Lupita Nyong'o speaks out about painful experience with uterine fibroids. What are they — and who do they affect?
Nyong'o revealed that in 2014, the same year she won an Academy Award for her performance in 12 Years a Slave, she was diagnosed with 30 uterine fibroids and underwent surgery to remove them. When she asked her doctor how to prevent them from returning, she was told there was nothing she could do — it was only a matter of time before they would likely grow back.
As Nyong'o explained in the post, uterine fibroids are noncancerous growths in or around the uterus, ranging in size from a pea to a melon. They can cause symptoms like heavy bleeding, pelvic pain and pregnancy complications — though some people have no symptoms at all. Despite affecting eight in 10 Black women and seven in 10 white women, fibroids are rarely talked about.
'When we reach puberty, we're taught that periods mean pain, and that pain is simply part of being a woman,' Nyong'o wrote. However, when the actress started talking about her experience privately, she realized so many women were also suffering.
'We're struggling alone with something that affects most of us. No more suffering in silence,' the post continued. 'We need to stop treating this massive issue like a series of unfortunate coincidences. We must reject the normalization of female pain. I envision a future with early education for teenagers, better screening protocols, robust prevention research, and less invasive treatments for uterine fibroids.'
She left readers with a call to action: 'Let's study women's health and prioritize this chronic condition that has never been comprehensively examined,' she wrote.
The comments section on Nyong'o's post was full of people who applauded her for speaking out.
'Mine were literally making me crazy,' one commenter wrote. 'The pain, the periods, etc. I opted to have a hysterectomy last year, and it's been life-changing.'
Another added, 'Had two surgeries for removal and had my hysterectomy in 10/2023. I could have avoided so much pain with a correct diagnosis when I was young.'
A third shared that she also had surgery in 2021, after she bled for four months consecutively. 'I was in so much pain,' she wrote. 'Thank you for speaking on this.'
And Nyong'o is doing more than just speaking out: In the caption of the post, she said she joined members of Congress on July 15 in Washington, D.C., to introduce a package of bills aimed at expanding research funding, improving early detection and treatment, studying uterine cancer causes and raising public awareness.
One of the lawmakers involved in that effort is Rep. Shontel Brown, who shared a photo with the star on her Instagram and wrote in the caption, 'Honored to stand alongside @lupitanyongo today on Capitol Hill to speak out about uterine health — a critical issue impacting so many women. Silence saves no one. It's time we raise our voices and demand better awareness, research, and care. #uterinehealthawareness.'
Rep. Yvette Clarke and Sen. Angela Alsobrooks posted similar messages on Instagram about working with the actress on this issue.
Additionally, Nyong'o partnered with the Foundation for Women's Health to launch the FWH x Lupita Nyong'o Uterine Fibroid Research Grant, which will fund the development of minimally or non-invasive treatments to help improve quality of life for '15 million patients suffering from this chronic condition in the U.S. alone.'
As Nyong'o explained in her post, uterine fibroids are benign tumors that develop in or around the uterus, most commonly during the reproductive years. They don't increase the risk of uterine cancer and rarely become cancerous, but they can vary widely in size and number — from tiny, undetectable nodules to large masses. They are typically discovered with a routine pelvic exam or an ultrasound.
Many people with fibroids don't experience symptoms, but for those who do, symptoms can include heavy menstrual bleeding; painful, long or frequent periods; pelvic pain or pressure; difficulties urinating; constipation; back pain and pain during sex. In extreme cases, uterine fibroids grow large enough to fill the pelvis or abdomen, sometimes causing visible swelling and discomfort and pain.
Maria Sophocles, a gynecologist and sexual medicine specialist at Women's Healthcare of Princeton told PureWow in 2023 that fibroids can 'cause such heavy bleeding that they can make you anemic and can even lead to such severe anemia that you can need a blood transfusion."
Fibroids affect about 40% to 80% of people with a uterus. They are most likely to develop between the ages of 30 and 50, as they're rare after menopause and before puberty, according to the Cleveland Clinic.
Several factors can increase the risk of developing fibroids, including obesity or a higher body mass index, a family history of fibroids and not having children. Starting menstruation at a young age and experiencing menopause later in life are also linked to a higher likelihood of developing them.
Treatment for uterine fibroids, according to the Cleveland Clinic, often starts with medication to manage symptoms like pain and heavy bleeding. Over-the-counter pain relievers like ibuprofen can help with discomfort, while iron supplements may be recommended if fibroids cause anemia. Hormonal birth control can reduce bleeding and cramps, and other medications — such as some newer oral therapies — can shrink fibroids or control bleeding, though the effects may be temporary.
There are also treatments like uterine fibroid embolization that shrink fibroids by cutting off their blood supply. However, these options may affect the uterus and aren't typically recommended for people who want to have children in the future as they can impact fertility.
Surgery, of the type that Nyong'o had, is also an option to treat fibroids. A myomectomy removes fibroids while keeping the uterus intact. A hysterectomy removes the uterus entirely.
Nyong'o is not the first person to call attention to how women's pain, particularly around reproductive health, tends to be ignored by the medical community. In fact, research shows that women are more likely than men to have their pain attributed to psychological causes, according to a 2019 report from the Washington Post. And a 2025 survey published in JAMA Network Open found that many women with pelvic disorders felt routinely dismissed by their medical teams, who often alleged that the pain was psychosomatic.
Other celebrities are speaking out about having that exact experience. Earlier this month, tennis star Venus Williams also spoke publicly about having painful fibroids in an interview with Today. In the interview, she said her pain was often dismissed by doctors, even when it left her 'laying on the floor in the locker room' before matches. Her persistent bleeding led to anemia, requiring multiple iron infusions, but it took her years to get diagnosed and properly treated by a doctor.
'It just got too bad, and I couldn't handle it,' Williams said. 'I'm sharing now because I was outraged that I didn't know this was possible. I didn't know what was wrong with me. No one should have to go through this.'
In 2022, the musician FKA Twigs shared her experience battling fibroids, telling the Guardian, 'If loads of people have it, why hadn't I heard of it? If this is something that's not a big deal, why is it an actual hell living in my body right now?'
That same year, Entertainment Tonight cohost Nischelle Turner also spoke about having three surgeries to get rid of her uterine fibroids, after years of heavy, painful periods.
'I knew that something was going on, but I didn't know what it was,' Turner told Today in 2022. 'I was actually scared that it could be some sort of cancer because my stomach looked like I was three months pregnant.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
High-fructose corn syrup versus cane sugar
Food & health Donald Trump Federal agencies Chronic diseasesFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump announced this week that the Coca-Cola Company has agreed to his requests for the brand to use 'REAL' cane sugar in its US products instead of high-fructose corn syrup. The company hasn't confirmed the swap, but high-fructose corn syrup has been one of many products targeted by US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in recent months. Kennedy called the common, cheap sweetener a 'formula for making you obese and diabetic' in a September episode of Dr. Jordan Peterson's podcast. Kennedy and the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement he leads have been lobbying the food and beverage industry to remove several ingredients from product formulations, including artificial food dyes and seed oils. While Coca-Cola is made with high-fructose corn syrup in the United States, its Mexican counterpart is made with cane sugar, a significant export of the country. The company did not confirm Trump's announcement and said it is unable to provide further comment at this time due to its upcoming earnings. Coca-Cola did issue a statement for a Thursday report, saying that 'more details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon.' Is cane sugar soda better for you? Sugar-filled soda isn't good for you regardless of whatever sugar is used to sweeten it, according to health experts. 'Excess consumption of sugar from any source harms health,' said Eva Greenthal, senior policy scientist at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group, via email. 'What makes soda unhealthy is that it's liquid sugar, providing empty calories with no nutritional benefits. Swapping one type of sugar for another does nothing to make soda healthier.' 'To make the US food supply healthier, the Trump administration should focus on less sugar, not different sugar,' added Greenthal, noting that CSPI and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene lobbied the US Food and Drug Administration to set added sugar reduction targets for the US food supply, 'similar to FDA's existing sodium reduction targets for industry.' Greenthal urged the administration to implement this policy, while veteran nutrition researcher Dr. Walter C. Willett said there's even more to be done. 'If we are serious about reducing the adverse effects of sugar-sweetened soda, there are many steps we can take, including warning labels on these beverages, limiting sales in schools and other public places, and taxing, then using these taxes to support health and nutrition programs for children,' said Willett, a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, via email. The corn refining industry opposes the possible swap, denying any nutritional benefit. 'Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn't make sense,' said John Bode, president and CEO of the Corn Refiners Association, a trade association representing the corn refining market in the US, in a statement. 'President Trump stands for American manufacturing jobs, American farmers, and reducing the trade deficit. Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit.' Cane sugar is produced from sugarcane and is sucrose, a type of sugar naturally comprised of two simple sugars, glucose and fructose, in equal measure. Fructose is commonly called 'fruit sugar' since it naturally occurs in fruits and berries, according to the FDA. High-fructose corn syrup, on the other hand, is made from processed corn starch. Starch is a chain of glucose molecules joined together, according to the FDA. 'When corn starch is broken down into individual glucose molecules, the end product is corn syrup, which is essentially 100% glucose.' To turn that product into high-fructose corn syrup, enzymes are added to convert some of the glucose to fructose. Different formulations of high-fructose corn syrup contain varying amounts of fructose, but the most common forms carry either 42% or 55% fructose, while the rest is glucose and water, according to the FDA. The 42% formulation is often used in processed foods including cereals and baked goods, while the 55% version is primarily used in sodas. Our food supply didn't always include high-fructose corn syrup. Sucrose from sugarcane and sugar beets was the primary sweetener globally until 1957, according to Britannica. That's when said enzymes allowed a turning point in the sweetener industry burdened by the rising costs of sugar; sugar shortages and rations during World War II and the Cuban Revolution; and technological advances in sweetener production in Japan. Consumption of the cheap sweetener in the US began spiking in the 1970s, coinciding with government subsidies for corn farmers. Coca-Cola started using it in the early 1980s to lower costs except in Mexico. The new sweetener was also more stable than sugar, which helps increase product shelf life, according to Sue-Ellen Anderson-Haynes, a registered dietitian nutritionist, certified diabetes educator and owner of 360Girls&Women. Most studies have supported the idea that 'from a nutritional standpoint, there's no difference between high-fructose corn syrup and sucrose,' said Dr. Marion Nestle, the Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health, Emerita, at New York University. 'They have the same number of calories,' Nestle said. 'They taste the same.' And there's been a long-held idea that the body doesn't know the difference between the two. However, some recent research challenges this long-held conclusion, according to Anderson-Haynes, a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 'In terms of how the body metabolizes it, it's a little different than straight sugar,' she said. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup has been more associated with weight gain, obesity and dyslipidemia, abnormal levels of lipids, or fats, in the blood, Anderson-Haynes added. But it's also true that despite a decline in intake over the past 26 years, according to Britannica, rates of diabetes and obesity have continued to climb. Also, some studies report that 'fatty liver or inflammation in the liver overall really increased with subjects who consume high-fructose corn syrup versus subjects who consume sucrose,' she said. Another study found high-fructose corn syrup is linked to higher levels of C-reactive protein, a substance the liver produces in response to inflammation from various causes or sources. Scientists have also discovered links between consumption and insulin resistance, Anderson-Haynes said. That's a condition in which your muscle, fat and liver cells don't properly respond to insulin, which helps sugar enter your cells to be used for energy. Insulin resistance can lead to high blood sugar and type 2 diabetes. Recent research also found babies who consumed formula sweetened with corn syrup solids had higher blood sugar and a higher risk of obesity by age 4 than those who drank lactose-based formula or breastmilk. Most corn grown in the United States is genetically modified and nearly half is sprayed with glyphosate, a commonly used herbicide that's also another target of the MAHA movement. Glyphosate has most conclusively been linked to cancer, and some researchers are investigating potential connections to infertility and insulin resistance, Anderson-Haynes said. 'Evidence shows that GMO corn is perfectly safe to eat,' Greenthal said. 'But even if you're worried about the safety of GMOs, by the time an ear of corn becomes a soft drink, there's no genetic material left from the corn that made the HFCS.' But really, herbicides should be the least of your worries when it comes to sugar, she said. 'A much more pressing concern is how the liquid sugar will affect your teeth and provide empty calories that can cause weight gain and increase your risk of type 2 diabetes and heart disease.' The healthiest diet is one rich in whole foods, including fruits and vegetables, Anderson-Haynes said. She recommends avoiding added sugar but does think that if you're going to eat it, natural sugar is slightly better than high-fructose corn syrup. People should limit sugar intake to less than 25 grams, or about 6 teaspoons, per day, according to the World Health Organization and other institutions. That's about as much in 2 ½ chocolate chip cookies, 16 ounces of fruit punch or 1 ½ tablespoons of honey — or just a bit over half of a 12-ounce can of Coca-Cola. If you're having trouble kicking a soda habit, consider trying sparkling water with lemon and lime juice and ginger, Anderson-Haynes suggested. Kombucha without added sugar may also sate cravings. Sign up for CNN's Eat, But Better: Mediterranean Style. Our eight-part guide shows you a delicious expert-backed eating lifestyle that will boost your health for life.


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
GOP senator reveals the 'dirty' secret to Trump's Make America Healthy Again movement
FIRST ON FOX: For one lawmaker, the path to making Americans healthier starts in the dirt. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., has styled himself as an early adopter of the Make America Healthy Again movement, a political slogan born on the 2024 campaign trail that has since seen major companies tweak their products to nix artificial additives. But Marshall sees the initiative, commonly known as MAHA, as one that can start sooner than switching the oil in deep friers or swapping out high-fructose corn syrup for cane sugar in soda. He has his own four pillars of MAHA, which include dialing up efficiency in agriculture; healthier, more nutrient-rich food; affordable access to primary care healthcare; and addressing mental health challenges among young people. But it all starts below the surface with soil health. "Soil is a dirty topic, you know, pun intended," Marshall told Fox News Digital in an interview. MAHA diehards and farmers are, at a surface level, at odds with one another, he said. For example, returning to an entirely organic food production process devoid of fertilizers would create healthier food, but also crank up the costs on consumers and strain farmland. Earlier in the week, Marshall held a roundtable with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to try and bridge that gap. "Soil health seems to be the common ground," he said. "So healthy soil meets healthy food meets healthy people. Rather than MAHA telling these farmers what you can and can't do, we wanted to say, 'What's our goal here?' If we have the same goals, then we're going to figure this out. Well, the goal is healthy soil." Getting those two in a room together, along with experts on regenerative agriculture, which is a more holistic approach to farming that targets soil health by restoring and enhancing ecosystems, is just a part of his plan. He also intends to drop a massive package of bills that is divided up into categories that echo his four pillars, including legislation geared toward health care, mental health, nutrition and agriculture. Among the nearly 30 bills and amendments in the package is one Marshall is particularly keen to see codified. The Plant Biostimulant Act would spur usage of organisms that can be placed into the soil and that latch onto the roots of plants that absorb nitrates and more water, he said. The bill ties in directly with his passion for regenerative agriculture, which uses fewer fertilizers, water and other status-quo farming techniques to produce healthier foods on more sustainable farmland, which, in turn, would yield a cheaper, more nutritious diet for Americans. "It's growing more with less," he said. Among the various, bipartisan pieces of legislation from both chambers are bills that would push mobile cancer screenings with grant funding, add mental health warnings for kids scrolling through social media, require more transparency in food ingredients, expansion of employer healthcare coverage for chronic diseases, and measures that would allow bleeding edge soil health technology and processes to be considered conservation practices and eligible for Farm Bill funding, among others. Most bills need to get 60 votes to pass in the Senate, Marshall noted, and that led to a desire to incorporate as many bipartisan measures in the package as possible. It's also a topic that, in spite of the political polarization in Washington, "unites us, rather than divides us." Still, with President Donald Trump in office, he sees the chance for the measures to pass as a kind of now or never moment. "We're seeing a time in our lives where the incidence of cancer, the age of cancer, is growing younger and younger, the age of Alzheimer's onset is growing younger and younger, and we believe it's an inflammatory reaction to the food that we're eating that leads to all that," he said. "We think heart disease, hypertension, is really an inflammatory reaction… to the food we're eating and the constantly high sugar levels in our blood system," he continued. "So absolutely, I think, seize the moment. This is it."


CNN
24 minutes ago
- CNN
High-fructose corn syrup versus cane sugar
Food & health Donald Trump Federal agencies Chronic diseasesFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump announced this week that the Coca-Cola Company has agreed to his requests for the brand to use 'REAL' cane sugar in its US products instead of high-fructose corn syrup. The company hasn't confirmed the swap, but high-fructose corn syrup has been one of many products targeted by US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in recent months. Kennedy called the common, cheap sweetener a 'formula for making you obese and diabetic' in a September episode of Dr. Jordan Peterson's podcast. Kennedy and the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement he leads have been lobbying the food and beverage industry to remove several ingredients from product formulations, including artificial food dyes and seed oils. While Coca-Cola is made with high-fructose corn syrup in the United States, its Mexican counterpart is made with cane sugar, a significant export of the country. The company did not confirm Trump's announcement and said it is unable to provide further comment at this time due to its upcoming earnings. Coca-Cola did issue a statement for a Thursday report, saying that 'more details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon.' Is cane sugar soda better for you? Sugar-filled soda isn't good for you regardless of whatever sugar is used to sweeten it, according to health experts. 'Excess consumption of sugar from any source harms health,' said Eva Greenthal, senior policy scientist at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group, via email. 'What makes soda unhealthy is that it's liquid sugar, providing empty calories with no nutritional benefits. Swapping one type of sugar for another does nothing to make soda healthier.' 'To make the US food supply healthier, the Trump administration should focus on less sugar, not different sugar,' added Greenthal, noting that CSPI and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene lobbied the US Food and Drug Administration to set added sugar reduction targets for the US food supply, 'similar to FDA's existing sodium reduction targets for industry.' Greenthal urged the administration to implement this policy, while veteran nutrition researcher Dr. Walter C. Willett said there's even more to be done. 'If we are serious about reducing the adverse effects of sugar-sweetened soda, there are many steps we can take, including warning labels on these beverages, limiting sales in schools and other public places, and taxing, then using these taxes to support health and nutrition programs for children,' said Willett, a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, via email. The corn refining industry opposes the possible swap, denying any nutritional benefit. 'Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn't make sense,' said John Bode, president and CEO of the Corn Refiners Association, a trade association representing the corn refining market in the US, in a statement. 'President Trump stands for American manufacturing jobs, American farmers, and reducing the trade deficit. Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit.' Cane sugar is produced from sugarcane and is sucrose, a type of sugar naturally comprised of two simple sugars, glucose and fructose, in equal measure. Fructose is commonly called 'fruit sugar' since it naturally occurs in fruits and berries, according to the FDA. High-fructose corn syrup, on the other hand, is made from processed corn starch. Starch is a chain of glucose molecules joined together, according to the FDA. 'When corn starch is broken down into individual glucose molecules, the end product is corn syrup, which is essentially 100% glucose.' To turn that product into high-fructose corn syrup, enzymes are added to convert some of the glucose to fructose. Different formulations of high-fructose corn syrup contain varying amounts of fructose, but the most common forms carry either 42% or 55% fructose, while the rest is glucose and water, according to the FDA. The 42% formulation is often used in processed foods including cereals and baked goods, while the 55% version is primarily used in sodas. Our food supply didn't always include high-fructose corn syrup. Sucrose from sugarcane and sugar beets was the primary sweetener globally until 1957, according to Britannica. That's when said enzymes allowed a turning point in the sweetener industry burdened by the rising costs of sugar; sugar shortages and rations during World War II and the Cuban Revolution; and technological advances in sweetener production in Japan. Consumption of the cheap sweetener in the US began spiking in the 1970s, coinciding with government subsidies for corn farmers. Coca-Cola started using it in the early 1980s to lower costs except in Mexico. The new sweetener was also more stable than sugar, which helps increase product shelf life, according to Sue-Ellen Anderson-Haynes, a registered dietitian nutritionist, certified diabetes educator and owner of 360Girls&Women. Most studies have supported the idea that 'from a nutritional standpoint, there's no difference between high-fructose corn syrup and sucrose,' said Dr. Marion Nestle, the Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health, Emerita, at New York University. 'They have the same number of calories,' Nestle said. 'They taste the same.' And there's been a long-held idea that the body doesn't know the difference between the two. However, some recent research challenges this long-held conclusion, according to Anderson-Haynes, a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 'In terms of how the body metabolizes it, it's a little different than straight sugar,' she said. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup has been more associated with weight gain, obesity and dyslipidemia, abnormal levels of lipids, or fats, in the blood, Anderson-Haynes added. But it's also true that despite a decline in intake over the past 26 years, according to Britannica, rates of diabetes and obesity have continued to climb. Also, some studies report that 'fatty liver or inflammation in the liver overall really increased with subjects who consume high-fructose corn syrup versus subjects who consume sucrose,' she said. Another study found high-fructose corn syrup is linked to higher levels of C-reactive protein, a substance the liver produces in response to inflammation from various causes or sources. Scientists have also discovered links between consumption and insulin resistance, Anderson-Haynes said. That's a condition in which your muscle, fat and liver cells don't properly respond to insulin, which helps sugar enter your cells to be used for energy. Insulin resistance can lead to high blood sugar and type 2 diabetes. Recent research also found babies who consumed formula sweetened with corn syrup solids had higher blood sugar and a higher risk of obesity by age 4 than those who drank lactose-based formula or breastmilk. Most corn grown in the United States is genetically modified and nearly half is sprayed with glyphosate, a commonly used herbicide that's also another target of the MAHA movement. Glyphosate has most conclusively been linked to cancer, and some researchers are investigating potential connections to infertility and insulin resistance, Anderson-Haynes said. 'Evidence shows that GMO corn is perfectly safe to eat,' Greenthal said. 'But even if you're worried about the safety of GMOs, by the time an ear of corn becomes a soft drink, there's no genetic material left from the corn that made the HFCS.' But really, herbicides should be the least of your worries when it comes to sugar, she said. 'A much more pressing concern is how the liquid sugar will affect your teeth and provide empty calories that can cause weight gain and increase your risk of type 2 diabetes and heart disease.' The healthiest diet is one rich in whole foods, including fruits and vegetables, Anderson-Haynes said. She recommends avoiding added sugar but does think that if you're going to eat it, natural sugar is slightly better than high-fructose corn syrup. People should limit sugar intake to less than 25 grams, or about 6 teaspoons, per day, according to the World Health Organization and other institutions. That's about as much in 2 ½ chocolate chip cookies, 16 ounces of fruit punch or 1 ½ tablespoons of honey — or just a bit over half of a 12-ounce can of Coca-Cola. If you're having trouble kicking a soda habit, consider trying sparkling water with lemon and lime juice and ginger, Anderson-Haynes suggested. Kombucha without added sugar may also sate cravings. Sign up for CNN's Eat, But Better: Mediterranean Style. Our eight-part guide shows you a delicious expert-backed eating lifestyle that will boost your health for life.