Anthony Albanese's government not ruling out a four-day working week for Australians
The idea is expected to be discussed at a three-day productivity roundtable in August, where strategies to strengthen Australia's economy will be debated.
Major business groups have already submitted their proposals to the roundtable, advocating for a corporate tax cut as a means to drive productivity and economic growth.
Meanwhile, the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) are pushing for a better work-life balance.
AMWU national secretary Steve Murphy argued that reducing work hours through options such as a four-day week, a nine-day fortnight, or a 35-hour week could be key to improving productivity without reducing pay.
'Where we would like it to get is that there is a much more healthy balance between time at work and time with your family and time for leisure than what it is right now,' Mr Murphy said.
On Sunrise on Tuesday, Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek declined to rule out the four-day week when asked directly by host Monique Wright.
'Could we be seeing a four-day working week,' Wright asked.
'Well, we'll listen to all views respectfully,' Plibersek said.
'The Treasurer's roundtable on productivity, I think is a great way of bringing unions and business and other groups together to discuss how we make our economy stronger and more productive.
'What we won't be doing to improve productivity is ask people to work longer for less.
'We want to invest in our people, boost training, invest in technologies and new ways of working, make sure that we're playing to our competitive advantages as a nation.
'That's how we boost productivity.'
Speaking about the upcoming productivity roundtable, Mr Albanese said he wanted businesses, unions and civil society to put forward practical measures that have 'as broad a support as possible'.
'If you had a choice between, do you have less things with more support, or more things with less broad support, then I'm in favour of the former,' Albanese said.
'The danger in something like that is you just have a list (of things) that aren't progressed.'
Treasurer Jim Chalmers will convene the three-day roundtable from August 19 in Canberra, along with representatives from businesses, unions, community organisations and experts.
Representatives from the Australian Council of Trade Unions have received four of 24 invitations to the upcoming economic reform roundtable.
The roundtable will also include delegates from the Business Council, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and the Australian Industry Group, among others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia
WASHINGTON/CANBERRA/CHICAGO, July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said that the United States would sell "so much" beef to Australia after Canberra relaxed import restrictions on Thursday, but economists and traders said that high prices and tight supplies make major American exports unlikely. Australia said it would loosen biosecurity rules for U.S. beef. The move will not significantly increase U.S. shipments, though, because Australia is a major beef producer and exporter whose prices are much lower, analysts said. U.S. companies export small quantities of beef to Australian buyers. They import much more in the form of lean beef used to make hamburgers, particularly as U.S. production has declined due to tight cattle supplies. U.S. beef prices set records this year and the number of beef cattle fell to the lowest level since 1961 after ranchers slashed their herds due to drought that burned up pasturelands used for grazing. A ban on cattle imports from Mexico because of New World screwworm, a devastating livestock pest, and steep tariffs on Brazilian beef that are set to take effect on Aug. 1 could further tighten supplies, and require additional imports of Australian beef. "We can't get enough beef in the U.S. right now, so we're bringing it in from Australia and Brazil," said Dan Norcini, an independent U.S. livestock trader. "We're not going to be selling anything significant to anyone." Last year, Australia shipped almost 400,000 metric tons of beef worth $2.9 billion to the United States, with just 269 tons of U.S. product moving the other way. "They have more cattle than people," said David Anderson, an agricultural economist at Texas A&M University. "That's why they export so much." U.S. and Australian beef also taste different. Many Australians like the grass-fed beef raised there, not marbled beef from U.S.-raised cattle that are generally fed with grain, said Jerry Klassen, chief analyst for Resilient Capital in Winnipeg. He predicted the United States will not export substantial amounts of beef to Australia in the next five years. "We just aren't in a position to export much beef to anyone, and the reality is Australia doesn't really have much need for U.S. beef," said Karl Setzer, partner at Consus Ag. The barriers that remain to exporting significant volumes of U.S. beef to Australia appeared to be lost on Trump this week. "We are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that U.S. Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE." Trump has attempted to renegotiate trade deals with numerous countries he says have taken advantage of the United States – a characterisation many economists dispute. "For decades, Australia imposed unjustified barriers on U.S. beef," U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement, calling Australia's decision a "major milestone in lowering trade barriers and securing market access for U.S. farmers and ranchers." Australian officials say the relaxation of restrictions was not part of any trade negotiations but the result of a years-long assessment of U.S. biosecurity practices. Canberra has restricted U.S. beef imports since 2003 due to concerns about bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease. Since 2019, it has allowed in meat from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S. but few suppliers were able to prove that their cattle had not been in Canada and Mexico. The U.S. sources some of its feeder cattle from the two neighboring countries. On Wednesday, Australia's agriculture ministry said U.S. cattle traceability and control systems had improved enough that Australia could accept beef from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the United States. The decision has caused some concern in Australia, where biosecurity is seen as essential to prevent diseases and pests from ravaging the farm sector. "We need to know if (the government) is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump," shadow agriculture minister David Littleproud said in a statement. Australia faces a 10% across-the-board U.S. tariff, as well 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium. Trump has also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Asked whether the change would help achieve a trade deal, Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said: "I'm not too sure." "We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement," he said. "We think that they should do that anyway."
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia's parliament opens with tradition and pageantry – plus a sideshow of protest and reactionary zeal
Just as the governor general, Sam Mostyn, was preparing to address the ceremonial opening of federal parliament this week, word got around the press gallery that One Nation was preparing to mount a stunt. Along with veterans Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts, One Nation's two new senators, Warwick Stacey from New South Wales and Tyron Whitten from Western Australia, had quietly let it be known they would turn their back on the Indigenous acknowledgment of country. Tuesday's opening was dominated by tradition and pageantry, including a welcome to country event in the Great Hall and a smoking ceremony on the forecourt earlier in the afternoon. Usually sparsely occupied, the Senate press gallery was packed with reporters but, initially at least, One Nation's statement failed to eventuate. During the speech – a laundry list of the government's policy commitments for the upcoming term, read by the king's representative in Canberra – Greens deputy leader, Mehreen Faruqi, held up a sign protesting against the starvation and suffering caused by Israel's denial of aid for Palestinians in Gaza. That move saw Faruqi sanctioned by the Senate a day later. Labor and the Coalition voted to bar her from taking part in any overseas parliamentary delegations for the next three years, and the Senate president, Sue Lines, called her 'utterly disrespectful' to Mostyn. The debate was at times bitter. Later, as the normal business of parliament got under way at about 5pm, the One Nation foursome turned their backs as Lines made the routine acknowledgment of Canberra's traditional custodians, the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people, and Indigenous elders around the country. The statement took barely 10 seconds, before Hanson, Roberts, Stacey and Whitten were forced into an awkward pivot to avoid snubbing the Lord's Prayer. Sign up: AU Breaking News email For decades, Hanson has weaponised the politics of grievance, including punching down on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. She was on Sky on Tuesday evening to say she was fed up with the practice of acknowledging Indigenous communities, erroneously calling the brief statement a welcome to country, before claiming the longstanding practice somehow 'disenfranchised' her. In reality, the stunt wasn't for the press gallery or other members, but rather it was orchestrated to be quickly packaged up for One Nation's social media followers. Ironically, Hanson then criticised Victorian independent senator Lidia Thorpe for making protests that disrupt parliamentary traditions in Canberra, before claiming it was Labor that was driving division in the community. Sky host Chris Kenny pointed out that some people consider the acknowledgment overdone elsewhere but it was surely appropriate at the start of a sitting of the country's parliament. He suggested participation by Hanson's crew would be the polite approach. The firebrand senator was unmoved. Not to be outdone, Coalition MPs did their best to overshadow Sussan Ley's first question time as opposition leader in the lower house, with Nationals backbenchers Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack making a splash on their new partnership to officially oppose net zero some time this year. Joyce has a private member's bill on the issue, and despite reviews being under way in both the Liberal and Nationals party rooms, he and McCormack came out to call plans to wind back damaging carbon emissions 'insane'. Farmers, they claimed, are fed up with infrastructure for renewable energy taking up prime agricultural land – the MPs failed to acknowledge that drought, floods and less predictable rain patterns caused by climate change are making life for farmers worse. Some Coalition figures consider net zero one of the most politically complex issues facing the Liberals and Nationals in decades, with both parties facing a likely impossible task of trying to reconcile disparate policies in time for the next election. One Nationals figure compared the two former leaders to old bulls bored after being put out to pasture. The rightwing MPs determined to keep fighting the climate wars look out of touch, long after voters have made up their minds on the subject. It shouldn't be lost on anyone that both Joyce and McCormack have previously argued for net zero and Labor's ascendancy could render the Coalition's policy position pretty meaningless for at least three – possibly six – years to come. By Friday, the Liberal Senate leader, Michaelia Cash, was arguing against acknowledgment of country and the Aboriginal flag being displayed at official events. Cash endorsed motions to be debated at the weekend's WA Liberal state council, also set to include a push to abandon net zero endorsed by frontbencher Andrew Hastie. For her part, Ley, who says she wants the Coalition to better reflect the modern Australia it seeks to represent, was gracious in acknowledging symbolic and practical recognition of Indigenous Australians this week. She called for the ceremonial welcome by Indigenous leaders to 'set the tone' for MPs as they seek practical action to improve lives and expand opportunity for Indigenous people around the country. Liberal figures were downcast about the atmospherics of renewed culture war fights on the flag, Indigenous recognition and net zero, asking why MPs would waste valuable political capital to speak outside their portfolios. One called the antics 'a sideshow' and suggested more discipline was necessary to bring the fight to Labor. It might be only a few months on from the 3 May election, but Hanson and the outspoken members of the Coalition have failed to appreciate that Anthony Albanese won the centre by focusing on the issues that voters see as critical to making their lives better. Ley's predecessor, Peter Dutton, lost in part because voters were turned off by his attacks on Indigenous recognition and Trump-style division and obstruction. Even many who find statements of acknowledgment overdone at public events or in meetings at work don't want parliament turned into a sideshow of reactionary zeal. Both the Coalition and Labor's election reviews will show Dutton's campaign aggression and intolerance unsettled voters, including those who might otherwise have been open to voting for the Coalition. Mostyn said it best in her speech to the Senate. While acknowledging the challenges of the past and urging renewed action to close the Indigenous disadvantage gap, she called for all Australians to 'approach the path forward together with determination, humility and optimism'. It might be a long three years.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
NSW real estate agents threaten renters with fees if they are not home for tradespeople – but legally they don't have to be
New South Wales real estate agents are threatening renters with fees as high as $330 if they are not at home to let maintenance workers in, despite there being no legal requirement for renters to personally allow entry. On 8 July, Lauren Gillin's agency told her she needed to be home during a two-and-a-half-hour window seven days from that date to allow access for a smoke alarm inspector or pay a $90 fee. 'Please make yourself available, this inspection is compulsory, and access must be provided,' Gillin's property manager at Rich & Oliva said in a letter seen by Guardian Australia. 'Should access not be made available, a fee of $90 will be incurred for re-inspection.' In a statement, a NSW Fair Trading spokesperson said real estate agents must provide two days' notice for 'non-urgent repairs or inspection of a smoke alarm'. However, 'there is no requirement for the tenant to be in the property for the inspection,' the spokesperson confirmed. Further, 'the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) limits fees and charges a landlord or agent can ask a tenant to pay, with only certain payments such as rent, rental bond and other prescribed fees allowed to be charged'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Gillin, a media manager at a community legal centre who lives in Haberfield in Sydney's inner west, said she was disappointed by the letter. 'It's an unreasonable request to be home for 2.5 hours on a weekday.' Tenants of an apartment block in the city's eastern suburbs received a similar notice from a different real estate agency, which Guardian Australia has chosen not to identify because renters said they were worried about the potential consequences. That agency wrote to the tenants in June, in an email seen by Guardian Australia, telling them they needed to be home on a day late that month between 9.30am and 10.30am for a mandatory fire safety inspection. The email warned that any failure to give access to the home would result in a re-inspection fee of $330 and advised the tenants to organise someone on their behalf to allow access if they could not do so. The Tenants' Union of NSW chief executive officer, Leo Patterson Ross, said the $90 charge Gillin faced did not 'strictly have any basis' because the agent or landlord could still give access to the smoke alarm inspector by organising entry. 'As long as the tenant hasn't actively prevented them from entering the property, then there's no basis for that charge,' he said. Patterson Ross said the $330 fee faced by residents of the eastern suburbs apartment block was 'pretty much the exact same situation' – there was no legal basis for the charge. 'The agent, probably, in a building like that where there's a lot of people, they don't want to spend their whole day walking around all the apartments,' he said. 'But there's nothing stopping them from doing that.' Patterson Ross said more than 2,100 people contacted the tenants' union in 2024 for advice about access issues. He said he regularly spoke to renters who had been threatened with fees for supposedly not allowing access to their homes, who assumed the charges were legitimate. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'No one's told the agent they can't do it and it becomes normal and then they train other people and it becomes process without anyone really checking whether it's compliant with the law,' Patterson Ross said. 'Generally, a lot of the pressure of enforcing the legislation is falling on the tenant at the moment.' Gillin said she tried to raise her concerns with one of the Rich & Olivia staff members, but did not feel the issue was resolved. The company did not respond to Guardian Australia's request for comment. On 8 July, Gillin lodged a complaint with the agency. In the email, seen by Guardian Australia, Gillin said her experience with the agency had otherwise 'been really positive' which made the letter she got from them 'all the more surprising'. She followed up on 9 July, citing legal advice she had received from the tenants' union and the NSW rental commissioner, Trina Jones, that she did not need to be at home during a smoke alarm inspection. Jones told Guardian Australia that a fee for not being present during a smoke alarm inspection could not legally be passed on to tenants. She said the state's rental taskforce – which was created earlier this year – contacted Gillin's agent to advise them of their responsibilities under the law and make clear the charge was not permitted. 'Illegal fees and charges remain an issue in the sector,' Jones said. 'Since January, the Rental Taskforce has overseen refunds of $165,303 to renters who were charged unlawful fees.' On Wednesday, Gillin said the smoke alarm technician let her know they had got a key from the agency to let themselves into the property. But she said the agency still had not responded to her complaint.
