
Glasgow £7.7bn smaller under SNP, says Darren Jones
The Labour MP compared its performance to Greater Manchester, which grew by nearly 50% between 2014 and 2022.
'If the Glasgow City Region had achieved that same level of growth, it would be £7.7bn larger today,' he said.
The council disputed Mr Jones's figures, and said recent economic data showed the Glasgow City Region outpaced both Greater Manchester and the West Midlands in growth in recent years.
READ MORE
His comments came after Susan Aitken, the leader of the SNP administration in Glasgow, wrote to Scottish Secretary Ian Murray to express her 'disappointment' that Rachel Reeves had failed to offer a devolution deal for the region.
She said the UK Government had 'disempowered' the city.
The Chancellor's Spending Review included detailed commitments to expand integrated settlements for English city regions.
Instead of having to bid for different pots of money, some areas in England now get one large, flexible budget they can spend over several years.
This means local mayors have more freedom to decide how to invest in things like housing, transport and skills.
Chief Secretary Darren Jones arrives in Downing Street (Image: Stefan Rousseau) After the latest Spending Review, this kind of funding is being extended to London, the North East, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire and the Liverpool City Region.
They will join Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, which already have these deals. In total, it means four in ten people in England will live in places where local leaders control how money is spent on growing the economy and improving public services.
Ms Aitken said the lack of a similar deal for Glasgow meant it would be 'reduced to simply administering programmes on behalf of UK Government as if it were a small local authority'.
She added: 'The empowerment of our comparator city regions in England and the disempowerment of Glasgow City Region threatens all of the progress we have made.'
READ MORE
In his column, Mr Jones said Glasgow had not been 'sidelined' in the Spending Review, pointing to £1.7 billion of potential investment from a new investment zone, £250 million for Faslane, and millions more for town centre regeneration in communities across the region — including Drumchapel, Coatbridge, Greenock and Clydebank.
He said: 'I could continue to list the monetary value of UK Government investments for Glasgow and Scotland, but I know that when it comes to changing things, power can be just as important as pounds.
'Progress made in Greater Manchester and the West Midlands is proof that our big city regions can do more when they have greater control over funding and decisions in their areas.
'But in Scotland, the decision to devolve power from Holyrood and empower the city regions rests firmly with the Scottish Government.
'I know that Anas Sarwar and my colleagues in Scottish Labour have begun to set out plans for directly elected mayors, with powers over skills and transport, so they can turbocharge growth in their cities and regions.
'This is the kind of fresh thinking that cities such as Glasgow deserve.
"This is in contrast to years of the SNP centralising power in Holyrood and cutting funding to Scotland's councils."
Glasgow Council Leader Susan Aitken hit back at the Treasury ministerCllr Aitken welcomed Mr Jones's recognition of the value of city region devolution, but accused him of implying that the UK Government would only agree to such a deal for Scottish cities if Labour won next year's Holyrood election.
She said: 'Darren Jones is absolutely right to say that the devolution of resources to our city regions is essential to drive growth and innovation — and that Greater Manchester and the West Midlands are now, clearly, starting to reap the benefits of the deals they have been handed by the UK Government.
'That is exactly why Glasgow City Region wants the same backing — and why I am disappointed to see him imply that the UK Government's willingness to support Glasgow and Edinburgh depends on the result of next year's Scottish Parliament elections.
'Glasgow's city region partners know very well that many of the administrative powers we are seeking rest with the Scottish Government — which is why the proposition we have made has been made jointly to both of our governments, at Holyrood and Westminster.
'The Chief Secretary is, however, rather evading the point — which is that the UK Government is continuing to give the impression that it is not prepared to back cities in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland with the kind of single-pot funding deal that is being offered to their English counterparts.
'Simply pulling together a list of previously committed funding — most of it announced by the previous government — does not come anywhere close to giving Scottish cities what our English counterparts will benefit from.'
The city council also disputed Mr Jones's figures, pointing to recent data which showed that in 2023, the Glasgow City Region recorded growth of 10.8% — higher than Greater Manchester on 10.2% and the West Midlands on 9.5%.
Unemployment in the region fell to just 2.9% in 2024, compared to 5.0% in Greater Manchester and 6.4% in the West Midlands.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
30 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
HMRC and DWP benefits to help parents and children
It comes as research reveals that UK parents now spend an average of £2,275 a year just to send one child to a state secondary school, with primary school costs also topping £1,000 annually. That's a jump of £520 in just three years, with families facing bigger bills for uniforms, tech, lunchboxes and lesson materials. 'Parents are under huge pressure with school costs climbing year after year, but there's more support out there than many people realise," says Fiona Peake, Personal Finance Expert at Ocean Finance. "The problem is, it's not always clearly signposted, so families end up missing out on hundreds of pounds in potential savings. 'With a bit of forward planning, there are real opportunities to cut costs before September, whether it's through government schemes, council support, or simply rethinking how you shop for essentials. Don't wait until the August rush. Start looking now, and you'll not only spread the cost, but give yourself the best chance of finding proper support before it's snapped up.' Tax-Free Childcare The government is urging more working families to sign up - and give their summer plans a financial boost. The money helps families pay for their childcare, as part of the government's Plan for Change to put more money in people's pockets. Working families who sign up to Tax-Free Childcare can boost their annual budget by up to £2,000 per child up to the age of 11 or up to £4,000 up to the age of 16 for a disabled child. Parents! 👪 Could you be missing out on up to £2,000 a year to help with childcare costs? Find out what you're entitled to here. 👇 — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) May 23, 2025 Parents can use the scheme to help towards the cost of approved childcare whether that's nursery for younger children, or for older children – wraparound or after school care clubs during term time or holiday clubs for the long summer holidays ahead. Martin Lewis discussed it on his podcast last month, where he said: "Tax free childcare is where you can put money into an account held at and for every 80p you put in the state adds 20p on top, up to a maximum free money of £500 pounds coming from the state per quarter - with double for disabilities. And this is tax free childcare for children under the age of 11." 30 hours funded childcare for working parents From September 2025, English working families will see 15 hours of funded childcare expand to 30 hours, from the term after their child turns 9 months until they reach school age. If you currently receive 15 hours for working families, just reconfirm as usual and the code will work for the 30 hours offer in September, providing you remain eligible and your provider has confirmed your new attendance pattern for your increased hours. You can usually get funded childcare for working parents if you (and your partner, if you have one) are: in work or starting a new job on sick leave or annual leave on shared parental, maternity, paternity or adoption leave The amount of funded childcare you can get depends on: your child's age and circumstances your income (and your partner's income, if you have one) your immigration status If you are not eligible for the working parent offer you will still receive the 15 hour entitlement for all 3 and 4 year olds from the term after your child turns 3 until they start school, irrespective of your income level, benefit status, or family circumstances. There's more details on here. Universal Credit help with childcare costs You may be able to reclaim up to 85% of childcare costs if you receive Universal Credit. Yu can't combine it with tax-free childcare though - so do a calculation on to work out which is best for you. Fiona Peake, Personal Finance Expert at Ocean Finance, says: 'Working parents on Universal Credit can claim back up to 85% of childcare costs, even during school holidays. That's up to £1,000 for one child or £1,800 for two, paid through your Universal Credit account. This often works out better than Tax-Free Childcare, especially for larger families.' Child Benefit Following the increases to the Child Benefit threshold from £50,000 to £60,000, many more families can now claim. The upper earnings limit has also increased from £60,000 to £80,000. You get Child Benefit if you're responsible for bringing up a child who is: under 16 or under 20, if they stay in approved education or training If either you or your partner's income (after deductions) is over the £80,000 threshold, you may have to pay the High Income Child Benefit Charge. This income is before any personal allowances and Gift Aid, but includes interest from savings and dividends. Work out if your adjusted net income is over the threshold using the Child Benefit tax calculator. If it is, the calculator will also tell you how much charge you'll have to pay. HMRC is also running a campaign to get parents to register their 16-19 years olds for continuing Child Benefit if they are staying on in full-time education after GCSEs. It's #GCSE season! 📚 If your teen is continuing education or training after their exams, you'll need to let us know. Use our online service to update your Child Benefit claim to keep receiving payments. 💻 — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) June 12, 2025 Free school meals Your child may be able to get free school meals if you get any of the following: Income Support income-based Jobseeker's Allowance income-related Employment and Support Allowance support under Part VI of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 the guaranteed element of Pension Credit Child Tax Credit (provided you're not also entitled to Working Tax Credit and have an annual gross income of no more than £16,190) Working Tax Credit run-on - paid for 4 weeks after you stop qualifying for Working Tax Credit Universal Credit - if you apply on or after 1 April 2018 your household income must be less than £7,400 a year (after tax and not including any benefits you get) Children who get paid these benefits directly, instead of through a parent or guardian, can also get free school meals. Your child may also get free school meals if you get any of these benefits and your child is both: younger than the compulsory age for starting school in full-time education If you do not qualify for most benefits (also known as having 'no recourse to public funds'), your child may still be eligible for free school meals. Ask their school or local authority whether they're eligible. Check if your child can get free school meals in England and find out how to apply on your local authority's website - here's how. There's a different process to apply for free school meals in Northern Ireland, free school meals in Scotland, or free school meals in Wales. If your child is eligible for free school meals, they'll also qualify for the Holiday Activity and Food Programme. Food vouchers may also be available through the Household Support Fund. Find out more by contacting your local council. Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for children Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for children may help with the extra costs of looking after a child who: is under 16 has difficulties walking or needs much more looking after than a child of the same age who does not have a disability They will need to meet all the eligibility requirements. The DLA rate is between £29.20 and £187.45 a week and depends on the level of help the child needs. Morning, we're here until 4pm to answer any general queries. No personal details please. ❎ Parents! 👪 If your child has recently turned 18, they may have a #ChildTrustFund, worth an average of £2,200. Find out more about how they can cash this in. 👇 — HMRC Customer Support (@HMRCcustomers) June 7, 2025 Healthy Start vouchers If you're more than 10 weeks pregnant or have a child under 4, the Healthy Start scheme can help you: buy healthy foods like milk or fruit get free vitamins You need to be claiming certain benefits to qualify. If you're pregnant and under 18 you can claim even if you do not receive any benefits. For more information or to apply, visit the NHS Healthy Start website. Sure Start Maternity Grant or Pregnancy and Baby Payment You could get a one-off payment of £500 to help towards the costs of having a child. This is known as a Sure Start Maternity Grant, in Scotland it's called a Pregnancy and Baby Payment. You usually qualify for the grant if both of the following apply: you're expecting your first child, or you're expecting a multiple birth (such as twins) and have children already you or your partner already get certain benefits You must claim the grant within 11 weeks of the baby's due date or within 6 months after the baby's birth. You do not have to pay the grant back and it will not affect your other benefits or tax credits. Child maintenance For separated parents, child maintenance covers how your child's living costs will be paid when one of the parents does not live with the child. Child maintenance is made when you've separated from the other parent or if you've never been in a relationship. You must have a child maintenance arrangement if your child is under 16 (or under 20 if they are in approved education or training). Home Responsibilities Protection This is more one to help parents with older kids, or even adults, but it's well worth knowing about. Home Responsibilities Protection is a scheme which could be worth an extra £100,000 or more to state pensioners when they retire. In a post on X, it said: "If you became a parent before May 2000, you may have Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) missing from your National Insurance record. This could mean you're missing out on State Pension payments." For someone with 13 missing years, who lives for another 20 years, it can be worth as much as £100,000 or more in State Pension payments. If you became a parent before May 2000, you may have Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) missing from your National Insurance record. This could mean you're missing out on State Pension payments. Check if you can apply for HRP below. ⬇️ — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) May 19, 2025 Most people got HRP automatically if they were: getting Child Benefit in their name for a child under the age of 16 and they had given the Child Benefit Office their National Insurance number getting Income Support and they did not need to register for work because they were caring for someone who was sick or disabled If your partner claimed Child Benefit instead of you, you may be able to transfer HRP from a partner you lived with if they claimed Child Benefit while you both cared for a child under 16 and they do not need the HRP. If you reached State Pension age before 6 April 2008, you cannot transfer HRP. The Ads claimed young people had "nothing to lose" by using its services, despite the firm charging possibly £100s for its services when Child Trust Funds can be reclaimed for free via HMRChttps:// — MoneySavingExpert (@MoneySavingExp) May 29, 2025 Child Trust Funds Again, this is one for older kids and young adults. Recent figures suggest £1.4bn belonging to 728,000 people is sitting in Child Trust Funds, ready to be claimed. But many do not know the accounts exist, or that they are eligible to withdraw it. In a tweet from its official account, HMRC said: "If your child is between the ages of 18 and 22, they can cash in their #ChildTrustFund. The average amount claimed is £2,200." The Share Foundation, a charity which helps people track down lost and unclaimed funds, is also calling for automatic payouts for some of these funds if they've not been claimed by the time the account holders turn 21. Martin Lewis, and others, have warned that young people don't need to use the services of agencies to get at their trust funds - it's easy to go direct and avoid fees. Recommended reading And one not to hold out for - reversal of VAT on school fees A group of private schools, pupils and their parents lost their High Court challenges over the imposition of VAT on school fees. Several schools, children who attend them and their parents, previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law. A Government spokesperson said: 'We welcome the court's decision, which confirms that the legislation is compatible with the Government's human rights obligations. 'Ending tax breaks for private schools will raise £1.8 billion a year, helping to support public services including the 94% of pupils who attend state schools.'


NBC News
33 minutes ago
- NBC News
British lawmakers vote to decriminalize abortion amid concern about the prosecution of women
LONDON — British lawmakers voted Tuesday to decriminalize abortion in England and Wales after a lawmaker argued it was cruel to prosecute women for ending a pregnancy. The House of Commons approved an amendment to a broader crime bill that would prevent women from being criminally punished under an antiquated law. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said the change was needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help,' she said. 'Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.' The amendment passed 379-137. The House of Commons will now need to pass the crime bill, which is expected, before it goes to the House of Lords, where it can be delayed but not blocked. Under current law, doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalized in 2019. Changes in the law implemented during the Covid-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within the first 10 weeks. That has led to a handful of widely publicized cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more. Anti-abortion groups opposed the measures, arguing it would open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy. 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers,' said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the U.K.'s biggest pro-life campaign group. The debate came after recent prosecutions have galvanized support to repeal parts of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act. In one case, a mother of three was sentenced to more than two years in prison in 2023 for medically inducing an abortion about eight months into her pregnancy. Carla Foster, 45, was released about a month later by an appeals court that reduced her sentence. Judge Victoria Sharp said that case called for 'compassion, not punishment' and there was no useful purpose in jailing her. Last month, a jury acquitted Nicola Packer on a charge of unlawfully self-administering poison or a noxious thing with intent to procure a miscarriage. Packer, who took abortion medicine when she was about 26 weeks pregnant, testified that she did not know she had been pregnant more than 10 weeks. Supporters of the bill said it was a landmark reform that would keep women from going to prison for ending their pregnancy. 'At a time when we're seeing rollbacks on reproductive rights, most notably in the United States, this crucial milestone in the fight for reproductive rights sends a powerful message that our lawmakers are standing up for women,' said Louise McCudden of MSI Reproductive Choices. A second amendment that would have gone even further than Antoniazzi's proposal, barring the prosecution of medical professionals and others who help women abort their fetuses, did not get to a vote. A competing Conservative measure that would have required an in-person appointment for a pregnant woman to get abortion pills was defeated.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Supreme Court gender ruling: Scottish ministers given deadline over single-sex spaces legal action
The Scottish Government now has 14 days to respond to the legal warning. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scottish ministers have been given a deadline to update their single-sex spaces guidelines or risk being taken back to court. For Women Scotland has issued a 'letter before action' to the Scottish Government, warning ministers they will be back in the dock if they do not immediately update its guidance on single-sex spaces following the UK Supreme Court gender ruling. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Back in April, the UK's highest court ruled in favour of For Women Scotland in its legal case against Scottish ministers. For Women Scotland members (Maya Forstater centre) celebrate outside the UK Supreme Court. |. The verdict ruled that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refers to biological sex only. Since then there have been calls for trans women to not be allowed to use female-only spaces such as toilets and changing rooms. However the Scottish Government has said it is waiting for updated guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission before issuing new guidance on single-sex spaces. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Maya Forstater from Sex Matters says the legal letter has been issued because the government is 'dragging its feet'. Speaking to BBC Good Morning Scotland, she said: 'The Supreme Court made the law absolutely clear - men are male and women are female, and both have rights to dignity and privacy in things like toilets, changing rooms and specialist services like women's refuges. 'The Scottish Government is dragging its feet. 'It hasn't changed its policy which is exposing women and girls to harassment because of their sex. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It creates a hostile environment for women and girls and that is unlawful.' Ms Forstater claims the government has a responsibility to comply with the law 'from the day the Supreme Court made its judgement'. She also suggested trans people should be asked to use unisex disabled toilets as 'gender dysphoria can be classed as a disability'. Ms Forstater added: 'They're passing the buck. They need to comply with the law now to protect women and girls from being in a humiliating and degrading situation, which is what happens if you allow men into women's changing rooms, showers and toilets. 'There is no reason to wait.'