Scientists Found a Black Hole That Shouldn't Exist. Now Physics Has a Problem.
Over the past decade, the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) network has detected hundreds of black hole mergers, but none quiet as large as GW231123.
At 225 solar masses, the black hole resulting from the merger far exceeds previous record holder GW190521, which weighed in at 140 solar masses.
This black holes involved in this merger were actually so large that they challenge some of our understanding of stellar evolution.
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory, or LIGO, made major headlines in 2015 when scientists confirmed the first ever detection of gravitational waves—ripples in spacetime caused by highly energetic deep space phenomena (think: black hole mergers, supernovae, and neutron star collisions). This particular detection originated from a black hole merger that created a new black hole 62 times the mass of our Sun.
The LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) network of gravitational wave detectors hasn't let off the gas in the decade since, and has made hundreds of confirmed gravitational-wave detections, including the first neutron star merger in 2017 and the largest black hole merger (clocking in at 140 solar masses) in 2021.
Now, in a preprint uploaded to the arXiv server, LVK scientists have provided evidence that there's a new heavyweight champion—a merger that produced a new 255-solar-mass black hole. Designated GW231123 for the date it was discovered (November 23, 2023, during the fourth observing run of the LVK network), this black hole is actually too big, according to our current best understanding of physics.
'This is the most massive black hole binary we've observed through gravitational waves, and it presents a real challenge to our understanding of black hole formation,' Mark Hannam, a member of the LVK Collaboration from Cardiff University, said in a press statement. 'Black holes this massive are forbidden through standard stellar evolution models.'
To form this black hole, the two black hole predecessors likely had to measure around 100 and 140 times the mass of the Sun, respectively. This means they potentially lie in what's known as the 'upper-mass gap'—a range of masses in which black holes aren't thought to form from stars directly (the resulting supernovae of these hugely massive stars should leave behind no stellar remnant at all).
'One possibility is that the two black holes in this binary formed through earlier mergers of smaller black holes." Hannam said.
However, these black holes' masses aren't the only mystery, as both were spinning between 80 and 90 percent of their top speed limit. This makes them the highest spinning black holes ever recorded by LVK.
'The black holes appear to be spinning very rapidly—near the limit allowed by Einstein's theory of general relativity,' Charlie Hoy, another member of the LVK from the University of Portsmouth, said in a press statement. 'That makes the signal difficult to model and interpret. It's an excellent case study for pushing forward the development of our theoretical tools.'
Because the detectors are sensitive to black holes of around 100 solar masses, detecting one more than double that size certainly pushes LIGO to its limits. According to Science News, the LVK network was only able to detect the smallest blip from this merger, with only around 0.1 seconds detected at the tail end of the collision.
LIGO's decades-long mission to detect gravitational waves has given scientists a whole new understanding of the universe, and nearly a decade after its first detection, it shows no signs of stopping.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scientific American
2 days ago
- Scientific American
We Just Discovered the Sounds of Spacetime. Let's Keep Listening
Long ago, in a galaxy far away, two black holes danced around each other, drawing ever closer until they ended in a cosmic collision that sent ripples through the fabric of spacetime. These gravitational waves traveled for over a billion years before reaching Earth. On September 14, 2015, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) heard their chirping signal, marking the first-ever detection of such a cosmic collision. Initially, scientists expected LIGO might detect just a few of these collisions. But now, nearing the first detection's 10th anniversary, we have already observed more than 300 gravitational-wave events, uncovering entirely unexpected populations of black holes. Just lately, on July 14, LIGO scientists announced the discovery of the most massive merger of two black holes ever seen. Gravitational-wave astronomy has become a global enterprise. Spearheaded by LIGO's two cutting-edge detectors in the U.S. and strengthened through collaboration with detectors in Italy (Virgo) and Japan (KAGRA), the field has become one of the most data-rich and exciting frontiers in astrophysics. It tests fundamental aspects of general relativity, measures the expansion of the universe and challenges our models of how stars live and die. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. LIGO has also spurred the design and development of technologies beyond astronomy. For example advances in quantum technologies, which reduce the noise and thereby improve LIGO's detector sensitivity, have promising applications to both microelectronics and quantum computing. Given all this, it comes as no surprise that the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to LIGO's founders in 2017. Yet despite this extraordinary success story, the field now faces an existential threat. The Trump administration has proposed slashing the total National Science Foundation (NSF) budget by more than half: a move so severe that one of the two LIGO detectors would be forced to shut down. Constructing and upgrading the two LIGO detectors required a public investment of approximately $1.4 billion as of 2022, so abandoning half this project now would constitute a gigantic waste. A U.S. Senate committee in mid-July pushed back against hobbling LIGO, but Congress has lately folded against administration budget cut demands, leaving it still on the table. The proposed $19 million cut to the LIGO operations budget (a reduction from 2024 of some 40 percent) would be an act of stunning shortsightedness. With only one LIGO detector running, we will detect just 10 to 20 percent of the events we would have seen with both detectors operating. As a result, the U.S. will rapidly lose its leadership position in one of the most groundbreaking areas of modern science. Gravitational-wave astronomy, apart from being a technical success, is a fundamental shift in how we observe the universe. Walking away now would be like inventing the microscope, then tossing it aside before we had a good chance to look through the lens. Here's why losing one detector has such a devastating impact: The number of gravitational-wave events we expect to detect depends on how far our detectors can 'see.' Currently, they can spot a binary black hole merger (like the one detected in 2015) out to a distance of seven billion light-years! With just one of the two LIGO detectors operating, the volume we can probe is reduced to just 35 percent of its original size, slashing the expected detection rate by the same fraction. Moreover, distinguishing real gravitational-wave signals from noise is extremely challenging. Only when the same signal is observed in multiple detectors can we confidently identify it as a true gravitational-wave event, rather than, say, the vibrations of a passing truck. As a result, with just one detector operating, we can confirm only the most vanilla, unambiguous signals. This means we will miss extraordinary events like the one announced in mid-July. Accounting for both the reduced detection volume and the fact that we can only confirm the vanilla events, we get to the dreaded 10 to 20 percent of the expected gravitational wave detections. Lastly, we will also lose the ability to follow up on gravitational-wave events with traditional telescopes. Multiple detectors are necessary to triangulate an event's position in the sky. This triangulation was essential for the follow-up of the first detection of a binary neutron star merger. By pinpointing the merger's location in the sky, telescopes around the world could be called into action to capture an image of the explosion that accompanied the gravitational waves. This led to a cascade of new discoveries, including the realization in 2017 that such mergers comprise one of the main sources of gold in the universe. Beyond LIGO, the proposed budget also terminates U.S. support for the European-led space-based gravitational-wave mission LISA and all but guarantees the cancellation of the next-generation gravitational wave detector Cosmic Explorer. The U.S. is thus poised to lose its global leadership position. As Europe and China move forward with ambitious projects like the Einstein Telescope, LISA and TianQin, this could result not only in missing the next wave of breakthroughs but also in a significant brain drain. We cannot predict what discoveries still lie ahead. After all, when Heinrich Hertz first confirmed the existence of radio waves in 1887, no one could have imagined they would one day carry the Internet signal you used to load this article. This underscores a vital point: while cuts to science may appear to have only minor effects in the short term, systematic defunding of the fundamental sciences undermines the foundation of innovation and discovery that has long driven progress in the modern world and fueled our economies. The detection of gravitational waves is a breakthrough on par with the first detections of x-rays or radio waves, but even more profound. Unlike those forms of light, which are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, gravitational waves arise from an entirely different force of nature. In a way, we have unlocked a new sense for observing the cosmos. It is as if before, we could only see the universe. With gravitational waves, we can hear all the sounds that come with it. Choosing to stop listening now would be foolish.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Yes, It's Possible to Safely Jump Into a Black Hole, Scientists Say
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Scientists say humans could indeed enter a black hole to study it. Of course, the human in question couldn't report their findings—or ever come back. The reason is that supermassive black holes are much more hospitable. In a finding ripped from Interstellar, scientists say humans can indeed explore black holes firsthand. The catch? If you're going to jump into a black hole, don't plan on ever jumping back out into our universe. 'A human can do this only if the respective black hole is supermassive and isolated, and if the person entering the black hole does not expect to report the findings to anyone in the entire Universe,' Grinnell College physicists explain in a new article in The Conversation. That's because of special physics found in supermassive black holes, resulting in a combination of gravity and event horizon that wouldn't instantaneously pull the human being into a very dead piece of spaghetti. Because supermassive black holes are much bigger than stellar and intermediate black holes, all the parts of them are more spread out. A person falling in would make it to the event horizon—the border of the black hole beyond which not even light can escape, and where gravity is so strong that light will orbit the black hole like planets orbit stars—a lot sooner than in a smaller black hole. The person would stay cognizant and intact for longer. But, of course, they would never emerge—making this a one-way rollercoaster ride of scientific discovery into oblivion. Why does the math work this way? It's a matter of facts about black holes of different sizes, the researchers say: 'For a black hole with a mass of our Sun (one solar mass), the event horizon will have a radius of just under 2 miles. The supermassive black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy, by contrast, has a mass of roughly 4 million solar masses, and it has an event horizon with a radius of 7.3 million miles or 17 solar radii. This implies, due to the closeness of the black hole's center, that the black hole's pull on a person will differ by a factor of 1,000 billion times between head and toe, depending on which is leading the free fall.' This means avoiding 'spaghettification' (really!) and a safe, gentle float past the event horizon. Why does stuff go in but never come out? Well, scientists have only begun to understand the specific instances in which black holes eject energy or information—and that's unlikely to ever take the form of a missive, or even Morse code message, from a disappearing astronaut. Those black holes are very old, for example, with different physics than this special case. But, like in Interstellar, our imaginations reel at the idea of studying a black hole from the inside. Perhaps in some far future, someone will invent the right kind of tether to pull someone back out. And in that case, we can confirm some of the facts of life in a black hole, time dilation or not. Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the IssueGet the Issue Get the Issue You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life? Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Is Earth's rotation speeding up? July 22 will be second shortest day in history
Earlier this month, the Earth spun just a bit faster than usual on July 9 and is expected to do so again on July 22 and Aug. 5, according to the website TimeAndDate. Over a millisecond was reportedly shaved off the clock on July 9, but the shortest day out of all three predicted will be in August. This shortening is due to the moon's position relative to Earth and its influence on the planet's rotation. Here's what to know about why Earth's rotation is speeding up, and how it is shortening three days this summer. Is Earth's rotation speeding up? Earth takes 24 hours to complete a full rotation in a standard day, equal to exactly 86,400 seconds. If a standard day is shortened or lengthened by a number of milliseconds, that added or detracted time is referred to as "length of day," according to the website TimeAndDate. Until 2020, the shortest "length of day" ever recorded by atomic clocks was -1.05 ms, meaning that Earth completed one daily rotation in 1.05 milliseconds less than 86,400 seconds. "Since then, however, Earth has managed to shatter this old record every year by around half a millisecond," astrophysicist Graham Jones wrote for TimeAndDate. That culminated on July 5, 2023, with the shortest day of all time, with a "length of day" of -1.66 ms, according to Jones. While the variations are expected, recent research suggests that human activity is also contributing to Earth's changing rotation. Researchers at NASA calculated that dwindling ice and groundwater and rising seas have actually increased the length of our days since 2000 by 1.33 milliseconds per century . A photo of Earth rising over the moon's horizon taken in 1968 by astronaut Bill Anders How short will the day be on July 22 On July 22, scientists predicted a -1.38 ms "length of day." This is a little bit faster than July 9, , which had about a -1.30 ms "length of day," according to TimeAndDate. August 5 is expected to the most truncated at -1.51 ms "length of day." On these days, the moon will be at its furthest from the Earth's equator, changing its gravitational pull and causing our planet to spin just a tiny bit faster on its axis, according to science news website LiveScience. Will the sped-up day be noticeable? Of course, you're unlikely to notice such a minuscule difference in your standard 24-hour day. But scientists who track and operate atomic clocks may be facing a bit of a predicament. First introduced in the 1950s, atomic clocks replaced how scientists previously measured the length of a day by tracking the Earth's rotation and the position of the sun. The clocks are also capable of measuring in billionths of a second, or nanoseconds, which are synchronized globally to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC.) If the clocks are thrown off even a tiny amount, it could also throw off computers, servers, GPS signals, and other networks that rely on accurate times, David Gozzard, an experimental physicist at the University of Western Australia, told the Guardian. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Earth will spin faster today, creating second shortest day in history
