
British Business Bank invests in entrepreneurs in £6.6bn funding commitment
The UK Government's development bank has revealed the investment plans as part of Sir Keir Starmer's 10-year industrial strategy announcement.
On Monday, the Prime Minister said he will cut electricity costs for thousands of businesses as part of the strategy, in a bid to help accelerate economic growth.
The British Business Bank has seen its total financial capacity grow to £25.6 billion since the most recent spending review.
🆕 The Government has confirmed £6.6bn of new capital for the British Business Bank to boost growth.
A new £4bn initiative, British Business Bank Industrial Strategy Growth Capital, will be invested across eight growth-driving sectors.
Read more: https://t.co/jFoWcP8vKp
— British Business Bank (@BritishBBank) June 23, 2025
It has said its latest £6.6 billion investment commitment will particularly help the rapid growth of small business across the UK.
The Government said £4 billion will be invested through the new Industrial Strategy Growth Capital initiative, focusing on eight target sectors including advanced manufacturing, clean energy, digital, and life sciences.
A further £2.6 billion will be aimed at supporting entrepreneurs across the UK, providing funds to help address regional funding gaps.
Louis Taylor, chief executive of the British Business Bank, said: 'We welcome today's announcement by the secretary of state to deliver British Business Bank industrial strategy growth capital, as well as the reforms to the Bank's governance and financial framework.
'Using our market expertise and reach, we have a critical role to play in supporting smaller businesses in the eight growth-driving sectors to grow and stay in the UK.
'To deliver the Government's growth mission it is also critical that our most promising entrepreneurs can access the finance they need to grow their businesses, no matter what their background or where they are located across the nations and regions of the UK.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Macron: Trump air strikes against Iran ‘illegal'
Emmanuel Macron has branded Donald Trump's air strikes against Iran 'illegal'. The French president said it could be considered legitimate to bomb nuclear facilities that pose a potential threat but that there was no legal framework, so strikes conducted by the United States and Israel were not legal. His intervention came as Sir Keir Starmer and a succession of ministers declined to explicitly state the US president had acted within international law or in a correct manner. Sir Keir was warned by Lord Hermer, his Attorney General, last week that joining a US attack on Iran could breach international law. However, the Prime Minister is coming under increasing pressure to 'get off the fence' and say whether the UK backs Mr Trump's action. The strike on Saturday evening came after a week of public and private lobbying from European leaders urging Mr Trump not to unilaterally strike Iran. Instead, the US carried out a stealth bombing raid on three Iranian nuclear sites, with the president later declaring the mission a success with the targets ' obliterated '. Mr Trump's decision to strike has led to fresh questions about the ability of Sir Keir and other Western leaders to influence his approach to international issues. The US president walked out of the G7 summit in Canada last week halfway through. He is expected to gather with many of the same leaders again at the Nato summit in the Hague on Wednesday. Mr Macron said of the US attacks: 'It may be considered legitimate... to neutralise nuclear facilities in Iran, given our objectives. 'However, there is no legal framework, no. And so we must say it as it is: there is no legality to these strikes. 'Even though France shares the objective of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, we have consistently believed from the outset that this can only be achieved through diplomatic and technical means. 'I say this because I hear many commentators who basically accuse you of inefficiency when you defend the diplomatic route on these issues. But when you are consistent, you can claim to be effective. He added: 'We continue to believe that it is through negotiation and re-engagement that we can achieve our goals.' Speaking alongside Mr Macron, the Norwegian prime minister Jonas Gahr Store echoed the sentiment. 'International law has some clear principles on the use of force. It can be granted by the Security Council or it can be in pure self-defence,' he said, noting that this meant the strikes were 'outside the realm of international law'. Mr Macron's comments were at odds with both Germany and Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, who said that pre-emptive US air strikes on Iran were not illegal. Asked twice about whether they breach international law as Russia did by attacking Ukraine in 2022, Mr Rutte said: 'My biggest fear would be for Iran to own and be able to use and deploy a nuclear weapon to be a stranglehold on Israel, on the whole region and other parts of the world. 'This is a consistent position of Nato: Iran should not have its hands on a nuclear weapon,' he added. 'I would not agree that this is against international law – what the US did.' In contrast Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, said on Monday there was 'no reason to criticise' Israel or America over their actions, adding: 'It is not without risk. But leaving it as it was wasn't an option either.' However, Government figures in Westminster echoed Mr Macron on Monday, with several ministers repeatedly refusing to say explicitly that the US bombing was either legal or the correct course of action. Instead, they said it was a 'good thing' that Iran was prevented from getting a nuclear bomb and talked about the importance of finding a diplomatic solution. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, was asked about the lawfulness of the strikes on BBC Radio 4's Today programme. He said: 'Well, we weren't involved, it's for the Americans to discuss those issues.' When reminded that the UK had publicly deemed Russia's invasion of Ukraine as illegal without being involved, Mr Lammy insisted: 'There isn't a moral equivalence here.' Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, batted away similar questions on Sky News, saying: 'It is up to the US to make that case. We weren't involved in those actions and of course we would never comment on the legal advice that the Government receives.' Meanwhile, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said that preventing Tehran from obtaining a nuclear bomb was a 'good thing' for the UK, but also declined to comment on whether the US strikes complied with international law. Sir Keir is facing growing criticism for failing to clarify the UK's position. Kemi Badenoch said the Government was showing a 'complete absence of moral clarity and in fact moral courage' by failing to offer a verdict on the US strikes against Iran. The Conservative leader said: 'They clearly don't think it is lawful because if they did they would have come out and said so.' Priti Patel, the Conservative shadow foreign secretary, said: 'Once again David Lammy and the Labour Government have tried to hide and obfuscate on whether or not they support the US's action to ensure that the despotic regime of Iran never obtains nuclear weapons. 'Hiding behind the weak pretences of legal advice and vague language is simply not good enough – the British public deserve to know if their government supports degrading the threat of Iran to us and our allies, or whether it is all too happy to sit on the moral fence.' Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, said he was 'pleased that the Americans have intervened', calling the Iranian regime 'brutally evil'. Richard Tice, the Reform deputy leader, questioned why Mr Lammy was not 'thanking the United States and Israel for degrading the Iranian nuclear weapons programme'. Criticism also came from within Mr Lammy's own party, with Labour Left-wingers calling for a more critical stance towards Washington. Richard Burgon, the Labour MP for Leeds East, said: ' Iraq showed the grave dangers of following a Right-wing US president into an illegal war for regime change. 'The consequences were hundreds of thousands dead, mass destruction, mass devastation, regional chaos and wasted resources. Many fear that the same thing is happening now.' On Monday evening, explosions were witnessed over Qatar as an apparent Iranian attempt to hit a US air base in retaliation was intercepted by anti-air strike defences. Iran was thought to be targeting Al Udeid, the US air base that has been used by British military personnel in the past. The Foreign Office was monitoring the situation on Monday night, but one senior Government insider said there was relative 'calm' because no British soldiers were stationed at the base.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Labour fails to back Donald Trump's Iran strikes as Keir Starmer's accused of sitting on ‘moral fence'
LABOUR is facing furious demands to get off the 'moral fence' and give full-throated backing to Donald Trump's strikes on Iran. Britain's stance on the escalating conflict was last night slammed as Foreign Secretary David Lammy refused to say if the US stealth raid on the Ayatollah's nuclear bunkers was even legal. 3 3 The Cabinet minister said the UK would not hesitate to 'defend our personnel' in case of attack — but urged the mad mullahs to 'take the off-ramp' by entering into peace talks. Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman said: 'The prevention of Iran getting nuclear weapons is a good thing for this country. "But our focus is on diplomacy. "Iran should take the opportunity presented by the US to re-enter talks.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said ministers were parroting lines written by pacifist civil servants which were 'designed to not upset anybody or give any views'. She aimed fire at international law-obsessed Attorney General Lord Richard Hermer, blasting: 'I do think it is quite extraordinary the position they found themselves in where the Foreign Secretary is unable to say whether or not he believes that action is lawful.' And Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel said: 'The British public deserve to know if their government supports degrading the threat of Iran to us and our allies, or whether it is all too happy to sit on the moral fence.' It came as Labour's hard Left MPs urged for all military involvement to be ruled out. Abtisam Mohamed said: 'Will the Foreign Secretary provide reassurance that we will not enter an endless war fuelled by reckless provocateurs?' RACHEL Reeves is demanding a cooling of tensions in the Middle East amid fears British households will be hit by surging oil prices. The Chancellor stressed any energy cost hike will have implications for our economy, especially if the vital Strait of Hormuz sea passage from the Gulf is closed. The intervention came as US President Donald Trump called for cheaper oil prices, demanding a 'drill, baby, drill' policy in America. She said: 'We want de-escalation because it's the right thing for the Middle East, but we also want de-escalation because of the ramifications of conflict in the Middle East for the rest of the world, including the UK.' Her warnings came as she launched the Government's ten year industrial strategy at a factory in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Oil prices hit a five-month high yesterday before falling back. 3


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
10 Universal Credit loopholes that mean you can apply for extra cash support worth £1,000s
OVER six million people claim Universal Credit which is worth thousands of pounds a year. How much you receive depends on your personal circumstances such as age and if you have any children. 1 But there are also a number of loopholes meaning those on the benefit can claim extra support. Here are 10 that are worth potentially thousands of pounds. Payments boost if you're on certain elements Universal Credit is designed to help people back into work. This means if you get a job, the amount you receive each month goes down under what's known as the "taper rate". For every £1 you earn, your UC payment goes down by 55p. This means your income becomes your wages plus your reduced UC payment. However, the taper rate can be different based on your specific circumstances, including if you have a disability or children. You can use a benefits calculator to see how much you can claim. A free-to-use one is available via Claiming 85% of childcare costs back Working parents on Universal Credit can claim up to 85% of the money they spend on childcare back. Since June 2023, parents starting work or increasing their working hours have been able to get payments up front as well. How does work affect Universal Credit? The most you can claim is £1,031 per month for one child and £1,768 per month for two or more children. More details can be found via Getting an advanced payment When you first make a claim for Universal Credit you usually receive your first payment seven days after the end of the first assessment period - around five weeks after first making a claim. However, you can apply for an "advance payment" if you are struggling to cover the cost of food or rent. You will need to pay back the money you get from the advance either through wages or future Universal Credit payments. More details can be found via Getting a Budgeting Loan You might be able to get a Budgeting Loan if you're on Universal Credit and need to cover the cost of an emergency. For example, if your fridge broke, you need new clothes or help moving home. The lowest amount you can borrow is £100. You could get up to: £348 if you're single £464 if you have a partner £812 if you or your partner claim child benefit You won't be eligible if you have savings of more than £1,000, or £2,000 if you or your partner are 63 or over. You will also not be accepted if you have been given an advance in the past and not paid it back. You can find out more by visiting Waived minimum income floor for self-employed The minimum income floor is based on how much a person your age would earn on the National Living Wage after tax and National Insurance Contributions. If you earn more than the minimum, the Government will calculate your Universal Credit payment using your actual earnings. If you earn less the Government will calculate your earnings based on the minimum income floor. Alternative payment arrangements These are set up for households who struggle with a monthly Universal Credit payment. For example, if you are struggling to pay your rent, you can arrange for the money to be sent directly to your landlord. Or you can be paid more frequently, such as twice a month, or request for payments to be split if you're part of a couple. This can be arranged in special circumstances, despicably if a claimant is in a vulnerable positions such as struggling with addiction. Council tax reduction Some on Universal Credit can get a reduction on their council tax, but whether you are eligible or not depends on where you live. You need to apply for a reduction via your local council's website. To make a claim, you will need to provide the council with information on your earnings and what pensions and benefits you receive. To find which is your local council, visit In some cases, you might be able to get up to 100% wiped off your bill which could save you thousands of pounds. You can get freebies Claiming Universal Credit also opens up a host of other freebies including free NHS prescriptions. You will qualify for help if the total take-home pay for your household in your last assessment period was: £435 or less £935 or less if your Universal Credit includes a payment for a child, or you have a limited capability for work or limited capability for work and work related activity You can get free NHS prescriptions, NHS dental treatment, NHS sight tests and even free NHS wigs and fabric supports. Find more information via the NHS website. You can get help through the Household Support Fund If you're on Universal Credit you might be able to get help with the cost of living via the Household Support Fund (HSF). The giant fund is worth £742million and, generally, paid to those on a low income, vulnerable or on benefits. The type of help on offer varies from supermarket vouchers to free cash payments, but you could be in line for up to £500. Each council in England sets its own criteria for who is eligible for help. Lots of local authorities have pages on their websites dedicated to their Household Support Fund allotment. Apply for extra benefits If you are suffering with any long-term illnesses, you could be entitled to claim extra benefits alongside your Universal Credit. For example, Personal Independent Payments (PIP) is a benefit for people who are under state pension age and need help with day-to-day life because of a long-term illness or disability. When you claim, you'll need: Your contact details Date of birth National Insurance number Bank or building society account number and sort code Your doctor or health worker's name, address and telephone number Dates and addresses for any time you've spent abroad, in a care home or hospital Are you missing out on benefits? YOU can use a benefits calculator to help check that you are not missing out on money you are entitled to Charity Turn2Us' benefits calculator works out what you could get. Entitledto's free calculator determines whether you qualify for various benefits, tax credit and Universal Credit. and charity StepChange both have benefits tools powered by Entitledto's data. You can use Policy in Practice's calculator to determine which benefits you could receive and how much cash you'll have left over each month after paying for housing costs. Your exact entitlement will only be clear when you make a claim, but calculators can indicate what you might be eligible for. .