Fashion Brand Veronica Beard Sets Its Eyes On International Growth
Veronica Beard is ready to take its woman-on-the-go style global.
The brand, known for its versatile styling and layering of blazers and dickeys, plus jeans, shoes and accessories, has built a reputation as a contemporary fashion label that can dress the modern working woman. After spending the past year putting puzzle pieces into place, the brand is now well-positioned for stronger international expansion, as a significant shift is underway in the prestige and luxury fashion markets.
The brand, which launched in 2010 from sisters-in-law Veronica Swanson Beard and Veronica Miele Beard, now has 41 stores in places like New York City; Troy, Mich., and Seattle. In the past 12-months alone, Veronica Beard has opened at least eight stores. The overall business is approximately two-thirds direct-to-consumer and one-third wholesale retail, with annual revenue of more than $300 million, said Stephanie Unwin, president of Veronica Beard.
Over the same 12-months, the Veronica Beard assortment has also grown with the addition of handbags. Priced at under $700, the idea was to offer a more affordable item to bring younger and more aspirational consumers into the brand. It's a strategy that has proven effective in the past. Veronica Beard launched shoes in 2017 for under $500, and it has grown by triple digits in the past year. Typically, Veronica Beard's hallmark blazers retail for approximately $700 to $800.
'When you look at the model, even with luxury, the accessories are often the entry point [for customers],' said Unwin. 'We thought about that similarly; and, when we looked at the market opportunity ... we wanted to fill the white space between mass, contemporary and the luxury brands.'
The big focus now is on international markets like Munich, Amsterdam, Brussels, and Geneva. Currently, the brand has a presence in London, Germany, and the Benelux region of Brussels, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Veronica Beard will open five to six stores over the next three years. The past year required focus on building a team to oversee international expansion, distribution and technological infrastructure. In March, Veronica Beard hired Francois LeFloch, as head of Veronica Beard International. More recently, in May, the brand announced the hire of Halsey Anderson as chief brand officer, a newly created post. Under that role, Anderson will be tasked with crafting the global brand vision, including influencer and social media marketing, creative assets, styling and editorial.
'Europe is a key growth market for us—our wholesale business has already shown strong potential, and now we want to complement that with retail spaces that fully express our brand's identity,' said LeFloch. 'Cities like Paris and Milan [are]The backdrop to Veronica Beard's growth is the ongoing decline in luxury sales, driving customers to look to other brands and more accessible, yet still high-quality, offerings. Since 2024, luxury brands from conglomerates like Kering, LVMH and Richemont have experienced inconsistent quarters of sales growth and decline. In April, Kering shared its first-quarter sales declined by 14% year-over-year with a whopping 25% year-over-year sales drop at its flagship Gucci brand. Also in April, LVMH shared that first-quarter fashion sales declined 5% year-over-year. Meanwhile, Richemont exceeded analyst expectations in May for its fourth-quarter sales, after a tough first-half of fiscal 2025 sales. Fourth-quarter sales rose 7% year-over-year, thanks in part to its jewelry brand, Cartier.
'It's an undeniably challenging time for many brands given the global climate. While luxury is currently under pressure, our positioning offers a unique advantage,' said LeFloch. 'Success will come from choosing the right locations that align with our brand and values.'
Veronica Beard's positioning has not only focused expansion categories like handbags, but also on ... More strategic partnerships and a focus on sportswear. (Resort 2026 collection)
The brand positioning has not only focused expansion categories like handbags, but also on strategic partnerships and a focus on sportswear. Following a collaboration with the NFL in Oct. 2024, the team then set its eyes on the French Open in early June with an eight-piece capsule collection with Head Sportswear. NCAA tennis champion Ayan Broomfield, starred in the collab campaign. Sportswear, a quintessentially American category, is also the focus for the brand's resort 2026 collection, dubbed 'Varsity Electric,' which features a sportswear-heavy offering mingled with Veronica Beard's traditional styles.
'Our woman has always been on the go. We've always tried to serve up an offering that provides her with that versatility,' said Unwin. 'Hopefully, we make her feel confident when she's out there, making it happen, and that's the most important thing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Rise of ‘Cute Debt'
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. On the subway a few weeks back, I noticed an ad for a 'buy now, pay later' service from Cash App. It read: 'Little payments are so much cuter.' This ad wasn't made for men, I thought. 'Buy now, pay later' is promoted as interest-free borrowing, which many people, frightened by the idea of going into debt, see as safer. But miss a payment, and the late fees kick in—$8 here, $6 there. Miss payments on a few different orders, and the fees add up fast. You could be paying much more in the end than you would if you were paying interest on a credit card. Worse, your account could be sent to a collection agency, destroying your credit score. On average, men have more total debt than women, but women are 68 percent more likely to use installment payment services such as Afterpay, Klarna, Affirm, and Quadpay, a 2024 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston found. This might be less about how women spend money than it is about where they spend it. Although buy-now-pay-later services are accepted on purchases as varied as airfare and electronics, clothing accounts for more than half of the services' gross merchandise value. And women are the bulk of those customers. This is easily gleaned from the services' advertising campaigns. Klarna, for example, paired up with Paris Hilton to create the 'House of Y2K,' an interactive pop-up devoted to Millennial nostalgia selling a limited-edition 'Paris Hilton x Klarna' velour tracksuit; Klarna also partnered with the fast-fashion brand Shein on pop-up stores, including a bubble-gum-pink party bus/traveling store emblazoned with the phrase In Pink We Trust. Murals in Los Angeles and New York featured illustrations of cute strawberries and ice-cream cones and the tagline Afterpay is like eating the whole carton and spreading the calories out over 6 weeks. The business model of 'buy now, pay later' companies is not really about selling their services to women directly. It's about selling themselves to the retailers that want to sell things to women. Lots of online shoppers load up their carts but, once they see the total cost, don't follow through. Companies such as Afterpay pitch themselves to merchants by promising to solve this issue of 'cart conversion'—shoppers are more likely to click 'Pay now' if they have the option to pay less upfront. Jessa Loomis, an associate professor at Newcastle University, in England, is an expert on these companies; she describes herself as a 'feminist economic geographer' whose research focuses on the 'everyday effects' of global finance. The companies make their real money not from the fees they charge consumers, she told me, but from what they charge 'the retailer or merchants to be able to have 'buy now, pay later' embedded in their payment ecosystem.' They are essentially telling brands, 'We can get women to spend money here.' And it's working. 'Buy now, pay later' has become the gateway drug to consumer debt for more and more women. I first used Afterpay in 2018, when I was 20. I had a sorority formal coming up, and the other girls at my SEC school would be wearing their wealth loudly. I couldn't be the one in the same sequined bodycon number that I wore to last year's spring fling. I filled my online cart with five dream dresses, planning to go back and narrow my choices down, dress by dress. But then I noticed an alternative way to pay. I could have all the beautiful gowns at once, for only a quarter of the total cost up front. The service required three subsequent payments at two-week intervals. But if I promptly picked my favorite dress and returned the rest, I'd be off the hook for the second payment by the time it was due. My plan seemed foolproof. As long as I was prompt with my returns and consistent with my payments, I could have what I couldn't afford. Afterpay quickly became a habit. [Mac Schwerin: The 'buy now, pay later' bubble is about to burst] Throughout my childhood, my Dave Ramsey–fearing parents warned me of the dangers of credit cards. They kept their cash in envelopes, and when the envelope labeled Eating Out was empty, we'd be enjoying Hamburger Helper for the rest of the month. I didn't really understand how interest or building credit worked. Afterpay felt like a safer alternative, but it got me used to 'carrying a balance.' When I did get a credit card a few years later, I thought I could pay 'in installments,' but compounding interest quickly made my debt mount. Before I knew it, I was paying off only the minimum each month, and drowning in debt. I was embarrassed to talk about my debt with my friends, but the more I asked around, the more I realized I wasn't alone. None of the men I asked had ever used Afterpay or its competitors. But many of the women had. 'I remember the first time I used 'buy now, pay later,'' one friend—who's now 27 and owes $16,000 in credit-card debt—told me. It was for a clothing haul before a family trip to Europe during college. 'I was like, Okay, I'm gonna return half of this. So I'll do the four payments so that I can pay a small payment now and not have to cough up all that at the same time. I didn't end up returning any of it. Shocker.' She said that, like me, she had found installment payments more palatable than putting the full expense on her debit or credit card, but that they led to out-of-control spending, which in turn led to more debt. Another friend, who first used Afterpay when she was waitressing in college, described it as 'a bite-size way to pay for things I couldn't really afford.' Buying indulgences made her feel guilty; smaller payments assuaged the guilt. 'Never once did I think that I couldn't really pay for these things. The way I budgeted was week to week.' Lots of our spending was driven by trying to keep up with our friends—not just the real ones, but also the parasocial ones we follow online. Social-media influencers seem to be just like us, only one step and hundreds of thousands of dollars ahead. 'The essence of influencer culture is a kind of low-grade gaslighting about what is possible and what is attainable,' Chelsea Fagan, founder of The Financial Diet, a media organization focused on promoting financial literacy among women, told me. Fagan began a blog to hold herself financially accountable when she found herself in credit-card debt at age 25. Social media leads us to believe that 'every purchase we make now is sort of a micro-expression of identity. Whether it's the smoothie that we're drinking or the place that we travel to or the bag we're holding, all of it is kind of an expression of the type of woman we are.' But 'there's just such a lack of transparency, and of financial honesty, around it.' One of my friends—who is in $15,000 of credit-card debt—describes social media as 'our generation's homeownership.' Our feeds, with their photos of meals or outfits, are the way we prove that we've made it, she said. 'It's like our white picket fence,' in a world where none of us can actually afford a house. Naturally, 'buy now, pay later' companies have invested in influencer marketing campaigns, resulting in a flood of 'get ready with me' videos in which women show themselves purchasing products with Afterpay. Many are clearly ads: 'Hot girls love all kinds of flexibility,' one TikTok comedian says in reference to Klarna; a catchy Cash App–inspired rap goes: 'Cash App, I can make that cash clap.' [From the January/February 2021 Issue: Why is there financing for everything now?] But other videos masquerade as financial advice: 'Basically, you just, like, split your payments up into, like, four manageable chunks, then you pay it over time. It's called shopping responsibly, okay?' the comedian says in another Klarna-sponsored sketch. 'Let's be real—ticket prices and new clothes really add up,' an influencer says over footage of her attending a music festival. 'This is where Klarna helps me.' In small type, near the bottom of the screen, a disclaimer: 'Borrowing more than you can afford or paying late may negatively impact your financial status.' Lots of people my age like to use the phrase girl math to justify reckless spending. It's only partly a joke. Didn't buy that $700 Gucci wallet? Now you have $150 to spend on dinner out. Girl math! A man bought your drink last night? Now you have extra money for martinis with your friends. Girl math! 'I hate the idea of 'girl math,'' Bola Sokunbi, the founder of Clever Girl Finance, told me. 'Math is math. And if it doesn't make sense as a purchase, it just doesn't make sense. Don't put girl on it and make us seem like we are stupid.' The phrase 'makes it seem that it's cute or silly to not understand finance,' Haley Sacks, the woman behind the popular Instagram account Mrs. Dow Jones, told me. 'It feeds the stereotypes that money is masculine and women should just spend it.' She said many young women confuse consumerism with empowerment. But 'you don't want to glamorize being out of control.' This year, buy-now-pay-later services are predicted to hit nearly $117 billion in transaction volume, thanks largely to young, female buyers. The biggest danger is that ''buy now, pay later' normalizes using debt to live,' Sacks says in one of her videos. 'One moment, you're financing your Coachella outfit; the next moment it's groceries.' And indeed, this is happening more and more frequently—a quarter of 'buy now, pay later' customers say they use an installment-payment service to shop for food. This summer, though, FICO began including buy-now-pay-later loans when calculating credit scores, and Affirm began sharing its Pay-in-4 customers' data with the credit bureau Experian. Now that credit scores are directly at stake, savvy customers may opt out of paying in installments. For younger customers desperate to get their hands on the next new thing, it might not matter. It wouldn't have stopped my 20-year-old self's shopping spree. But at least buy-now-pay-later loans will be seen as what they always were: debt. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gemini Hires Goldmans, Citi, Morgan Stanley and Cantor as Lead Bookrunners For its IPO
Crypto exchange Gemini filed an updated registration statement for its initial public offering effort, sharing a few more details in its push to become a publicly traded firm. Goldman Sachs (GS), Citigroup (C), Morgan Stanley (MS) and Cantor acting as lead bookrunners on the IPO, Gemini said in a press release Friday. Evercore ISI, Mizuho, Truist Securities, Cohen & Company Capital Markets, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Needham & Company and Rosenblatt are also acting as bookrunners, the company said. Academy Securities and AmeriVet Securities are acting as co-managers. The S-1 published on Friday follows a confidential filing submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission back in June, and confirms "Gemini Space Station," co-founded by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, intends to sell an undisclosed number of Class A shares. Gemini's filing indicated that it had generated total revenue of $142.2 million in 2024, up from $98.1 million the prior year. For the six months ending on June 30, 2025, the total revenue was $68.6 million, down from $74.3 million in the first six months of 2024. Its net loss in 2024 stood at $158.6 million, compared to $319.7 million in 2023. That figure stood at $282.5 million for the first six months of 2025. Its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for 2024 stood at a loss of $13.2 million, and a loss of $113.5 million for the first half of 2025. Like other crypto firms, Gemini pointed to standard risks in the risk portion of the filing, including the general nature of blockchain networks and how banks and regulators view the industry. "Key factors influencing the further development of blockchain networks and digital assets include the global adoption of digital assets and blockchain technology; regulatory and quasi-government restrictions on access to and operation of blockchain networks; and the maintenance of open source protocols that support blockchain networks," the filing said. Gemini is only the latest crypto company to try and go public this year, following Circle (CRCL), eToro (ETOR) and CoinDesk parent company Bullish (BLSH). BitGo has filed for paperwork to go public as well. Gemini plans to list its Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol in to access your portfolio
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Bolivia heads to the polls as its right-wing opposition eyes first victory in decades
LA PAZ, Bolivia (AP) — Bolivians headed to the polls on Sunday to vote in presidential and congressional elections that could spell the end of the Andean nation's long-dominant leftist party and see a right-wing government elected for the first time in over two decades. The election on Sunday is one of the most consequential for Bolivia in recent times — and one of the most unpredictable. Even at this late stage, a remarkable 30% or so of voters remain undecided. Polls show the two leading right-wing candidates, multimillionaire business owner Samuel Doria Medina and former President Jorge Fernando 'Tuto' Quiroga, locked in a virtual dead heat. Many undecided voters But a right-wing victory isn't assured. Many longtime voters for the governing Movement Toward Socialism, or MAS, party, now shattered by infighting, live in rural areas and tend to be undercounted in polling. With the nation's worst economic crisis in four decades leaving Bolivians waiting for hours in fuel lines, struggling to find subsidized bread and squeezed by double-digit inflation, the opposition candidates are billing the race as a chance to alter the country's destiny. 'I have rarely, if ever, seen a situational tinderbox with as many sparks ready to ignite,' Daniel Lansberg-Rodriguez, founding partner of Aurora Macro Strategies, a New York-based advisory firm, writes in a memo. Breaking the MAS party's monopoly on political power, he adds, pushes 'the country into uncharted political waters amid rising polarization, severe economic fragility and a widening rural–urban divide.' Bolivia could follow rightward trend The outcome will determine whether Bolivia — a nation of about 12 million people with the largest lithium reserves on Earth and crucial deposits of rare earth minerals — follows a growing trend in Latin America, where right-wing leaders like Argentina's libertarian Javier Milei, Ecuador's strongman Daniel Noboa and El Salvador's conservative populist Nayib Bukele have surged in popularity. A right-wing government in Bolivia could trigger a major geopolitical realignment for a country now allied with Venezuela's socialist-inspired government and world powers such as China, Russia and Iran. Conservative candidates vow to restore US relations Doria Medina and Quiroga have praised the Trump administration and vowed to restore ties with the United States — ruptured in 2008 when charismatic, long-serving former President Evo Morales expelled the American ambassador. The right-wing front-runners also have expressed interest in doing business with Israel, which has no diplomatic relations with Bolivia, and called for foreign private companies to invest in the country and develop its rich natural resources. After storming to office in 2006 at the start of the commodities boom, Morales, Bolivia's first Indigenous president, nationalized the nation's oil and gas industry, using the lush profits to reduce poverty, expand infrastructure and improve the lives of the rural poor. After three consecutive presidential terms, as well as a contentious bid for an unprecedented fourth in 2019 that set off popular unrest and led to his ouster, Morales has been barred from this race by Bolivia's constitutional court. His ally-turned-rival, President Luis Arce, withdrew his candidacy for the MAS on account of his plummeting popularity and nominated his senior minister, Eduardo del Castillo. As the party splintered, Andrónico Rodríguez, the 36-year-old president of the senate who hails from the same union of coca farmers as Morales, launched his bid. Ex-president Morales urges supports to deface ballots Rather than back the candidate widely considered his heir, Morales, holed up in his tropical stronghold and evading an arrest warrant on charges related to his relationship with a 15-year-old girl, has urged his supporters to deface their ballots or leave them blank. Voting is mandatory in Bolivia, where some 7.9 million Bolivians are eligible to vote. Doria Medina and Quiroga, familiar faces in Bolivian politics who both served in past neoliberal governments and have run for president three times before, have struggled to stir up interest as voter angst runs high. 'There's enthusiasm for change but no enthusiasm for the candidates,' said Eddy Abasto, 44, a Tupperware vendor in Bolivia's capital of La Paz torn between voting for Doria Medina and Quiroga. 'It's always the same, those in power live happily spending the country's money, and we suffer.' Conservative candidates say austerity needed Doria Medina and Quiroga have warned of the need for a painful fiscal adjustment, including the elimination of Bolivia's generous food and fuel subsidies, to save the nation from insolvency. Some analysts caution this risks sparking social unrest. 'A victory for either right-wing candidate could have grave repercussions for Bolivia's Indigenous and impoverished communities,' said Kathryn Ledebur, director of the Andean Information Network, a Bolivian research group. 'Both candidates could bolster security forces and right-wing para-state groups, paving the way for violent crackdowns on protests expected to erupt over the foreign exploitation of lithium and drastic austerity measures.' All 130 seats in Bolivia's Chamber of Deputies, the lower house of Parliament, are up for grabs, along with 36 in the Senate, the upper house. If, as is widely expected, no one receives more than 50% of the vote, or 40% of the vote with a lead of 10 percentage points, the top two candidates will compete in a runoff on Oct. 19 for the first time since Bolivia's 1982 return to democracy.
