
Trump threatens 25% tariff on iPhones not made in US, targets India production
US President Donald Trump on Friday threatened to impose 'at least' 25% tariff on
iPhones
sold in the country unless they are made in America, and 'not in India, or anyplace else.' The development, which came a week after he said he had told Apple chief executive Tim Cook not to build in India, is seen by experts as a negotiation tactic to secure a more favourable trade deal with India.
Apple shares plunged more than 4% to a low of nearly $194 on the Nasdaq after Trump's statement. 'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the US, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
The move, if implemented, would hit the Cupertino-based firm, which has been seeking to diversify its production base beyond China, as well as India's electronics manufacturing services ecosystem, which has been supporting not only phone manufacturers but also hundreds of ancillary and downstream component makers beginning to set up shop, according to experts.
Some feel it won't hurt India
A section of industry executives, however, said the US administration's move to slap tariffs on Apple would not halt India's strides in electronics manufacturing services.
'India is primarily involved in assembly, and even within that, India's piece of the pie is under $40,' said Raja Manickam, founder of fabless chip startup iVP Semiconductor and former chief executive of Tata Electronics. 'I do see that sense will prevail and that Apple will reason with the US government that at least 50% or more of their value addition comes in from chips, IP and software by American companies.'
Most of the iPhones sold in the US currently are made in India. Apple's assembly lines in India churned out smartphones worth $22 billion in FY25, with a 60% year-on-year increase in output.
Shifting Apple's manufacturing to the US would not be a feasible solution, though, said experts, since that would increase the cost of the iPhone to $3,000 on average, from the current price of around $1,000, owing to the high cost of labour in the US.
'Trump's posturing of a potential 25% tariff on 'Made in India' Apple phones will certainly be a dampener on Apple's India plans,' said Jaijit Bhattacharya, president, Centre for Digital Economy Policy Research. 'It brings in regulatory uncertainty for Apple, which in itself is extremely detrimental. Apple was signalled to move out of China into trusted supply chain locations such as India. As it started ramping up in India, conflicting signals have emerged from the US administration.' He said the outcome would be significant uncertainty for Apple, impacting the company's ability to build a resilient supply chain and serve the market.
Some experts also said Trump's statement as a strategic move amid trade deal discussions with India.
Anurag Agrawal, founder of market researcher Techaisle, said, 'Trump's past actions indicate a willingness to impose tariffs to push for domestic production, and his recent comments suggest he is not pleased with Apple's move to diversify manufacturing to India. Therefore, some form of targeted tariffs remains a possibility. While Trump can impose tariffs, previous threats have often been used as negotiating tactics, and exemptions for electronics (including iPhones) have been granted before.'
ET's queries sent to Apple remained unanswered till press time.
'The notion of Apple moving iPhone assembly to the US is less a concrete strategy and more of a negotiating tool, especially in the context of US-India trade dynamics," said Sanyam Chaurasia, technology market analyst at Canalys Research.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
What Apple announced at WWDC 2025
Apple unveiled upgrades to operating systems across its devices on Monday, including overhauled visual elements, a fresh naming system for software updates and new features in its Apple Intelligence suite. At its annual Worldwide Developers Conference, the company also said it would open up the underlying technology it uses for Apple Intelligence to developers. These are some of the key announcements from the event: Liquid Glass Apple is rolling out a new "Liquid Glass" design language across its software, bringing sleek translucence and a glass-like shine to app interfaces. Inspired by visionOS on the Vision Pro augmented reality device, the design adapts to light and dark modes and reacts dynamically to movement using real-time rendering. The new design will be implemented in buttons, sliders, media controls and larger elements such as tab bars and sidebars, along with matching redesigned toolbars and navigation. Apple is releasing updated Application Programming Interfaces so that developers can begin adapting their apps ahead of the new design rollout later this year. Apple iOS 26 This year's major iOS release would have originally been called iOS 19, following the usual sequence after iOS 18. However, Apple is now changing its naming convention: future iOS versions will be numbered based on the year following their release—similar to how car manufacturers name new models. Several parts of the operating systems are getting a major visual overhaul as part of the redesign. The Phone app now includes call screening, allowing it to answer calls or wait on hold for you. The Messages app is also getting updates that include customisable chat backgrounds. Apple also said it would add generative AI to its Xcode coding tools that can help developers write code, test it and resolve errors. The company said it would add other coding models such as ChatGPT to Xcode. Apple Intelligence New additions to the operating system include Live Translation, which uses on-device AI models to translate conversations in real time, in text messages, phone calls or FaceTime. Apple Pay is also getting Apple Intelligence integration, enabling it to track orders even for purchases made outside Apple Pay. Meanwhile, Image Playground is getting a boost with a new feature that allows users to generate images with the help of OpenAI's ChatGPT. Apple will now allow developers to tap into its on-device foundational model for their own apps. Through the new Foundation Models framework, developers can build intelligent, privacy-focused experiences that work offline too. Visual Intelligence Apple will also let users learn more about what's on their iPhone screens via Visual Intelligence. Users can search across Google, Etsy and other supported apps to find visually similar images or products. If the tool detects that you're viewing an event, iOS 26 will suggest adding it to your calendar. This feature will be accessible using the same button combination used to take a screenshot on an iPhone.


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Can Donald Trump call for Gov Newsom's arrest over LA riots? Here's what the law says
President Donald Trump on Monday suggested his border czar Tom Homan should arrest Gov Gavin Newsom amid riots in Los Angeles. 'I would do it … I think it would be a great thing,' Trump responded when asked if Homan should arrest the governor, who has challenged the administration's mobilization of National Guard in LA. Newsom, too, was quick to slam Trump. "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America," he said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: Los Angeles protests: 'Incendiary devices' hurled at police horses, says LAPD No, Trump cannot unilaterally arrest Gov Newsom over riots in Los Angeles. The US Constitution and legal system have clear checks and balances that prevent a former president—or even a sitting president—from directly arresting state officials without due process. Separation of Powers (Article II & III of the Constitution) The president does not have the judicial authority to issue warrants. Only law enforcement, backed by court orders, can detain someone. Any attempt to arrest Newsom without due process would violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which guarantee fair legal procedures. State Sovereignty – Tenth Amendment Under the US system of federalism, states like California retain control over their own officials and law enforcement. The president cannot interfere in state governance unless federal law is violated and due process is followed. Read More: After tear gas and street fires, an Los Angeles community cleans up as National Guard troops arrive Military Limitations – The Posse Comitatus Act (18 US Code § 1385) This law forbids the use of the US military to carry out domestic law enforcement activities without explicit congressional authorization. Even in times of civil unrest, the president cannot use the military to detain or arrest state leaders like Newsom. No Legal Authority Post-Presidency As a former president, Trump has no legal powers—executive, military, or judicial. He cannot issue federal commands or make arrests.


Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly
Sixteen states have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners. The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland. There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration. The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month with Rare Breed Triggers to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers with. The company was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel. Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government. The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia. The attorneys general in those states are all Democrats, though the office in Hawaii is technically nonpartisan.