Mass. AG Campbell sues Trump admin over plan to distribute machine gun conversion tech
The suit, filed by Campbell and 16 state attorneys general nationwide, specifically targets the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
In a statement, Campbell's office said the ATF's action involves so-called 'Forced Reset Triggers,' which allow shooters to reach the firepower of a military-grade machine gun.
The federal agency previously had classified the devices as machine guns, keeping them off the streets and out of the hands of gun owners.
However, the ATF, under a directive from the White House, signed a settlement agreement that would stop enforcing federal law against the FRTs, as they're known, and would redistribute thousands of the devices the agency had previously seized.
The multistate litigation seeks to prevent that imminent redistribution, because FRTs are illegal to possess under federal law, Campbell's office said.
'Weapons of war and tools of mass destruction like FRTs have no place or purpose in everyday society—nor in any home, community, or school within the Commonwealth,' Campbell said in a statement.
Read More: This $150 device turns pistols into machine guns. Here's why Mass. should worry
'The ATF's actions are a direct assault on every American's inalienable right to feel safe in their homes, schools, and grocery stores—free from the fear or threat of gun violence. I will continue to defend enforcement against FRTs and fight to protect the safety and well-being of Commonwealth residents.'
The lawsuit argues that the federal government cannot violate U.S. law, even when it tries to bury those violations in a settlement agreement.
Campbell and the other state attorneys general are seeking a a preliminary injunction to halt the Trump Administration from distributing the devices 'in ways that directly harm plaintiff states in contravention of federal law,' they argued.
Machine gun conversion devices such as the FRTs have been frequently used in violent crimes and mass shootings, Campbell's office said, contributing to worsening gun violence.
Firearms equipped with the conversion devices can exceed the firing rate of many military machine guns, firing up to 20 bullets per second.
The ATF has noted a 'significant' rise in the use of the devices, leading to a 1,400% increase between 2019 and 2021, Campbell's office said.
The ATF has classified devices that act similarly to FRTs as machine guns since at least 1975, which means they've been banned under federal law.
Even so, the ATF has estimated that at least 100,000 FRTs have been distributed across the country. And they have been showing up more often at crime scenes, Campbell's office said.
Last month, the Trump administration announced that it had settled Biden-era litigation dealing with the devices, doing so in a way that 'eviscerates' the existing prohibition in federal law, Campbell's office said.
In addition to Massachusetts, attorneys general from Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington State, also are participating in the litigation.
Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader
Here are 10 NASA missions that could be grounded under Trump's 2026 budget
'I don't know if I want to do this anymore': leaked audio highlights turmoil among Dems
Graffiti on tank in Trump's parade calls for hanging 2 well-known Americans
'I would': Trump calls for arrest of California's Newsom amid lawsuit over National Guard in LA
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Everyone Is Laughing At JD Vance's Response To His Character In The New "South Park" Episode
Remember when the White House had a complete meltdown over South Park airing an episode about Donald Trump getting into bed with Satan and unveiling a micropenis? Well, the show aired its second episode of Season 27 last night, along with JD Vance's character debut. Related: JD is depicted as Trump's brown-nosing lackey who the president calls "stupid"... ...and literally kicks around. At one point, when Trump bursts into Satan's bedroom and immediately takes off his pants, JD appears with a bottle, asking, "Would you like me to apply the baby oil to Satan's asshole, boss?" Now, the real JD Vance has responded (and he's opting for a different approach in his public statement than the White House). Related: "Well, I've finally made it," the 41-year-old shared on X alongside an image from the episode. His post has been viewed by over 14.7 million a lot of them aren't buying his attempt to brush it off. Related: "This is JD pretending he's cool with it," one person wrote. Someone questioned why JD chose the image of him and Trump standing next to each other, instead of the one inside Satan's room. Another mocked him for "making it." A TON of people left comments saying something like, "we're not laughing with you. We're laughing AT YOU." Related: Or they suggested he may just not understand that the depiction is no laughing matter. Regardless, commenters insisted, "The likeness [of the character and JD] is exquisite." What are your thoughts on JD's response? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration will end $7 billion solar energy grant program
(Reuters) -The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will end a $7 billion Biden-era grant program to expand solar energy to low-income communities, Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a post on X on Thursday. "EPA no longer has the authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive," Zeldin said in a video post. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed into law by President Donald Trump last month eliminated the program's source of funding, Zeldin added. Cancellation of the Solar for All program had been widely expected. The grants were awarded in 2024 during the administration of former President Joe Biden to 60 nonprofit groups, tribes and states.

5 minutes ago
Anita Dunn defends Biden's mental fitness in GOP House committee grilling
Anita Dunn, who was a senior adviser to former President Joe Biden, defended him during a five-hour closed-door deposition at the House Oversight Committee Thursday. Dunn told investigators that while she observed a "physical" decline in Biden during his four years in office, she maintained the belief that he was calling the shots and mentally engaged in decision-making at the White House. "From what I experienced and observed in the White House, President Biden made all of the important decisions expected of someone serving as the president of the United States," she told the committee, according to her prepared remarks obtained by ABC News. Dunn refused to answer any questions from reporters as she arrived and later left the deposition. But her statement indicates she believes Biden was fit to serve and West Wing staff did not usurp his power. "I did not observe White House staff making key decisions or exercising the powers of the presidency without President Biden's knowledge or consent," Dunn testified, according to the prepared remarks. "The President made it clear that decisions rested with him, and White House staff brought issues to him for him to decide." Her remarks continued, "Before scheduling a press interview or releasing statements under his name, we sought his approval, and he was an active participant in the preparation of his speeches and public I observed that President Biden aged physically during his time in office, which is something that happens to every President, he remained throughout my interactions with him fully engaged and clear in his directions and supervision. His ability to probe, to find the weakness in an argument, and to make well-informed decisions, did not change during my time in the White House." House Republicans reacted to Dunn's closed-door interview, saying Dunn "revealed" that Biden's "inner circle" decided against a cognitive test, concluding it would offer no political benefit, a source familiar with her account told ABC News. Dunn confirmed that President Biden's team decided against doing a 2024 Super Bowl interview due to information contained in the special counsel Robert Hur's report that probed Biden's handing of sensitive documents and questioned his mental fitness. She is the latest Biden official to answer questions after several former senior officials invoked their Fifth Amendment right to not answer questions.