Proposed changes to Civil Service Act raise job security questions
Among the many proposed changes in Bill 1 are amendments to the Civil Service Act, which would give deputy department heads the ability to fire non-unionized bureaucrats without cause. Compensation would be based on years of service, but the thresholds would be determined in regulations yet to be released.
As the legislation makes its way through Province House, it coincides with recent emails public servants received from Premier Tim Houston and his top deputy, Tracey Taweel.
Houston writes that Nova Scotia finds itself in a period of significant change and that the province needs "a strong, innovative public service."
"The simple reality is that the public service must change," he writes. "The world is changing and so must we."
Looking for problem solvers
The premier goes on to say that he believes all workplaces have two types of people: problem solvers and problem stretchers.
"Our province needs you to be a problem solver who is sympathetic to the needs of the Nova Scotians you are serving with a devotion to finding a solution to their challenge or issue. Our civil service needs problem solvers and I have faith in you to be a problem solver."
Taweel's email talks about engagement opportunities for employees to share thoughts on how to make the public service "a more agile, innovative, and productive workforce."
"In times of economic challenges, our ability to be efficient is key, and the growing expectations of citizens demand heightened responsiveness, creativity, and collaboration. We must be a driving force in creating solutions that anticipate and address the future for the citizens we serve."
NDP Leader Claudia Chender told reporters last week that the public service is supposed to be non-partisan.
She said the letters from Houston and Taweel, along with the contents of Bill 1, put that at risk. Bill 1 also formally dissolves Communications Nova Scotia, the government entity required by legislation to produce non-partisan communication materials for the public.
Government communications will now fall to the executive council office, which supports the premier and cabinet.
"If they aren't seen as solving the problem in the way the government wants it solved, which we've already seen this session is not always the best way — they walk it back all the time — well, then they might get stretched right out of government," Chender told reporters.
Interim Liberal Leader Derek Mombourquette said he's hearing concerns from civil servants about the situation, a sentiment multiple government employees have shared with CBC News.
But Twila Grosse, the cabinet minister responsible for the Public Service Commission, said there are no threats implied by Bill 1 or the letters Houston and Taweel sent to staff.
"The whole idea is involving our employees, giving them the opportunity to give us ideas, again, as to how we can become more innovative, how we can become more agile, how we can become more responsive to the changing needs of Nova Scotians," she said in a recent interview.
Grosse said the government wants the changes proposed to the Civil Service Act in Bill 1 to "give us greater flexibility" to be able to respond quickly to "changing needs in the public service."
The province's largest union is also monitoring the situation.
Sandra Mullen, president of the Nova Scotia Government and General Employees Union, said new governments often reach out to members of the public service at the beginning of a mandate.
But Mullen said the timing is interesting given what's happening with the U.S. government as public employees there are being asked to justify what they do at work.
"It's kind of alarming to read that you're looking at problem solvers, problem stretchers — those kinds of concerns resonate with our members for sure," she said in a recent interview.
Mullen said her members are watching what's happening to non-unionized workers as the NSGEU engages in bargaining with the province and has concerns about the status of job security language in their next contract.
Taweel was not made available for an interview.
A statement attributed to her said the government wants "to ensure that employees understand how valued they are and how important their views are in modernizing the public service."
It goes on to say that there will be no penalties for employees who decline to share ideas or whose ideas "are not actioned."
"Civil servants interact with people every day," said Taweel. "Listening to the ideas and experiences of those who understand the system and have ideas to make it better can only help improve how we serve and support Nova Scotians."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
14 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Social housing improvements a must
Opinion The NDP government's pledge to end chronic homelessness by 2031 is both ambitious and overdue. For a province where more than a thousand people sleep in shelters or on the streets on any given night, it is a commitment that should be applauded. But it is also a promise that cannot be realized without a comprehensive plan, one that takes aim at the multiple factors keeping people unhoused. That includes revising rent control rules, building more social housing units, and reforming the province's Rent Assist program, something the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives took aim at last week. Manitoba has long had rent-control rules, but tenants know all too well how easily those rules can be undermined. Each year, landlords can apply for exemptions to raise rents above the guideline, and those requests are routinely granted. For someone living on a low or fixed income, an unexpected increase of even $50 or $100 a month can push them out of their home. MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS Files Without social housing, the cycle of shelter use, encampments and homelessness only deepens. If the government is serious about preventing homelessness, it must strengthen protections for tenants. That does not mean ignoring the genuine costs landlords face in maintaining buildings. But it does mean closing loopholes that allow excessive rent hikes under the guise of routine upgrades. Affordable housing begins with stable rents. Without that, more Manitobans will continue to find themselves at risk. Another pillar of the solution is social housing, an area where Manitoba has fallen badly behind. The former Progressive Conservative government sold off public housing units, shrinking the supply at a time of rising demand. Those decisions are still being felt today. Social housing is not a luxury. It is a lifeline for people who cannot compete in the private rental market, whether because of low incomes, health issues, or systemic barriers. Without it, the cycle of shelter use, encampments, and homelessness only deepens. The NDP government must make rebuilding Manitoba's social housing stock a top priority. That means replacing what was lost under the PCs and building new units in the years ahead. It will take significant public investment, but the alternative — continuing to warehouse people in shelters or leave them in tents along riverbanks — is neither humane nor fiscally responsible. Equally important is reforming the Rent Assist program, which is supposed to help low-income Manitobans cover the cost of housing. In its current form, the program is fundamentally unfair. Thanks to changes introduced by the previous PC government, renters who receive Employment and Income Assistance get less support than other low-income renters. This two-tiered system penalizes those already living in the deepest poverty. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. In a report released last week, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives called for changes to the program, including ensuring that all low-income renters – whether on social assistance or not – are treated equally, so they have a better chance of remaining in their homes. Some may balk at the price tag attached to new housing, enhanced rent supports, and stronger tenant protections. But the costs of doing nothing are already staggering. Homelessness fuels pressure on the health-care system, emergency shelters, and police services. More importantly, it exacts an incalculable human toll on those forced to live without the security and dignity of a home. The government's 2031 goal sets a high bar. Meeting it will take more than political will, it will take concrete reforms and a willingness to make difficult choices. Tightening rent control rules, rebuilding social housing, and repairing Rent Assist are not optional pieces of the puzzle. They are essential. The alternative is to watch the cycle of homelessness deepen, with more Manitobans left behind. That is not acceptable. Manitoba can, and must, do better.
a day ago
Who controls the food supply? Proposed changes to seed reuse reopens debate
It's a small change that risks cultivating a big debate. On one side is the principle of farmer's privilege — the traditional right of Canadian farmers to save seeds at the end of a growing season and reuse them the next year. On the other is the principle of plant breeders' rights — the right of those who develop new seeds and plants to protect and profit from their discoveries. The issue has been dormant for a decade. Now, proposed changes to government rules regarding plant breeders' rights are reviving that debate. It also raises questions about how Canada gets its food and who controls what is grown. Ultimately, it's about food security, said Keith Currie, president of the Canadian Federation of Agriculture. The group supports the changes, which include narrowing the scope of farmer's privilege. Not only keeping us competitive to keep food costs down, but also to make sure that we maintain new varieties coming forward for that food availability. Enlarge image (new window) The proposed changes could reduce the right of farmers to save and reuse seeds for crops like fruits and vegetables. Photo: The Canadian Press / Giordano Ciampini In a notice (new window) dated Aug. 9, the government announced proposed changes to Canada's Plant Breeders' Rights Regulations — a form of intellectual property protection for plants, similar to a patent. The regulations give plant breeders a monopoly over the distribution of their product for a set period, as a way to to encourage investment and innovations such as varieties with higher yields or more resistant to drought or pests. It's a big business. Estimates of the economic impact of the seed industry in Canada range from $4 billion to $6 billion a year. The right to reuse The changes would remove the right of farmers to save and reuse seeds and cuttings from protected fruits, vegetables, ornamental varieties, other plants reproduced through vegetative propagation and hybrids. For most plants recognized under the law, the protections last for 20 years. Personal gardens and many other kinds of crops such as wheat, cereals and pulses, where seed saving is more widespread, would not be affected. Among the other proposed changes is to extend the protection for new varieties of mushrooms, asparagus and woody plants like raspberries and blueberries to 25 years from the current 20 years. A public consultation on the changes runs until Oct. 18. Enlarge image (new window) NDP agriculture critic Gord Johns is calling for parliamentary hearings into the proposed changes. Photo: Kendal Hanson/CHEK News NDP agriculture critic Gord Johns says the changes raise an important issue for Canadians. He questions why the government is holding the consultation in summer when most farmers are focused on growing and harvesting crops — not drafting submissions for public consultations. They keep doing this over and over again, said Johns of the federal government. They announce regulatory changes that impact farmers and their livelihoods [and] they schedule the consultation period during the busiest time of the year for farmers. Johns said companies producing new kinds of seed should be adequately compensated for their innovation and intellectual property. But he said farmers who grow and harvest the food Canadians eat shouldn't be starved by big corporations choking off their seed supply. He wants the House of Commons agriculture committee to hold hearings and take a closer look at the changes being proposed. A spokesperson for Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Heath MacDonald said the government is committed to encouraging innovation, investment, research and competitiveness in Canadian agriculture, horticulture and ornamental industries. The spokesperson said the government will review all feedback before determining next steps. Access vs. innovation Former prime minister Stephen Harper's government triggered a debate in 2015 when it adopted measures to bring Canada's rules more in line with guidelines adopted by the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, known as UPOV 91. The rules are separate from patent law or technology use agreements which some seed companies use to prevent farmers from saving and reusing seeds. Changes to plant breeders' rules are now again on the table. Last year, a government consultation resulted in 109 submissions, the majority supportive of change. Meanwhile, lobbyists have been busy behind the scenes. According to the federal lobbying registry, 13 people from several different groups or companies are currently registered to lobby on plant breeders' rights including the Canadian Federation of Agriculture, the Canadian Canola Growers Association, the Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association and Swiss-based Syngenta, owned by Sinochem, a Chinese state-owned enterprise. Enlarge image (new window) Wheat is not included in the proposed changes, but a research director for the National Farmers Union worries they could be the start of a 'slippery slope.' Photo: Reuters / Todd Korol Cathy Holtslander, director of research and policy for the National Farmers Union, says the proposed changes risk hurting farmers while increasing profits and the power of seed-producing companies — often multinationals with foreign ownership. While the changes are focused on an area of agriculture where seed saving is less common, Holtslander warns the changes are a slippery slope that could lead to an erosion of the rights of farmers. If they were to go after wheat with the amendment, there would be a huge uproar and people would really be angry and push back, Holtslander said. She said what's being proposed paves the way for other crops to be included later. The seed industry does not want farmers' privilege to exist for any seed. They want to be able to require people to buy new seed every year, she said. Holtslander's group plans to fight the proposed changes. She said the issue goes beyond the question of individual farmers reusing seed. If the big multinational companies control the seed, they control our food supply, she said. Lauren Comin, director of policy for Seeds Canada, acknowledges the issue can be controversial but argues Canada needs strong intellectual property protection if it wants access to the newest innovations to compete on the world stage. It's incredibly important to have these frameworks to encourage investment companies, businesses, public entities, to know that they are going to somehow be compensated and protected, Comin said. She said that while the changes provide that certainty and that incentive for investment, she wants them to go further. While acknowledging there isn't enough certified seed for all of Canada's cereals and small grains crop, Comin would also like to see farmers compensate plant breeders when they reuse seeds, as they do in Europe. The farmer's privilege does not say that that use is free, she said. [Farmers] can choose to buy the latest and greatest product of innovation, which means that there is a tremendous amount of investment and effort that went toward developing this improved variety. Or they can decide that they don't value innovation, and they can go back to a variety that's unprotected and grow that. Currie, an Ontario grains and oil seed farmer who saves and reuses seeds, says Canada needs to balance the two principles. He says farmer's privilege is key to Canada's competitiveness, but so is access to new varieties of seeds and plants. While I do understand where some of the multinationals want to have better control, I believe in order for the industry to be viable, farmers have to have some control as well, he said.
CBC
a day ago
- CBC
Double the payments to wildfire evacuees to $1,000, says NDP Leader Jim Dinn
Premier John Hogan said the $500 payments to evacuated residents are for 'incidentals' and that there's been no pushback on that amount. But NDP Leader Jim Dinn said some people are going into week three of being out of their homes, and they need more help.
