Decision to pull cops from duty over Tallia Storm photo 'sparked fury among colleagues'

Daily Record

16 hours ago

The decision to permanently withdraw Mr Jones and Mr Tunnock sent "shockwaves" through the force, a tribunal has heard.
A Police Scotland inspector has said the decision to permanently withdraw two firearm officers after they posed for a photo with a pop singer has sent "shockwaves" through the force.
On June 13, Inspector Andrew Miller told the Edinburgh Employment Tribunal that the force's reaction to the incident was "disproportionate" and left colleagues furious, reports Edinburgh Live.
‌
Firearms officers Steven Jones and Greg Tunnock were withdrawn from the firearms unit after they were filmed taking pictures with Scottish singer Tallia Storm on the job. They argued that the incident was branded "misogynistic" by bosses, claiming the "knee-jerk" withdrawal decision was made to mitigate bad publicity.
‌
Speaking to the tribunal on Friday, Mr Miller admitted he believed the officers ' treatment "may not be proportionate to the circumstances."
Mr Miller said: "I didn't believe their actions were misogynistic. I was aware it could be interpreted as misogynistic [by the public]. I didn't believe that was the case, but it could be interpreted that way by others."
He later stated: "We had to be aware how the public would view this."
Miller, who's spent nearly three decades in the job, said he had "never seen" a "critical decision taken like this" so quickly in his 27 years of police service.
The inspector said the decision to permanently withdraw Mr Jones and Mr Tunnock sent "shockwaves" through the force and that " officers were enraged at the action" taken against their colleagues.
‌
Mr Miller added: "If we take a step back, it was ultimately a photograph" and he "had concerns the punishment may not be proportionate to the circumstances".
The tribunal also heard reference to the Rhona Malone case, where the former firearms officer was awarded almost £1 million in 2019 after being victimised on the basis of sex by Police Scotland.
Mr Miller claimed Police Scotland had done a lot of combat misogyny since 2019 but he was aware senior management "still talk" about the case.
‌
The inspector added: "I felt the outcome from the ACC was made too quick and should have followed, in my experience, normal process", such as the conclusion of an investigation by the Professional Standards Department (PSD).
Mr Tunnock earlier told the hearing that Insp Miller warned him "the last thing the firearms unit needs is another misogyny case".
Mr Miller claimed on Friday "that is how it would be viewed" by management.
‌
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
However, under questioning from Police Scotland's lawyer, Mr Gibson, Mr Miller agreed with assistant chief constable Ritchie's assertion on June 12 that Ms Storm's gender was irrelevant to the withdrawal decision.
He also said his concerns about management's perception of misogyny were "unfounded" given that the officers were struck off for "poor judgement, decision-making, and situational awareness".
Mr Miller also criticised the officers for their decision-making, saying: "There was acknowledgement [from the officers] that this wasn't the best thing they'd ever done. They need to have a degree of professional awareness that they were being filmed. It just doesn't look good."
The proceedings are presided over by Employment Judge Amanda Jones. The five-day hearing began on Monday, June 9 and was scheduled to conclude on Friday, June 13.