logo
Amid Trump trade war, L.A. urged to hold off on wage hikes for tourism workers

Amid Trump trade war, L.A. urged to hold off on wage hikes for tourism workers

Five months ago, the Los Angeles City Council endorsed a plan to boost wages for airport and hotel workers to $30 per hour by 2028 — just in time for the Olympic and Paralympic Games in the city — while also requiring new healthcare payments.
For some in L.A.'s tourism industry, that moment feels like another era.
Since then, President Trump has launched a trade war, which in turn sparked a major drop-off in travel from Canada and other nations. The city experienced a catastrophic wildfire, then a massive budget crisis. By the end of March, passenger traffic at Los Angeles International Airport had fallen nearly 5% compared with the same period the prior year.
Now, with the first of several wage hikes scheduled to go into effect on July 1, a coalition of L.A. business leaders is urging the council to hold off on the minimum wage increases, saying they will devastate an industry that was already struggling.
'Two hotels have closed. More are starting to reduce services and lay off workers,' Rosanna Maietta, president and chief executive of the American Hotel and Lodging Assn., said at City Hall last week. 'If this ordinance is enacted, we expect more hotels to close.'
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., offered an equally dire warning, saying the wage increases will cause 'irreversible damage' to local tourism. With the entertainment industry in crisis and construction of new homes down 57% this year, L.A.'s political leaders cannot afford to lose another sector of the local economy, he said.
'L.A. has destroyed housing production. Now they're coming for tourism,' Waldman said in an interview.
Despite those warnings, the council's economic development committee signed off on the tourism wage ordinance Tuesday, setting the stage for a vote by the full council this month. If the proposal is approved without changes, airport workers and employees of hotels with 60 or more rooms would see their hourly minimum wage climb to $22.50 in July, $25 in 2026, $27.50 in 2027 and $30 in 2028.
In addition to those increases, the proposal would require that, starting Jan. 1, those same workers would receive $8.35 per hour for their healthcare coverage. (Employers already providing healthcare would need to make sure the coverage has a value of $8.35 per hour, or else make up the difference.)
Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez, a onetime hotel union organizer who now serves on that committee, said he sees no reason to change course.
'I understand things look different than they looked a year ago,' he said in an interview. 'But the reality is, we live in a city people cannot afford. They don't have health insurance. The effect it has on their family and children and their quality of life has been going on for way too long.'
Kurt Petersen, co-president of Unite Here Local 11, said it was hypocritical for business leaders to fight wage increases at the same time they were pressing the council to spend tens of millions of dollars preparing for a renovation of the Los Angeles Convention Center. That vote was cast only last month.
Hotel owners at unionized properties already showed last year that they could afford higher wages, with some providing increases of $10 per hour during contract negotiations, Petersen said.
'They just don't want to pay their workers, that's what it is. So they come up with every excuse in the book to keep the money to themselves,' he said.
Los Angeles has four municipal minimum wage laws. Hotel workers have the highest wage — $20.32 per hour — compared with the basic minimum wage for the vast majority of workers, $17.28 per hour.
Employees of contractors at LAX, such as airlines and concession businesses, have a $19.28 hourly minimum wage. However, they also receive a minimum healthcare payment of $5.95 per hour, which boosts their overall hourly rate to $25.23.
Under the council's proposal, workers at hotels with 60 or more rooms would see their minimum wage go up by 48% over 3½ years. At LAX, skycaps, cabin cleaners and other workers would receive a minimum wage increase of nearly 56%.
Hugo Ortega, a line cook for Hilton Garden Inn LAX and Holiday Inn LAX, said the package of pay increases will help him pay the rent and provide for his three children. Ortega, 52, works 70 hours a week as a cook and a maintenance engineer.
'I have to be doing two jobs to keep my family going,' he said in an interview.
Backers of the higher wage have repeatedly pointed to a city-commissioned study finding that higher incomes for tourism workers would stimulate the region's economy.
In recent months, the fight over the minimum wage has run headlong into the crisis over the city budget, which relies each year on more than $300 million in hotel tax revenue to pay for basic services such as police, firefighters and paramedics.
Mayor Karen Bass, faced with a nearly $1-billion shortfall for 2025-26, recently recommended laying off about 1,600 city workers, including staffers at the Los Angeles Police Department, the Bureau of Sanitation and the Department of Transportation. Since then, some council members have warned that a dramatic hike in wages will lead to fewer hotels overall — and diminished tax revenues.
'We are moving forward a 50% increase in wages and healthcare costs while our entire tourism economy is underwater,' said Councilmember Traci Park, the only committee member to vote against the wage hike Tuesday. 'And that is directly impacting our sales taxes, our business taxes, our [hotel] taxes and everything else that is impacting our city budget.'
In recent months, the council's budget committee has been hearing increasingly gloomy assessments of the city's tourism and aviation industries. City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo, a high-level budget official, warned the committee last week that flight bookings to the U.S. from major European cities have dropped by double digits this year.
Szabo, citing figures from aviation data provider OAG, said bookings from Canada were faring even worse, dropping by more than 70% this year.
'Nowhere are we seeing the impacts of federal policies more immediately than in tourism,' he said.
Trump, shortly after taking office, hit Canada and Mexico with steep tariffs, some of which remained in place even after he announced a 90-day pause on his trade war. Canadians, furious over Trump's threats to annex their country, began boycotting American products and canceling travel to the U.S., including to popular winter destinations such as Palm Springs.
On Monday, the budget committee heard from John Ackerman, the top executive at Los Angeles World Airports, who reported that concession businesses at LAX are experiencing major financial distress — and may need additional financial help from the city.
'If they can't succeed, I think it's going to be challenging to replace them with someone who is miraculously going to do better,' Ackerman told the committee. 'So it could put us in significant jeopardy. For us, long term, that would likely lead to less airline flights and less revenue, and it becomes kind of a downward spiral.'
Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Monday that Visit California, the tourism marketing nonprofit, is forecasting a 1% drop in visitors to the state this year, the first decrease since the pandemic. Much of that is being driven by a projected 9.2% decline in international visits, the agency said.
The tourism group attributed the reduction in large part to 'weakening consumer sentiment' and a strong U.S. dollar that makes travel more expensive for tourists from other countries.
Elisa Valencia, who works for the airline catering company Flying Food Group, said her $20.76 hourly wage is not nearly enough to provide for her three children in Michoacán, Mexico. Valencia, 34, rejected the idea that turmoil in the travel industry is a reason to deny workers a wage boost.
'Tariffs are affecting everybody, not just companies,' she said. 'Buying everyday food and gas is getting more expensive.'
Times staff writer Sandra McDonald contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LAPD Chief Pushes Back on Trump National Guard Claim
LAPD Chief Pushes Back on Trump National Guard Claim

Newsweek

time34 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

LAPD Chief Pushes Back on Trump National Guard Claim

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Chief Jim McDonnell said the protests and riots in portions of downtown Los Angeles on Wednesday are "nowhere near" the level of needing the National Guard, denouncing President Donald Trump's assertion that without the troops, the city would be "burning to the ground." Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment on Wednesday. Why It Matters Since his January 20 inauguration, Trump has implemented sweeping change, mainly through executive orders, and has prioritized immigration control as a key pillar within his second administration. Trump last month utilized the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a wartime law granting the commander in chief authority to detain or deport non-citizens. The implementation was originally blocked in federal court and sparked a contentious legal back-and-forth. The president also campaigned on the promise of mass deportations and appointed Tom Homan as his administration's border czar to execute his agenda. What To Know Protests broke out on Friday in reaction to numerous U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids throughout Los Angeles. Amid the ongoing tumult, city officials including Mayor Karen Bass implemented a curfew for portions of downtown, from 8 p.m. Tuesday to 6 a.m. Wednesday, and it was extended into Wednesday night as well. The LAPD warned that people who break the curfew and who are not exempt—like first responders, credentialed media and those who live in the affected area—will be subject to arrest. While speaking to CNN's Kaitlan Collins, McDonnell said that Wednesday was a "better day," adding that it is "calmer." "No, we were not in a position to request the National Guard," McDonnell said. "We have a protocol that we work up through; first we bring in all internal resources to bear on the issue, whatever it is. Then we mobilize the department or part of the department to be able to get everybody out there dealing with the issue. If we don't have the capacity at that point to be able to do that, then through the sheriff we request mutual aid and we get our law enforcement partners from police departments and sheriff's departments throughout the Southern California region to assist us in doing what it is we need to do." "We're at that level now," McDonnell added. "And we're nowhere near a level where we would be reaching out to the governor for National Guard at this stage. And my hope is that things are going in the right direction now and that we wouldn't have had to have done that, or we won't either." Trump said in part on Wednesday while speaking to reporters that if he didn't bring in the National Guard and the Marines, the city of Los Angeles would be "burning to the ground, just like it was a number of months ago." The president's reference was to the deadly wildfires that inundated Los Angeles County, torching thousands of buildings and displacing thousands of Angelenos. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom in a formal address to the Golden State on Tuesday ripped Trump and his administration for inflaming an already combustible situation. Newsom also denounced any violence or harm to law enforcement, vowing to prosecute any lawlessness. Protesters confront California National Guard soldiers and police outside a federal building on June 9 as protests continue in Los Angeles following three days of clashes with police after a series of immigration raids. (Photo... Protesters confront California National Guard soldiers and police outside a federal building on June 9 as protests continue in Los Angeles following three days of clashes with police after a series of immigration raids. (Photo by) More What People Are Saying Newsom posted to X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Trump is politicizing our military and pulling them off critical missions to further his own agenda." Trump said on Truth Social Wednesday: "If our troops didn't go into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now, just like so much of their housing burned to the ground. The great people of Los Angeles are very lucky that I made the decision to go in and help!!!" California Attorney General Rob Bonta posted to X on Wednesday: "18 Attorneys General from across the nation speaking out against the President's abuse of power. The Trump Administration's unlawful efforts to force federalized national guard forces and the U.S. military to patrol our streets is deeply alarming and cannot go unchecked." Bass said on X Wednesday: "Curfew remains in effect tonight 8 PM - 6 AM for Downtown Los Angeles to stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the President's chaotic escalation. If you do not live or work in Downtown L.A., avoid the area and follow guidance from law enforcement. Vandalism and violence will not be tolerated." What Happens Next There is a hearing scheduled for 1:30 p.m. Thursday to discuss the legality of the National Guard activation in Los Angeles.

NDP leader says Carney needs to keep Parliament in the loop on trade talks
NDP leader says Carney needs to keep Parliament in the loop on trade talks

Hamilton Spectator

time36 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

NDP leader says Carney needs to keep Parliament in the loop on trade talks

OTTAWA - Interim NDP Leader Don Davies is accusing Prime Minister Mark Carney of not being transparent about negotiations with the U.S. on getting President Donald Trump's tariffs lifted. Davies said Wednesday that Parliament has not been kept in the loop on what Carney and Trump are talking about behind closed doors, or whether Ottawa has involved stakeholders in negotiations with the U.S. 'Previous Liberal governments have made quite a deal out of appointing different stakeholders from society to be present in advising them. Yet we don't know anything about that in these negotiations,' Davies told reporters outside the House of Commons just ahead of question period. 'It's time that Carney government became more transparent with Canadians, let us know who's negotiating, and definitely explain to Canadians why he's pursuing deeper military and economic integration with the United States when he promised Canadians that he would do exactly the opposite.' Carney declared during the recent federal election that Canada's old relationship with the United States, based on deepening economic integration and military cooperation, had come to an end and he vowed to stand up to Trump in the face of steep U.S. tariffs. CBC/Radio-Canada reported earlier Wednesday that the U.S. and Canada are hashing out a 'working document' that outlines details of a potential trade deal and states that Canada will participate in Trump's Golden Dome missile defence project. The prime minister's office is neither confirming nor denying that report. Asked by reporters about talks on the U.S. tariffs, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the government's 'endgame' is to have all of Trump's tariffs removed, but he referred journalists to Carney and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc for the most up-to-date information. 'It's a very dynamic situation,' Champagne said. 'We've been engaging with our friends in the United States. You know, we talk to different people in the administration.' But Carney and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand breezed past reporters who shouted questions at them on Wednesday, while LeBlanc was not seen in Parliament. Ontario Premier Doug Ford publicly confirmed the secret, top-level discussions last week, saying that Carney and Trump are in 'deep discussions' on trade and working 'around the clock to get a deal.' 'They're right at the brink,' Ford said in Toronto on June 5. Pete Hoekstra, Trump's ambassador to Canada, said in an armchair talk at the Canadian Club of Ottawa on Wednesday that he thinks there's a 'possibility to have a great deal.' He said that 'all indications' are that the two countries could reach a 'very positive agreement,' but couched that 'there's also the possibility you could end up with something like no deal or whatever.' 'Until a deal is announced, you really won't know what's it in it,' Hoekstra said. Trump has insisted that Canada could join his unbuilt Golden Dome continental missile defence program at a cost of $61 billion. Carney confirmed last month that he is in talks with Trump about the project. 'It's something that we are looking at and something that has been discussed at a high level,' Carney said at a press conference in Ottawa on May 21. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025.

How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs
How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs

President Donald Trump and American business leaders this week celebrated a provision in his tax bill that would create and fund investment accounts for babies born in the next few years. The accounts would be allowed to compound and grow tax-deferred, similar to the way some retirement accounts work. 'In addition to the substantial financial benefits of investing early in life, extensive research shows that children with savings accounts are more likely to graduate high school and college, buy a home, start a business and are less likely to be incarcerated,' Trump said. 'Trump accounts will contribute to the lifelong success of millions of newborn babies.' Here's what you should know about these 'baby 401(k)s' and how they compare to other savings plans for children. The so-called Trump accounts are part of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that passed through the House of Representatives last month. Republicans are aiming to get the bill through the Senate and signed by Trump by July 4th. Here's how the accounts would work: The federal government would contribute $1,000 to an investment account for every American baby born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028. An additional $5,000 in after-tax contributions could be made annually to the accounts by parents, employers or other private entities. The money would be invested in index funds that track the overall U.S. stock market. Accounts would be controlled by a child's legal guardians until age 18. Earnings would grow tax-deferred and qualified withdrawals would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate. 'The compounded growth of an initial $1,000 investment at the time of birth, at an average annual return of 8 percent, would amount to nearly $4,000 by age 18, more than $10,000 by age 30, and over $148,000 by age 65,' according to Bankrate Chief Financial Analyst Greg McBride. 'The key to achieving this type of growth is leaving the money untouched. As Warren Buffett espouses, 'Never interrupt compounding.'' Several business leaders praised the accounts and said they'd make contributions to their employee's kids' accounts. 'We see … the establishment of these Trump Accounts as a simple yet powerful way to transform lives,' Dell Technologies CEO Michael Dell said. 'Decades of research has shown that giving children a financial head start profoundly impacts their long-term success.' Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Trump Accounts have some similarities with 529 savings plans, but there are some notable differences. Funding: Trump accounts would be initially funded by the federal government, while 529 plans are typically funded by parents, grandparents or other relatives. Withdrawals: Withdrawals from 529 plans are tax-free as long as they're used for qualified educational expenses. Withdrawals from Trump accounts would have fewer restrictions on their uses, but are taxed at long-term capital gains rates. Contribution limits: Annual contributions for Trump accounts would be limited to $5,000, while 529 plans allow for much higher limits, from about $235,000 to more than $600,000, depending on the state that sponsors the plan (these are lifetime limits; there's no annual limit for 529s). Many people assume that the maximum 529 plan contribution is $19,000 per child in 2025 — or $38,000 if you file jointly — but that's the maximum amount you can contribute without exceeding the annual gift tax limit. (If you give someone more than that limit in any given year, then you're required to file a gift tax return, though you likely still won't owe taxes on the gift.) Here's what else you should know about using a 529 plan to save for your kids' education. Compare advisors: Bankrate's list of the best financial advisors Custodial Roth IRAs also allow kids to set aside money and have it be invested so it grows over time. Here's how they compare to the proposed Trump accounts. Earned income requirement: Trump accounts would be funded at birth and allow for additional contributions each year, while custodial Roth IRAs require a child to have earned income during the year in order to contribute. Contribution limits: Custodial Roth IRA contributions are limited to $7,000 in 2025, or the total amount of earned income a child has during the year, whichever is less. Trump accounts would allow for annual contributions of $5,000. Taxes on withdrawals: Withdrawals from Roth IRAs during retirement are tax-free, while withdrawals from the proposed Trump accounts would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate. Here's more on custodial Roth IRAs. The proposed Trump Accounts would create new investment accounts for every American baby born in the next few years, funded with $1,000 from the federal government. The accounts would be invested in index funds that track the U.S. stock market and could receive additional contributions each year of $5,000 from private entities. The plan is subject to change as the bill makes its way through the legislative process. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store