Public praise, private pressure: How Europe hopes to steer Trump from wider war

Los Angeles Times

23-06-2025

THE HAGUE — Whether the United States launches a broader war against Iran after bombing its nuclear facilities may come down to President Trump's meetings with NATO partners this week at a summit of the alliance, a gathering long scheduled in the Netherlands now carrying far higher stakes.
So far, Washington's transatlantic partners have praised the U.S. operation, which supplemented an ongoing Israeli campaign targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure, air defenses and military leadership. But European officials told The Times their hope is to pull Trump back from any flirtation with regime change in Iran, a prospect that Trump and Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, have openly discussed in recent days.
Trump is scheduled to arrive in The Hague on Tuesday morning for two days of meetings, now expected to focus on the nascent crisis, as U.S. intelligence and military officials continue to assess the outcome of U.S. strikes over the weekend against Iran's main nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
NATO was directly involved in the last two U.S. wars in the Middle East, taking part in a U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 attacks and helping to train and advise security forces in Iraq. And while not a member of NATO, Israel coordinates with the security bloc through a process called the Mediterranean Dialogue, which includes work against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
At the Mauritshuis on Monday evening, overlooking The Hague's historic court pond and under the gaze of Vermeer's 'Girl with a Pearl Earring,' NATO officials, European military leaders and U.S. senators discussed the obvious: A summit that had been seen as an opportunity to show Trump that Europe is willing to pay more for its defense — with NATO members now committing to spend 5% of their GDP on military essentials and expenditures — will now be consumed instead with the possibility of a new war.
As the event was ending, Iran struck the U.S. military base in Qatar, its largest in the Middle East. But the Iranians gave Doha advance notice of the strike in an effort to avert casualties, the New York Times reported, indicating Tehran might be looking for an off-ramp from continuing escalation with Washington.
While the Pentagon said the U.S. bombing run, dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear infrastructure, American and Israeli officials acknowledged to The Times that it is not entirely clear how much equipment and fissile material Tehran was able to salvage before the attacks began.
And as concerns emerge that Iran may have been able to preserve a breakout capability, Israel's target list across Iran seemed to broaden on Monday to reflect military ambitions beyond Iran's nuclear program, including the headquarters of the Basij militia and a clock in downtown Tehran counting down to Israel's destruction.
'Trump spoke too soon,' said Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and Iran expert at the American Enterprise Institute, of Trump's declaration that the United States had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear capacity with its weekend strikes.
'We may have simply waited too long with our hand-wringing, and given the Iranians time to evacuate their enriched stockpiles. If so, that represents a failure of leadership,' he added, noting reports that trucks could be seen at the Fordow site leading up to the U.S. attack. 'If they then scattered and the U.S. intelligence community lost track of where they went, then that is an intelligence failure that could potentially be as costly as the one that preceded the Iraq war.'
European powers, particularly France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, have been careful to praise Trump for ordering the strikes. But they have also urged an immediate return to negotiations, and expressed concern that Israel has begun targeting sites tangential and unrelated to Iran's nuclear program.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, warning of 'volatility' in the region, encouraged Iran 'to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.' And Germany's foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, questioned whether Tehran's nuclear knowledge could be bombed away. 'No one thinks it's a good thing to keep fighting,' he told local media.
'I called for deescalation and for Iran to exercise the utmost restraint in this dangerous context, to allow a return to diplomacy,' said French President Emmanuel Macron. 'Engaging in dialogue and securing a clear commitment from Iran to renounce nuclear weapons are essential to avoid the worst for the entire region. There is no alternative.'
Later Monday, after Israel had struck Iran's notorious Evin prison, where foreign nationals are held, France's foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, issued a more scathing rebuke. 'All strikes must now stop,' he said.
One European official said that efforts would be made once Trump arrives to underscore his military successes, noting the example he has made — using military force to deter an authoritarian foe — could still be applied to Russia in its war against Ukraine. Now that Trump has demonstrated peace through strength, the official said, it is time to give diplomacy another chance.
But it's unclear if Iran would be receptive to pleas for a diplomatic breakthrough.
In a post on X on Sunday, Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, noted that Israel's attacks last week and the U.S. strikes this week coincided with negotiations, torpedoing any chance for talks to succeed.
'Last week, we were in negotiations with the U.S. when Israel decided to blow up that diplomacy. This week, we held talks with the E3/E.U. when the U.S. decided to blow up that diplomacy,' he wrote, adding that calls to European calls to bring Iran to negotiations were misplaced. The E3 represents France, Germany and Italy.
'How can Iran return to something it never left, let alone blew up?' he added.
On Monday, before its strikes against the U.S. base in Qatar, Iranian military leaders vowed vengeance against the United States for the strikes.
The retaliation 'will impose severe, regret-inducing, and unpredictable consequences on you,' said Lt. Col. Ebrahim Zolfaqari, head of the Iranian military's central command headquarters, in a video statement on Iranian broadcaster Press TV. He added that the U.S. attack 'will expand the range of legitimate and diverse targets for Iran's armed forces.'
Times staff writer Nabih Bulos, in Beirut, contributed to this report.