logo
1,000 musicians release a silent album in protest of U.K.'s proposed AI copyright law changes

1,000 musicians release a silent album in protest of U.K.'s proposed AI copyright law changes

NBC News25-02-2025

A group of musicians is hoping the sound of their collective silence speaks volumes to lawmakers in the U.K.
More than 1,000 artists — including Kate Bush, Imogen Heap, Annie Lennox, Cat Stevens and Hans Zimmer — released a silent album titled "Is This What We Want?' on Tuesday in response to the U.K. government's proposed changes to a copyright law.
They argue that changes to the law, proposed late last year, would "allow artificial intelligence companies to build their products using other people's copyrighted work — music, artworks, text, and more" without a license, according to a website for the album. 'The musicians on this album came together to protest this.'
The album 's track list spells out a sentence: 'The British Government Must Not Legalize Music Theft To Benefit AI Companies.'
'It's an album of recordings of empty studios & performance spaces, representing the effect the govt's plans would have on musicians' livelihoods,' Ed Newton-Rex, a composer who was among those who organized the album, wrote in a post on X.
The album is the latest action from creatives over growing concerns that AI could encroach on their works. While it focuses on British law, concerns over AI's impact on artists' livelihood have been widespread.
Laws regulating AI are sparse, and because generative AI, which can create media from songs to images, is so accessible, many creatives have raised ethical and legal questions over tech companies training their programs on artists' works.
The album's release came on the closing day of the British government's public consultation on changing the copyright laws. In December, the left-leaning Labour Party announced that it would begin consulting on AI and shifting copyright laws with the intent of becoming a world leader in AI technology.
As it is currently proposed, the law would allow artists to opt-out of being used for AI learning.
On Tuesday, newspapers in the U.K. ran identical messages titled 'Make it fair,' which called for protecting creative industries from AI. Some shared side-by-sides of the British newspaper covers on X.
In a statement to The Associated Press, the British government said it was 'consulting on a new approach that protects the interests of both AI developers and right holders and delivers a solution which allows both to thrive.' It added that 'no decisions have been taken.'
There have been efforts to combat the legislative changes prior to the album's release, including from a group called the Creative Rights in AI Coalition. The group says companies should seek permission first to train AI on artists' works. This would put the responsibility on the companies seeking to use AI rather than on artists having to opt out.
'Protecting copyright and building a dynamic licensing market for the use of creative content in building generative AI (GAI) isn't just a question of fairness: it's the only way that both sectors will flourish and grow,' the coalition wrote on its website.
In a letter to the Times published Tuesday, 34 artists, including some featured on the album, called for "protecting U.K.'s creative copyright against AI."
The new proposal is "wholly unnecessary and counterproductive," and jeopardizes not only the U.K.'s international position as "a beacon of creativity but also the resulting jobs, economic contribution and soft power — and especially harming new and young artists who represent our nation's future," the artists wrote.
Signees include Bush, Dua Lipa, Ed Sheeran, Elton John and Sting.
Bush, who is known for hit songs like 'Running Up That Hill,' shared a music video for the album on her website. The 1-minute-and-25-second video features footage of empty recording studios, with the names of the album's tracks in a bold white font above the video.
"The U.K. is full of pioneering, highly creative and imaginative artists.' Bush wrote on her website. 'The government's willingness to agree to these copyright changes shows how much our work is undervalued and that there is no protection for one of this country's most important assets: music. Each track on this album features a deserted recording studio. Doesn't that silence say it all?'
She added that she's 'very happy to have contributed a track to this project and to join the protest' and asked for the public's support in protecting ' the music makers and our heartfelt work."
'In the music of the future, will our voices go unheard?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dawn French apologises after being accused of underplaying October 7 attacks
Dawn French apologises after being accused of underplaying October 7 attacks

Metro

time32 minutes ago

  • Metro

Dawn French apologises after being accused of underplaying October 7 attacks

British comedian and actress Dawn French has issued a public apology after a social media video she posted about the conflict in Gaza and Israel drew widespread criticism. The 67-year-old Vicar of Dibley star shared the video on X (formerly Twitter), using a baby-like voice to deliver a satirical monologue critiquing what she described as the justifications used by those supporting Israel's continued military campaign in Gaza. 'Complicated, no, but nuanced. But [the] bottom line is no,' she says in the video, before launching into a series of exaggerated, childlike impressions mimicking pro-Israel arguments. 'Yeah, but you know they did a bad thing to us… and we want that land… and we have history… Those people aren't really even people, are they?' Each segment is followed by French returning to her natural voice to declare: 'No.' The video, which has since been deleted, quickly amassed over 4.7million views and sparked a fierce backlash among some. Critics accused French of trivialising the October 7 Hamas attacks, in which over 1,200 Israelis were killed and hundreds taken hostage. Some viewers said her tone appeared to mock victims rather than leaders. In response to the outcry, French posted a lengthy apology on Instagram on Saturday, acknowledging that her attempt at satire had fallen short of the mark. 'I clumsily used a mocking tone,' she wrote. 'My intention was NEVER to mock, or dismiss, or diminish the horror of what happened on 7 October 2023 and what continues to unfold from that brutal, unthinkable, unforgivable savage [attack].' French said her real aim had been to 'mock and point the finger of shame at the behaviour of the cruel leaders on ALL sides of this attricious [sic] war,' but admitted that her message had come across as one-sided. 'I'm particularly sorry that my disgust at Hamas didn't figure. It appeared one-sided and that is wrong,' she said. She added that she had been motivated by a growing sense of helplessness and a desire to speak out against the escalating humanitarian crisis, particularly the suffering of children in Gaza. More Trending 'The images of starving and wounded children have haunted me day and night,' she wrote. 'History has taught us never to stand by and allow this kind of inhumane violence to be wrought on anyone, especially innocent children.' 'I hope you will understand my intention was not to offend, but clearly I have. For which I am sorry and I have removed the video.' French's apology has prompted mixed responses online, with some praising her for addressing the issue directly and others continuing to criticise the original post. This is a breaking news story, more to follow soon… Check back shortly for further updates. If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. For more stories like this, check our entertainment page. Follow Entertainment on Twitter and Facebook for the latest celeb and entertainment updates. You can now also get articles sent straight to your device. Sign up for our daily push alerts here.

POLL: What do you think to Prince Harry's strange plan for his kids?
POLL: What do you think to Prince Harry's strange plan for his kids?

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

POLL: What do you think to Prince Harry's strange plan for his kids?

Prince Harry and Meghan may have stepped back from royal life - but they're not shutting the palace gates for their kids just yet. The couple reportedly want Archie and Lilibet to keep their titles, sparking debate over whether it's about choice … or mixed messages. Despite Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepping away from their royal duties and all the palace drama a while ago, it seems they're keeping the door open for their kids to walk a different path. They reportedly want Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet to hang onto their royal titles - just in case they decide they do want to be working royals one day. Apparently, Harry and Meghan see it as giving their kids the option when they're older. But here's where it gets a bit sticky, as the 'plan' comes after the source claimed the Sussexes feared passports for their children were being held up due to the use of their royal titles. ‌ It has all raised a few eyebrows., with former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond asking why the Sussexes are holding so tightly to the titles when they've been so outspoken about wanting out of the royal system in the first place. ‌ So, what do you think? Is Harry being thoughtful about giving his kids future choices — or is it a bit contradictory after everything he and Meghan have said about the monarchy? What do you think to Harry's plan? Take our poll below. If you can't see it, click here Jennie Bond told the Mirror: "I really don't understand why, having extricated themselves from a life they did not enjoy and in which Harry has publicly spoken of 'feeling trapped', they want to give their children the option of re-joining. It makes no sense. "Who knows what's going to happen in the future? But it's very hard to see how two children who are clearly now more American than British would want to change their whole way of life and become working members of the royal family." Archie and Lilibet got prince and princess titles when their grandfather King Charles became monarch in 2022. The first time their titles were formally announced was after Lilibet's christening in March 2023. ‌ Due to the reported hold-up in their British passports, it is said that Harry started to explore the possibility of changing his family surname to Spencer in a nod to his late mother, Princess Diana. And Jennie added: "I think Harry has always been more Spencer than Windsor, so if he was ever going to change his name, it would be to Spencer. "But this would be a final nail in the coffin of his relationship with his father and his brother. It would amount to a public declaration that he no longer saw himself as part of the royal family." ‌ There has been continued controversy over the Sussexes' HRH titles since the pair quit their royal roles five years ago. As part of their Megxit negotiations with the Palace, Meghan and the Duke of Sussex agreed to stop using 'Her Royal Highness' and 'His Royal Highness' at the end of March 2020. They still retain the styles, with Harry having had his since birth, but they are essentially held in abeyance. However, earlier this year, it emerged Meghan had used her HRH style on a gift basket sent to make-up entrepreneur Jamie Kern Lima last year, with a monogrammed card reading: 'With Compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex'. ‌ Kern Lima showed an image of the present in footage of her podcast interview with Meghan. It contained a jar of Meghan's jam which she has started selling as part of her As Ever lifestyle business brand. A source described the basket as a 'personal gift'. The duchess's representatives denied that the couple used them, but a source later said that the Sussexes did not use HRH publicly but retained the style, and did not use it for commercial purposes.

'I went to Benidorm on holiday and couldn't believe cost of a pint'
'I went to Benidorm on holiday and couldn't believe cost of a pint'

Daily Record

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Record

'I went to Benidorm on holiday and couldn't believe cost of a pint'

A man, who is known as the Benidorm Fanatic to his TikTok followers, recently headed to the popular holiday destination and was left gobsmacked by the price of a drink A Brit was gobsmacked by the cost of a pint in Benidorm, despite being a frequent visitor to Spain. Known amongst his TikTok followers as the Benidorm Fanatic, he recounts his visit to Uncle Ron's, a bar renowned for its affordably priced pints, where he found himself pleasantly surprised by just how much bang he got for his buck. In his popular video, he raves: "I tell you what, I believe it's actually a very, very nice pint as well, so it comes to the equivalent of about 84p in British money. Let's go and try it out, shall we? Let's give it a try." ‌ Upon reaching the bar, he continued: "So there you go, I'll give you a euro, a €1 pint, and I'll take that. Let's try this €1 pint. Look at that - a nice, clean, cold pint. It's got a nice, good head on it - let's try it." ‌ He enthusiastically shared his verdict, saying: "That is actually one of the best pints I've had in one of the popular bars. That is actually one of the best pints I've had in Benidorm to be honest with you. €1, I'll drink them all day." The video quickly gained traction, prompting viewers to share their impressions and even their own tales of Benidorm adventures. Among the comments, one user exclaimed: "Wow," while another who'd been there on holiday exclaimed: "I was there last week." Someone else who'd be there said: "Lovely pint. Had many." Whil a fellow TikToker simply added: "Bargain." Uncle Ron's, a hit with British holidaymakers in Benidorm, is famed for its budget-friendly tipples and hearty meals. ‌ TripAdvisor reviews boast of the establishment's offerings from breakfast through to dinner, with an average rating of 3.8 out of 5 on the platform, suggesting it's a must-visit for those seeking a decent meal and drinks while away. In the review section, one visitor commented: "Had a fantastic breakfast at Ron's today. Lovely English produce. Great service. Brilliant staff. "A massive group came in, but they were serviced promptly. Don't know how they manage with so few staff." ‌ Another shared their experience: "Last day we visited for some lunch before heading to airport. Left full, which is always a good thing. In all my times of going here, never left unhappy at the service nor the food - always really good." A third reviewer added: "We went many times during our two-week holiday. The staff are friendly and extremely hard working day and night. "Cheapest drinks you will find in town and food to suit everyone (daily deal only 6 euros). It's not a stylish 5* restaurant but then you wouldn't expect it. "For drinks just go to the bar like a normal bar. Always busy Sunday and Friday, so expect to book if you want a Sunday lunch. Would we go again? Certainly would!"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store