Why Ford's made-in-America strategy hurts it in Trump's trade war
Ford Motor, the second-largest American carmaker, prides itself on making most of its vehicles in the U.S. Some 80% of the cars Ford sells in the U.S. are built there, and it makes more vehicles in the U.S. than any other automaker.
But the Dearborn, Mich., company said the Trump administration's latest trade deals with Japan, the European Union and South Korea put it at a disadvantage with foreign rivals. Those deals now set a 15% tariff rate, which is lower than the 25% auto tariff that went into effect this spring.
Ford faces steeper tariffs on many parts as well as higher costs for imported aluminum, which is subject to 50% duties. Ford, one of the industry's biggest users of aluminum, buys the material from U.S. suppliers who pass on a chunk of their tariff costs.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a CNBC interview that Ford's predicament is due to 'idiosyncratic" factors, as the company's F-series pickups are made with aluminum, which isn't readily available in the U.S. Bessent said the administration hopes to cut a deal with Canada to address aluminum costs in particular. 'I admire Ford," he said.
When President Trump rolled out his tariff plan in April, he railed against the tariffs other countries had imposed on U.S.-made vehicles and said his new trade policy would help restore the U.S. to be an industrial powerhouse.
U.S. automakers have long complained that they struggle to compete with foreign rivals that enjoy lower labor costs, higher levels of government support and less-stringent regulations.
'For decades now, it has not been a level playing field for U.S. automakers globally, with either tariffs or trade barriers," General Motors Chief Executive Mary Barra said earlier this year. 'So I think tariffs is one tool that the administration can use to level the playing field."
As the trade policy was rolled out, the U.S. automakers found themselves also vulnerable to the tariffs. Trump slapped duties on steel and aluminum, on automotive parts and on all imported foreign vehicles, even those made by American carmakers.
During the era of the North American Free Trade Agreement, GM, Ford and Stellantis expanded significant portions of their manufacturing capacity to Mexico and Canada. Those products became subject to tariffs.
Around half of what GM sells in the U.S. it makes abroad; Ford builds most of its vehicles in the U.S. but relies heavily on imported parts. A trade deal that helps one might weaken the other.
'Ford has more reason to complain," said Daniel Roeska, a Bernstein analyst. 'If you're now lowering tariffs and letting more cars and content flow into the U.S., that relatively disadvantages Ford more than others."
All three companies have reported big tariff costs. Ford said it paid $800 million in the second quarter. GM put its tab at $1.1 billion. Stellantis, which makes the U.S. brands Chrysler, Ram and Jeep, said tariffs shaved $350 million from its bottom line.
Tesla, which builds all the vehicles it sells in the U.S. domestically and gets most parts in North America, said tariffs cost its automotive unit $200 million.
When the Trump administration started striking deals with big trading partners in recent weeks, Ford executives cringed with each deal.
Ford said the pacts helped its competitors, from Japan's Toyota Motor and Germany's Volkswagen to GM, which builds lower-cost Chevrolets and Buicks in South Korea.
Ford said that the new 15% rate is too low to motivate competitors to move production to the U.S. 'Japan and South Korea have real advantages in labor costs, materials and currency," the company said. 'Meanwhile, Ford is facing billions due to multiple tariffs on auto parts, steel, aluminum and more that increase our costs of building in America."
The United Auto Workers and a trade group representing Detroit's automakers have criticized Trump's move to lower tariffs. 'U.S. trade policy should push automakers to build in America, with skilled, union labor," the UAW said. 'A flat 15% tariff doesn't accomplish that."
They have said cost advantages of building cars outside the U.S., such as weaker currency and cheaper labor, far outweigh the 15% tariff. Ford said the company's Ford Escape SUV cost roughly $5,000 more to make than a Toyota RAV4 SUV built in Japan.
The new deals also could give a boost to Ford's crosstown rival, GM. Analysts estimate that the new 15% tariff on imports from South Korea will lower GM's $5 billion tariff bill this year by close to $1 billion.
Ford executives said they have been in near-daily talks with administration officials, who they said have been receptive to the company's argument. 'Ford is a leading auto producer in the U.S. and the leading exporter with the most UAW workers," Chief Executive Jim Farley said on a call with analysts. 'We're very clear with the administration."
Ford and the rest of the U.S. industry are awaiting a deal with Mexico, which accounts for a big chunk of auto-parts shipments into the U.S. Trump said Thursday that tariffs on Mexican goods would remain unchanged for 90 days as the nations negotiate a trade deal.
Write to Sharon Terlep at sharon.terlep@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Can Trump's Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac IPO plan slash mortgage rates? Bill Ackman says...
Synopsis Donald Trump is reportedly planning to IPO Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, potentially the largest IPO in history. Billionaire Investor Bill Ackman suggests merging the two mortgage giants to reduce mortgage rates and government oversight costs. Ackman believes privatization could yield substantial gains for the government, citing their improved capitalization and government backing. AP American hedge fund manager Bill Ackman took to X, formerly known as Twitter, and one way to reduce mortgage rates would be to merge government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac US President Donald Trump Saturday seemed to acknowledge reporting by The Wall Street Journal on Friday that he plans to IPO Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the end of this year. The President and his economic advisers are planning a historic sale of stock in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-owned mortgage giants that help provide stability and affordability to America's home loan market. Reacting to the development, American hedge fund manager Bill Ackman took to X, formerly known as Twitter, and one way to reduce mortgage rates would be to merge government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He suggested the merger move would help reduce mortgage rates and achieve huge synergies both in their operations and in the trading price. ALSO READ: 'Ban Gay sex, end women's voting': Pete Hegseth sparks controversy for re-posting pastor's radical message Bill Ackman said Fannie and Freddie merger would also reduce the costs and risks of government way to reduce mortgage rates would be to merge Fannie and Freddie. A merger would enable them to achieve huge synergies both in their operations and in the trading price and spreads of their MBS, savings which could be passed along to consumers in the form of reduced mortgage rates, Ackman wrote in his post. "A merger would also reduce the cost and risks of government oversight as there would be only one institution that would require FHFA oversight. I suspect that this is @realDonaldTrump 's idea as implied by his post below. It's a really good one," his post read. US-government owned twin giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are tasked with expanding credit availability in the American market by securitising mortgages. Their shares surged over 20 per cent on Friday after the Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration may privatise the two institutions this year. ALSO READ: Powerball jackpot rises to $479 million: Who won lottery jackpot last night? Lotto results, drawing time US President Donald Trump has previously met the top leadership of US investment banks such as Citigroup, the Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase to explore potential public offerings of the twin mortgage giants, Reuters reported, citing an the plans have not been finalised yet, and Trump continues to weigh various options, according to a senior administration official. But the White House believes an initial public offering of up to 15% of the two companies' shares could raise $30 billion, which could make it the largest IPO in has been weighing an IPO for years now. During his first term, Trump attempted — but ultimately failed — to privatize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, removing them from government conservatorship. Now, in his second term, he has revived the push. In May, he wrote on Truth Social that he was 'giving very serious consideration to bringing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public,' adding that he would consult with his Cabinet before making a decision 'in the near future.'Trump has argued for the monetisation of these two institutions, which were brought under US government control in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. In May this year, Trump floated the idea while emphasising that the government will maintain its implicit guarantees for the securities issued by the two institutions. ALSO READ: Last planet parade of 2025 happening today? How to watch the rare planetary alignment in the US Trump backer Bill Ackman, a long-time shareholder in the twin behemoths, has repeatedly called for their privatisation. Ackman, founder, Pershing Capital Management, told Forbes magazine last month that the US government is the preferred stockholder of the twins, and in a position to realise gains worth $300 billion. He argued that the two institutions were 'vastly better capitalised' today than for the past 60 two institutions are not banks, but tap creditworthy mortgage buyers and pack the mortgages in securities to be sold on the market, Ackman explained. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have guarantees worth $7 trillion coupled with enormous cash flows, apart from a government backing, underlining their ability to weather any future crisis, Ackman added.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump demands $1 billion from UCLA over antisemitism claims: Here's why California says it's political
The administration of US President Donald Trump is seeking a $1 billion settlement from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), following accusations from the Department of Justice (DOJ) that the university violated federal civil rights laws by failing to address antisemitic incidents on campus. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed the demand, as reported by the Associated Press. UCLA is the first public university to face such a large-scale financial penalty amid the Trump administration's broader push to reform higher education institutions it claims are failing to uphold civil rights protections. Federal funding for UCLA was suspended earlier, totalling $584 million, according to university officials. DOJ cites violation of civil rights law and the Fourteenth Amendment According to a DOJ finding issued on July 29, UCLA violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by 'acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students,' as reported by the Associated Press. The allegations stem largely from the university's handling of protests related to the 2024 Israel-Hamas war. During one night of unrest, counterprotesters attacked a pro-Palestinian encampment on UCLA's campus, resulting in several injuries before police intervened hours later. Over 200 individuals were arrested the following day after refusing orders to disband. Jewish students reported being blocked from campus areas and classrooms by demonstrators. California officials respond to $1 billion demand California Governor Gavin Newsom accused the Trump administration of using financial threats for political purposes. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking to reporters, he said, 'He has threatened us through extortion with a billion-dollar fine unless we do his bidding,' as quoted by the Associated Press. He contrasted California's response with settlements reached by private institutions, stating, 'We will not be like some of those other institutions that have followed a different path. ' James B. Milliken, president of the University of California, said the university had 'just received' the DOJ document and would review it. He noted that such a settlement 'would completely devastate our country's greatest public university system,' as reported by the Associated Press. Milliken, who recently assumed office, stated the university had offered to engage in a 'good faith dialogue' with the DOJ. Settlements with other universities set precedent The Trump administration has already reached civil rights settlements with other institutions, including $50 million from Brown University and $221 million from Columbia University. Columbia also regained access to over $400 million in research grants. Negotiations with Harvard University are ongoing, with the administration reportedly pressing for a larger settlement. UCLA previously settled separate civil rights lawsuit Last week, UCLA reached a $6 million settlement in a civil rights lawsuit filed by three Jewish students and a Jewish professor. The university also committed $2.3 million to organisations addressing antisemitism and supporting its Jewish community. As part of broader reforms, UCLA established an Office of Campus and Community Safety and introduced new systemwide protest guidelines. As reported by the Associated Press, Chancellor Julio Frenk, whose family history includes Holocaust survivors, also launched an initiative aimed at combating antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias on campus. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us .


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Can Trump's Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac IPO plan slash mortgage rates? Bill Ackman says...
What did Bill Ackman say? Live Events Bill Ackman's call for privatisation (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump Saturday seemed to acknowledge reporting by The Wall Street Journal on Friday that he plans to IPO Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the end of this year. The President and his economic advisers are planning a historic sale of stock in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-owned mortgage giants that help provide stability and affordability to America's home loan to the development, American hedge fund manager Bill Ackman took to X, formerly known as Twitter, and one way to reduce mortgage rates would be to merge government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He suggested the merger move would help reduce mortgage rates and achieve huge synergies both in their operations and in the trading Ackman said Fannie and Freddie merger would also reduce the costs and risks of government way to reduce mortgage rates would be to merge Fannie and Freddie. A merger would enable them to achieve huge synergies both in their operations and in the trading price and spreads of their MBS, savings which could be passed along to consumers in the form of reduced mortgage rates, Ackman wrote in his post."A merger would also reduce the cost and risks of government oversight as there would be only one institution that would require FHFA oversight. I suspect that this is @realDonaldTrump 's idea as implied by his post below. It's a really good one," his post owned twin giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are tasked with expanding credit availability in the American market by securitising mortgages. Their shares surged over 20 per cent on Friday after the Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration may privatise the two institutions this President Donald Trump has previously met the top leadership of US investment banks such as Citigroup, the Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase to explore potential public offerings of the twin mortgage giants, Reuters reported, citing an the plans have not been finalised yet, and Trump continues to weigh various options, according to a senior administration official. But the White House believes an initial public offering of up to 15% of the two companies' shares could raise $30 billion, which could make it the largest IPO in has been weighing an IPO for years now. During his first term, Trump attempted — but ultimately failed — to privatize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, removing them from government conservatorship. Now, in his second term, he has revived the push. In May, he wrote on Truth Social that he was 'giving very serious consideration to bringing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public,' adding that he would consult with his Cabinet before making a decision 'in the near future.'Trump has argued for the monetisation of these two institutions, which were brought under US government control in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. In May this year, Trump floated the idea while emphasising that the government will maintain its implicit guarantees for the securities issued by the two backer Bill Ackman, a long-time shareholder in the twin behemoths, has repeatedly called for their privatisation. Ackman, founder, Pershing Capital Management, told Forbes magazine last month that the US government is the preferred stockholder of the twins, and in a position to realise gains worth $300 billion. He argued that the two institutions were 'vastly better capitalised' today than for the past 60 two institutions are not banks, but tap creditworthy mortgage buyers and pack the mortgages in securities to be sold on the market, Ackman explained. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have guarantees worth $7 trillion coupled with enormous cash flows, apart from a government backing, underlining their ability to weather any future crisis, Ackman added.