
What is NATO's new 5% defence spending pledge, and how will Canada meet it?
Canada joined its NATO allies on Wednesday in agreeing to a new defence spending target of five per cent of GDP — but the details are more complicated.
Members of the alliance will have until 2035 to reach the new spending goal, for one thing. And the five per cent is being split into two categories: 'core defence requirements' and broader defence-related infrastructure and industry.
Speaking to reporters at The Hague at the NATO summit, Prime Minister Mark Carney expressed confidence that Canada will achieve its new objectives after lagging behind the alliance's spending goals for years.
'We've arrived at this summit looking forward with a plan to help lead with new investments to build our strength,' he said.
'The investments we're making in defence and security, broader security, given the new threats that Canada faces — we're not at a trade-off, we're not at sacrifices in order to do those. These will be net-additive.'
Story continues below advertisement
Carney did note that towards the end of the decade, Canadians would likely need to have conversations around 'trade-offs' for continued high defence spending.
2:09
NATO 5% defence spending target tops agenda at Netherlands summit
David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute who attended the summit in Brussels, said the defence spending increase Canada will have to undertake is the largest since the 'massive' ramp-up during the Second World War.
'This is a complete game changer for Canada's defence,' he told Global News.
Here's what to know about the new spending pledge and what Canada plans to do in order to achieve it.
What's in the 5% spending pledge?
The official declaration from the NATO leaders' summit pledges a new commitment to invest five per cent of GDP annually 'on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035.'
Story continues below advertisement
The pledge marks a substantial increase from the alliance's previous commitment to spend at least two per cent of GDP on defence, which was agreed to in 2014 and which Canada for years consistently failed to meet.
The new target includes at least 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence expenditures, which NATO defines as funding primarily toward a country's armed forces. That includes everything from large-scale military equipment like fighter jets and submarines, to ammunition, to salaries and pensions for military members, to related defence forces like national police and coast guards.
The second spending category is up to 1.5 per cent of GDP toward broadly-defined initiatives to 'protect our critical infrastructure, defend our networks, ensure our civil preparedness and resilience, unleash innovation, and strengthen our defence industrial base,' according to the summit declaration.
NATO leaders agreed to review the new spending plan in 2029 to ensure it aligns with the global threat environment at that time.
'Our investments will ensure we have the forces, capabilities, resources, infrastructure, warfighting readiness, and resilience needed to deter and defend in line with our three core tasks of deterrence and defence, crisis prevention and management, and cooperative security,' the declaration says.
How will Canada get there?
Canada has long lagged behind the previous two per cent NATO target. According to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte's annual report released in April, Canada's defence spending likely hit 1.45 per cent last year.
Story continues below advertisement
Carney previously announced Canada will reach two per cent by the end of the current fiscal year in March — half a decade earlier than previously estimated — with $9.3 billion in new funding.
2:07
How will Canada meet its defence spending targets?
Much of that money will go toward pay increases for Canadian Armed Forces members and enhancing existing military bases and equipment, while also shoring up the domestic defence industrial base.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'At the core of our defence investment, of course, are the men and women of the Canadian Armed Forces,' Carney said Wednesday while framing the earlier announcement as 'working toward' the new 3.5 per cent core defence target.
Carney noted those military members 'have not been paid to reflect what we are asking them to do' and have been stuck with outdated or non-working equipment.
Story continues below advertisement
'We're making up for that and level setting that, and that's an important part of just what we're doing this year in terms of the increase in defence.'
As for the 1.5 per cent portion, Carney said that will include 'ports, airports, infrastructure to support the development and exportation of critical minerals, telecommunications and emergency preparedness systems.'
He added that allies 'will buy more equipment and technology made in Canada, by Canadian workers in shipyards, in labs, and shop floors right across our country,' which will not only contribute to that 1.5 per cent portion but also grow the Canadian economy.
'We'll make the drones, the icebreakers, the aerospace technologies, and much more that's needed to build a more secure world,' he said.
6:20
PM Carney pledges to meet NATO's 2% defence spending target this year
Carney noted much of the work towards those initiatives is already underway.
Story continues below advertisement
He's previously said the major projects legislation passed by the House of Commons last week — which could become law by Friday after a Senate review — will ensure 'nation-building' projects like critical minerals mining and transport will be built quickly.
'Canada has one of the biggest and most varied deposits of critical minerals, and we're going to develop those' both domestically and with international partners, Carney told CNN in an interview that aired Tuesday.
'Some of the spending for that counts towards that five per cent. In fact, a lot of it will happen towards that five per cent because of infrastructure spending, ports and railroads and other ways to get these minerals. So that's something that benefits the Canadian economy, but is also part of our new NATO responsibility.'
Carney also noted to both CNN and to reporters Wednesday that as the nature of warfare changes, with threat actors turning to cyberwarfare and pilotless technologies like drones, Canada will pivot toward those priorities as well and costs and expenditures will change accordingly.
That, he said Wednesday, makes it difficult to predict how much Canada will need to spend on defence 10 years from now.
Can Canada achieve all this?
Carney estimated to CNN that five per cent of Canada's GDP currently equates to $150 billion annually.
Story continues below advertisement
Perry said Canada can reach the new spending targets on the timeline set by NATO 'if the government actually makes it a priority,' noting it would cost less than what Ottawa spent to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and provide economic supports during that relatively shorter time period.
'That was hundreds of billions of dollars of spending annually,' he said. 'This is going to be tens of billions dollars of spending — a huge amount of money, don't get me wrong, but it's not nearly as much on an annual basis as we did to combat the pandemic.
'So if the Government Canada wants to see this through, it can absolutely happen.'
2:06
Canada needs to spend $150B per year for new NATO target: Carney
Carney said international defence partnerships like the one Canada signed this week with the European Union, as well as the one being negotiated with the United States, will help keep domestic costs down.
Story continues below advertisement
'If you all of a sudden start spending a lot more money in one area, you can end up spending a lot more money on rising prices and choke points,' he said.
'That's part of the reason why we're co-operating more closely with the Europeans, part of the reason why we continue co-operation with the U.S. in the right areas, but also part of the reason why this increase will happen at a measured pace, or we'll try to do it at a measured pace.'
Perry noted the wording of the agreement gives Canada and other allies 'a lot less rigor and fidelity around the additional 1.5 percent of non-core defence spending.'
Kevin Page, the former parliamentary budget officer and president of the Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy at the University of Ottawa, told Global News the overall spending increase is 'feasible, but it will be challenging.'
'We're going to need to see the strategy and the plan that kind of goes with it,' he said, both in the upcoming budget in the fall and other detailed reports on defence spending.
Where are other allies at?
NATO says it expects all 32 alliance members to reach the earlier two per cent target this year, compared to just three allies in 2014.
Story continues below advertisement
According to Rutte's annual report, only Poland has met or surpassed the new 3.5 per cent target for core defence spending, having hit 4.07 per cent last year.
The United States — whose president Donald Trump has pushed for the five per cent target, as well as Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, spent above three per cent of their GDP on defence in 2024.
The annual report noted that the U.S. last year accounted for 64 per cent of defence expenditures among all NATO allies, with the other 31 members making up the rest.
Rutte on Wednesday credited Trump, who has criticized the alliance and even threatened to not defend members that don't pay enough for defence, for shifting that dynamic.
'He was totally right that Europe and Canada were not basically providing to NATO what we should provide, and that the U.S. was spending so much more on defence than the Europeans and the Canadians,' he said.
'Now we are correcting that. We are equalizing.'
—With files from Global's Nathaniel Dove
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
28 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
U.S., Iran to talk next week and 'may sign an agreement,' Trump says
President Donald Trump said the U.S. would hold a meeting with Iran next week but cast doubt on the need for a diplomatic agreement on the country's nuclear program, citing the damage that American bombing had done to key sites. 'We're going to talk to them next week,' Trump said Wednesday at a press conference during the NATO summit at The Hague, without giving more details. 'We may sign an agreement. I don't know, to me, I don't think it's that necessary.' He reiterated that the U.S. strikes on the Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow facilities had 'obliterated' them, again disputing an American intelligence assessment that said Tehran's nuclear program had only been set back by a matter of months. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The comments came on day two of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, ending 12 days of conflict that threatened to escalate into a wider regional war and upend energy markets. As the missiles fell silent and oil prices plunged — wiping out most of their increase during the hostilities — focus has switched to a possible next stage of nuclear diplomacy. Trump said the conflict was effectively 'over' after the U.S. bombing mission — though he also warned: 'Can it start again? I guess someday it can. It could maybe start soon.' Iran has been sending signals that it's ready to resume talks, which were underway with the U.S. before Israel attacked. 'The logic of war has failed — return to the logic of diplomacy,' Iran's mission to the United Nations said Wednesday. The mission didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on Trump's hint at new talks. Before Israel's June 13 attack on Iran, Trump envoy Steve Witkoff had taken the lead in five rounds of talks with the Islamic Republic, seeking a deal to replace the 2015 nuclear agreement that Trump abandoned during his first term. 'We're hopeful for a comprehensive peace agreement,' Witkoff said Wednesday on CNBC when asked what the next steps are for diplomacy with Iran. 'We were hopeful when we first started negotiations. It didn't quite work out that way, but today, we are hopeful. The signs are there.' Witkoff said the U.S. has been 'having conversations with the Iranians' and that 'multiple interlocutors are reaching out to us,' adding that his 'strong sense' is that 'they're ready.' 'For Iran, a diplomatic track makes as much sense today as it did before the attack,' said Ray Takeyh, a senior fellow at the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations. 'It seems that the Iranian program was not fully disabled. This may tempt Israel or the U.S. to conduct additional strikes. A diplomatic process will obviate that possibility.' It's not clear what that would entail. The UN's nuclear watchdog has for decades been central to monitoring of Iranian nuclear activities. But Tehran is in no hurry to resume working with the agency, which it blames for failing to condemn the U.S. and Israeli attacks. Iran's parliament has approved legislation that would suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency until nuclear sites are secured, though any ultimate decision will be taken at higher levels of the state. The IAEA said Tuesday that inspections in Iran should resume 'as soon as possible' to determine what's happened to stocks of uranium enriched to 60 per cent levels, not far short of the 90 per cent required to build a bomb. The IAEA says it last verified those inventories a few days before Israel's June 13 attack and their whereabouts is now unknown, suggesting they may have been moved preemptively from sites targeted by U.S. bombs. Trump said the U.S. bunker-buster strikes had eliminated some key risks by burying the country's atomic materials under 'granite, concrete and steel.' 'We think everything nuclear is down there,' he said. 'They didn't take it out.' Pressed about the sources for such findings, he cited new intelligence assessments and also said 'we've also spoken to people who've seen the site,' without identifying them. The White House declined to specify to whom Trump was referring. Iran's nuclear installations were 'badly damaged' by U.S. airstrikes, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told Al Jazeera TV on Wednesday, in the first such comments from Tehran. The official didn't give further details and said authorities were still reviewing the situation on the ground. Trump cited that assessment during his NATO press conference, as well as a statement by Israel's nuclear agency that said the Fordow site had been rendered inoperable and Tehran's ability to make a nuclear weapon set back by 'many years.' Earlier this month, Trump had said Iran was 'weeks away' from having an atomic weapon, though some experts and U.S. intelligence estimates said it could take months or years for the nation to develop a weapon. Iran maintains that its nuclear program has purely civilian purposes, and that it's entitled to pursue that goal under international law. Witkoff said that 'enrichment is the red line' for the U.S. with Iran, 'and beyond enrichment, weaponization is the red line.' Israel's attacks on Iranian military and nuclear sites killed several top generals and atomic scientists. Iran countered by firing drones and ballistic missiles into Israel. Both have declared victory. The death toll from the Israeli airstrikes climbed to 627 and more than 4,800 people have been wounded, according to Iranian state media reports. At least 28 people have been killed in Israel in Iranian missile attacks, emergency services officials said, including four on Tuesday morning just as the truce was to take effect. Oil has slid back to around the levels it was trading at before the fighting began, posting a two-day decline of some 14 per cent. It rebounded slightly on Wednesday as Trump played down the prospect of near-term sanctions relief for Iran. Asked if his Tuesday comments approving Chinese purchases of Iranian oil undermined his strategy of maximum pressure on Iran, Trump said he is 'not giving up' on it. But he also indicated U.S. financial penalties are doing little to stop Beijing from buying Tehran's supplies. 'If they're going to sell oil, they're going to sell oil,' Trump said. 'China is going to want to buy oil. They can buy it from us. They can buy it from other people.' Bank of Israel chief Amir Yaron told Bloomberg that the military campaign cost the government about 1 per cent of gross national product and would require revisions to this year's budget. He said gains on the country's financial markets suggest that they see the conflict resulting in 'a positive outcome for Israel.' Iran's civil aviation authority said 13 airports in the country's eastern regions have reopened for flights, though Tehran's airports remain closed until further notice, according to state media. Trump said both nations are 'tired, exhausted. They fought very, very hard and very viciously, very violently, and they were both satisfied to go home and get out.' — With assistance from Ryan Chua, Kate Sullivan, Skylar Woodhouse, Hadriana Lowenkron and Golnar Motevalli Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


Edmonton Journal
30 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
U.S., Iran to talk next week and 'may sign an agreement,' Trump says
Article content President Donald Trump said the U.S. would hold a meeting with Iran next week but cast doubt on the need for a diplomatic agreement on the country's nuclear program, citing the damage that American bombing had done to key sites. 'We're going to talk to them next week,' Trump said Wednesday at a press conference during the NATO summit at The Hague, without giving more details. 'We may sign an agreement. I don't know, to me, I don't think it's that necessary.'


Calgary Herald
31 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
'This is an opportunity': Federal energy minister says world is eying Canada's critical minerals
Article content Energy and Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson says he constantly hears from other countries that want to buy critical minerals from Canada, and that is presenting the country with an opportunity for economic growth. Article content 'At the G7 (meeting this month in Alberta), all the countries said they wanted to buy Canadian critical minerals,' he said at a Toronto Region Board of Trade event on Wednesday. 'Right now, at the NATO summit, what the prime minister is hearing is that all those countries want to buy our critical minerals. This is an opportunity for us.' Article content Article content Article content Hodgson said Canada needs to ensure it mines critical minerals, but also builds processing facilities so that it can share in some of the wealth created by products made from what it mines. The federal government is focused on ensuring Canada builds major projects quickly and responsibly, he added. Article content Article content Hodgson said Canada is standing at a unique moment in its history that is defined by 'instability.' Supply chains are 'being ripped apart,' climate change is advancing and Canada is in the midst of a 'devastating trade war ' with the United States, its closest trading partner. Article content Last week, the House of Commons passed Bill C-5, which he referred to as the One Canadian Economy Act because he said it would break down interprovincial trade barriers while also ensuring that major nation-building projects, such as mines, pipelines and other infrastructure, are built quickly and with the consent of affected communities. Article content Article content As part of that process, he said Prime Minister Mark Carney plans to hold a summit on July 17 with leaders from First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities to discuss some of the projects that will be fast-tracked. Article content Article content 'The goal here is to create certainty that catalyzes investment,' Hodgson said. Article content He said Canada also has an opportunity because it is unified in its resolve to grow its economy by working together despite the impending crisis brought on by the trade war. Article content 'This is a trade war we did not ask for, but it is a trade war we must win,' he said. Article content It was similar to the message that Ontario's Minister of Energy and Mines Stephen Lecce delivered when he introduced Hodgson at the event.