Gaza: Dozens of Palestinian civilians killed in Israeli shelling
Six citizens were killed and others were wounded when the Israeli occupation forces shelled tents for displaced people in the Al-Mawasi area of Khan Yunis. Ten citizens, including children, were also wounded when tents sheltering displaced people were shelled in the same area, which is considered a "safe area" for displaced families, but has been repeatedly bombed in recent weeks.
He added that four other citizens were killed and others were wounded when the occupation forces shelled a house belonging to the Zeno family on Jaffa Street in central Gaza City.
The four slain people were the father, Ahmed Ayyad Zeno, his wife, Ayat Zeno, their daughters, Zahra Zeno, and Obaida Zeno.
The shelling almost completely destroyed the house, while ambulance and civil defense crews continue to search under the rubble, amid fears of more casualties.
In the city of Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip, medical sources reported that ten citizens were injured when an Israeli drone targeted a tent housing displaced persons near Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital. A number of citizens were also injured by Israeli drone fire in the Al-Karama neighborhood, northwest of Gaza City.
Yesterday, the Gaza Strip saw a series of massacres committed by the occupation forces against families, with approximately 100 citizens killed by Israeli fire and airstrikes.
The death toll in the Gaza Strip since October 7, 2023, has risen to 56,647, and the number of injuries has risen to 134,105.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Jordan News
an hour ago
- Jordan News
Martyrs and Injuries in Israeli Massacres Across Several Areas in Gaza Strip - Jordan News
Martyrs and Injuries in Israeli Massacres Across Several Areas in Gaza Strip Seven Palestinians were martyred and others injured early Saturday morning after Israeli warplanes bombed tents sheltering displaced people in the Al-Mawasi area of Khan Younis in southern Gaza. اضافة اعلان According to Palestinian medical sources, two additional civilians were killed in an airstrike targeting a home in Al-Bureij refugee camp in central Gaza. Two more people were martyred and others wounded in a separate strike on a home in Al-Maghazi camp, also in central Gaza. The sources added that four civilians were martyred in a strike targeting a tent in Al-Mawasi area of Al-Qarara town, northwest of Khan Younis. Additionally, five people were killed in an Israeli strike on Al-Shafa'i School in the Asqoula area of the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood in southeastern Gaza City. — (Petra)
Jordan News
an hour ago
- Jordan News
3 Injured in Israeli Drone Strike on Lebanese Border Town of Shebaa - Jordan News
3 Injured in Israeli Drone Strike on Lebanese Border Town of Shebaa Three people were injured on Saturday morning in an Israeli drone strike that targeted a house in the Shamis area of the border town of Shebaa in southern Lebanon. اضافة اعلان A Lebanese security source said in a press statement that Israeli drones flew over several areas this morning, including the southern suburb of Beirut, Bashamoun, Khaldeh, Dahr Al-Baydar, Badnayel, Bouday, Al-Asirah–Baalbek, Bazaliyah, Halabta, and along the eastern mountain range of Lebanon in the Bekaa region. — (Petra)
Ammon
4 hours ago
- Ammon
Trump and Netanyahu: Executing Washington's Regional Agenda
Since his arrival on the American political scene, Donald Trump has been an exceptional case in the United States' relationship with Israel. Historically described as a strategic alliance, this relationship has transformed under Trump into a personal partnership between him and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This relationship has deepened to an unprecedented degree, with Trump becoming one of the most biased and supportive American presidents toward Netanyahu, not only in foreign policy decisions but also on issues of a purely Israeli domestic nature, such as the ongoing trials against Netanyahu or calls for early elections. What drives Trump to this level of involvement in Israeli domestic affairs? And why does he insist on defending Netanyahu despite the criticism and accusations against him? In the current Israeli landscape, Netanyahu faces significant domestic challenges related to multiple corruption trials, in addition to escalating tensions within the ruling coalition, particularly with the religious parties, which have expressed on more than one occasion their desire to dissolve the Knesset and call for early elections. These parties, despite being partners in the government, view continuing under Netanyahu's leadership as a political burden due to the corruption cases and poor performance in some cases. This recently prompted them to propose a vote within the Knesset to call for new elections. In this context, Trump's position was clearly supportive of Netanyahu, expressing his rejection of any attempt to remove Netanyahu from power and considering his continued rule essential to Israel's stability and its security and political future. Even stranger are the reported interventions by Trump or his circle in the matter of Netanyahu's trial. It has been reported—through both official and unofficial channels—that he called for a pardon or an end to the legal proceedings against him, arguing that these trials are politically motivated and that Netanyahu is being subjected to an unfair campaign by the Israeli judiciary. This intervention raises many questions, most importantly: What is Trump's interest in Netanyahu's survival? Why would he risk his political reputation for the sake of being a foreign leader facing criminal charges? The answer to these questions requires examining the nature of the relationship between the two men. Since Trump assumed the presidency in 2017, he has pursued an unprecedented agenda in support of Israel, including moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, recognizing Israel's sovereignty over the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, and supporting the "Deal of the Century," considered the most biased in the history of US mediation. All these measures were met with widespread acclaim and celebration by Netanyahu, who used them in his election campaign to bolster his domestic popularity, portraying himself as capable of bringing absolute US support to Israel. In turn, Trump found in Netanyahu a reliable ally who reflects his vision for the Middle East and helps him win the support of a pivotal electoral base within the United States: evangelical Christians. People must realize that the true backbone of support for Israel in America is not the Jewish community, but evangelicals, who constitute approximately 25% of the population, compared to less than 2% of American Jews. Therefore, Trump—as he has stated on more than one occasion—considers engaging with evangelicals more effective than appeasing the Jews, because they constitute a formidable lobbying force pushing for American policies aligned with the Israeli right-wing agenda, and view support for Israel as part of the Christian Zionist religious doctrine. These people see Netanyahu as the leader most qualified to preserve the "Jewishness of the state" and advance policies of expansion and hegemony. Accordingly, Netanyahu's downfall, or even his trial, represents a threat not only to Trump, but also to the political and ideological system he has meticulously crafted during his presidency. It is impossible to trust that potential Israeli alternatives will maintain the same level of loyalty or pursue the same confrontational approach toward Iran and the Palestinians. Hence, for Trump, defending Netanyahu becomes a defense of a broader regional project that keeps Israel at the forefront of the confrontation with Tehran and strengthens right-wing populist alliances globally. Moreover, Trump himself faces investigations and legal prosecutions in the United States, whether related to his attempt to overturn the election results, his retention of classified documents after leaving the White House, or various financial issues. Therefore, his defense of Netanyahu may be implicitly understood as self-defense. He seeks to establish the principle that the trial of political leaders is primarily a selective political process, not a fair judicial process. If Netanyahu is able to escape accountability or obtain a pardon, Trump will see this as a precedent that will strengthen his argument before the American judiciary and domestic public opinion. Strategically, Trump does not view Israel merely as a traditional ally, but rather as an extension of his global political vision based on isolation from international institutions, undermining the liberal multilateral order, and strengthening bilateral alliances with strong leaders who share his political style and confrontational personality. For him, Netanyahu is the Israeli version of this model: a leader who clings to power despite internal and external pressures, fiercely confronts the media and the judiciary, and relies on a solid right-wing popular base fueled by a sense of existential danger and threat. From this perspective, Trump's support for Netanyahu is not limited to domestic issues but extends to regional security issues, most notably the open confrontation with Iran. Trump believes that an alliance with Netanyahu is necessary to sustain the escalation against Tehran and contain its influence in the region. Therefore, any weakening of Netanyahu, whether through elections or trials, is viewed as a direct blow to the axis of pressure on Iran and a threat to the deterrence strategy adopted by Trump during his presidency. All of this explains why Trump supports Netanyahu and even intervenes in domestic issues, such as seeking a judicial pardon or rejecting early elections that could lead to Netanyahu's removal from the political scene. It is a deeply mercenary relationship that transcends diplomatic protocol and extends to an ideological alliance between two leaders who each see the other as a mirror to their own selves and a first line of defense for their political and personal futures. Despite the criticism Trump faces for this involvement, he continues this approach without wavering, driven by an overwhelming desire to return to the White House and see a world shaped according to his own vision. In this world, there is no place for trials of political leaders, no room for elections that bring down allies, and only mutual loyalty, no matter the cost.
