas or processed in Tennessee, so lower grocery purchases in one state may cause losses in other states,' the Commonwealth report stated. 'A nurse who loses her job at a Louisiana clinic might reside in Texas; thus, a job lost in one state could create economic losses in another.' While the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' proposes extending tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, it does not include provisions to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, contrary to some expectations. The bill does introduce a new $4,000 standard deduction for seniors aged 65 and older, providing tax relief for individuals with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 and couples with incomes of $150,000 annually. However, the substantial tax cuts and increased spending outlined in the proposal are projected to add approximately $3.8 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. This significant increase in the deficit raises concerns among financial experts about potential future tax hikes to address the fiscal imbalance. 'If the proposal is passed, it could increase taxes on retirement income, making Roth conversions and smart withdrawal strategies more important than ever,' Cirksena said. 'The best move right now is do not wait. Review incomes, run scenarios and add some flexibility into your plan. Better to adjust early than react late.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money This article originally appeared on Trump's 2026 Budget Proposal: 4 Things Retirees Need To Know Sign in to access your portfolio