logo
Proposed changes to Civil Service Act raise job security questions

Proposed changes to Civil Service Act raise job security questions

CBC04-03-2025

Recent emails from the premier and his top deputy minister to members of the public service, coupled with legislation being debated at Province House, have some bureaucrats wondering about job security.
Among the many proposed changes in Bill 1 are amendments to the Civil Service Act, which would give deputy department heads the ability to fire non-unionized bureaucrats without cause. Compensation would be based on years of service, but the thresholds would be determined in regulations yet to be released.
As the legislation makes its way through Province House, it coincides with recent emails public servants received from Premier Tim Houston and his top deputy, Tracey Taweel.
Houston writes that Nova Scotia finds itself in a period of significant change and that the province needs "a strong, innovative public service."
"The simple reality is that the public service must change," he writes. "The world is changing and so must we."
Looking for problem solvers
The premier goes on to say that he believes all workplaces have two types of people: problem solvers and problem stretchers.
"Our province needs you to be a problem solver who is sympathetic to the needs of the Nova Scotians you are serving with a devotion to finding a solution to their challenge or issue. Our civil service needs problem solvers and I have faith in you to be a problem solver."
Taweel's email talks about engagement opportunities for employees to share thoughts on how to make the public service "a more agile, innovative, and productive workforce."
"In times of economic challenges, our ability to be efficient is key, and the growing expectations of citizens demand heightened responsiveness, creativity, and collaboration. We must be a driving force in creating solutions that anticipate and address the future for the citizens we serve."
NDP Leader Claudia Chender told reporters last week that the public service is supposed to be non-partisan.
She said the letters from Houston and Taweel, along with the contents of Bill 1, put that at risk. Bill 1 also formally dissolves Communications Nova Scotia, the government entity required by legislation to produce non-partisan communication materials for the public.
Government communications will now fall to the executive council office, which supports the premier and cabinet.
"If they aren't seen as solving the problem in the way the government wants it solved, which we've already seen this session is not always the best way — they walk it back all the time — well, then they might get stretched right out of government," Chender told reporters.
Interim Liberal Leader Derek Mombourquette said he's hearing concerns from civil servants about the situation, a sentiment multiple government employees have shared with CBC News.
But Twila Grosse, the cabinet minister responsible for the Public Service Commission, said there are no threats implied by Bill 1 or the letters Houston and Taweel sent to staff.
"The whole idea is involving our employees, giving them the opportunity to give us ideas, again, as to how we can become more innovative, how we can become more agile, how we can become more responsive to the changing needs of Nova Scotians," she said in a recent interview.
Grosse said the government wants the changes proposed to the Civil Service Act in Bill 1 to "give us greater flexibility" to be able to respond quickly to "changing needs in the public service."
The province's largest union is also monitoring the situation.
Sandra Mullen, president of the Nova Scotia Government and General Employees Union, said new governments often reach out to members of the public service at the beginning of a mandate.
But Mullen said the timing is interesting given what's happening with the U.S. government as public employees there are being asked to justify what they do at work.
"It's kind of alarming to read that you're looking at problem solvers, problem stretchers — those kinds of concerns resonate with our members for sure," she said in a recent interview.
Mullen said her members are watching what's happening to non-unionized workers as the NSGEU engages in bargaining with the province and has concerns about the status of job security language in their next contract.
Taweel was not made available for an interview.
A statement attributed to her said the government wants "to ensure that employees understand how valued they are and how important their views are in modernizing the public service."
It goes on to say that there will be no penalties for employees who decline to share ideas or whose ideas "are not actioned."
"Civil servants interact with people every day," said Taweel. "Listening to the ideas and experiences of those who understand the system and have ideas to make it better can only help improve how we serve and support Nova Scotians."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tom Flanagan: Apologizing for slavery would be a distortion of history
Tom Flanagan: Apologizing for slavery would be a distortion of history

National Post

time5 hours ago

  • National Post

Tom Flanagan: Apologizing for slavery would be a distortion of history

One of the first petitions to Canada's new Parliament has landed, and the topic is slavery. Endorsed by Gord Johns, an MP from British Columbia who managed to survive the recent NDP annihilation, it demands an apology to Black-Canadians from the Government of Canada: 'Black Canadians have endured centuries of systemic racism, beginning with transatlantic slavery, followed by legalized segregation and ongoing institutional discrimination in policing, education, employment, housing, health care and the justice system.… The Government of Canada has yet to formally apologize.' Article content Article content With only 125 signatures so far from a country of 40 million people, the petition is not exactly a milestone of populist politics. Nonetheless, the issues it raises are worth clarification. Article content Article content Article content The institution of slavery was not brought to the New World with the arrival of the European settlers. Slavery had been practised since time immemorial over most of North and South America. When the French arrived in what is now Quebec, they brought a few African slaves with them by way of their Caribbean outposts, but mostly they purchased Indigenous slaves from the Iroquois, the Illinois and other far-ranging tribes. These slaves became known as 'Panis,' after the Pawnee tribe of Nebraska that furnished many of the captives. The noted historian Marcel Trudel has estimated that, prior to 1760, the Panis made up two-thirds of all slaves in New France. Africans afterwards became more common, but overall numbers remained relatively small. New France lacked the plantations and mines that were worked by millions of slaves in Latin America, the American south and the Caribbean, so slaves were mainly personal servants and craftsmen. Article content After the Conquest, more African slaves were brought in from the United States and the Caribbean, but the English conquerors also imported the philosophy of abolition, then starting to make headway in England and its colonies. In 1793, the Government of Upper Canada (now Ontario), under the leadership of Gov. John Simcoe, passed the Act Against Slavery, outlawing the importation of slaves, one of the modern world's first anti-slavery statutes. In contrast, slavery was not abolished in the British Empire until 1834, in the United States until 1865 (with the end of a bloody civil war) and in Brazil in 1888. Far from being a mainstay of slavery and the slave trade, Canada was a leader in its abolition. Article content

NDP grassroots buck against 'top-down' leadership race
NDP grassroots buck against 'top-down' leadership race

National Observer

time7 hours ago

  • National Observer

NDP grassroots buck against 'top-down' leadership race

After the unmitigated disaster that was the NDP's 2025 election result, prominent members are pushing back against an 'elitist' leadership race and want the party to rebuild from the grassroots up. 'We lost touch, and we have to be honest about that,' former MP Charlie Angus said at a June 11 press conference in Ottawa. 'We have to re-engage with people.' When asked about Angus' comments, NDP interim leader Don Davies said it was a 'tough election' but he doesn't think the party lost touch. The question of how to rebuild has become existential: the NDP is down to seven MPs and lost official party status for the first time since 1993. This limits the party's influence significantly. They no longer get a seat on committees to study issues and amend legislation, and no longer have the right to ask daily questions of the government during Question Period, among other lost privileges. The party is searching for a way out of the wilderness, and doing so without a leader. According to Angus, the party needs two things: a strong leader and a return to grassroots organizing. But the NDP must do more than just rally behind a leader, he emphasized. 'Nothing against Jagmeet [Singh], but we stopped being the New Democratic Party. We became Team Jagmeet, and that wasn't selling,' Angus said in an interview with Canada's National Observer. With the NDP reduced to seven seats, Former MP Charlie Angus and party activists are pushing back against a "top-down approach" to the NDP leadership race and instead are advocating for a return to grassroots organizing. 'If it's all about just going to cheer on the leader, then the riding associations start to disintegrate,' he said. Proposed leadership contest rules controversial Angus, who once again ruled out a bid for the leadership, has run before: he ran against Singh in the 2017 NDP leadership race. At the time, the entry fee was $30,000. Now, there are rumblings among a handful of prominent New Democrats that the entry fee could go up to $150,000, the Globe and Mail reported last month. Angus said he doesn't know what an acceptable fee for entry is but said $150,000 'seems like a high number.' Brad Lavigne, a key member of former NDP leader Jack Layton's leadership team who also participated in Thomas Mulclair's race, said the leadership campaign needs to strike the balance between duration, financial viability and broad support. Running a long leadership race can make the costs of a campaign for both the candidates and party unsustainable, Lavigne said. Lavigne didn't speculate about an appropriate leadership fee, but noted fee thresholds self-select tenable candidates that have grassroots support from across the country. "If you can't find 1,000 people to contribute $20, then how viable are you as a leadership candidate?' Lavigne said. The primary objective of running any leadership campaign is to find a leader that has broad support from party members and get the majority of Canadians to vote NDP at the polls so it can implement the party's policies, he said. 'Grassroots members that I've talked to want to see a successful electoral game plan,' he said. 'It's not enough to make the case for policy ideas in the hopes that other parties will adopt them and enact them in Parliament.' Grassroots 'tired of this top-down approach' Des Bissonnette and Ashley Zarbatany, co-chairs of the Indigenous People's Commission, criticized the proposed leadership race fee and short race, arguing the plan is the brainchild of an unelected party elite that wasn't vetted by the executive council and will potentially exclude grassroots supporters and ideas. 'There are a lot of grassroots and team members who are tired of this top-down approach by the consultant class in our party,' said Zarbatany, who added the proposed fee is 'abysmal' and didn't represent the values or pocketbooks of a working-class party. Ideas about the leadership race were floated in the press before discussing them with the federal executive, she added, reflecting the poor internal communication that also led to pushback by half the elected caucus around the selection of the interim leader, Don Davies. Bissonnette, the NDP candidate for Lakeland, Sask. in the last election, agreed. 'There's never really any consultation with [federal NDP] council members on what direction the party is going to take most of the time,' she said. 'You're rubber-stamping decisions that they've already made, rather than actively engaging in the democratic process.' The party has also shifted away from grassroots progressive values, she said, citing the decision to remove socialist language from the party's constitution and the failure to push hard for electoral reform while backing the Liberal government or in the election campaign. 'People like myself in the grassroots, the volunteers who are passionate about progressive politics want to see a real progressive party,' Bissonnette said. Bissonnette and Zarbatany said the climate crisis is a key issue with many grassroots members of the party who feel environmental policy proposals get ignored. Doubling down on centralist ideas that are too similar to the Liberal Party isn't going to lead to the renewal of the party, Zarbatany said. 'They are the reason why our party has suffered catastrophic electoral losses.' 'Kill Zoom' Rebuilding the party is about far more than the leadership race, and last time round, the party's leader-centric focus undermined the role of local riding associations, Angus said. 'People living in 12 ridings probably decided the leadership last time and that left a lot of parts of the country out in the cold,' he said. The party must find a way for members in New Brunswick or rural Saskatchewan to feel like a part of the movement. Angus' main recommendation to bring the party back to its grassroots origins? 'We need to kill Zoom,' he said. 'Everything by the NDP is done on Zoom. Zoom doesn't include anybody,' he told Canada's National Observer at Parliament Hill. 'We used to do pub nights. We used to do bean dinners,' he said. Angus said 'doing old-school organizing' with an emphasis on public meetings and getting people involved to vote at the party's convention are key, adding that TikTok views did not translate into votes. Mobilizing the grassroots is trickier when you're strapped for cash, Dennis Pilon, a political science professor at York University, told Canada's National Observer last month. 'On the right, they just buy people, they just hire people to go out and go door to door, but the NDP don't have the resources to do that,' Pilon said. With fewer people voting in general elections, the NDP is suffering more than other parties, Pilon said. In the postwar period, voter turnout was about 75 to 80 per cent, but in recent elections, it has slipped to between 60 and 65 per cent. 'The missing voters aren't just anyone. They tend to be poor. They tend to be less integrated with the political system. They tend to have less sense of social entitlement,' Pilon said. The NDP needs to reconnect with these missing voters, but it will be challenging because you have to actually go out and meet them, he said. The party lost touch with its traditional working-class base because it lacked an 'on-the-ground force,' Angus said. 'We need an honest appraisal of what went wrong,' he said. 'New Democrats aren't very honest when it comes to disasters. We sort of blame strategic voting, or we blame something. We made a lot of mistakes. I think people just want an honest accounting.' Angus would not speculate on who might run for the party leadership. 'At the end of the day, this has to be about winning,' Angus said. Rather than repeat the mistake of gambling everything on a likeable leader, Angus prefers to focus on how the party finds its people again. 'We don't need big ideas. We've got tons of big ideas … We don't need dramatic and bold moves. We need to re-engage and be the party that ordinary people feel has their back. It's pretty simple stuff, but maybe that's the hardest thing, is just going back to the grassroots, going back to coffee shops, going back to inviting people in and making them feel like they belong and that they're welcome, regardless of whether they say the right thing or not.'

Indian agent had Jagmeet Singh under close surveillance
Indian agent had Jagmeet Singh under close surveillance

Global News

time7 hours ago

  • Global News

Indian agent had Jagmeet Singh under close surveillance

A suspected Indian government agent had Jagmeet Singh under close surveillance, prompting the RCMP to place the New Democratic Party leader in police protection 18 months ago, sources have told Global News. The agent, who is allegedly tied to activities directed by the Indian government, had access to intimate knowledge of Singh's daily routines, travel and family, according to the sources familiar with the matter. He was also described by the sources as associated with the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, which the Indian government has been accused of using to commit violence in Canada. Police notified Singh about a credible risk to his life in late 2023 and put tight security around him and his homes. Singh revealed during the 2025 federal election that he had been under police protection. But no details of the investigation have been publicly disclosed until now, and Singh has said the RCMP never told him who was behind the threat, although 'the implication was a foreign government.' Police responded to the threat at the time and Singh is no longer considered to be in imminent danger. Singh lost his seat in the 2025 federal election and has stepped down as NDP leader. The allegation that a suspected Indian agent was gathering information about the day-to-day movements of a federal party leader will likely raise new questions about foreign interference. View image in full screen NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh steps off campaign plane as member of his RCMP security detail stands by in Winnipeg, April 23, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck. Singh did not respond to requests for comment through an intermediary. Global News is not identifying the multiple sources with knowledge of the investigation who spoke on condition they would not be named. Advertisement The Indian High Commission in Ottawa has not responded to questions about the allegations. The RCMP said it does not discuss 'protective measures, nor confirm individuals who may be designated to receive protection.' 'The security environment in which public figures operate is constantly evolving, and the RCMP takes all threats against public officials seriously,' spokesperson Marie-Eve Breton said on Wednesday. The reasons police became concerned about Singh's safety a year-and-a-half ago have emerged as Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to visit Canada on the weekend. With President Donald Trump in the White House, Prime Minister Mark Carney has said he wants to diversify Canada's trading relationships and has invited Modi to the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta. But the decision has faced criticism because New Delhi is still not cooperating with RCMP investigations into India's suspected involvement in the 2023 killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, among other violent crimes. RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme held a news conference last October to announce that investigators had found evidence linking 'agents of the government of India to homicides and violent acts' across the country. Police said India was collecting information on potential victims in Canada and using the Lawrence Bishnoi crime group, and similar drug and extortion outfits, to target them. They also said 'well over a dozen credible and imminent threats to life' had led them to issue warnings to members of the South Asian community, specifically those active in the pro-Khalistan movement. Singh told reporters in April that police had advised him in the winter of 2023 that his life could be in danger. They did not tell him who was behind the threat but he said the implication was that it was a foreign government. He said he stayed in his basement, avoided windows and considered quitting politics over fears about his family's safety. He decided to carry on but was forced to lead the NDP for a period under police protection. 2:28 Evidence links violent crimes in Canada to Indian government A lawyer who became federal NDP leader in 2017, Singh has angered India by pressing the Canadian government to take a harder line against Modi's government over its problematic human rights record. Indian press reports have wrongly labelled Singh a supporter of anti-India 'terrorists' and reported that the intelligence agency that works for Modi's office had prepared dossiers on him. Under Modi, New Delhi has amped up its claims that Canada has not done enough to counter the Khalistan movement that seeks independence for India's Sikh-majority Punjab. It has also meddled in all levels of Canadian politics and now ranks as the 'second most active country engaging in electoral foreign interference in Canada,' according to the Hogue Commission. With the murder of Nijjar, however, India has allegedly taken its grievances against Canada to another level. A Sikh temple leader, Nijjar was leading a referendum campaign on Khalistan independence when he was gunned down. Then-prime minister Justin Trudeau told the House of Commons in September 2023 that investigators were probing the involvement of Indian government agents. Police believe India used gang members to carry out the killing. Sources have told Global News that Modi's right-hand man Amit Shah allegedly approved the operation. India has denied that. Canada later expelled six Indian diplomats and consular officials for allegedly collecting information on Canadians of Indian descent that was fed back to intelligence officers in New Delhi and used to direct attacks. View image in full screen NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh speaks at campaign rally in Winnipeg, April 23, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck. The alleged surveillance of Singh is not unprecedented. Before Nijjar was killed, he told a close friend that a tracking device had been found on his pickup truck when he was having it serviced. Advertisement 'He told me this personally,' said Moninder Singh, the spokesperson for the Sikh Federation who is also among those police have warned about threats to their lives. Nijjar was shot dead inside the same vehicle outside Surrey's Guru Nanak Sikh Temple. Moninder Singh said he did not know whether agents had followed him too. 'I've had multiple warnings but have never been told or known if I was under surveillance, but I would think I would be and do live my life as though I am,' he said. 'There's no other way.' As someone living under threat, he said Modi's visit to Canada had added 'insult to injury.' After Modi said he would attend the G7, Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal said his constituents had told him that inviting the Indian prime minster was sending the wrong message. Carney has said that Modi agreed to 'continued law enforcement dialogue and discussions addressing security concerns' and that countering foreign interference was high on the summit agenda. 2:24 Carney lays out G7 priorities, faces criticism over Modi invite But a Canadian Sikh coalition wrote to MPs this week to voice their 'anger and sense of betrayal' over Carney's decision to extend an invitation to the leader of a government that has not yet been held to account for Nijjar's killing. 'His death was not an isolated act but part of a coordinated campaign of transnational repression that continues to violate Canadian sovereignty to this day,' the four Sikh organizations wrote. 'To extend an invitation to the architect of these policies who proudly boasts that India 'enters the homes of its enemies and kills them,' without any public commitment to justice or accountability, undermines the very principles Canada claims to uphold.' The letter was signed by the leaders of the World Sikh Organization of Canada, Sikh Federation of B.C., Ontario Gurdwara's Committee and Quebec Sikh Council. The groups are holding a news conference on Parliament Hill on Thursday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store