logo
What we know about the suspect in the Minnesota lawmaker shooting

What we know about the suspect in the Minnesota lawmaker shooting

NBC News6 hours ago

The man suspected of fatally shooting a Democratic Minnesota state representative and her husband, and wounding another state legislator and his wife, was captured in a Green Isle field on Sunday evening after a massive two-day manhunt.
Authorities said Vance Boelter, 57, wore a "hyper realistic" silicone face mask, body armor, and a tactical vest to impersonate law enforcement when he carried out the violent rampage early Saturday morning.
He planned "his attack carefully," acting U.S. attorney for the District of Minnesota Joseph Thompson said, and used the internet to research his victims and their families. He conducted surveillance on their homes and took notes on the homes' locations, Thompson said at a Monday news conference.
Boelter also allegedly purchased materials to make a fake "police" license plate for his SUV and equipped the vehicle with law enforcement-style lights before the shootings that killed Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark Hortman, and wounded State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette Hoffman.
Thompson said it's clear Boelter had been "planning these attacks for quite some time."
He faces both federal and state charges.
Who is Boelter?
In an online video, Boelter described himself as a married father of five from Green Isle, Minnesota. He said he works for two funeral homes and previously worked for three decades in the food industry.
Boelter said in the video that he once traveled to the Democratic Republic of Congo to partner with farmers and fishermen and help stimulate the country's food supply system.
Boelter has a handful of traffic violations, including speeding and not using a seatbelt, records show.
According to a statement, he attended the Christ For The Nations Institute from 1998 to 1990, when he graduated with a diploma in practical theology in leadership and pastoral.
Records show he purchased his Green Isle home for over half a million dollars in 2023. During a federal court hearing Monday afternoon, Boelter said he now makes $540 a week through his part-time job and could not afford a lawyer. His federal defender declined to comment.
Authorities located his wife and found two handguns, about $10,000 in cash, and passports for her and her children in her vehicle, the affidavit says.
After the shootings, he allegedly texted his family: "Dad went to war last night … I don't wanna say more because I don't wanna implicate anybody."
His wife also received a text from him saying, "Words are not gonna explain how sorry I am for this situation. … there's gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger-happy and I don't want you guys around."
The motive for the attacks remains unclear.
'Stalked his victims like prey'
Boelter took "deliberate steps to research his victims and prepare" for his alleged attacks, authorities said in the affidavit.
He is accused of using the internet to find their home addresses and the names of their family members. The affidavit states that he also "made lists containing the names and home addresses of many Minnesota public officials, mostly or all Democrats. "
Authorities said he found websites that sold hyper-realistic silicone face masks, and he allegedly purchased other materials from a store, including flashlights and resources that could be used to create the fake "police" license plate found on his SUV.
He traveled to the homes of at least four public officials.
"Political assassinations are rare. They strike at the very core of our democracy, but the details of Boelter's crimes are even worse," Thompson told reporters. "They are truly chilling. It is no exaggeration to say that his crimes are the stuff of nightmares. Belter stalked his victims like prey."
'This is the police,' suspect shouted before Hoffman shooting
Boelter allegedly arrived at the Champlin home of Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette Hoffman, in an SUV equipped with law enforcement-style emergency lights, the affidavit states.
Video footage from the home showed Boelter approach the front door "dressed to impersonate a law enforcement officer" in a black tactical vest and carrying a flashlight, according to the affidavit. He was wearing the flesh-colored face mask.
While knocking on the door, he repeatedly shouted, "This is the police. Open the door," the affidavit states. They answered the door.
Thompson said that Boelter shined the flashlight in their faces, said there had been a shooting reported in the home, and asked if they had any weapons. When he lowered the flashlight, they realized he was not a police officer.
"They shouted out, 'You're not a cop. You're not a police officer,'" he said. "Boelter then announced, This is a robbery, and forced himself into their home."
The senator tried to push Boelter backward out the door, at which point Boelter allegedly repeatedly shot the senator, according to the affidavit. He then repeatedly fired at the senator's wife.
Around 2:06 a.m., their daughter called 911.
The Hoffmans were taken to the hospital, where they remain. In a statement released by the family, Yvette Hoffman thanked law enforcement for capturing Boelter.
"John and I are both incredibly lucky to be alive," the statement read. "We continue our healing journey and are humbled by the outpouring of love and support our family has received from across the state and our nation."
Boelter drives to homes of 2 other public officials
After shooting the Hoffmans, Boelter traveled to Maple Grove, about 12 miles from Champlin, to the home of an unnamed public official, authorities said.
The official and her family were not at home.
Security footage from the home showed him repeatedly ringing the doorbell around 2:24 a.m. and shouting, "This is the police. Open the door. This is the police. We have a warrant," according to the affidavit.
He was wearing a black tactical vest and what looked like a law enforcement-style badge, it says.
When no one came to the door, he drove the short distance to the New Hope home of another unnamed public official. By this time, local police were aware of the shooting at the Hoffmans' home and dispatched an officer to the home to conduct a safety check, the affidavit states.
The affidavit says the officer encountered a man believed to be Boelter sitting in an SUV parked down the street from the home. The officer believed the SUV was a law enforcement vehicle. The officer tried to speak with the man, but he did not respond.
According to the affidavit, the officer drove to the official's home, and Boelter left the area.
Rep. Hortman and husband shot and killed
Local police in Brooklyn Park were also made aware of the shooting at the Hoffmans and went to the home of Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark Hortman, to conduct a safety check.
According to the affidavit, when police arrived, a black SUV was parked outside the home, and Boelter was standing near the front door.
Moments after their arrival, he allegedly fired several shots into the home "as he moved forward, entering the Hortmans' home." A second set of gunshots could be heard from inside the home, it says.
The couple had been shot multiple times and died from their injuries. Their family dog also died.
Boelter fled the home, sparking a manhunt.
In a statement shared Monday evening, the Hortmans' adult children, Sophie and Colin Hortman, said they were safe and with loved ones.
"We are devastated and heartbroken at the loss of our parents, Melissa and Mark. They were the bright lights at the center of our lives, and we can't believe they are gone. Their love for us was boundless. We miss them so much," they said.
"Our parents touched so many lives, and they leave behind an incredible legacy of dedication to their community that will live on in us, their friends, their colleagues and co-workers, and every single person who knew and loved them," the statement added.
What evidence has been recovered?
Five firearms and a large amount of ammunition were found in his SUV, according to a federal criminal affidavit. There were also several notebooks containing the names of more than 45 state and federal public officials.
According to the affidavit, Boelter was connected to a home in north Minneapolis.
A man at the home told authorities he lives there with Boelter, at least part-time. While searching the house, the affidavit says authorities found a handwritten list containing many of the same public officials named in the notebooks. Security footage from the area showed that Boelter returned to the home in the morning after the shootings.
He was arrested Sunday night in a field in Green Isle, about a mile from the family home. Authorities had received a tip earlier in the day that said a person was seen riding an electric bike about two miles from the residence.
Investigators said he purchased the bike and a sedan from a witness after the shootings. The sedan was found abandoned on a highway near the family home.
During a search of the vehicle, Boelter allegedly left a note admitting to the crime, the affidavit says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic divisions emerge as Congress tackles crypto regulation
Democratic divisions emerge as Congress tackles crypto regulation

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Democratic divisions emerge as Congress tackles crypto regulation

Democrats are wrestling with their strategy on cryptocurrency, a once underground industry that has become a powerful player on Capitol Hill — and closely associated with President Donald Trump. Cryptocurrency groups scored a major win in Washington on Tuesday, with the Senate passing a landmark bill to regulate some digital assets. It was a bipartisan vote, with 18 Democrats joining nearly every Republican to support the bill following an intense lobbying and advocacy effort. But the battle over the legislation has exposed deep Democratic divisions over how to handle the broader issue of crypto in a GOP-controlled Washington. While some Democrats have pushed for the party to be leading the charge on developing policy for the quickly emerging industry, others have been wary of embracing a tool that they say has created conflicts of interest for Trump. Newly released financial disclosures show Trump made one of his largest fortunes last year, $57.3 million, on his family's cryptocurrency company World Liberty Financial. Progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking committee, said the GENIUS Act — the bill the Senate passed that would establish the first regulatory framework for issuers of stablecoins, digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar — would create a 'superhighway' for corruption in the Trump White House. Warren also lamented to NBC News that the crypto industry is 'pouring money in to try to influence votes here in Congress.' But other Democrats see this is a rare chance for Congress to get ahead of an issue, arguing they can't afford to wait until they win back power in Washington to act — especially with how quickly technology moves. 'I think every politician will say this. It's the same thing about any industry that they don't like or understand,' Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., who supports the GENIUS Act, told NBC news in an interview. Democrats clash over crypto behind closed doors The GENIUS Act now heads to the House, where the Democratic divide over cryptocurrency — which can often fall along generational lines — came to a head during a private meeting last week attended by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., other Democratic leaders and committee ranking members, according to three sources who were in the room and a fourth source who was briefed on the meeting. Rep. Angie Craig, D-Minn., who is running for the Senate, expressed her support for the industry and a recent bipartisan bill called the Clarity Act, which would provide a regulatory framework for digital assets, according to three of the sources. The 53-year-old Craig serves in the House Agriculture Committee as the top Democrat, and 86-year-old Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is the ranking member in the Financial Services Committee. Waters opposes the legislation and instead wants to bar Trump from benefiting from the digital assets Congress could legitimize. Waters expressed those concerns in the Wednesday meeting, three of the sources said. Other members agreed, including Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee. Both Himes and Waters stressed a need for greater insider trading protections in the bill, the three sources said. The lawmakers said Democrats should not enable Trump to get wealthy off of unfettered access to the industry he wants Congress to regulate. Craig argued Trump was already bound by existing laws, one of the sources said. Waters began talking over Craig, who told the room that she was in the middle of speaking, leading to a heated discussion, the source said. As this episode was unfolding, Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., suggested that perhaps Democrats should act to ban the industry altogether, two sources added — an example of just how wildly far apart some Democrats are on the issue. Jeffries moved to table the discussion for another time, the three sources said. After the meeting, both Waters and a Craig spokespersons declined to comment, saying the meeting was private. Jeffries' office also declined to comment on a private meeting. A spokesperson for Scott did not respond to a request for comment. Craig, whose re-election campaign received a big boost from groups associated with the industry last year, has backed a check on Trump. During the Agriculture Committee markup on the Clarity Act, Rep. Eugene Vindman, D-Va., offered an amendment targeting entities that hold meme-based assets associated with the president, vice president or other public officials. All 24 Democrats on the panel, including Craig, backed the amendment; Republicans successfully voted it down. Crypto groups spent big bucks on the last election Looming over the Democratic debate is the fact that groups associated with the crypto industry were heavily involved in the last election. Fairshake, a crypto-focused super PAC that formed in 2023, spent $195 million in the 2024 elections. And the group already has $116 million in cash on hand for the 2026 midterm election cycle, according to the group's spokesperson, Josh Vlasto. 'We are keeping our foot on the gas and all options are on the table,' Vlasto told NBC News. Crypto groups supported candidates from both parties in 2024, but they also spent $40 million to oppose then-Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, who was ultimately defeated by Republican Bernie Moreno. That race is still lingering in the air among Democrats who fear that kind of cash being used against them. The cryptocurrency industry has also dialed up its lobbying and grassroots advocacy efforts in recent years. Stand With Crypto, an advocacy group, launched a campaign around the passage of the GENIUS Act encouraging people to call or email their senators in support of the bill. The effort resulted in 75,000 emails being sent to members, according to the organization. The group also organized so-called fly-in meetings ahead of key votes on the bill in order to link members with constituents who utilize crypto. Stand With Crypto has not made any election endorsements, but it is leaving itself the room to do so in the future. In the meantime, the group created a 'scorecard' that tracks how members fare on key votes and has been arguing to lawmakers that an increasing number of voters care about crypto. 'For these folks that are afraid of [crypto] people donating money, that's not really what we do. But what they should be concerned about is our voters voting differently, because these votes are up for grabs,' Mason Lynaugh, community director for Stand With Crypto, told NBC News. 'A lot of these people were not civically engaged before, and I don't know if the genie's going back in the bottle.' Even though Democrats are far from united on the topic, the industry has made some key allies in the party. 'We are here to legislate, and again, to try to bring into compliance an economy that is largely outside the United States is uncontrollable at this point,' Gallego said. 'I think it's the responsibility of us as Congress to put down the rules of the road.' Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., who also supports the GENIUS Act, said he voted for the bill because many of his constituents already use crypto. 'We're already using these products. And so from a public policy point of view, one of the questions for me, is, what will leave the consumers in a better place? So we clearly need some kind of regulatory structure,' Warnock told NBC news. Asked if the industry is pumping too much money into elections, Warnock replied: 'I think there's too much money in our system whether you're talking about oil and gas or the gun industry, it's a serious democracy problem.'

In Washington and across the country, lawmakers express safety fears: From the Politics Desk
In Washington and across the country, lawmakers express safety fears: From the Politics Desk

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

In Washington and across the country, lawmakers express safety fears: From the Politics Desk

Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we explore the security concerns elected officials are harboring in the wake of the Minnesota shootings. Plus, Steve Kornacki explains why New York City's Democratic mayoral primary may not be the end of the Andrew Cuomo-Zohran Mamdani battle. — Adam Wollner In Washington and across the country, lawmakers express safety fears After the targeted shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers, elected officials serving in Capitol buildings in Washington and around the country are growing increasingly worried about the level of protection they receive. In Congress: Law enforcement officials have been holding security briefings with members of Congress over the past several days, Scott Wong, Julie Tsirkin and Melanie Zanona report. Federal lawmakers have been told that they can spend money from their office budgets on home security systems and campaign cash on private security. Only a handful of congressional leaders get 24-hour protection from Capitol Police security details. Members can request extra protection, which is assigned based on whether Capitol Police determine there is an active threat. But so far, those assurances have done little to calm nervous lawmakers, who have been harboring such concerns amid a string of violent attacks on American politicians over the past 15 years — a period that has included assassination attempts on a presidential candidate and members of Congress and a riot at the U.S. Capitol. House Democratic leaders have asked Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to boost members' official budgets 'to support additional safety and security measures in every single office.' And over the weekend, House Republicans held a tense call that featured rank-and-file members' expressing concerns about their safety when they are in their districts. 'It's scary as sh--,' a senior House lawmaker said, describing how members of Congress feel after the Minnesota shootings. In the states: Even the limited protection available to the average member of Congress goes far beyond what is available to most state lawmakers, Adam Edelman reports. Outside of their state capital complexes, state legislators have little to no security protection. No state offers proactive security to members of its legislature, though law enforcement will typically step in if there are credible threats. And despite the renewed attention to the issue, lawmakers fear little will ultimately be done that can make a meaningful difference, given that in many states, such positions are effectively part-time jobs with small budgets. 'We are constantly out there, vulnerable. Whether I'm volunteering somewhere, knocking doors for someone, starting to run my own campaign, I'm out there, vulnerable,' said Arizona state Rep. Stephanie Simacek, a Democrat. , by Megan Lebowitz and Kelly O'Donnell GOP Sen. Mike Lee deletes social media posts about the Minnesota shooting after facing criticism, by Dareh Gregorian Political violence thrusts 2028 candidates onto the national stage, by Natasha Korecki and Jonathan Allen No matter the result of the Democratic primary, NYC's mayoral election could get chaotic Analysis by Steve Kornacki New York City is overwhelmingly Democratic, so it seems logical that the winner of the party's mayoral primary next week will be a shoo-in for November. But it may not be that simple, as a confluence of factors could give rise to an unpredictable, multicandidate general election campaign. Start with the two leaders in the Democratic race, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. Each carries significant political baggage. Cuomo, of course, resigned as governor in a sexual harassment scandal in 2021 and has faced sustained criticism of his Covid pandemic policies, especially relating to nursing homes. Even within his own party, Cuomo is a lightning rod, with a recent poll finding that over 40% of Democrats have unfavorable views of him. And Mamdani is a democratic socialist with a history of far-left pronouncements that are now being featured in attack ads from the Cuomo side. If either wins the Democratic primary, there figure to be plenty of unhappy customers within the party and — potentially — among general election voters who would be open to an alternative. And if one falls just short in the primary, either Cuomo and Mamdani could decide to turn around and take another shot in the general election. Each already has a ready-made vehicle to do so. Cuomo has created his own third party, which he is calling the Fight and Deliver Party. Officially, he did that to give himself a second spot on the November ballot if he is the Democratic nominee. Under New York's peculiar election laws, third parties can run major-party nominees as their own candidates. Cuomo's position is that he plans to be both the Democratic nominee and the Fight and Deliver nominee. But if Cuomo were to lose to Mamdani in the primary, there'd be nothing to stop him from simply running as the Fight and Deliver candidate. In fact, his father, Mario, made that very move back in 1977, when he lost the Democratic mayoral primary to Ed Koch but then ran as the Liberal Party candidate in the fall. Meanwhile, the Working Families Party, which is closely aligned with progressive Democrats, has already indicated that it won't back Cuomo even if he is the Democratic nominee. The WFP has also encouraged its backers to make Mamdani their top choice in the Democratic primary. That raises the possibility that Mamdani could run as the WFP's general election nominee even if he loses to Cuomo next week. For that matter, given its antipathy to Cuomo, the WFP might also seek out another high-profile candidate if Mamdani isn't interested. If Cuomo or Mamdani do opt to mount third-party bids in the fall, it could open the door to chaos, since other candidates already loom. The current mayor, Eric Adams, is bypassing the Democratic primary and already has created two vehicles for the general election, the 'EndAntiSemitism' and 'Safe&Affordable' parties. Adams, who faced federal corruption charges before President Donald Trump pardoned him, has his own political baggage but still retains some support, particularly from Black voters. That base, along with his incumbency, would make him a factor in a multicandidate general election. Republicans also have their own ballot line and are set to nominate Curtis Sliwa, who was their nominee against Adams in 2021. And a former federal prosecutor, Jim Walden, is running his own independent bid. He is positioning himself as a centrist and says he was motivated to run after Adams was indicted last year. Of course, it's possible that the Democratic primary result will be decisive enough that the loser stands down for the general election. That would all but ensure the winner a glide path to Gracie Mansion. It's also theoretically possible that another candidate besides Cuomo or Mamdani catches fire in the final week, claims the nomination and unites the party.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store